REVIEW 1 cited by
Comparison of spectral models for disc truncation in the hard state of GX 339-4
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Comparison of spectral models for disc truncation in the hard state of GX 339-4
read the original abstract
We probe models of disc truncation in the hard spectral state of an outburst of the well-known X-ray transient GX 339--4. We test a large number of different models of disc reflection and its relativistic broadening, using two independent sets of codes, and apply it to a \textit{Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer} spectrum in the rising part of the hard state of the 2010/11 outburst. We find our results to be significantly model-dependent. While all of the models tested show best-fits consistent with truncation, some models allow the disc to extend close to the innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO) and some require substantial disc truncation. The different models yield a wide range in best-fit values for the disc inclination. Our statistically best model has a physical thermal Comptonization primary continuum, requires the disc to be truncated at a radius larger than or equal to about two ISCO radii for the maximum dimensionless spin of 0.998, and predicts a disc inclination in agreement with that of the binary. Our preferred models have moderate Fe abundance, $\gtrsim$2 times solar. We have also tested the effect of increasing the density of the reflecting medium. We find it leads to an increase in the truncation radius, but also to an increase in the Fe abundance, opposite to a previous finding.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Black-Hole Spin Measurements from X-ray Reflection Spectroscopy: Quality Criteria and Community Recommendations
Reflection-based black-hole spin measurements should be graded by detectability, uniqueness, and robustness, and classified into high-confidence, systematics-limited, provisional, or non-assessable tiers.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.