REVIEW 3 cited by
Reverse isoperimetric problems under curvature constraints
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
In this paper we solve several reverse isoperimetric problems in the class of $\lambda$-convex bodies, i.e., convex bodies whose curvature at each point of their boundary is bounded below by some $\lambda > 0$. We give an affirmative answer in $\mathbb{R}^3$ to a conjecture due to Borisenko which states that the $\lambda$-convex lens, i.e., the intersection of two balls of radius $1/\lambda$, is the unique minimizer of volume among all $\lambda$-convex bodies of given surface area. Also, we prove a reverse inradius inequality: in model spaces of constant curvature and arbitrary dimension, we show that the $\lambda$-convex lens (properly defined in non-zero curvature spaces) has the smallest inscribed ball among all $\lambda$-convex bodies of given surface area. This solves a conjecture due to Bezdek on minimal inradius of isoperimetric ball-polyhedra in $\mathbb{R}^n$.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Two properties of optimisers for the reverse isoperimetric problem
No volume-constrained area maximizer among λ-convex bodies has a C² boundary, and every C² piece of such a maximizer has smallest principal curvature exactly λ, in constant-curvature space forms.
-
Central Limit Theorems for Functionals of Persistence Diagrams in Germ-Grain Random Set Models with Applications to Goodness-of-Fit Testing
M-bounded persistence-diagram functionals of germ-grain models with exponential correlation decay are asymptotically normal, enabling chi-squared GoF tests for spatial interactions.
-
Optimal $L^p$-approximation of convex sets by convex subsets
The Gamma-convergence result is correct, but the abstract monotonicity theorem used to prove the polygonal-boundary result is false.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.