Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Image Vectorization: a Review

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.06441 v1 pith:RCJX322D submitted 2023-06-10 cs.CV cs.GR

classification cs.CVcs.GR
keywords imagemethodsvectorizationvectorimagesmodelsshapesthere
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Nowadays, there are many diffusion and autoregressive models that show impressive results for generating images from text and other input domains. However, these methods are not intended for ultra-high-resolution image synthesis. Vector graphics are devoid of this disadvantage, so the generation of images in this format looks very promising. Instead of generating vector images directly, you can first synthesize a raster image and then apply vectorization. Vectorization is the process of converting a raster image into a similar vector image using primitive shapes. Besides being similar, generated vector image is also required to contain the minimum number of shapes for rendering. In this paper, we focus specifically on machine learning-compatible vectorization methods. We are considering Mang2Vec, Deep Vectorization of Technical Drawings, DiffVG, and LIVE models. We also provide a brief overview of existing online methods. We also recall other algorithmic methods, Im2Vec and ClipGEN models, but they do not participate in the comparison, since there is no open implementation of these methods or their official implementations do not work correctly. Our research shows that despite the ability to directly specify the number and type of shapes, existing machine learning methods work for a very long time and do not accurately recreate the original image. We believe that there is no fast universal automatic approach and human control is required for every method.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MultiFluxAI Enhancing Platform Engineering with Advanced Agent-Orchestrated Retrieval Systems

    cs.AI 2025-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The authors claim their MultiFluxAI orchestration framework achieves 95% accuracy and 0-10 ms responses by combining rule-based routing, caching, and graph knowledge stores for multi-service RAG queries.

Pith tools