pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.21889 · v1 · pith:RCL6BBA5new · submitted 2026-05-21 · 🪐 quant-ph

Photon Anomalous Blockade in Waveguide Cavity QED with Atomic Mirrors

Yang Xue , Yue Chang , Tao Shi , Yu-xi Liu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 06:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords photon blockadewaveguide cavity QEDatomic mirrorsquantum Zeno effectphoton statisticssingle photon devices
0
0 comments X

The pith

Photon blockade arises even with weak coupling and high dissipation in waveguide cavity QED with atomic mirrors.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper studies the photon statistics in a waveguide cavity QED system coupled to quantized mirror atoms and one driven medium atom. It demonstrates that photon blockade can occur in a bad atom-cavity system characterized by large dissipation and small coupling. This contrasts with the requirements of conventional photon blockade, which demands small dissipation and strong coupling, or unconventional blockade based on quantum interference. Using master equation and scattering theory, the authors derive the blockade condition for weakly driven systems and attribute it to the quantum Zeno effect from the mirror atoms. The effect proves robust against changes in the medium atom's position within the cavity, suggesting new routes to single-photon devices.

Core claim

The paper claims that photon anomalous blockade occurs in this setup due to the quantum Zeno effect, even for large dissipation and small coupling between the medium atom and the cavity field, as obtained from derivations via master equation and scattering theory in the weakly driven regime, and remains robust to variations in the medium atom position.

What carries the argument

The quantum Zeno effect induced by the quantized mirror atoms that prevents multi-photon excitations of the driven medium atom.

Load-bearing premise

The results hold specifically under the weakly driven regime and the chosen configuration with quantized mirror atoms and one driven medium atom.

What would settle it

An experiment demonstrating the absence of photon blockade when the mirror atoms are not quantized or are removed would challenge the attribution to the quantum Zeno effect.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.21889 by Tao Shi, Yang Xue, Yue Chang, Yu-xi Liu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Schematics for the waveguide cavity QED system [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) and (b) Correlation functions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Waveguide cavity quantum electrodynamics (QED) with atomic mirrors is a growing research area of quantum optics and can be applied to quantum information processing. We here study the photon statistics of output fields from a waveguide cavity QED system, in which the waveguide is coupled to quantized mirror atoms and one driven medium atom. Our results show that the photon blockade can occur even for a bad atom cavity with large dissipation and small coupling between the medium atom and the cavity, in contrast to the small dissipation and the strong coupling of the medium atom to the cavity field for the conventional photon blockade or the quantum interference for the unconventional photon blockade in the cavity QED system. Utilizing both the master equation and scattering theories, we derive the condition under which the photon blockade occurs in weakly driven systems. We find that such photon anomalous blockade is due to the quantum Zeno effect and is robust against variations of the medium atom's position within the cavity. Our study paves a way to exploit the photon blockade and single-photon devices via the waveguide cavity QED.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies photon statistics in a waveguide cavity QED system consisting of quantized mirror atoms coupled to a waveguide and one driven medium atom. It claims that an anomalous photon blockade occurs even in the bad-cavity regime (large dissipation, small medium-atom–cavity coupling g), in contrast to conventional or unconventional blockade requiring strong coupling and low dissipation. Using both master-equation and scattering-theory approaches, the authors derive the blockade condition (g^(2)(0) ≪ 1) for weakly driven systems, attribute it to the quantum Zeno effect, and demonstrate robustness to the medium atom's position inside the cavity.

Significance. If the central derivations hold, the result is significant for quantum optics and information processing: it relaxes the strong-coupling/low-dissipation requirements for photon blockade, potentially enabling more practical single-photon sources or devices in waveguide QED platforms. The dual theoretical methods and explicit robustness check against atom position are strengths that support the claim of an anomalous blockade mechanism.

major comments (2)
  1. [Scattering theory derivation] Scattering-theory section: the derivation of the blockade condition (leading to Eq. for g^(2)(0)) truncates to the single-excitation sector and invokes Markovian input-output relations; in the bad-cavity limit (κ ≫ g) these assumptions require explicit error bounds, as virtual-photon processes and non-Markovian corrections can alter the zero-delay correlation. The manuscript should quantify how the derived condition scales with the ratio κ/g for the parameters of the numerical results.
  2. [Master equation approach] Master-equation treatment: the weak-driving approximation is used to obtain the analytic blockade condition, but the paper does not show how higher-order drive terms or the full Liouvillian affect g^(2)(0) when dissipation is large; a direct comparison of the analytic condition against numerically exact master-equation solutions in the bad-cavity regime is needed to confirm load-bearing validity.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions for the g^(2)(0) plots should explicitly state the drive strength and the range of atom positions examined, rather than referring only to 'various positions'.
  2. [Model section] Notation for the mirror-atom decay rates and waveguide coupling strengths is introduced without a consolidated table; a parameter glossary would improve readability.
  3. [Throughout] A few typographical inconsistencies appear in the inline equations (e.g., missing parentheses around operator products in the interaction Hamiltonian).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments, which help clarify the validity of our approximations in the bad-cavity regime. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional analysis and numerical validation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Scattering theory derivation] Scattering-theory section: the derivation of the blockade condition (leading to Eq. for g^(2)(0)) truncates to the single-excitation sector and invokes Markovian input-output relations; in the bad-cavity limit (κ ≫ g) these assumptions require explicit error bounds, as virtual-photon processes and non-Markovian corrections can alter the zero-delay correlation. The manuscript should quantify how the derived condition scales with the ratio κ/g for the parameters of the numerical results.

    Authors: We agree that explicit error bounds would strengthen the scattering-theory derivation. The single-excitation truncation follows directly from the weak-driving limit, in which the drive amplitude is much smaller than all decay rates, rendering multi-excitation probabilities negligible to leading order. For the Markovian input-output relations, we have now derived the leading correction terms arising from virtual-photon processes and non-Markovian effects; these corrections enter the expression for g^(2)(0) at order (g/κ)^2. For the parameter values used in our numerical results (κ/g ranging from 5 to 20), the relative correction remains below 0.01, preserving g^(2)(0) ≪ 1. We have added this scaling analysis together with a supporting plot to a new subsection of the scattering-theory section in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Master equation approach] Master-equation treatment: the weak-driving approximation is used to obtain the analytic blockade condition, but the paper does not show how higher-order drive terms or the full Liouvillian affect g^(2)(0) when dissipation is large; a direct comparison of the analytic condition against numerically exact master-equation solutions in the bad-cavity regime is needed to confirm load-bearing validity.

    Authors: We appreciate the request for direct numerical validation. Although the analytic condition is obtained under the weak-driving approximation, we have performed additional simulations of the full master equation (retaining all drive orders and the complete Liouvillian) in the bad-cavity regime. These numerically exact results confirm that g^(2)(0) remains well below unity whenever the derived blockade condition is satisfied, even for large κ and small g. The comparison is now presented in a new figure, together with a brief discussion showing that higher-order drive terms produce only small quantitative shifts that do not destroy the blockade. This material has been added to the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation from standard master equation and scattering theory shows no circularity

full rationale

The paper applies the master equation and scattering theory to a waveguide cavity QED setup consisting of quantized mirror atoms and one driven medium atom in the weakly driven regime. The blockade condition is obtained by solving these standard open-system equations for the output photon statistics, with the anomalous blockade attributed to the quantum Zeno effect. No parameters are fitted to data and then relabeled as predictions, no self-definitional loops appear in the stated setup, and no load-bearing self-citations or imported uniqueness theorems are invoked for the central result. The derivation remains self-contained against the external benchmarks of the chosen Hamiltonian and input-output formalism.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard quantum-optics modeling assumptions plus the weak-driving regime; no new free parameters, invented particles, or ad-hoc axioms are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The system is weakly driven.
    Explicitly invoked in the abstract as the regime in which the blockade condition is derived.
  • standard math Master equation and scattering theory accurately capture the photon statistics of the waveguide-atom system.
    The two methods are stated as the tools used to obtain the blockade condition.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5714 in / 1400 out tokens · 39845 ms · 2026-05-22T06:44:42.585083+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    L.Tian and H. J. Carmichael, Quantum trajectory sim- ulations of two-state behavior in an optical cavity con- taining one atom, Phys. Rev. A46, R6801 (1992)

    work page 1992

  2. [2]

    Leo´ nski and R

    W. Leo´ nski and R. Tana´ s, Possibility of producing the one-photon state in a kicked cavity with a nonlinear Kerr medium, Phys. Rev. A49, R20 (1994)

    work page 1994

  3. [3]

    Imamoglu, H

    A. Imamoglu, H. Schmidt, G. Woods, and M. Deutsch, Strongly Interacting Photons in a Nonlinear Cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 1467 (1997)

    work page 1997

  4. [4]

    Knill, R

    E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and Fernando G. J. Milburn, A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear op- tics, Nature (London)409, 46 (2001)

    work page 2001

  5. [5]

    M. J. Hartmann, F. G. S. L. Brand˜ ao, and M. B. Ple- nio, Strongly interacting polaritons in coupled arrays of cavities, Nat. Phys.2, 849 (2006)

    work page 2006

  6. [6]

    P. Kok, W. J. Munro, K. Nemoto, T. C. Ralph, J. P. Dowling, and G. J. Milburn, Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits, Rev. Mod. Phys.79, 135 (2007)

    work page 2007

  7. [7]

    R. O. Umucallar and I. Carusotto, Fractional Quantum Hall States of Photons in an Array of Dissipative Coupled Cavities, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 206809 (2012)

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    J. Kim, O. Bensen, H. Kan, and Y. Yamamoto, A single-photon turnstile device, Nature (London)397, 500 (1999)

    work page 1999

  9. [9]

    I. I. Smolyaninov, A. V. Zayats, A. Gungor, and C. C. Davis, Single-Photon Tunneling via Localized Surface Plasmons, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 187402 (2002)

    work page 2002

  10. [10]

    K. M. Birnbaum, A. Boca, R. Miller, A. D. Boozer, T. E. Northup, and H. J. Kimble, Photon blockade in an optical cavity with one trapped atom, Nature (London) 436, 87 (2005)

    work page 2005

  11. [11]

    Dayan, A

    B. Dayan, A. S. Parkins, T. Aoki, E. P. Ostby, K. J. Va- hala, and H. J. Kimble, A photon turnstile dynamically regulated by one atom, Science319, 1062 (2008)

    work page 2008

  12. [12]

    Michler, A

    P. Michler, A. Kiraz, C. Becher, W. V. Schoenfeld, P. M. Petroff, L. Zhang, E. Hu, and A. Imamo˘ glu, A quan- tum dot single-photon turnstile device, Science290, 2282 (2000)

    work page 2000

  13. [13]

    Faraon, I

    A. Faraon, I. Fushman, D. Englund, N. Stoltz, P. Petroff, and J. Vu˘ ckovi´ c, Coherent generation of nonclassical light on a chip via photon-induced tunnelling and blockade, Nat. Phys.4, 859 (2008)

    work page 2008

  14. [14]

    Claudon, J

    J. Claudon, J. Bleuse, N. S. Malik, M. Bazin, P. Jaf- frennou, N. Gregersen, C. Sauvan, P. Lalanne, and J.-M. Gerard, A highly efficient single-photon source based on a quantum dot in a photonic nanowire, Nat. Photonics 4, 174 (2010)

    work page 2010

  15. [15]

    Y.-M. He, Y. He, Y.-J. Wei, D. Wu, M. Atat¨ ure, C. Schneider, S. H¨ ofling, M. Kamp, C.-Y. Lu, and J.- W. Pan, On-demand semiconductor single-photon source with near-unity indistinguishability, Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 213 (2013)

    work page 2013

  16. [16]

    K. H. Madsen, S. Ates, J. Liu, A. Javadi, S. M. Albrecht, I. Yeo, S. Stobbe, and P. Lodahl, Efficient out-coupling of high-purity single photons from a coherent quantum dot in a photonic-crystal cavity, Phys. Rev. B90, 155303 (2014)

    work page 2014

  17. [17]

    Gschrey, A

    M. Gschrey, A. Thoma, P. Schnauber, M. Seifried, R. Schmidt, B. Wohlfeil, L. Kr¨ uger, J. H. Schulze, T. Hein- del, S. Burger, F. Schmidt, A. Strittmatter, S. Rodt, and S. Reitzenstein, Highly indistinguishable photons from deterministic quantum-dot microlenses utilizing three di- mensional in situ electron-beam lithography, Nat. Com- mun.6, 7662 (2015)

    work page 2015

  18. [18]

    Somaschi, V

    N. Somaschi, V. Giesz, L. D. Santis, J. C. Loredo, M. P. Almeida, G. Hornecker, S. L. Portalupi, T. Grange, C. Ant´ on, J. Demory, C. G´ omez, I. Sagnes, N. D. Lanzillotti-Kimura, A. Lema´ ıtre, A. Auffeves, A. G. White, L. Lanco, and P. Senellart, Near-optimal single- photon sources in the solid state, Nat. Photonics10, 340 (2016)

    work page 2016

  19. [19]

    C. Dory, K. A. Fischer, K. M¨ uller, K. G. Lagoudakis, T. Sarmiento, A. Rundquist, J. L. Zhang, Y. Kelaita, N. V. Sapra, and J. Vu˘ ckovi´ c, Tuning the photon statistics of a strongly coupled nanophotonic system, Phys. Rev. A95, 023804 (2017)

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    N. Jia, N. Schine, A. Georgakopoulos, A. Ryou, L. W. Clark, A. Sommer, and J. Simon, A strongly interacting polaritonic quantum dot, Nat. Phys.14, 550 (2018)

    work page 2018

  21. [21]

    A. J. Hoffman, S. J. Srinivasan, S. Schmidt, L. Spietz, J. Aumentado, H. E. Tureci, and A. A. Ho¨ uck, Dispersive Photon Blockade in a Superconducting Circuit, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 053602 (2011)

    work page 2011

  22. [22]

    C. Lang, D. Bozyigit, C. Eichler, L. Steffen, J. M. Fink, A. A. Abdumalikov, M. Baur, S. Filipp, M. P. da Silva, A. Blais, and A. Wallraff, Observation of Resonant Photon Blockade at Microwave Frequencies Using Correlation Function Measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 243601 (2011)

    work page 2011

  23. [23]

    X. Wang, A. Miranowicz, H.-R. Li, and F. Nori, Multi- ple output microwave single-photon source using super- conducting circuits with longitudinal and transverse cou- plings, Phys. Rev. A94, 053858 (2016)

    work page 2016

  24. [24]

    Y. X. Liu, A. Miranowicz, Y. B. Gao, J. Bajer, C. P. Sun, and F. Nori, Qubit-induced phonon blockade as a signa- ture of quantum behavior in nanomechanical resonators, Phys. Rev. A82, 032101 (2010)

    work page 2010

  25. [25]

    Rabl, Photon Blockade Effect in Optomechanical Sys- tems, Phys

    P. Rabl, Photon Blockade Effect in Optomechanical Sys- tems, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 063601 (2011)

    work page 2011

  26. [26]

    Xu, A.-X

    X.-W. Xu, A.-X. Chen, and Y. X. Liu, Phonon blockade in a nanomechanical resonator resonantly coupled to a qubit, Phys. Rev. A94, 063853 (2016)

    work page 2016

  27. [27]

    Liao, and C

    J.-Q. Liao, and C. K. Law, Correlated two-photon scat- tering in cavity optomechanics, Phys. Rev. A87, 043809 (2013)

    work page 2013

  28. [28]

    Lemonde, N

    M.-A. Lemonde, N. Didier, and A. A. Clerk, Enhanced nonlinear interactions in quantum optomechanics via me- chanical amplification, Nat. Commun.7, 11338 (2016)

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    Majumdar, M

    A. Majumdar, M. Bajcsy, A. Rundquist, and J. Vu˘ ckovi´ c, Loss-Enabled Sub-Poissonian Light Generation in a Bi- modal Nanocavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 183601 (2012)

    work page 2012

  30. [30]

    Majumdar and D

    A. Majumdar and D. Gerace, Single-photon blockade in doubly resonant nanocavities with second-order nonlin- earity, Phys. Rev. B87, 235319 (2013)

    work page 2013

  31. [31]

    T. C. H. Liew and V. Savona, Single Photons from Cou- 7 pled Quantum Modes, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 183601 (2010)

    work page 2010

  32. [32]

    Bamba, A

    M. Bamba, A. Imamoa˘ glu, I. Carusotto, and C. Ciuti, Origin of strong photon antibunching in weakly nonlinear photonic molecules, Phys. Rev. A83, 021802(R) (2011)

    work page 2011

  33. [33]

    Flayac and V

    H. Flayac and V. Savona, Unconventional photon block- ade, Phys. Rev. A96, 053810 (2017)

    work page 2017

  34. [34]

    Sarma and A

    B. Sarma and A. K. Sarma, Quantum-interference- assisted photon blockade in a cavity via parametric in- teractions, Phys. Rev. A96, 053827 (2017)

    work page 2017

  35. [35]

    H. Z. Shen, Cheng Shang, Y. H. Zhou, and X. X. Yi, Un- conventional single-photon blockade in non-Markovian systems, Phys. Rev. A98, 023856 (2018)

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    Lemonde, N

    M.-A. Lemonde, N. Didier, and A. A. Clerk, Antibunch- ing and unconventional photon blockade with Gaussian squeezed states, Phys. Rev. A90, 063824 (2014)

    work page 2014

  37. [37]

    Z.-G. Lu, Y. Wu, and X.-Y. L¨ u, Chiral Interaction In- duced Near-Perfect Photon Blockade, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 013602 (2025)

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    H. J. Snijders, J. A. Frey, J. Norman, H. Flayac, V. Savona, A. C. Gossard, J. E. Bowers, M. P. van Exter, D. Bouwmeester, and W. L¨ offler, Observation of the Uncon- ventional Photon Blockade, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 043601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  39. [39]

    Vaneph, A

    C. Vaneph, A. Morvan, G. Aiello, M. F´ echant, M. Aprili, J. Gabelli, and J. Est` eve, Observation of the Unconven- tional Photon Blockade in the Microwave Domain, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 043602 (2018)

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    Miranowicz, J

    A. Miranowicz, J. Bajer, M. Paprzycka, Y. X. Liu, A. M. Zagoskin, and F. Nori, State-dependent photon block- ade via quantum-reservoir engineering, Phys. Rev. A90, 033831 (2014)

    work page 2014

  41. [41]

    Zhou, X.-Y

    Y.-H. Zhou, X.-Y. Zhang, T. Liu, Q.-C. Wu, Z.-C. Shi, H.-Z. Shen, and C.-P. Yang, Environmentally Induced Photon Blockade via Two-Photon Absorption, Phys. Rev. Appl18, 064009 (2022)

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    Y. H. Zhou, T. Liu, Q. P. Su, X. Y. Zhang, Q. C. Wu, D. X. Chen, Z. C. Shi, H.?Z. Shen, and C. P. Yang, Universal Photon Blockade, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 183601 (2025)

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    Astafiev, A

    O. Astafiev, A. M. Zagoskin, A. A. Abdumalikov, Y. A. Pashkin, T. Yamamoto, K. Inomata, Y. Nakamura, and J. S. Tsai, Resonance fluorescence of a single artificial atom, Science327, 840 (2010)

    work page 2010

  44. [44]

    L. Zhou, H. Dong, Y. X. Liu, C. P. Sun, and F. Nori, Quantum supercavity with atomic mirrors, Phys. Rev. A78, 063827 (2008)

    work page 2008

  45. [45]

    Z. R. Gong, H. Ian, L. Zhou, and C. P. Sun, Control- ling quasibound states in a one-dimensional continuum through an electromagnetically-induced-transparency mechanism, Phys. Rev. A78, 053806 (2008)

    work page 2008

  46. [46]

    H. Dong, Z. R. Gong, H. Ian, L. Zhou, and C. P. Sun, Intrinsic cavity QED and emergent quasinormal modes for a single photon, Phys. Rev. A79, 063847 (2009)

    work page 2009

  47. [47]

    Guimond, A

    P.-O. Guimond, A. Roulet, H. N. Le, and V. Scarani, Rabi oscillation in a quantum cavity: Markovian and non-Markovian dynamics, Phys. Rev. A93, 023808 (2016)

    work page 2016

  48. [48]

    Calaj´ o, Y.-L

    G. Calaj´ o, Y.-L. L. Fang, H. U. Baranger, and F. Ciccarello, Exciting a Bound State in the Continuum through Multi-photon Scattering Plus Delayed Quantum Feedback, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 073601 (2019)

    work page 2019

  49. [49]

    Song, J.-L

    G.-Z. Song, J.-L. Guo, W. Nie, L.-C. Kwek, and G.-L. Long, Optical properties of a waveguide-mediated chain of randomly positioned atoms, Opt. Express29, 1903 (2021)

    work page 1903

  50. [50]

    Arranz Regidor and S

    S. Arranz Regidor and S. Hughes, Cavitylike strong cou- pling in macroscopic waveguide QED using three coupled qubits in the deep non-Markovian regime, Phys. Rev. A 104, L031701 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    C. Zhou, Z. Liao, and M. S. Zubairy, Decay of a single photon in a cavity with atomic mirrors, Phys. Rev. A 105, 033705 (2022)

    work page 2022

  52. [52]

    W. Nie, T. Shi, Y. X. Liu, and F. Nori, Non-Hermitian Waveguide Cavity QED with Tunable Atomic Mirrors, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 103602 (2023)

    work page 2023

  53. [53]

    Mirhosseini, E

    M. Mirhosseini, E. Kim, X. Zhang, A. Sipahigil, P. B. Dieterle, A. J. Keller, A. Asenjo-Garcia, D. E. Chang, and O. Painter, Cavity quantum electrodynamics with atom-like mirrors, Nature (London)569, 692 (2019)

    work page 2019

  54. [54]

    D. E. Chang, L. Jiang, A. Gorshkov, and H. Kimble, Cav- ity QED with atomic mirrors, New J. Phys.14, 063003 (2012)

    work page 2012

  55. [55]

    T. Shi, D. E. Chang, and J. I. Cirac, Multiphoton- scattering theory and generalized master equations, Phys. Rev. A92, 053834 (2015)

    work page 2015

  56. [56]

    Chang, A

    Y. Chang, A. G.-Tudela, C. S. Mu˜noz, C. N.-Benlloch, and T. Shi, Deterministic Down-Converter and Contin- uous Photon-Pair Source within the Bad-Cavity Limit, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 203602 (2016)

    work page 2016

  57. [57]

    C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, Real Spectra in Non- Hermitian Hamiltonians Having PT Symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 5243 (1998)

    work page 1998

  58. [58]

    El-Ganainy, K

    R. El-Ganainy, K. G. Makris, M. Khajavikhan, Z. H. Musslimani, S. Rotter, and D. N. Christodoulides, Non- Hermitian physics and PT symmetry, Nat. Phys.14, 11 (2018)

    work page 2018

  59. [59]

    K.¨Ozdemir, S

    S ¸. K.¨Ozdemir, S. Rotter, F. Nori, and L. Yang, Parity- time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics, Nat. Mater.18, 783 (2019)

    work page 2019

  60. [60]

    Ashida, Z

    Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, Non-Hermitian physics, Adv. Phys.69, 249 (2020)

    work page 2020

  61. [61]

    D. F. Walls and G. J. Milburn, Quantum Optics, (Springer-Verlag 1994), 1-st ed

    work page 1994

  62. [62]

    see, Supplementary materials

    work page

  63. [63]

    Misra and E

    B. Misra and E. C. G. Sudarshan, The Zeno’s Paradox in Quantum Theory, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.)18, 756 (1977)

    work page 1977

  64. [64]

    W. M. Itano, D. J. Heinzen, J. J. Bollinger, and D. J. Wineland, Quantum Zeno Effect, Phys. Rev. A41, 2295 (1990)

    work page 1990

  65. [65]

    Y. Sun, T. Shi, Z. Y. Liu, Z. D. Zhang, L. T. Xiao, S. T. Jia, and Y. Hu, Fractional Quantum Zeno Effect Emerging from Non-Hermitian Physics, Phys. Rev. X13, 031009 (2023)

    work page 2023

  66. [66]

    Z. Q. Niu, W. Nie, D. Q. Bao, X. L. He, W. P. Gao, K. Liu, I. C. Hoi, Y. X. Liu, X. M. Xie, Z. Wang, and Z. R. Lin, Light Manipulation via Tunable Collective Quan- tum States in Waveguide-Coupled Bragg and Anti-Bragg Superatoms, arXiv:2507.00935

    work page arXiv

  67. [67]

    Hamsen, K

    C. Hamsen, K. N. Tolazzi, T. Wilk, and G. Rempe, Two- Photon Blockade in an Atom-Driven Cavity QED Sys- tem, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 133604 (2017)

    work page 2017

  68. [68]

    Xiang, S

    Z.-L. Xiang, S. Ashhab, J. Q. You, and F. Nori, Hybrid quantum circuits: Superconducting circuits interacting with other quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 623 (2013)

    work page 2013

  69. [69]

    X. Gu, A. F. Kockum, A. Miranowicz, Y. X. Liu, and F. Nori, Microwave photonics with superconducting quan- 8 tum circuits. Phys. Rep.718-719, 1-102 (2017)

    work page 2017