Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Spectroscopic Observations of Supra-Arcade Downflows

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The dark downflows seen above solar flares are themselves downflowing plasma, not static voids.

desk verdict First EIS spectra of supra-arcade downflows, but the main Doppler result needs a local background comparison before it fully lands. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.22624 v1 pith:RDIPTDIG submitted 2025-05-28 astro-ph.SR physics.plasm-phphysics.space-ph

Ryan J. French , Maria D. Kazachenko , Teodora Mihailescu , Katharine K. Reeves This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRphysics.plasm-phphysics.space-ph
keywords supra-arcadedownflowssolarflaresEUVspectroscopyHinodeEISDopplervelocitiesnon-thermalelectrontemperaturestealthSADs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first spectroscopic observations of supra-arcade downflows (SADs) since 2003, using Hinode EIS sit-and-stare data of an M3.9 flare on April 2, 2022. It tries to establish that the dark SAD streaks are not merely static low-density voids but are themselves plasma flowing downward toward the flare arcade. The evidence is Fe XXIV Doppler red shifts that align spatially and temporally with the dark intensity drops, plus total velocities of 59–83 km/s when line-of-sight and plane-of-sky components are combined. The paper also derives electron temperatures of 12.2–13.4 MK, finds enhanced non-thermal velocities inside SADs, and reports 'stealth SADs' that produce downflow Doppler signals with no measurable intensity drop. If correct, these results connect SADs more directly to the standard flare reconnection picture and give future models new observables to reproduce.

What carries the argument

The central observational machinery is the Hinode EIS Fe XXIV 192.02 Å sit-and-stare sequence, where a slit is held fixed while SADs drift across it, giving time-resolved spectra of individual structures. Doppler velocities come from single-Gaussian centroid fits calibrated to a quiet-Sun reference line, non-thermal velocities from excess line broadening, and electron temperatures from the ratio of Fe XXIV 255.11 Å to Fe XXIII 263.41 Å lines compared with CHIANTI theoretical ratios. Plane-of-sky velocities are measured by tracking the same SADs in AIA 131 Å time-distance diagrams; combining both components gives the 3D velocity profile for four SADs.

What would settle it

Take the binned Fe XXIV 192.02 Å spectra from the SAD contours and fit a two-component model consisting of the static, brighter fan spectrum plus a low-density void with no bulk motion. If such a model reproduces the observed centroid shifts and line profiles as well as a single red-shifted Gaussian, the claim that the SADs themselves are downflowing plasma would be falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using sit-and-stare spectra from Hinode EIS, the paper finds that the darkest, most prominent supra-arcade downflows in the April 2, 2022 flare coincide with Fe XXIV 192.02 Å Doppler red shifts of 2.1–8.7 km/s along the line of sight, while the surrounding flare fan is predominantly blue-shifted. Combining these Doppler measurements with AIA 131 Å plane-of-sky tracking yields total SAD velocities of about 59–83 km/s, similar to, though on the lower end of, previously imaged SAD speeds. The paper further reports that SADs show higher non-thermal velocities than the fan (minimum about 20 km/s, with peaks above 70 km/s), electron temperatures of 12.2–13.4 MK close to the fan temperature, a north-south Doppler pattern interpreted as SADs diverging above the flare looptop, and the detection of 'stealth SADs' that have SAD-like Doppler signatures but no corresponding intensity drop. The central conclusion is that the dark SADs themselves are downflowing plasma, not static low-density wakes behind contracting loops, although the authors note that the contracting-loop interpretation could still hold if the loops are too thin or too cool to detect in their data.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the Fe XXIV spectra extracted from the binned, low-intensity SAD pixels are dominated by the SAD plasma itself, rather than by scattered light or by the much brighter surrounding flare fan, so the measured Doppler shifts, temperatures, and line widths genuinely describe the SAD rather than the fan.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If SADs are truly downflowing plasma rather than static voids, models of supra-arcade downflows must explain both the intensity deficit and the bulk downward motion of the same structure.
  • The north-south pattern of Doppler shifts, interpreted as divergence above the flare looptop, supports the idea that a high-altitude termination shock decelerates reconnection outflows before they reach the arcade.
  • SAD temperatures close to the surrounding fan imply that the dark appearance of normal SADs is primarily a density effect, not a temperature effect.
  • The existence of 'stealth SADs' means imaging surveys that identify SADs only by dark features will miss a population of downflowing structures with no intensity drop.
  • Sit-and-stare spectroscopy with a slit crossing a flare fan can catch individual SADs, offering a practical observing strategy for future spectral studies of these transient structures.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if 'stealth SADs' are common, the total number of downflow events in a flare may be substantially higher than dark-feature counts suggest, and Doppler surveys could provide a more complete census.
  • Beyond the paper: the observed time lag between the intensity drop and the peak non-thermal velocity, with turbulence persisting after the SAD passes, could be used to estimate dissipation or drag in the flare fan if compared with MHD turbulence decay models.
  • Beyond the paper: because the SAD temperatures match the fan temperature, a density-sensitive line pair in future EIS observations could directly test whether SADs are in pressure balance with their surroundings, which would help distinguish void models from contracting-flux-tube models.
  • Beyond the paper: if the divergence pattern is produced by a termination shock, the measured SAD velocity directions may constrain the shock height and geometry when combined with the flare's magnetic field extrapolation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper presents new spectroscopic observations of supra-arcade downflows (SADs) in an M3.9 flare on 2022 April 2, using Hinode/EIS sit-and-stare observations of Fe XXIV 192.02 Å, Fe XXIV 255.11 Å, and Fe XXIII 263.41 Å, together with SDO/AIA imaging. The authors identify SADs as transient intensity dips, measure their Doppler velocities, non-thermal velocities, and electron temperatures, and combine LOS Doppler velocities with POS velocities from AIA to derive total velocities for four SADs. They report that SADs are redshifted relative to the surrounding fan, show enhanced non-thermal velocities, have temperatures near the fan value, and that some SAD-like Doppler features occur without intensity drops, which they term 'stealth SADs'. They also interpret a north-south Doppler asymmetry as evidence for divergence of SADs above the flare loop arcade.

Significance. The dataset is unique and valuable: it represents the first EIS spectroscopy of SADs since the SUMER era, and the multi-line diagnostics provide constraints that imaging alone cannot. The paper is careful in quoting uncertainties (point-to-point 1–1.5 km/s, absolute 5 km/s) and in discussing the CHIANTI-based line blending. The main claims—that the SADs themselves are downflowing, that they show enhanced turbulence, and that a subset shows no intensity drop—are interesting and would, if robust, advance the debate on the nature of SADs. However, the central Doppler-velocity result is currently not demonstrated at the required level.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3.2, Figures 3D-3F] The comparison of Doppler velocities between SAD and non-SAD pixels uses all non-SAD pixels in the field of view, rather than a local background at the same slit position. The paper itself states that the northern half of the Doppler map is predominantly redshifted, and the SADs are concentrated in that northern region (top half of the map). Consequently, the measured 2.1–8.7 km/s redshifts may simply reflect the ambient fan velocity gradient rather than a flow intrinsic to the SADs. This is particularly important because these shifts are comparable to the 1–1.5 km/s point-to-point uncertainty and below the 5 km/s absolute calibration. The same issue affects the non-thermal velocity histogram (Figure 3E) and the divergence interpretation (Section 5, item 2). To support the claim that the SADs are themselves redshifted, the authors must show a local control: either compare SAD pixels with non-SAD pixels at the same Y-coordinate and at the same or immediately adjacent times, or subtract a spatially and temporally smoothed background velocity from the Doppler map and demonstrate that the SAD signatures remain.
  2. [Section 3.2 and Section 5, item 6] The existence of 'stealth SADs' is not established. The paper identifies red-shift features that do not coincide with intensity drops as stealth SADs, using only the Doppler signature. However, the same map shows redshifted regions that are not associated with any detected SAD, and the paper has not shown that these features have independent SAD-like properties (such as coherent motion in time-distance plots or enhanced non-thermal velocities) or that they are distinct from the ambient fan's velocity structure. Without such a control, the interpretation of these features as downflowing SADs is speculative.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 3.2] The wavelength of the Fe XXIV line is given as 192.02 Å in the abstract and Figure 2, but as 192.04 Å in Section 3.2; please make this consistent.
  2. [Section 3.3] The text says 'Figure 3D shows a map of non-thermal velocity', but Figure 3D is a histogram; the map of non-thermal velocity is in Figure 2D. Please correct the reference.
  3. [Section 3.2] Near Figure 3, the text mentions 'SADs i-v', but only four SADs (i–iv) are labeled; please correct the numbering.
  4. [Table 1] The column header for non-thermal velocity appears as 'V N T'; please use a clearer notation such as 'V_NT'.
  5. [Section 3.4] The line ratio is written as 'Fe XXIII 263.41 Å / Fe XXIV 255.11 Å' in some places and as 'Fe XXIV 255.11 / Fe XXIII 263.41' in others; please be consistent.
  6. [Section 4] The definition of the line-of-sight angle is given as θLOS = tan(Vlos/Vpos), which should presumably be θLOS = atan(Vlos/Vpos); please correct.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper's SAD detection, Doppler, non-thermal, and temperature results are independent measurements tied to external calibration and atomic data.

full rationale

The paper's chain of claims is observational and self-contained. SADs are detected from Fe XXIV 192.02 Å intensity drops (Section 3.1), and the red-shift, non-thermal broadening, and temperature signals are then measured from independent spectral quantities: Gaussian centroid shifts calibrated to quiet-Sun Fe XII, line widths, and the CHIANTI-based Fe XXIV/Fe XXIII line ratio. The central co-location claim (intensity drop plus red shift) compares two independent observables, so it is not a definitional tautology. The 'stealth SADs' are identified from Doppler features lacking intensity drops; this is an interpretation of an empirical pattern, not a fitted quantity. Rest-wavelength calibration, CHIANTI atomic data, and point-to-point uncertainty estimates are external benchmarks. Although several cited works share authors (e.g., Hanneman & Reeves 2014; Savage et al. 2012), none of these citations supplies the load-bearing inferred value; they are used for comparison or context. A possible fan-contamination or selection effect would be a systematic-error concern, not circularity, because the SAD selection is made on intensity rather than on the Doppler quantity being interpreted.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The analysis is observational and does not fit a physical model to data, so there are no model free parameters. The central results instead depend on calibration and threshold choices: hand-set SAD detection thresholds, an explicitly excluded noise region, the single-Gaussian and ionization-equilibrium assumptions, and visual cross-instrument alignment. The only new named object is the 'stealth SAD' observational category.

free parameters (2)
  • SAD detection thresholds = -1.8% (start), -3% (minimum), 3 consecutive timesteps
    Section 3.1: hand-set thresholds used by the automated SAD detection algorithm. They determine which dimming events are classified as SADs and affect all subsequent SAD versus non-SAD comparisons.
  • Excluded high-noise region for SAD detection = Y = 220-230 arcsec, after 14:50 UT
    Section 3.1: this region is excluded from automated detection after a certain time. The rationale is high noise, but the impact on the detected SAD population is not quantified.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Ionization equilibrium holds for Fe XXIV/Fe XXIII line-ratio temperature measurement
    Section 3.4. The temperature is derived by comparing observed line ratios to CHIANTI predictions in ionization equilibrium. The paper cites Kawate et al. (2016) for validity in roughly 98.6% of flare pixels but acknowledges unquantified departures.
  • domain assumption Single-Gaussian line profiles represent Fe XXIV emission in SAD pixels
    Sections 3.1 and 3.2. Doppler and non-thermal velocities are measured from a single Gaussian fit. If the SAD line profile is multi-component or contaminated by the surrounding fan, the centroid and width do not measure the SAD bulk flow.
  • domain assumption Rest wavelength calibration from quiet-Sun Fe XII is valid for Fe XXIV 192 Å
    Section 3.2. Absolute Doppler velocities rely on this calibration and carry a roughly 5 km/s systematic uncertainty, comparable to the measured SAD red shifts of 2.1 to 8.7 km/s. Comparisons of SAD versus non-SAD pixels cancel this zero-point.
  • domain assumption SADs identified in AIA images are the same structures crossing the EIS slit
    Section 4. The combination of LOS and POS velocities assumes spatial and temporal coincidence between SADs tracked in AIA difference images and the EIS slit crossings, which is established visually from Figures 1 and 4.
  • domain assumption Fe XXIV 192.02 Å blending with Fe XI is negligible
    Section 3.1. The paper uses CHIANTI with a typical flare differential emission measure to argue the Fe XI blend is three orders of magnitude weaker. This depends on the assumed emission measure distribution.
invented entities (1)
  • Stealth SADs
    purpose: To explain SAD-like Doppler red-shift features that occur without an associated intensity drop in EIS or AIA data.
    Section 3.2 and Section 5, item 6. This is a newly named observational class. The evidence is presented inside this paper (red-shift features with no dimming), but there is no independent falsifiable handle outside the dataset, and the paper does not rule out that these are fainter, unresolved SADs.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spectroscopic Observations of Supra-Arcade Downflows." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RDIPTDIG

@misc{pith2026250522624,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spectroscopic Observations of Supra-Arcade Downflows},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RDIPTDIG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.22624}
}
read the original abstract

Despite their somewhat-frequent appearance in EUV imaging of off-limb flares, the origins of Supra-Arcade Downflows (SADs) remain a mystery. Appearing as dark, tendril-like downflows above growing flare loop arcades, SADs themselves are yet to be tied into the standard model of solar flares. The uncertainty of their origin is, in part, due to a lack of spectral observations, with the last published SAD spectral observations dating back to the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory / Solar Ultraviolet Measurements of Emitted Radiation (SOHO/SUMER) era in 2003. In this work, we present new observations of SADs within an M-class solar flare on April 2nd, 2022, observed by the Hinode EUV Imaging Spectrometer (EIS) and NASA Solar Dynamics Observatory. We measure Fe XXIV 192.02 Angstrom Doppler downflows and non-thermal velocities in the low-intensity SAD features, exceeding values measured in the surrounding flare fan. The ratio of temperature-sensitive Fe XXIV 255.11 Angstrom and Fe XXIII 263.41 Angstrom lines also allow the measurement of electron temperature, revealing temperatures within the range of the surrounding flare fan. We compare EIS line-of-sight Doppler velocities with plane-of-sky velocities measured by AIA, to construct the 3D velocity profile of four prominent SADs, finding evidence for their divergence above the flare loop arcade - possibly related to the presence of a high altitude termination shock. Finally, we detect 'stealth' SADs, which produce SAD-like Doppler signals, yet with no change in intensity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.22624 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Top row: AIA 131 ˚A snapshots of the flare evolution, at times where individual Supra-Arcade Downflow (SAD) structures cross the EIS slit. The red slit identifies the location of the sit-and-stare EIS slit, and small blue markers the subrange of the EIS raster analyzed in Figures 2 and 4. The black line marks the location of the solar limb. The yellow cross-sections mark the path of SADs i-iv, four individual SADs w… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A: EIS Fe XXIV 192.02 ˚A intensity sit-and-stare maps for full time range plotted in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. A-C: Spectroscopic line profiles for key SADs i-iv, in Fe XXIV 192.02 ˚A (left), Fe XXIV 255.11 ˚A (center) and Fe XXIII 263.41 ˚A (right). D-E: Histograms for Fe XXIV 192.02 ˚A Doppler velocity and non-thermal velocity, comparing values between all SAD and non-SAD pixels, as per contours in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A: AIA 131 ˚A emission along the EIS slit subrange, creating a pseudo-raster. Our key SADs of interests are labeled i-iv. Yellow horizontal lines show the projection across the slit position of the north and south SAD path cross-section slices plotted in [PITH_FULL_IM…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A cartoon depicting the simplified geometry of the of the April 2nd 2022 M-class solar flare and SADs, relative to the suspected location of the higher altitude reconnection site and possible termination shock. The viewing geometry explains the observed distinction in …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 3 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. SADCat: A Catalog of Supra-Arcade Downflow Events in Solar Flares

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A catalog of 178 SAD-producing flares shows peak GOES flux, duration, CME speed and mass strongly control visible SADs while impulsivity and acceleration do not.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    2022, A&A, 663, A18, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141868

    Br¨ ose, M., Warmuth, A., Sakao, T., & Su, Y. 2022, A&A, 663, A18, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141868

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141868 2022

  2. [2]

    1964, NASA Special Publication, 50, 451 C´ ecere, M., Schneiter, M., Costa, A., Elaskar, S., &

    Carmichael, H. 1964, NASA Special Publication, 50, 451 C´ ecere, M., Schneiter, M., Costa, A., Elaskar, S., &

    work page 1964

  3. [3]

    2012, ApJ, 759, 79, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/759/2/79

    Maglione, S. 2012, ApJ, 759, 79, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/759/2/79

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/759/2/79 2012

  4. [4]

    S., Shen, C., et al

    Chen, B., Bastian, T. S., Shen, C., et al. 2015, Science, 350, 1238, doi: 10.1126/science.aac8467

    doi:10.1126/science.aac8467 2015

  5. [5]

    K., Guo, F., & Yu, S

    Chen, B., Shen, C., Reeves, K. K., Guo, F., & Yu, S. 2019, ApJ, 884, 63, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3c58

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab3c58 2019

  6. [6]

    L., Harra, L

    Culhane, J. L., Harra, L. K., James, A. M., et al. 2007, SoPh, 243, 19, doi: 10.1007/s01007-007-0293-1

    doi:10.1007/s01007-007-0293-1 2007

  7. [7]

    P., Landi, E., Mason, H

    Dere, K. P., Landi, E., Mason, H. E., Monsignori Fossi, B. C., & Young, P. R. 1997, A&AS, 125, 149, doi: 10.1051/aas:1997368

    doi:10.1051/aas:1997368 1997

  8. [8]

    A., McKenzie, D

    Doschek, G. A., McKenzie, D. E., & Warren, H. P. 2014, ApJ, 788, 26, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/26

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/788/1/26 2014

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    P., Del Zanna, G., Young, P

    Dufresne, R. P., Del Zanna, G., Young, P. R., et al. 2024, ApJ, 974, 71, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6765

    2024 doi

  2. [10]

    J., Hayes, L

    French, R. J., Hayes, L. A., Kazachenko, M. D., et al. 2024a, ApJ, 977, 207, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8ed1

    doi

  3. [11]

    M., & Judge, P

    Long, D. M., & Judge, P. G. 2020, ApJ, 900, 192, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aba94b

    2020 doi

  4. [12]

    J., Yu, S., Chen, B., Shen, C., & Matthews, S

    French, R. J., Yu, S., Chen, B., Shen, C., & Matthews, S. A. 2024b, MNRAS, 528, 6836, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae430 13

    doi

  5. [13]

    N., Acton, L

    Handy, B. N., Acton, L. W., Kankelborg, C. C., et al. 1999, SoPh, 187, 229, doi: 10.1023/A:1005166902804

    1999 doi

  6. [14]

    J., & Reeves, K

    Hanneman, W. J., & Reeves, K. K. 2014, ApJ, 786, 95, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/786/2/95

    2014 doi

  7. [15]

    1974, SoPh, 34, 323, doi: 10.1007/BF00153671

    Hirayama, T. 1974, SoPh, 34, 323, doi: 10.1007/BF00153671

    1974 doi

  8. [16]

    E., McKenzie, D

    Innes, D. E., McKenzie, D. E., & Wang, T. 2003a, SoPh, 217, 247, doi: 10.1023/B:SOLA.0000006899.12788.22

  9. [17]

    E., McKenzie, D

    Innes, D. E., McKenzie, D. E., & Wang, T. 2003b, SoPh, 217, 267, doi: 10.1023/B:SOLA.0000006874.31799.bc

  10. [18]

    R., et al

    Janvier, M., Mzerguat, S., Young, P. R., et al. 2023, A&A, 677, A130, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346321

    2023 doi

  11. [19]

    P., & Jess, D

    Kawate, T., Keenan, F. P., & Jess, D. B. 2016, ApJ, 826, 3, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/826/1/3

    2016 doi

  12. [20]

    I., Bain, H

    Khan, J. I., Bain, H. M., & Fletcher, L. 2007, A&A, 475, 333, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077894

    2007 doi

  13. [21]

    A., & Pneuman, G

    Kopp, R. A., & Pneuman, G. W. 1976, SoPh, 50, 85, doi: 10.1007/BF00206193

    1976 doi

  14. [22]

    J., Grimm, O., et al

    Krucker, S., Hurford, G. J., Grimm, O., et al. 2020, A&A, 642, A15, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937362

    2020 doi

  15. [23]

    2020, Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 6, 3, doi: 10.12737/stp-61202001

    Kaufman, A. 2020, Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 6, 3, doi: 10.12737/stp-61202001

    2020 doi

  16. [24]

    R., Title, A

    Lemen, J. R., Title, A. M., Akin, D. J., et al. 2012, SoPh, 275, 17, doi: 10.1007/s11207-011-9776-8

    2012 doi

  17. [25]

    F., Cheng, X., Ding, M

    Li, Z. F., Cheng, X., Ding, M. D., et al. 2021, ApJ, 915, 124, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac043e

    2021 doi

  18. [26]

    2018, ApJ, 868, 148, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaeac4

    Priest, E. 2018, ApJ, 868, 148, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaeac4

    2018 doi

  19. [27]

    S., Schneiter, E

    Maglione, L. S., Schneiter, E. M., Costa, A., & Elaskar, S. 2011, A&A, 527, L5, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015934

    2011 doi

  20. [28]

    T., & Muglach, K

    Mariska, J. T., & Muglach, K. 2010, ApJ, 713, 573, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/713/1/573

    2010 doi

  21. [29]

    McKenzie, D. E. 2000, SoPh, 195, 381, doi: 10.1023/A:1005220604894

    2000 doi

  22. [30]

    E., & Hudson, H

    McKenzie, D. E., & Hudson, H. S. 1999, ApJL, 519, L93, doi: 10.1086/312110

    1999 doi

  23. [31]

    E., & Savage, S

    McKenzie, D. E., & Savage, S. L. 2009, ApJ, 697, 1569, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/1569

    2009 doi

  24. [32]

    Miles, A. R. 2009, ApJ, 696, 498, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/498 M¨ uller, D., St. Cyr, O. C., Zouganelis, I., et al. 2020, A&A, 642, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038467

    2009 doi

  25. [33]

    M., & Melnikov, V

    Nakariakov, V. M., & Melnikov, V. F. 2009, SSRv, 149, 119, doi: 10.1007/s11214-009-9536-3

    2009 doi

  26. [34]

    K., & Musset, S

    Polito, V., Galan, G., Reeves, K. K., & Musset, S. 2018, ApJ, 865, 161, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aadada

    2018 doi

  27. [35]

    K., Freed, M

    Reeves, K. K., Freed, M. S., McKenzie, D. E., & Savage, S. L. 2017, ApJ, 836, 55, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/55

    2017 doi

  28. [36]

    K., Polito, V., Chen, B., et al

    Reeves, K. K., Polito, V., Chen, B., et al. 2020, ApJ, 905, 165, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc4e0

    2020 doi

  29. [37]

    2021, The Innovation, 2, 100083, doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100083

    Samanta, T., Tian, H., Chen, B., et al. 2021, The Innovation, 2, 100083, doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100083

    2021

  30. [38]

    L., & McKenzie, D

    Savage, S. L., & McKenzie, D. E. 2011, ApJ, 730, 98, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/730/2/98

    2011 doi

  31. [39]

    L., McKenzie, D

    Savage, S. L., McKenzie, D. E., & Reeves, K. K. 2012, ApJL, 747, L40, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/747/2/L40

    2012 doi

  32. [40]

    B., McKenzie, D

    Scott, R. B., McKenzie, D. E., & Longcope, D. W. 2016, ApJ, 819, 56, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/819/1/56

    2016 doi

  33. [41]

    K., et al

    Shen, C., Chen, B., Reeves, K. K., et al. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 317, doi: 10.1038/s41550-021-01570-2

    2022 doi

  34. [42]

    Shen, C., Lin, J., & Murphy, N. A. 2011, ApJ, 737, 14, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/737/1/14

    2011 doi

  35. [43]

    K., et al

    Shen, C., Polito, V., Reeves, K. K., et al. 2023, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 10, 19, doi: 10.3389/fspas.2023.1096133

    2023

  36. [44]

    Sturrock, P. A. 1968, in Structure and Development of Solar Active Regions, ed. K. O. Kiepenheuer, Vol. 35, 471

    1968

  37. [45]

    2022, MNRAS, 516, 3120, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2470

    Tan, G., Hou, Y., & Tian, H. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 3120, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2470

    2022 doi

  38. [46]

    1991, SoPh, 136, 37, doi: 10.1007/BF00151694 Van Doorsselaere, T., Kupriyanova, E

    Tsuneta, S., Acton, L., Bruner, M., et al. 1991, SoPh, 136, 37, doi: 10.1007/BF00151694 Van Doorsselaere, T., Kupriyanova, E. G., & Yuan, D. 2016, SoPh, 291, 3143, doi: 10.1007/s11207-016-0977-z

    1991 doi

  39. [47]

    P., Brooks, D

    Warren, H. P., Brooks, D. H., Ugarte-Urra, I., et al. 2018, ApJ, 854, 122, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa9b8

    2018 doi

  40. [48]

    P., O’Brien, C

    Warren, H. P., O’Brien, C. M., & Sheeley, Jr., N. R. 2011, ApJ, 742, 92, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/742/2/92

    2011 doi

  41. [49]

    S., Hughes, J

    Warren, J. S., Hughes, J. P., Badenes, C., et al. 2005, ApJ, 634, 376, doi: 10.1086/496941

    2005 doi

  42. [50]

    1995, SoPh, 162, 189, doi: 10.1007/BF00733430

    Wilhelm, K., Curdt, W., Marsch, E., et al. 1995, SoPh, 162, 189, doi: 10.1007/BF00733430

    1995 doi

  43. [51]

    Xie, X., & Reeves, K. K. 2023, ApJ, 942, 28, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9f47

    2023 doi

  44. [52]

    K., Shen, C., & Ingram, J

    Xie, X., Reeves, K. K., Shen, C., & Ingram, J. D. 2022, ApJ, 933, 15, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac695d

    2022 doi

  45. [53]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.13827, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.13827

    Xie, X., Shen, C., Reeves, K., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.13827, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.13827

    2025 doi arXiv

  46. [54]

    2020, ApJ, 898, 88, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9a3d

    Xue, J., Su, Y., Li, H., & Zhao, X. 2020, ApJ, 898, 88, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9a3d

    2020 doi

  47. [55]

    R., O’Dwyer, B., & Mason, H

    Young, P. R., O’Dwyer, B., & Mason, H. E. 2012, ApJ, 744, 14, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/744/1/14

    2012 doi

  48. [56]

    R., Del Zanna, G., Mason, H

    Young, P. R., Del Zanna, G., Mason, H. E., et al. 2007, PASJ, 59, S857, doi: 10.1093/pasj/59.sp3.S857

    2007 doi

  49. [57]

    V., McLaughlin, J

    Zimovets, I. V., McLaughlin, J. A., Srivastava, A. K., et al. 2021, SSRv, 217, 66, doi: 10.1007/s11214-021-00840-9

    2021 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.