pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.01716 · v1 · pith:RDPTEXCSnew · submitted 2019-07-03 · ✦ hep-ph

Lepton (non-) unversality in (flavor changing) neutral current B decays

Rodrigo Alonso This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 10:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords lepton non-universalityB meson decaysflavor changing neutral currentsLHCb anomaliesR_K ratiosnew physicsmuon electron comparison
0
0 comments X

The pith

Deviations in B to K(*) muon versus electron decay ratios indicate lepton non-universality in flavor changing neutral currents.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review paper examines the anomalies reported by LHCb in the ratios of B meson decays involving muons compared to those involving electrons. The standard model predicts these ratios should be close to one due to lepton universality, yet the data show deviations. A sympathetic reader would care because confirming such non-universality would point to new physics that distinguishes between lepton flavors in neutral current processes. The paper offers a theory perspective on how these observations might arise and what they imply for beyond standard model scenarios.

Core claim

The ratios B→K(*)μμ/B→K(*)ee show deviations from standard model predictions, hinting at lepton non-universality in flavor changing neutral current B decays. The paper presents this as evidence that new physics may be at work in these transitions, with the anomalies providing a window into flavor structure beyond the standard model.

What carries the argument

The lepton universality ratios R_K and R_K* comparing muon and electron channels in b to s ll transitions.

If this is right

  • New physics must contribute to the effective operators governing b to s transitions with flavor-dependent lepton couplings.
  • Models such as leptoquarks or Z prime bosons with non-universal couplings become favored explanations.
  • Related observables in other decay channels and at higher energies should exhibit correlated deviations.
  • Collider searches gain motivation for particles that couple differently to muons and electrons.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The pattern of deviations could help distinguish among different new physics models if more channels are measured precisely.
  • This non-universality might link to broader flavor problems such as the hierarchy in quark and lepton masses.
  • If real, the effect would motivate dedicated searches in related processes like rare tau decays.

Load-bearing premise

The observed deviations in the decay ratios are caused by new physics rather than experimental systematics, hadronic uncertainties, or standard model calculation errors.

What would settle it

A future measurement showing the ratios consistent with standard model expectations within uncertainties would disprove the new physics interpretation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.01716 by Rodrigo Alonso.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Sketch of the fermionic spectrum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Bounds on scalar ops from leptonic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Correlation between different lepton flavor observ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The following proceedings contain a theory perspective on the flavor changing neutral current anomalies reported by LHCb on the ratios $B\to K^{(*)} \mu\mu/B\to K^{(*)} ee$

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a theory perspective summarizing the LHCb-reported anomalies in the lepton non-universality ratios R_K and R_K* for the decays B→K(*)μμ over B→K(*)ee, discussing their implications for flavor-changing neutral current processes.

Significance. As a perspective piece rather than a new derivation or model, the paper's value is in contextualizing existing experimental hints of lepton non-universality in b→sℓℓ transitions. If the deviations hold, they would point to new physics, but the manuscript advances no quantitative predictions or parameter-free results.

minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract and title use non-standard spacing and punctuation (e.g., 'Lepton (non-) unversality'); a light copy-edit would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our perspective manuscript and for recommending acceptance. We appreciate the recognition that the work contextualizes the LHCb-reported anomalies in R_K and R_K* without claiming new quantitative predictions, consistent with its nature as a theory overview rather than an original model-building paper.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No derivation chain; perspective summarizing experimental anomalies

full rationale

The manuscript is explicitly a theory perspective on LHCb-reported anomalies in the ratios R_K and R_K*. It advances no new model, derivation, equations, or fitted parameters. The central claim is a summary of existing experimental results rather than a prediction derived from internal assumptions. No self-citations, ansatze, or renamings are load-bearing because no quantitative derivation exists to reduce to its inputs. This matches the reader's assessment of circularity score 0.0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are specified in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5538 in / 902 out tokens · 30649 ms · 2026-05-25T10:50:45.725937+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

15 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages · 11 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    S. L. Glashow, J. Iliopoulos and L. Maiani, Phys. Rev. D 2 (1970) 1285. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.2.1285

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.2.1285 1970

  2. [2]

    Search for lepton-universality violation in $B^+\to K^+\ell^+\ell^-$ decays

    R. Aaij et al. [LHCb Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) no.19, 191801 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.191801 [arXiv:1903.09252 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.191801 2019

  3. [3]

    Test of lepton universality with $B^{0} \rightarrow K^{*0}\ell^{+}\ell^{-}$ decays

    R. Aaij et al. [LHCb Collaboration], JHEP 1708 (2017) 055 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2017)055 [arXiv:1705.05802 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep08(2017)055 2017

  4. [4]

    Abdesselam et al

    A. Abdesselam et al. [Belle Collaboration], arXiv:1904.02440 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 1904

  5. [5]

    On the Standard Model predictions for $R_K$ and $R_{K^*}$

    M. Bordone, G. Isidori and A. Pattori, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) no.8, 440 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016- 4274-7 [arXiv:1605.07633 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016- 2016

  6. [6]

    Angular Distributions of B -> K ll Decays

    C. Bobeth, G. Hiller and G. Piranishvili, JHEP 0712 (2007) 040 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/12/040 [arXiv:0709.4174 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/12/040 2007

  7. [7]

    $SU(2)\times U(1)$ gauge invariance and the shape of new physics in rare $B$ decays

    R. Alonso, B. Grinstein and J. Martin Camalich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 241802 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.241802 [arXiv:1407.7044 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.241802 2014

  8. [8]

    L. S. Geng, B. Grinstein, S. Jger, J. Martin Ca- malich, X. L. Ren and R. X. Shi, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) no.9, 093006 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.093006 [arXiv:1704.05446 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.093006 2017

  9. [9]

    Flavour anomalies after the $R_{K^*}$ measurement

    G. D’Amico, M. Nardecchia, P. Panci, F. San- nino, A. Strumia, R. Torre and A. Urbano, JHEP 1709 (2017) 010 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2017)010 [arXiv:1704.05438 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep09(2017)010 2017

  10. [10]

    Aebischer, W

    J. Aebischer, W. Altmannshofer, D. Guadag- noli, M. Reboud, P. Stangl and D. M. Straub, arXiv:1903.10434 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 1903

  11. [11]

    Opportunities in Flavour Physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC

    A. Cerri et al. , arXiv:1812.07638 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [12]

    A. J. Buras, J. Girrbach-Noe, C. Niehoff and D. M. Straub, JHEP 1502 (2015) 184 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2015)184 [arXiv:1409.4557 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep02(2015)184 2015

  13. [13]

    On the Importance of Electroweak Corrections for B Anomalies

    F. Feruglio, P. Paradisi and A. Pattori, JHEP 1709 (2017) 061 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2017)061 [arXiv:1705.00929 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep09(2017)061 2017

  14. [14]

    S. L. Glashow, D. Guadagnoli and K. Lane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 091801 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.091801 [arXiv:1411.0565 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.091801 2015

  15. [15]

    Lepton universality violation and lepton flavor conservation in $B$-meson decays

    R. Alonso, B. Grinstein and J. Mar- tin Camalich, JHEP 1510 (2015) 184 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2015)184 [arXiv:1505.05164 [hep-ph]]. MonB1400

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2015)184 2015