Integrated magnonic neural circuits based on nonlinear wave neurons

Andrii V. Chumak; Carsten Dubs; Chuan Gao; Jing Li; Kaiming Cai; Krist\'yna Davidkova; Mengying Guo; Philipp Pirro; Qi Wang; Roman Verba

arxiv: 2606.11703 · v1 · pith:REND54LGnew · submitted 2026-06-10 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · physics.app-ph

Integrated magnonic neural circuits based on nonlinear wave neurons

Mengying Guo , Xudong Jing , Krist\'yna Davidkova , Roman Verba , Zhenyu Zhou , Xueyu Guo , Carsten Dubs , Chuan Gao

show 6 more authors

Yiheng Rao Kaiming Cai Jing Li Philipp Pirro Andrii V. Chumak Qi Wang

This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 09:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.app-ph

keywords magnonic neural networksspin wavesnonlinear neuronsneuromorphic computingyttrium iron garnetpattern recognitionwave-based computingcascadable neurons

0 comments

The pith

Nonlinear spin-wave neurons in nanoscale waveguides self-normalize their outputs and self-adjust phases to enable direct cascading in integrated magnonic circuits.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that spin-wave neurons realized in yttrium iron garnet waveguides can perform weighted summation of inputs while using pump-controlled nonlinear activation to set tunable firing thresholds. Because the dynamics are deeply nonlinear, activated neurons produce outputs whose intensity stays largely independent of input strength and whose phase behavior reduces sensitivity to relative input phases. This combination removes the need for external signal restoration between stages, allowing deterministic neuron-to-neuron connections. A reader would care because conventional wave systems have lacked exactly these cascadable nonlinear elements, so the work supplies a concrete route to scalable wave-based neural hardware. The authors demonstrate the approach with programmable single neurons, reconfigurable classification, stage-to-stage cascading, and a seven-neuron circuit that classifies binary letter patterns.

Core claim

Nonlinear threshold neurons realized in nanoscale yttrium iron garnet waveguides perform weighted summation of multiple spin-wave inputs; a pump-controlled nonlinear activation defines continuously tunable firing thresholds. Owing to deeply nonlinear spin-wave dynamics the activated neurons emit self-normalized outputs whose intensities are largely independent of the input amplitudes, while nonlinear phase self-adjustment suppresses sensitivity to the relative input phases, enabling deterministic neuron-to-neuron cascading without external signal restoration. Programmable threshold neurons, reconfigurable weighted classification, deterministic cascading between sequential stages, and reconfi

What carries the argument

Nonlinear threshold neurons based on deeply nonlinear spin-wave dynamics in yttrium iron garnet waveguides, with pump-controlled activation supplying the required nonlinearity for summation and firing.

If this is right

Programmable threshold neurons can be fabricated and operated in the waveguides.
Weighted classification can be reconfigured on the same hardware by changing pump or input settings.
Sequential neuronal stages can be cascaded deterministically without external amplification or phase correction.
A seven-neuron integrated circuit can classify binary letter patterns such as HUST.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the self-normalization and phase robustness persist at larger scale, networks of hundreds of magnonic neurons could be integrated on a single chip without auxiliary electronics.
The same nonlinear-wave principle might be tested in other physical wave platforms such as optical or acoustic systems to create analogous neuromorphic hardware.
Phase self-adjustment could reduce the precision required when interfacing magnonic neurons with conventional spintronic or electronic components.

Load-bearing premise

Deeply nonlinear spin-wave dynamics produce outputs whose intensity is independent of input amplitude and whose phase behavior is insensitive to relative input phases, allowing reliable cascading.

What would settle it

An experiment in which output intensity changes substantially when input amplitude is varied across the operating range, or in which phase differences between inputs produce inconsistent firing in a cascaded pair of neurons.

read the original abstract

Artificial intelligence is driving intense interest in alternative computing hardware capable of neural information processing beyond conventional charge-based electronics. Among emerging approaches, wave-based computing promises highly parallel and energy-efficient operation, but scalable physical neural hardware has remained elusive because wave systems generally lack cascadable nonlinear neurons with signal regeneration and phase-robust operation. Here we demonstrate integrated magnonic neural circuits based on nonlinear threshold neurons realized in nanoscale yttrium iron garnet waveguides. The neurons perform weighted summation of multiple spin-wave inputs, while a pump-controlled nonlinear activation defines continuously tunable firing thresholds. Owing to deeply nonlinear spin-wave dynamics, the activated neurons emit self-normalized outputs whose intensities are largely independent of the input amplitudes, while nonlinear phase self-adjustment suppresses sensitivity to the relative input phases, enabling deterministic neuron-to-neuron cascading without external signal restoration. We experimentally realize programmable threshold neurons, reconfigurable weighted classification and deterministic cascading between sequential neuronal stages, and further demonstrate reconfigurable physical pattern recognition in a seven-neuron integrated magnonic circuit through experimental classification of the binary letter patterns 'HUST'. These results establish nonlinear magnons as a scalable platform for integrated neural hardware and position nonlinear wave dynamics as a general paradigm for physical neuromorphic computing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper shows a working seven-neuron magnonic circuit that classifies simple binary patterns, with experimental support for self-normalized cascading, though the quantitative independence from input amplitude still needs the raw plots to judge how robust it really is.

read the letter

The main result is an experimental seven-neuron magnonic circuit in YIG waveguides that performs reconfigurable classification of binary letter patterns like 'HUST'. They achieve this by combining weighted spin-wave summation with a pump-tunable nonlinear threshold, then chaining the neurons without external restoration stages.

What stands out is the demonstration of deterministic cascading. The nonlinear dynamics are said to produce outputs whose intensity stays largely stable across input amplitudes and whose phase adjusts to reduce sensitivity to relative input phases. They show programmable single neurons, stage-to-stage cascading, and the full integrated circuit working on the pattern task. That combination moves beyond single-device proofs and gives a concrete hardware example in the wave-computing space.

The soft spot is exactly the one flagged in the stress-test note. The claim that outputs are largely independent of input amplitude is central to the scalability argument. If the measured variation stays small across the operating range used in the seven-neuron circuit, the deterministic operation holds. If the spread is larger, error accumulation would limit how many stages can be chained before the classification fails. The abstract uses the word "largely," so the paper needs to show the actual numbers and error bars rather than just the successful end-to-end result.

The work is aimed at people building neuromorphic hardware in magnonics or related wave systems. A reader already following spin-wave devices or physical neural nets will find the circuit-level integration useful even if they want more quantitative detail on the normalization.

It deserves peer review. The experimental claims are specific enough that referees can check the data directly, and the topic is relevant enough that the community should see the full methods and figures.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental demonstration of integrated magnonic neural circuits realized in nanoscale yttrium iron garnet (YIG) waveguides. Nonlinear threshold neurons are claimed to perform weighted summation of multiple spin-wave inputs with pump-controlled activation for tunable firing thresholds. Deeply nonlinear spin-wave dynamics are said to produce self-normalized outputs whose intensities are largely independent of input amplitudes, while nonlinear phase self-adjustment suppresses sensitivity to relative input phases, enabling deterministic cascading without external restoration. The work experimentally realizes programmable threshold neurons, reconfigurable weighted classification, deterministic cascading between stages, and reconfigurable physical pattern recognition in a seven-neuron circuit classifying binary letter patterns 'HUST'.

Significance. If the quantitative claims on self-normalized outputs and phase-robust cascading hold with supporting data, the work would constitute a significant experimental advance in physical neuromorphic computing. It directly addresses the longstanding challenge of cascadable nonlinear neurons in wave-based systems by providing an integrated magnonic platform with signal regeneration properties arising from the nonlinear dynamics. The experimental (rather than simulated) demonstration of a functional multi-neuron circuit for pattern recognition strengthens the positioning of nonlinear magnons as a scalable hardware paradigm. Credit is due for the focus on physical measurements of the claimed neuron properties.

major comments (2)

[Neuron behavior section] Neuron behavior section: The central claim that activated neurons emit self-normalized outputs whose intensities are largely independent of input amplitudes is load-bearing for the cascading and seven-neuron circuit functionality. The manuscript must provide quantitative metrics (e.g., output intensity variation over a stated input amplitude range with error bars from repeated measurements) to substantiate the degree of independence; absence of such data leaves the deterministic cascading claim unsupported.
[Cascading and seven-neuron circuit sections] Cascading and seven-neuron circuit sections: The assertion of nonlinear phase self-adjustment enabling phase-robust deterministic cascading without restoration requires explicit experimental support, such as output statistics across controlled relative-phase variations in cascaded stages. Without these controls, the reconfigurable classification results in the seven-neuron circuit cannot be attributed to the claimed mechanism.

minor comments (2)

[Figures] Figure captions and legends should explicitly state the number of experimental repetitions, error bar definitions, and pump power values used for threshold tuning.
[Methods] The methods section would benefit from additional detail on waveguide fabrication tolerances and spin-wave detection calibration to allow reproducibility assessment.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments, which help clarify the presentation of our experimental results on magnonic neural circuits. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Neuron behavior section] Neuron behavior section: The central claim that activated neurons emit self-normalized outputs whose intensities are largely independent of input amplitudes is load-bearing for the cascading and seven-neuron circuit functionality. The manuscript must provide quantitative metrics (e.g., output intensity variation over a stated input amplitude range with error bars from repeated measurements) to substantiate the degree of independence; absence of such data leaves the deterministic cascading claim unsupported.

Authors: We agree that quantitative metrics with error bars are necessary to rigorously substantiate the self-normalization property. The manuscript presents experimental traces of neuron output versus input in the relevant section, but does not include the requested variation statistics over a defined amplitude range. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated panel (or supplementary figure) reporting output intensity variation (with standard deviation from repeated measurements) across the operating input range, thereby directly supporting the cascading functionality. revision: yes
Referee: [Cascading and seven-neuron circuit sections] Cascading and seven-neuron circuit sections: The assertion of nonlinear phase self-adjustment enabling phase-robust deterministic cascading without restoration requires explicit experimental support, such as output statistics across controlled relative-phase variations in cascaded stages. Without these controls, the reconfigurable classification results in the seven-neuron circuit cannot be attributed to the claimed mechanism.

Authors: We concur that controlled phase-variation experiments would strengthen attribution of the observed cascading to nonlinear phase self-adjustment. The seven-neuron circuit results demonstrate functional deterministic operation, yet explicit phase-sweep statistics are not reported. We will incorporate new experimental data in the revised manuscript showing output intensity and classification fidelity for controlled relative-phase offsets between cascaded stages, confirming the robustness arising from the nonlinear dynamics. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental demonstration with independent physical measurements

full rationale

The paper's central claims rest on experimental realization of magnonic neurons in YIG waveguides, including measured self-normalized outputs and phase-robust cascading in a seven-neuron circuit for pattern classification. No derivation chain is presented that reduces predictions or uniqueness claims to fitted inputs, self-citations, or ansatzes by construction; the work is framed as hardware demonstration relying on direct physical observations rather than theoretical self-consistency loops.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

As an experimental demonstration paper, the central claim rests primarily on established domain knowledge in magnonics rather than new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Nonlinear spin-wave dynamics and properties of yttrium iron garnet (YIG) materials
The neuron behavior and cascading rely on known magnonic physics in YIG waveguides.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5794 in / 1394 out tokens · 27427 ms · 2026-06-27T09:20:03.790989+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

[1]

Kudithipudi, C

D. Kudithipudi, C. Schuman, C. M. Vineyard, T. Pandit, C. Merkel, et al., Neuromorphic computing at scale, Nature 637, 801-812 (2025)

2025
[2]

C. C. Wanjura & F. Marquardt, Fully nonlinear neuromorphic computing with linear wave scattering , Nat. Phys. 20, 1434-1440 (2024)

2024
[3]

Brückerhoff-Plückelmann, A

F. Brückerhoff-Plückelmann, A. P. Ovvyan, A. Varri, H. Borras, B. Klein, et al., Probabilistic photonic computing for AI, Nat. Comput. Sci. 5, 377-387 (2025)

2025
[4]

Z. Xu, T. Zhou, M. Ma, C. Deng, Q. Dai, & L. Fang, Large-scale photonic chiplet Taichi empowers 160- TOPS/W artificial general intelligence, Science 384, 202-209 (2024)

2024
[5]

Y. Chen, M. Nazhamaiti, H. Xu, Y. Meng, T. Zhou, et al., All-analog photoelectronic chip for high-speed vision tasks, Nature 623, 48-57 (2023)

2023
[6]

Feldmann, N

J. Feldmann, N. Youngblood, C. D. Wright, H. Bhaskaran, & W. H. P. Pernice , All-optical spiking neurosynaptic networks with self-learning capabilities, Nature 569, 208-214 (2019)

2019
[7]

Flebus, D

B. Flebus, D. Grundler, B. Rana, Y. Otani, I. Barsukov, et al., The 2024 magnonics roadmap, J. Phys: Condens. Matter 36, 363501 (2024)

2024
[8]

Q. Wang, G. Csaba, R. Verba, A. V. Chumak, & P. Pirro, Nanoscale magnonic networks, Phys. Rev. Appl. 21, 040503 (2024)

2024
[9]

A. V. Chumak, V. I. Vasyuchka, A. A. Serga, & B. Hillebrands, Magnon spintronics. Nat. Phys. 11, 453- 461 (2015)

2015
[10]

Dieny, I

B. Dieny, I. L. Prejbeanu, K. Garello, P. Gambardella, P. Freitas et al., Opportunities and challenges for spintronics in the microelectronic industry (Topical Review). Nat. Electron. 3, 446-459 (2020). 15

2020
[11]

A. V. Chumak, P. Kabos, M. Wu, C. Abert, C. Adelmann, et al., Advances in Magnetics Roadmap on Spin-Wave Computing, IEEE Trans. Magn. 58, 1 (2022)

2022
[12]

Kajiwara, K

Y. Kajiwara, K. Harii, S. Takahashi, J. Ohe, K. Uchida, et al., Transmission of electrical signals by spin- wave interconversion in a magnetic insulator. Nature 464, 262 (2010)

2010
[13]

J. Han, P. Zhang, J. T. Hou, S. A. Siddiqui, & L. Liu, Mutual control of coherent spin waves and magnetic domain walls in a magnonic device, Science 336, 1121 (2019)

2019
[14]

Q. Wang, M. Kewenig, M. Schneider, R. Verba, F. Kohl, et al., A magnonic directional coupler for integrated magnonic half-adders. Nat. Electron. 3, 765 (2020)

2020
[15]

Kumar, A

A. Kumar, A. K. Chaurasiya, V. H. González, N. Behera, A. Alemán, et al., Spin-wave-mediated mutual synchronization and phase tuning in spin Hall nano-oscillators, Nat. Phys. 21, 245 (2025)

2025
[16]

Sheng, A

L. Sheng, A. Duvakina , H. Wang, K. Yamamoto, R. Yuan, et al., Control of spin currents by magnon interference in a canted antiferromagnet, Nat. Phys. 21, 740 (2025)

2025
[17]

H. Qin, R. B. Holländer, L. Flajšman, F. Hermann, R. Dreyer, et al., Nanoscale magnonic Fabry -Pérot resonator for low-loss spin-wave manipulation, Nat. Commun. 12, 2293 (2021)

2021
[18]

Wintz, V

S. Wintz, V. Tiberkevich, M. Weigand, J. Raabe, J. Lindner, et al. Magnetic vortex cores as tunable spin- wave emitters. Nat. Nano., 11, 948-953 (2016)

2016
[19]

Q. Wang, A. Chumak, & P. Pirro, Inverse-design magnonic devices, Nat. Commun. 12, 2636 (2021)

2021
[20]

Zenbaa, F

N. Zenbaa, F. Majcen, C. Abert, F. Bruckner, N. J. Mauser, et al., Realization of inverse-design magnonic logic gates, Sci. Adv. 11, eadu9032 (2025)

2025
[21]

Á. Papp, W. Porod, & G. Csaba, Nanoscale neural network using non-linear spin-wave interference, Nat. Commun. 12, 6422 (2021)

2021
[22]

Körber, C

L. Körber, C. Heins, T. Hula, J. -V. Kim, S. Thlang, H. Schultheiss, J. Fassbender, & K. Schultheiss, Pattern recognition in reciprocal space with a magnon-scattering reservoir, Nat. Commun. 14, 3954 (2023)

2023
[23]

Breitbach, M

D. Breitbach, M. Bechberger, H. Mortada, B. Heinz, R. Verba, et al., All -magnonic neurons for analog artificial neural networks, arXiv:2509.18321 (2025)

arXiv 2025
[24]

K. G. Fripp, A. V. Shytov, & V. V. Kruglyak, Resonant nanoscale magnonic neurons, Appl. Phys. Lett. 128, 212402 (2026)

2026
[25]

K. -S. Lee & S. -K. Kim Conceptual design of spin wave logic gates based on a Mach-Zehnder-type spin wave interferometer for universal logic functions, J. Appl. Phys. 104, 053909 (2008)

2008
[26]

Balynsky, D

M. Balynsky, D. Gutierrez, H. Chiang, A. Kozhevnikov, D. Dudko et al., A Magnetometer Based on a Spin Wave Interferometer, Sci. Rep. 7, 11539 (2017)

2017
[27]

Schneider, A

T. Schneider, A. A. Serga, B. Leven, B. Hillebrands, R. L. Stamps, & M. P. Kostylev, Realization of spin- wave logic gates, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 022505 (2008)

2008
[28]

A. V. Chumak, A. A. Serga, & B. Hillebrands, Magnon transistor for all -magnon data processing, Nat. Commun. 5, 4700 (2014)

2014
[29]

Talmelli, T

G. Talmelli, T. Devolder, N, Träger, J. Förster, S. Wintz, et al., Reconfigurable submicrometer spin-wave majority gate with electrical transducers, Sci. Adv. 6, eabb4042 (2020)

2020
[30]

Fischer, M

T. Fischer, M. Kewenig, D. A. Bozhko, A. A. Serga, I. I. Syvorotka, et al., Experimental prototype of a spin-wave majority gate, Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 152401 (2017). 16

2017
[31]

Merbouche, B

H. Merbouche, B. Divinskiy, D. Gouéré, R. Lebrun, A. E. Kanj, et al. True amplification of spin waves in magnonic nano-waveguides, Nat. Commun. 15, 1560 (2024)

2024
[32]

Verba, M

R. Verba, M. Carpentieri, G. Finocchio, V. Tiberkevich, & A. Slavin, Amplification and stabilization of large-amplitude propagating spin waves by parametric pumping. Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 042402 (2018)

2018
[33]

Brächer, F

T. Brächer, F. Heussner, P. Pirro, T. Fischer, M. Geilen, et al., Time - and power-dependent operation of a parametric spin-wave amplifier. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 232409 (2014)

2014
[34]

Q. Wang, R. Verba, K. Davídková, B. Heinz, S. Tian, et al., All-magnonic repeater based on bistability. Nat. Commun. 15, 7577 (2024)

2024
[35]

X. Xu, G. Ren, T. Feleppa, T. Feleppa, X. Liu, et al., Self-calibrating programmable photonic integrated circuits, Nat. Photon. 16, 595-602 (2022)

2022
[36]

Pérez-López, A

D. Pérez-López, A. López, P. DasMahapatra, & J. Capmany , Multipurpose self -configuration of programmable photonic circuits. Nat. Commun. 11, 6359 (2020)

2020
[37]

C. Dubs, O. Surzhenko, R. Linke, A. Danllewsky, U. Brückner & J. Dellith, Sub-micrometer yttrium iron garnet LPE films with low ferromagnetic resonance losses, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 50, 204005 (2017)

2017
[38]

C. Dubs, O. Surzhenko, R. Thomas, J. Osten, T. Schneider, et al., Low damping and microstructural perfection of sub -40nm-thin yttrium iron garnet films grown by liquid phase epitaxy. Phys. Rev. Materials 4, 024426 (2020)

2020
[39]

Y. Li, V. V. Naletov, O. Klein, J. L. Prieto, M. Muñoz et al., Nutation Spectroscopy of a Nanomagnet Driven into Deeply Nonlinear Ferromagnetic Resonance. Phys. Rev. X 9, 041036 (2019)

2019
[40]

Q. Wang, R. Verba, B. Heinz, M. Schneider, O. Wojewoda, et al. Deeply nonlinear excitation of self - normalized short spin waves, Sci. Adv. 9, eadg4609 (2023)

2023
[41]

Y. Wang, G. Zhang, D. Zhang, T. Li, C. -M Hu, et al., Bistability of Cavity Magnon Polaritons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 057202 (2018)

2018
[42]

R. Shen, J. Li, Z. Fan, Y. Wang, & J. Q. You, Mechanical Bistability in Kerr -modified Cavity Magnomechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 123601 (2022)

2022
[43]

Vanderveken, V

F. Vanderveken, V. Tyberkevych, G. Talmelli, B. Sorée1, F. Ciubotaru, & C. Adelmann, Lumped circuit model for inductive antenna spin-wave transducers, Sci. Rep. 12, 3796 (2022)

2022
[44]

Sushruth, M

M. Sushruth, M. Grassi, K. Ait-Oukaci, D. Stoeffler, Y. Henry, et al., Electrical spectroscopy of forward volume spin waves in perpendicularly magnetized materials, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043203 (2020)

2020
[45]

Y. Wang, M. Guo, K. Davídková, R. Verba, X. Guo, et al., Fast switchable unidirectional forward volume spin wave emitter, Phy. Rev. Appl. 23, 014066 (2025)

2025
[46]

Sebastian, K

T. Sebastian, K. Schultheiss, B. Obry, B. Hillebrands, & H. Schultheiss, Micro -focused Brillouin light scattering: imaging spin waves at the nanoscale. Front. Phys. 3, 55 (2015)

2015
[47]

Wang, Non-volatile magnonic logic circuits engineering

Alexander Khitun & Kang L. Wang, Non-volatile magnonic logic circuits engineering. J. Appl. Phys. 110 034306 (2011)

2011
[48]

Heinz, T

B. Heinz, T. Brächer, M. Schneider, Q. Wang, B. Lägel, et al. Propagation of spin -wave packets in individual nanosized yttrium iron garnet magnonic conduits. Nano Lett. 12, 4220 (2020)

2020
[49]

Spin + X

A. Vansteenkiste, J. Leliaert, M. Dvornik, M. Helsen, F. Garcia -Sanchez, et al. The design and verification of MuMax3. AIP Adv. 4, 107133 (2014). 17 Acknowledgements This work was supported from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2023YFA1406600) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12574118). ...

work page doi:10.55776/pin1434524 2014

[1] [1]

Kudithipudi, C

D. Kudithipudi, C. Schuman, C. M. Vineyard, T. Pandit, C. Merkel, et al., Neuromorphic computing at scale, Nature 637, 801-812 (2025)

2025

[2] [2]

C. C. Wanjura & F. Marquardt, Fully nonlinear neuromorphic computing with linear wave scattering , Nat. Phys. 20, 1434-1440 (2024)

2024

[3] [3]

Brückerhoff-Plückelmann, A

F. Brückerhoff-Plückelmann, A. P. Ovvyan, A. Varri, H. Borras, B. Klein, et al., Probabilistic photonic computing for AI, Nat. Comput. Sci. 5, 377-387 (2025)

2025

[4] [4]

Z. Xu, T. Zhou, M. Ma, C. Deng, Q. Dai, & L. Fang, Large-scale photonic chiplet Taichi empowers 160- TOPS/W artificial general intelligence, Science 384, 202-209 (2024)

2024

[5] [5]

Y. Chen, M. Nazhamaiti, H. Xu, Y. Meng, T. Zhou, et al., All-analog photoelectronic chip for high-speed vision tasks, Nature 623, 48-57 (2023)

2023

[6] [6]

Feldmann, N

J. Feldmann, N. Youngblood, C. D. Wright, H. Bhaskaran, & W. H. P. Pernice , All-optical spiking neurosynaptic networks with self-learning capabilities, Nature 569, 208-214 (2019)

2019

[7] [7]

Flebus, D

B. Flebus, D. Grundler, B. Rana, Y. Otani, I. Barsukov, et al., The 2024 magnonics roadmap, J. Phys: Condens. Matter 36, 363501 (2024)

2024

[8] [8]

Q. Wang, G. Csaba, R. Verba, A. V. Chumak, & P. Pirro, Nanoscale magnonic networks, Phys. Rev. Appl. 21, 040503 (2024)

2024

[9] [9]

A. V. Chumak, V. I. Vasyuchka, A. A. Serga, & B. Hillebrands, Magnon spintronics. Nat. Phys. 11, 453- 461 (2015)

2015

[10] [10]

Dieny, I

B. Dieny, I. L. Prejbeanu, K. Garello, P. Gambardella, P. Freitas et al., Opportunities and challenges for spintronics in the microelectronic industry (Topical Review). Nat. Electron. 3, 446-459 (2020). 15

2020

[11] [11]

A. V. Chumak, P. Kabos, M. Wu, C. Abert, C. Adelmann, et al., Advances in Magnetics Roadmap on Spin-Wave Computing, IEEE Trans. Magn. 58, 1 (2022)

2022

[12] [12]

Kajiwara, K

Y. Kajiwara, K. Harii, S. Takahashi, J. Ohe, K. Uchida, et al., Transmission of electrical signals by spin- wave interconversion in a magnetic insulator. Nature 464, 262 (2010)

2010

[13] [13]

J. Han, P. Zhang, J. T. Hou, S. A. Siddiqui, & L. Liu, Mutual control of coherent spin waves and magnetic domain walls in a magnonic device, Science 336, 1121 (2019)

2019

[14] [14]

Q. Wang, M. Kewenig, M. Schneider, R. Verba, F. Kohl, et al., A magnonic directional coupler for integrated magnonic half-adders. Nat. Electron. 3, 765 (2020)

2020

[15] [15]

Kumar, A

A. Kumar, A. K. Chaurasiya, V. H. González, N. Behera, A. Alemán, et al., Spin-wave-mediated mutual synchronization and phase tuning in spin Hall nano-oscillators, Nat. Phys. 21, 245 (2025)

2025

[16] [16]

Sheng, A

L. Sheng, A. Duvakina , H. Wang, K. Yamamoto, R. Yuan, et al., Control of spin currents by magnon interference in a canted antiferromagnet, Nat. Phys. 21, 740 (2025)

2025

[17] [17]

H. Qin, R. B. Holländer, L. Flajšman, F. Hermann, R. Dreyer, et al., Nanoscale magnonic Fabry -Pérot resonator for low-loss spin-wave manipulation, Nat. Commun. 12, 2293 (2021)

2021

[18] [18]

Wintz, V

S. Wintz, V. Tiberkevich, M. Weigand, J. Raabe, J. Lindner, et al. Magnetic vortex cores as tunable spin- wave emitters. Nat. Nano., 11, 948-953 (2016)

2016

[19] [19]

Q. Wang, A. Chumak, & P. Pirro, Inverse-design magnonic devices, Nat. Commun. 12, 2636 (2021)

2021

[20] [20]

Zenbaa, F

N. Zenbaa, F. Majcen, C. Abert, F. Bruckner, N. J. Mauser, et al., Realization of inverse-design magnonic logic gates, Sci. Adv. 11, eadu9032 (2025)

2025

[21] [21]

Á. Papp, W. Porod, & G. Csaba, Nanoscale neural network using non-linear spin-wave interference, Nat. Commun. 12, 6422 (2021)

2021

[22] [22]

Körber, C

L. Körber, C. Heins, T. Hula, J. -V. Kim, S. Thlang, H. Schultheiss, J. Fassbender, & K. Schultheiss, Pattern recognition in reciprocal space with a magnon-scattering reservoir, Nat. Commun. 14, 3954 (2023)

2023

[23] [23]

Breitbach, M

D. Breitbach, M. Bechberger, H. Mortada, B. Heinz, R. Verba, et al., All -magnonic neurons for analog artificial neural networks, arXiv:2509.18321 (2025)

arXiv 2025

[24] [24]

K. G. Fripp, A. V. Shytov, & V. V. Kruglyak, Resonant nanoscale magnonic neurons, Appl. Phys. Lett. 128, 212402 (2026)

2026

[25] [25]

K. -S. Lee & S. -K. Kim Conceptual design of spin wave logic gates based on a Mach-Zehnder-type spin wave interferometer for universal logic functions, J. Appl. Phys. 104, 053909 (2008)

2008

[26] [26]

Balynsky, D

M. Balynsky, D. Gutierrez, H. Chiang, A. Kozhevnikov, D. Dudko et al., A Magnetometer Based on a Spin Wave Interferometer, Sci. Rep. 7, 11539 (2017)

2017

[27] [27]

Schneider, A

T. Schneider, A. A. Serga, B. Leven, B. Hillebrands, R. L. Stamps, & M. P. Kostylev, Realization of spin- wave logic gates, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 022505 (2008)

2008

[28] [28]

A. V. Chumak, A. A. Serga, & B. Hillebrands, Magnon transistor for all -magnon data processing, Nat. Commun. 5, 4700 (2014)

2014

[29] [29]

Talmelli, T

G. Talmelli, T. Devolder, N, Träger, J. Förster, S. Wintz, et al., Reconfigurable submicrometer spin-wave majority gate with electrical transducers, Sci. Adv. 6, eabb4042 (2020)

2020

[30] [30]

Fischer, M

T. Fischer, M. Kewenig, D. A. Bozhko, A. A. Serga, I. I. Syvorotka, et al., Experimental prototype of a spin-wave majority gate, Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 152401 (2017). 16

2017

[31] [31]

Merbouche, B

H. Merbouche, B. Divinskiy, D. Gouéré, R. Lebrun, A. E. Kanj, et al. True amplification of spin waves in magnonic nano-waveguides, Nat. Commun. 15, 1560 (2024)

2024

[32] [32]

Verba, M

R. Verba, M. Carpentieri, G. Finocchio, V. Tiberkevich, & A. Slavin, Amplification and stabilization of large-amplitude propagating spin waves by parametric pumping. Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 042402 (2018)

2018

[33] [33]

Brächer, F

T. Brächer, F. Heussner, P. Pirro, T. Fischer, M. Geilen, et al., Time - and power-dependent operation of a parametric spin-wave amplifier. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 232409 (2014)

2014

[34] [34]

Q. Wang, R. Verba, K. Davídková, B. Heinz, S. Tian, et al., All-magnonic repeater based on bistability. Nat. Commun. 15, 7577 (2024)

2024

[35] [35]

X. Xu, G. Ren, T. Feleppa, T. Feleppa, X. Liu, et al., Self-calibrating programmable photonic integrated circuits, Nat. Photon. 16, 595-602 (2022)

2022

[36] [36]

Pérez-López, A

D. Pérez-López, A. López, P. DasMahapatra, & J. Capmany , Multipurpose self -configuration of programmable photonic circuits. Nat. Commun. 11, 6359 (2020)

2020

[37] [37]

C. Dubs, O. Surzhenko, R. Linke, A. Danllewsky, U. Brückner & J. Dellith, Sub-micrometer yttrium iron garnet LPE films with low ferromagnetic resonance losses, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 50, 204005 (2017)

2017

[38] [38]

C. Dubs, O. Surzhenko, R. Thomas, J. Osten, T. Schneider, et al., Low damping and microstructural perfection of sub -40nm-thin yttrium iron garnet films grown by liquid phase epitaxy. Phys. Rev. Materials 4, 024426 (2020)

2020

[39] [39]

Y. Li, V. V. Naletov, O. Klein, J. L. Prieto, M. Muñoz et al., Nutation Spectroscopy of a Nanomagnet Driven into Deeply Nonlinear Ferromagnetic Resonance. Phys. Rev. X 9, 041036 (2019)

2019

[40] [40]

Q. Wang, R. Verba, B. Heinz, M. Schneider, O. Wojewoda, et al. Deeply nonlinear excitation of self - normalized short spin waves, Sci. Adv. 9, eadg4609 (2023)

2023

[41] [41]

Y. Wang, G. Zhang, D. Zhang, T. Li, C. -M Hu, et al., Bistability of Cavity Magnon Polaritons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 057202 (2018)

2018

[42] [42]

R. Shen, J. Li, Z. Fan, Y. Wang, & J. Q. You, Mechanical Bistability in Kerr -modified Cavity Magnomechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 123601 (2022)

2022

[43] [43]

Vanderveken, V

F. Vanderveken, V. Tyberkevych, G. Talmelli, B. Sorée1, F. Ciubotaru, & C. Adelmann, Lumped circuit model for inductive antenna spin-wave transducers, Sci. Rep. 12, 3796 (2022)

2022

[44] [44]

Sushruth, M

M. Sushruth, M. Grassi, K. Ait-Oukaci, D. Stoeffler, Y. Henry, et al., Electrical spectroscopy of forward volume spin waves in perpendicularly magnetized materials, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043203 (2020)

2020

[45] [45]

Y. Wang, M. Guo, K. Davídková, R. Verba, X. Guo, et al., Fast switchable unidirectional forward volume spin wave emitter, Phy. Rev. Appl. 23, 014066 (2025)

2025

[46] [46]

Sebastian, K

T. Sebastian, K. Schultheiss, B. Obry, B. Hillebrands, & H. Schultheiss, Micro -focused Brillouin light scattering: imaging spin waves at the nanoscale. Front. Phys. 3, 55 (2015)

2015

[47] [47]

Wang, Non-volatile magnonic logic circuits engineering

Alexander Khitun & Kang L. Wang, Non-volatile magnonic logic circuits engineering. J. Appl. Phys. 110 034306 (2011)

2011

[48] [48]

Heinz, T

B. Heinz, T. Brächer, M. Schneider, Q. Wang, B. Lägel, et al. Propagation of spin -wave packets in individual nanosized yttrium iron garnet magnonic conduits. Nano Lett. 12, 4220 (2020)

2020

[49] [49]

Spin + X

A. Vansteenkiste, J. Leliaert, M. Dvornik, M. Helsen, F. Garcia -Sanchez, et al. The design and verification of MuMax3. AIP Adv. 4, 107133 (2014). 17 Acknowledgements This work was supported from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2023YFA1406600) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12574118). ...

work page doi:10.55776/pin1434524 2014