Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 8 minor 59 references

Quantum Geometric Origin of Strain-Induced Ferroelectric Phase Transitions

T0 review · 4 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that strain-induced ferroelectric phase transitions are driven by a sign flip of the electron-phonon Berry curvature in a nearly degenerate electronic subsystem, which reverses the quantum part of the interatomic force…

desk verdict A plausible and potentially useful reformulation of the soft-phonon mechanism in terms of EPC Berry curvature, but the central strain-insensitivity assumption for the classical force terms is asserted, not shown; the BiOCl validation is suggestive, not conclusive. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.01463 v2 pith:REQMFXGB submitted 2025-02-03 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Jiaming Hu , Ziye Zhu , Yubo Yuan , Wenbin Li , Hua Wang , Kai Chang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords ferroelectricityelectron-phononcouplingBerrycurvaturequantumgeometrystrain-inducedphasetransitionsoftphonondensity-functionalperturbationtheoryBiOClmonolayer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that strain-induced ferroelectric phase transitions have a quantum-geometric origin: an external strain can invert the orbital energy ordering of a nearly degenerate electronic subsystem, which reverses the sign of a Berry curvature attached to electron-phonon coupling, turning a phonon's restoring force negative and driving the mode soft. The claim is derived within density-functional perturbation theory, where the quantum part of the interatomic force matrix is expressed as an integral over the imaginary part of an electron-phonon coupling (EPC) quantum geometric tensor, $G^{s}_{mn}=\langle\partial_s m|n\rangle\langle n|\nabla_{\mathbf{k}}m\rangle$. The paper then shows the mechanism operating in the BiOCl monolayer, where biaxial tensile strain above about 2.6 percent softens an $E_u$ phonon mode exactly as band inversion of oxygen $p$ states flips the curvature, and it reports the same signature in seven further materials. A sympathetic reader would care because the mechanism unifies the soft-phonon and (pseudo) Jahn-Teller pictures into a single computable, strain-tunable microscopic quantity.

What carries the argument

The central object is the EPC quantum geometric tensor $G^{s}_{mn}=\langle\partial_s m|n\rangle\langle n|\nabla_{\mathbf{k}}m\rangle$, defined in the hybrid Hilbert space parameterized by the displacement of phonon mode $s$ and the electronic wavevector $\mathbf{k}$; its imaginary part, the EPC Berry curvature $\mathrm{Im}[G^{s}_{mn}]$, is a Berry magnetic field in that space. The derivation reduces the quantum term $C^{s}|1$ of the interatomic force matrix to an integral of $\gamma^{s}_{nm}\ \mathrm{Im}[G^{s}_{mn}]$ (its Eq. 6), so the sign and magnitude of the curvature directly set the sign of the phonon restoring force. The argument turns on two properties of this curvature in a nearly degenerate two-band subsystem: it diverges as the gap closes, making it the dominant contribution to $C^{s}|1$, and it flips sign when the orbital energy difference $h_z$ is inverted by strain.

What would settle it

A direct DFPT decomposition of the force-constant matrix of BiOCl into the quantum term $C^{s}|1$ and the classical terms $C^{s}|2,3$, computed as a function of biaxial strain across the critical value of about 2.6 percent, would settle the claim: if the classical terms shift appreciably or change sign while the $E_u$ mode softens, the proposed mechanism fails, whereas if they stay flat and only $C^{s}|1$ crosses zero, the mechanism is supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the contribution $C^{s}|1$ of the perturbed electron density to the interatomic force matrix of a phonon mode $s$ is controlled by the EPC Berry curvature $\mathrm{Im}[G^{s}_{mn}]$, the imaginary part of the geometric tensor $G^{s}_{mn}=\langle\partial_s m|n\rangle\langle n|\nabla_{\mathbf{k}}m\rangle$ built from the derivative with respect to the phonon displacement and the $\mathbf{k}$-space Berry connection. Because this curvature diverges near quasi-degenerate band points and its polarity is tied to the orbital energy difference $h_z$, a symmetry-preserving regulation such as strain that inverts the band ordering sends $C^{s}|1$ to $-C^{s}|1$ while the classical ionic terms $C^{s}|2,3$ stay essentially fixed, so the total force constant can cross zero and the phonon frequency becomes imaginary. The paper demonstrates the reversal in a two-orbital Pauli model, reproduces the DFT-computed $E_u$ soft-mode energy of the BiOCl monolayer as a function of strain with a three-band tight-binding model, and reports the same band-inversion-plus-curvature-reversal signature in BiOBr, BiOI, Bi2O2Se, BiCuOSe, Bi3O4Br, PbClF, and PbO.

Load-bearing premise

The argument's load-bearing premise is that the classical, purely ionic contributions to the interatomic force constants stay essentially unchanged when strain is applied while the crystal's mirror symmetry is preserved, so the sign flip of the quantum-geometric term $C^{s}|1$ is not cancelled or overwhelmed by a strain-driven shift in $C^{s}|2,3$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Strain engineering of ferroelectricity reduces to tuning band inversion in specific FE-inducing electronic subsystems, so fully occupied valence bands can drive the transition without closing the global band gap.
  • The mechanism gives a microscopic reading of the (pseudo) Jahn-Teller effect as the singular behavior of EPC quantum geometry, since both require near-degenerate states coupled to a phonon.
  • The soft mode that appears at the transition breaks inversion or mirror symmetry, and the resulting polarization carries the same symmetry representation as the unstable mode, identifying the transition as ferroelectric.
  • Because the EPC Berry curvature is detectable through phonon-mediated optical responses, the predicted softening should appear as a strain-dependent optical signature, not only as a calculated phonon frequency.
  • The same band-inversion-plus-curvature-reversal condition should govern strain-induced ferroelectric transitions in any material with a quasi-degenerate subsystem, consistent with the paper's DFT results for BiOBr, BiOI, Bi2O2Se, BiCuOSe, Bi3O4Br, PbClF, and PbO.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the polarity-reversal mechanism is as generic as the paper suggests, candidate strain-tunable ferroelectrics could be screened by computing orbital energy differences and EPC Berry curvature at high-symmetry points alone, without full phonon calculations.
  • A testable extension the paper leaves implicit: transiently flipping the orbital energy difference by photoexcitation should transiently soften the same phonon mode, linking the geometric mechanism to ultrafast, THz-frequency structural switching.
  • Because the quantum force-constant term can be asymmetric under exchange of spatial directions, materials with the same band-inversion signature but lower lattice symmetry may show a strain-induced chirality or rotational character in the softened mode, an extrapolation beyond the mirror-symmetric cases treated here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 8 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a quantum-geometric mechanism for strain-induced ferroelectric phase transitions. Within density-functional perturbation theory, the authors rewrite the electronic part of the interatomic force matrix, C^{ab}_{ij}|1, in terms of a force-gradient factor γ^s_nm and the imaginary part of an electron-phonon-coupling (EPC) quantum geometric tensor G^s_mn = ⟨∂_s m|n⟩⟨n|∇_k m⟩, which is the central result, Eq. (6). They argue that external strain that inverts the orbital energy difference of a quasi-degenerate electronic subsystem reverses the sign of Im[G^s_mn], flipping C^s|1 from positive to negative; because the classical terms C^s|2,3 are asserted to be essentially strain-insensitive, the total force constant C^s crosses zero and the Γ-point phonon softens. The mechanism is illustrated with a two-band Bloch-sphere model, tested on the BiOCl monolayer through a three-band tight-binding model fitted to the DFT band structure, interpreted through the bonding/anti-bonding phase of the FE-inducing wavefunction, and claimed to extend to seven additional materials.

Significance. If the central claim survives scrutiny, the paper makes a substantial contribution: it supplies a concrete microscopic quantity—the sign of the EPC Berry curvature, Im[G^s_mn]—that controls phonon softening and thereby connects soft-phonon theory, the (pseudo) Jahn-Teller effect, and quantum geometry, with a testable prediction that band inversion reverses this sign at the critical strain. The formal rewriting of the DFPT force matrix into Eq. (6), the analytic two-band argument, and the wavefunction interpretation in Fig. 2 are genuine strengths, and the multi-material survey in the supplement, if fully documented, would support generality. The model analysis is analytic and falsifiable rather than a post-hoc fit of the final result. However, the significance is conditional: the bridge from 'C^s|1 flips sign' to 'C^s becomes negative' rests on an undemonstrated assertion about C^s|2,3, and the BiOCl validation is partly a re-statement of fitted data. These gaps are closable within the scope of the manuscript, but until they are closed the main claim is not fully established.

major comments (4)
  1. [After Eq. (1); 'Geometric aspect' section] The load-bearing assumption that the classical terms C^s|2,3 are strain-insensitive is asserted but never demonstrated. After Eq. (1) the text states that these terms 'are basically not supposed to have polarity-reversal variation induced by regulations that conserve the mirror symmetry of crystal lattice,' and the Geometric aspect section repeats that they 'typically do not undergo sharp transitions [22,45,47,51].' The assertion is deferred to Sec. II of the supplement, but the main text presents it as the pivot of the mechanism without any quantitative support. No numerical decomposition of Eq. (1) into its three terms, or of C^s into C^s|1 and C^s|2,3, is presented anywhere in the main text; this decomposition is precisely what is needed to establish that the computed sign flip of Im[G^s_mn] actually controls the total force constant. Strain that produces band inversion also changes the ground-state density n(r) (through the altering orbital weights), the orbital overlaps, the effective charges, and the ionic sublattice response, and any of these can shift C^s|2,3 by an amount comparable to the expected C^s|1 change. The paper should report, for BiOCl, the strain dependence of C^s|1 and C^s|2,3 separately—for example by direct evaluation of the three terms of Eq. (1) in DFPT, or by comparing the full DFPT force constant with the TB-model C^s|1—so that the mechanism is verified rather than assumed. The cited works [22,45,47,51] concern vibronic coupling and do not quantify the strain dependence of the ionic force constants.
  2. [Eq. (3) and following text] The linearization in Eq. (3) is the step that turns the DFPT response (Eq. (2)) into the geometric form (Eqs. (5)–(6)), but the main text does not establish its small parameter for the systems under study. The justification offered is that for 'localized valence electrons with |ζ_mn − R_j| ≫ η_mn' the ionic potential is smooth and nearly linear near ζ_mn. In the BiOCl application, however, the FE-inducing states are predominantly O 2p orbitals and the soft Eu mode displaces the same oxygen sublattice on which these orbitals are centered; for such on-site matrix elements |ζ_mn − R_j| is of order η_mn, not much larger, and the neglected term o(|(r − ζ_mn)/(ζ_mn − R_j)|^2) is uncontrolled. The derivation referenced to Sec. I of the supplement should state the precise small parameter for the expansion and verify it for the O-2p states used in the BiOCl model; absent that, Eq. (6) cannot be claimed as a general rewriting of the DFPT interatomic force matrix.
  3. ['Geometric aspect' section, after Eq. (10)] The two essential features of the EPC Berry curvature—(i) sign reversal under h_z → −h_z and (ii) divergence at quasi-degenerate points—support the entire general mechanism, yet in the main text they are asserted rather than derived, with the derivation deferred to Sec. IV A of the supplement. This would be acceptable for a short step, but it is not: Im[G^s_mn] depends on ∂_s θ, ∂_s φ, ∇_k θ, and ∇_k φ, and the sign-reversal claim must be checked together with the strain dependence of γ^s_nm, which enters Eq. (6) multiplicatively and is not held fixed by any argument in the text. In addition, the full-occupation case—the one relevant for large-gap semiconductors, feature (iii)—is said to receive its contribution from coupling to 'other unoccupied states |n⟩,' which are never specified; the eigenstates displayed in Eq. (10) only describe the internal |ψ+⟩–|ψ−⟩ transition. The main text should display the key result of the Sec. IV A calculation for both occupation regimes, or the authors should state plainly the auxiliary assumptions under which features (i) and (ii) hold.
  4. ['Application to BiOX'; Fig. 1(c), Fig. S2(a)] The confirmatory BiOCl analysis is partly circular. The three-band tight-binding model is fitted to the DFT band structure and orbital weights (the text states it 'offers a great description to DFT results'), the EPC matrix elements are free parameters, and this same model is then used both to obtain the sign reversal of Im[G] (Fig. 1(c)) and to reproduce the strain dependence of the soft-phonon energy (Fig. S2(a)). Agreement of the model with the DFT data it was fitted to is a consistency check, not an independent test of the proposed mechanism. To close this gap the authors should either (i) compute Im[G^s_mn] directly from first-order DFPT or from the DFT wavefunctions without a fitted model, or (ii) predict the critical strain using parameters fixed at zero strain, or (iii) apply the sign-flip criterion to a material whose bands were not used in any fitting. As written, the application demonstrates that a fitted TB model is consistent with the mechanism, which is weaker than the claimed verification.
minor comments (8)
  1. [Eq. (2)] The second line of Eq. (2) introduces f_mn without defining it; specify f_mn = f_m − f_n and state explicitly that the replacement is valid for gapped systems.
  2. ['Application to BiOX'; Eq. (11)] The meaning of the subscript ∥ in 'Eu phonon mode (denoted by index ∥)' and of the ∥/⊥ notation in Eq. (11) is given only in the Fig. 1 caption; define it in the text.
  3. [After Eq. (1)] The word 'regulations' is used several times (after Eq. (1), in the Geometric aspect section, and in the conclusions) where 'external perturbations' or 'tuning parameters' is meant; also 'regulations that conserve the mirror symmetry' should read 'perturbations that preserve the mirror symmetry.'
  4. [Eq. (9)] Please check the prefactor in Eq. (9): with p^s_mn = −e Q̄_s Im[G^s_mn] and E^s_nm = Q̄_s γ^s_mn/e, the right-hand side equals ½∫[dk] Σ_mn f_m γ^s_nm Im[G^s_mn] Q̄_s^2, whereas ½ C^s|1 Q̄_s^2 from Eq. (6) equals ∫[dk] Σ_mn f_m γ^s_nm Im[G^s_mn] Q̄_s^2; the two differ by a factor of two unless the summation convention differs.
  5. [Conclusions] The concluding claim that the theory 'provides a quantum geometric interpretation of the (pseudo) Jahn-Teller effect' is not substantiated in the main text; the two-state subsystem coupled to a vibration is structurally identical to the standard pseudo-JT model, and the authors should either show what is gained relative to that framework or cite the specific derivation.
  6. [Eq. (8)] Eq. (8) is presented as a 'fundamental relation' taken from the unpublished preprint [41]; since the interpretation of the divergence at quasi-degeneracy rests on the 1/ε_mn^2 structure, its derivation should be given in the supplement rather than relying on a non-peer-reviewed reference.
  7. ['Application to BiOX'] The claimed extension to 'a broad range of materials' (BiOBr, BiOI, Bi2O2Se, BiCuOSe, Bi3O4Br, PbClF, PbO) is confined to Sec. VI of the supplement; the main text should at least show the critical-strain table or a representative case, otherwise the generality claim is unverifiable from the Letter itself.
  8. [References] Some references are incomplete: [15] ('Arxiv-Cond-Mat.supr-Con (2018)') and [18] ('Physical Review Letter') contain errors, and [34] and [40] lack page numbers; also, the supplemental material [45] is cited without a DOI or repository link.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; central mechanism is derived analytically, and the BiOCl model is a consistency check rather than a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The derivation chain from DFPT to Eq. 6 is self-contained: Eq. 2 follows from the standard definition of the interatomic force matrix, Eq. 3 uses a local approximation for the ionic potential gradient, and Eq. 6 projects onto a phonon eigenvector. The subsequent two-orbital analysis (Eq. 10 and following) is analytic and parameter-free at the level of the mechanism; the polarity reversal of Im[G^s_mn] under h_z -> -h_z is a derived property of the Bloch-sphere eigenstates, not an input fitted to the target phonon softening. The BiOCl three-band tight-binding model is fit to DFT band structures and orbital weights, but the phonon-energy agreement (Fig. S2(a)) is presented as a separate comparison; fitting electronic bands does not by itself force the strain dependence of the soft-phonon energy, and the main text gives no evidence that phonon frequencies are fit parameters. The assertion that the classical terms C^s|2,3 do not vary sharply (stated after Eq. 1 and repeated in the Geometric aspect section, quoting 'C s|2,3 are ... which typically do not undergo sharp transitions [22, 45, 47, 51] under symmetry-preserving regulations') is an unproven assumption and therefore a correctness risk, not a circular step. The only self-citation of note is Eq. 8, which relates G^s_mn to the EPC matrix element via ref. [41]; this relation is ancillary to the central derivation of C^s|1 and is not load-bearing for the soft-phonon mechanism. No step in the claimed derivation reduces by construction to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, dimensions, or conserved quantities are introduced. The EPC Berry curvature tensor G^s_mn is a composite object defined from existing Bloch states, phonon eigenvectors, and the Berry connection, so it is a mathematical descriptor rather than an invented physical entity. The central claim rests on one fitted TB model and three domain assumptions about locality, smoothness of classical terms, and two-band dominance.

free parameters (1)
  • Three-band tight-binding model parameters for BiOCl (on-site orbital energies, hoppings, EPC matrix elements) = Not given in main text; deferred to supplemental
    Fitted to DFT band structures, orbital weights, and possibly EPC matrix elements. The strain-dependent sign change of m = ε_pz - ε_pxy is read from DFT, making the later prediction of phonon softening a consistency check rather than an independent test.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The interband matrix element of the ionic potential derivative can be linearized as <n|∂_j V_ext|m> = γ·r_nm, with γ constant near the state localization center (Eq.3).
    This step connects the DFPT force matrix to the Berry connection r_nm. Its validity depends on the Wannier functions being sufficiently localized; the bound o(|r-ζ|^2) is stated but not derived in the main text.
  • domain assumption The classical contributions C^ab_ij|2,3 to the IFM vary smoothly and never reverse sign under symmetry-preserving strain.
    Asserted after Eq.1 and used to conclude that a sign flip in the quantum term C^s|1 drives the total C^s negative. No proof or numerical test is provided in the main text.
  • domain assumption The FE-inducing electronic subsystem is weakly entangled with the rest and can be represented by the two-band Hamiltonian H = ϵ0 + σ·h.
    This is the model on which the polarity-reversal argument rests; for BiOCl it is justified by COHP and band character analysis, but for the general mechanism it is an assumption that a single quasi-degenerate two-band subspace controls the IFM.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum Geometric Origin of Strain-Induced Ferroelectric Phase Transitions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/REQMFXGB

@misc{pith2026250201463,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum Geometric Origin of Strain-Induced Ferroelectric Phase Transitions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/REQMFXGB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.01463}
}
read the original abstract

Strain-regulated ferroelectric (FE) materials have long attracted significant attention due to their diverse applications. While soft-phonon theory and the (pseudo) Jahn-Teller effect have achieved considerable success in providing phenomenological descriptions and general understanding, the detailed connection between these perspectives and their microscopic dependence on strain regulation remains unclear. Here, under the framework of density-functional perturbation theory (DFPT), we demonstrate that the Berry curvature of electron-phonon coupling (EPC) plays a pivotal role in the interatomic force matrix (IFM). A subsequent model analysis shows that external strain can reverse the polarity of the EPC Berry curvature in (quasi)-degenerate electronic subsystems through band inversion, thereby directly leading to phonon softening. The general theory is then applied to the BiOCl monolayer as a benchmark, which offers an accurate description of the density functional theory (DFT) calculations. This mechanism is further observed across a broad range of materials through ab initio calculations, providing an insightful perspective on EPC quantum geometry in lattice dynamics and FE phase transitions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.01463 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. , when m > 0 (or m < 0), the phase of |ψd⟩ either mismatches (or matches) with the phase of the nearest￾neighboring electrons, which results in an anti-bonding (or bonding) response to the ionic displacement, thus fa￾voring (or disfavoring) the polar phase energetically. FIG. 2. Wavefunction interpretation of FE phase in￾stability in BiOCl. (a) DFT-calculated wavefunction of the pxy-dominated branch in FE-inducing s… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    L. W. Martin and A. M. Rappe, Thin-film ferroelectric materials and their applications, Nature Reviews Mate- rials 2, 1 (2016)

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    X.-K. Wei, N. Domingo, Y. Sun, N. Balke, R. E. Dunin- Borkowski, and J. Mayer, Progress on emerging ferroelec- tric materials for energy harvesting, storage and conver- sion, Advanced Energy Materials 12, 2201199 (2022)

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    X. Han, Y. Ji, and Y. Yang, Ferroelectric photovoltaic materials and devices, Advanced Functional Materials 32, 2109625 (2022)

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Setter, D

    N. Setter, D. Damjanovic, L. Eng, G. Fox, S. Gevorgian, S. Hong, A. Kingon, H. Kohlstedt, N. Y. Park, G. B. Stephenson, et al., Ferroelectric thin films: review of ma- terials, properties, and applications, Journal of Applied Physics 100 (2006)

    work page 2006

  5. [5]

    S. I. Shkuratov and C. S. Lynch, A review of ferroelectric materials for high power devices, Journal of Materiomics 8, 739 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Bl´ azquez-Castro, A

    A. Bl´ azquez-Castro, A. Garc ´ ıa-Caba˜ nes, and M. Car- rascosa, Biological applications of ferroelectric materials, Applied Physics Reviews 5 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Z. Zhu, J. Hu, Y. Yuan, H. Wang, X. Lin, and W. Li, Highly polarizable semiconductors and universal origin of ferroelectricity in materials with a litharge-type struc- tural unit (2024), arXiv:2412.11577 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    work page arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Pesquera, E

    D. Pesquera, E. Parsonnet, A. Qualls, R. Xu, A. J. Gubser, J. Kim, Y. Jiang, G. Velarde, Y.-L. Huang, H. Y. Hwang, et al., Beyond substrates: strain engineer- ing of ferroelectric membranes, Advanced Materials 32, 2003780 (2020)

    work page 2020

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    T. Xu, X. Wang, J. Mai, J. Zhang, J. Wang, and T.-Y. Zhang, Strain engineering for 2D ferroelectricity in lead chalcogenides, Advanced Electronic Materials 6, 1900932 (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    S. S. Behara and A. Van der Ven, Ferroelectric HfO2 and the importance of strain, Physical Review Materials 6, 054403 (2022)

    2022

  3. [11]

    D. G. Schlom, L.-Q. Chen, C.-B. Eom, K. M. Rabe, S. K. Streiffer, and J.-M. Triscone, Strain tuning of ferroelec- tric thin films, Annual Review of Materials Research, Vol 41 37, 589 (2007)

    2007

  4. [12]

    Ederer and N

    C. Ederer and N. A. Spaldin, Effect of epitaxial strain on the spontaneous polarization of thin film ferroelectrics, Physical Review Letters 95, 257601 (2005)

    2005

  5. [13]

    Shirane, R

    G. Shirane, R. Nathans, and V. J. Minkiewicz, Tempera- ture dependence of the soft ferroelectric mode in KTaO3, Physical Review (1967)

    1967

  6. [14]

    Pytte, Theory of perovskite ferroelectrics, Physical Review B (1972)

    E. Pytte, Theory of perovskite ferroelectrics, Physical Review B (1972)

    1972

  7. [15]

    S. E. Rowley, C. Enderlein, J. F. de Oliveira, D. A. Tompsett, E. B. Saitovitch, S. S. Saxena, and G. G. Lon- zarich, Superconductivity in the vicinity of a ferroelec- tric quantum phase transition, Arxiv-Cond-Mat.supr- Con (2018)

    2018

  8. [16]

    Misra, K

    M. Misra, K. Kotani, I. Kawayama, H. Murakami, and M. Tonouchi, Observation of TO1 soft mode in SrTiO 3 films by terahertz time domain spectroscopy, Applied Physics Letters (2005)

    2005

  9. [17]

    N. S. Gillis, Soft phonon mode in SnTe, Physical Review Letter 22, 1251 (1969)

    1969

  10. [18]

    Weber, S

    F. Weber, S. Rosenkranz, J.-P. Castellan, R. Osborn, G. Karapetrov, R. Hott, R. Heid, K.-P. Bohnen, and A. Alatas, Electron-phonon coupling and the soft phonon mode in tise 2, Physical Review Letter 107, 266401 (2011)

    2011

  11. [19]

    Roedhammer, W

    P. Roedhammer, W. Reichardt, and F. Holtzberg, Soft- mode behavior in the phonon dispersion of YS, Physical Review Letter 40, 465 (1978)

    1978

  12. [20]

    Uwe and T

    H. Uwe and T. Sakudo, Stress-induced ferroelectricity and soft phonon modes in SrTiO 3, Physical Review B 13, 271 (1976)

    1976

  13. [21]

    I. B. Bersuker, Jahn–Teller and Pseudo-Jahn–Teller ef- fects: from particular features to general tools in explor- ing molecular and solid state properties, Chemical Re- views 121, 1463 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    Bersuker, The Jahn-Teller effect and vibronic interac- tions in modern chemistry (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

    I. Bersuker, The Jahn-Teller effect and vibronic interac- tions in modern chemistry (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

    2013

  15. [23]

    Kristoffel and P

    N. Kristoffel and P. Konsin, Electron-phonon interac- tion, microscopic mechanism and properties of ferroelec- tric phase transitions, Ferroelectrics 6, 3 (1973)

    1973

  16. [24]

    Ahn, G.-Y

    J. Ahn, G.-Y. Guo, N. Nagaosa, and A. Vishwanath, Rie- mannian geometry of resonant optical responses, Nature Physics 18, 290 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Reviews of Modern Physics 82, 1959 (2010)

    2010

  18. [26]

    Nagaosa, J

    N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A. H. MacDonald, and N. P. Ong, Anomalous Hall effect, Reviews of Modern Physics 82, 1539 (2010)

    2010

  19. [27]

    Sundaram and Q

    G. Sundaram and Q. Niu, Wave-packet dynamics in slowly perturbed crystals: gradient corrections and Berry-phase effects, Physical Review B 59, 14915 (1999)

    1999

  20. [28]

    Resta, The insulating state of matter: a geometrical theory, The European Physical Journal B79, 121 (2011)

    R. Resta, The insulating state of matter: a geometrical theory, The European Physical Journal B79, 121 (2011)

    2011

  21. [29]

    D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs, Quantized Hall conductance in a two- dimensional periodic potential, Physical Review Letters 49, 405 (1982)

    1982

  22. [30]

    Sodemann and L

    I. Sodemann and L. Fu, Quantum nonlinear Hall effect induced by Berry curvature dipole in time-reversal in- variant materials, Physical Review Letters 115, 216806 (2015)

    2015

  23. [31]

    Citro and M

    R. Citro and M. Aidelsburger, Thouless pumping and topology, Nature Reviews Physics 5, 87 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    H. Wang, X. Tang, H. Xu, J. Li, and X. Qian, Gen- eralized Wilson loop method for nonlinear light-matter 6 interaction, Npj Quantum Materials 7, 61 (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    Ahn, G.-Y

    J. Ahn, G.-Y. Guo, and N. Nagaosa, Low-frequency di- vergence and quantum geometry of the bulk photovoltaic effect in topological semimetals, Physical Review X 10, 041041 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    J. Gu, Y. Mou, J. Ma, H. Chen, C. Zhang, Y. Wang, J. Wang, H. Guo, W. Shi, X. Yuan, et al. , Discov- ery of acousto-drag photovoltaic effect, Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:2312.15939 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Morimoto and N

    T. Morimoto and N. Nagaosa, Topological nature of nonlinear optical effects in solids, Science Advances 2, e1501524 (2016)

    2016

  28. [36]

    Morimoto, S

    T. Morimoto, S. Zhong, J. Orenstein, and J. E. Moore, Semiclassical theory of nonlinear magneto-optical re- sponses with applications to topological Dirac/Weyl semimetals, Physical Review B 94, 245121 (2016)

    2016

  29. [37]

    Bhalla, K

    P. Bhalla, K. Das, D. Culcer, and A. Agarwal, Resonant second-harmonic generation as a probe of quantum ge- ometry, Physical Review Letters 129, 227401 (2022)

    2022

  30. [38]

    J. Im, C. H. Kim, and H. Jin, Ferroelectricity-driven phonon Berry curvature and nonlinear phonon Hall transports, Nano Letters 22, 8281 (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    Saparov, B

    D. Saparov, B. Xiong, Y. Ren, and Q. Niu, Lattice dy- namics with molecular Berry curvature: chiral optical phonons, Physical Review B 105, 064303 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    J. Yu, C. J. Ciccarino, R. Bianco, I. Errea, P. Narang, and B. A. Bernevig, Non-trivial quantum geometry and the strength of electron–phonon coupling, Nature Physics , 1 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    J. Hu, W. Li, H. Wang, and K. Chang, Phonon- mediated nonlinear optical responses and quantum ge- ometry (2024), arXiv:2410.09677 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Onoda, S

    S. Onoda, S. Murakami, and N. Nagaosa, Topological na- ture of polarization and charge pumping in ferroelectrics, Physical Review Letters 93, 167602 (2004)

    2004

  35. [43]

    S. Liu, Y. Kim, L. Z. Tan, and A. M. Rappe, Strain- induced ferroelectric topological insulator, Nano Letters 16, 1663 (2016)

    2016

  36. [44]

    Baroni, S

    S. Baroni, S. de Gironcoli, A. Dal Corso, and P. Gi- annozzi, Phonons and related crystal properties from density-functional perturbation theory, Reviews of Mod- ern Physics 73, 515 (2001)

    2001

  37. [45]

    Supplemental information about derivation and calcula- tion details

  38. [46]

    Y. Gao, S. A. Yang, and Q. Niu, Field induced positional shift of Bloch electrons and its dynamical implications, Physical Review Letters 112, 166601 (2014)

    2014

  39. [47]

    P. Chen, H. J. Zhao, S. Prosandeev, S. Artyukhin, and L. Bellaiche, Microscopic origin of the electric Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction, Physical Review B 106, 224101 (2022)

    2022

  40. [48]

    Calandra, G

    M. Calandra, G. Profeta, and F. Mauri, Adiabatic and nonadiabatic phonon dispersion in a Wannier function approach, Physical Review B 82, 165111 (2010)

    2010

  41. [49]

    Souza, N

    I. Souza, N. Marzari, and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally lo- calized Wannier functions for entangled energy bands, Physical Review B 65, 035109 (2001)

    2001

  42. [50]

    Giustino, M

    F. Giustino, M. L. Cohen, and S. G. Louie, Electron- phonon interaction using Wannier functions, Physical Re- view B 76, 165108 (2007)

    2007

  43. [51]

    Polinger, P

    V. Polinger, P. Garcia-Fernandez, and I. B. Bersuker, Pseudo Jahn–Teller origin of ferroelectric instability in BaTiO3 type perovskites: the Green’s function approach and beyond, Physica B: Condensed Matter 457, 296 (2015)

    2015

  44. [52]

    H. Li, J. Li, Z. Ai, F. Jia, and L. Zhang, Oxygen vacancy- mediated photocatalysis of BiOCl: reactivity, selectivity, and perspectives, Angewandte Chemie International Edi- tion 57, 122 (2018)

    2018

  45. [53]

    Zhang, C.-M

    K.-L. Zhang, C.-M. Liu, F.-Q. Huang, C. Zheng, and W.-D. Wang, Study of the electronic structure and pho- tocatalytic activity of the BiOCl photocatalyst, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 68, 125 (2006)

    2006

  46. [54]

    Cheng, B

    H. Cheng, B. Huang, and Y. Dai, Engineering BiOX (X= Cl, Br, I) nanostructures for highly efficient photocat- alytic applications, Nanoscale 6, 2009 (2014)

    2014

  47. [55]

    Hussain, J

    A. Hussain, J. Hou, M. Tahir, S. S. Ali, Z. U. Rehman, M. Bilal, T. Zhang, Q. Dou, and X. Wang, Recent ad- vances in BiOX-based photocatalysts to enhanced effi- ciency for energy and environment applications, Cataly- sis Reviews 66, 119 (2024)

    2024

  48. [56]

    I. B. Bersuker, Pseudo Jahn–Teller effect: a two-state paradigm in formation, deformation, and transformation of molecular systems and solids, Chemical Reviews 113, 1351 (2013)

    2013

  49. [57]

    G. Song, B. Gao, G. Li, and J. Zhang, First-principles study on the electric structure and ferroelectricity in epi- taxial CsSnI3 films, Rsc Advances 7, 41077 (2017)

    2017

  50. [58]

    Z. Gong, Y. Xun, Z. Qian, K. Chang, J. Qi, and H. Wang, One-dimensional multiferroic semiconductor WOi 3: un- conventional anisotropic d1 rule and bulk photovoltaic effect, Physical Review B 110, 094408 (2024)

    2024

  51. [59]

    Chadov, X

    S. Chadov, X. Qi, J. K¨ ubler, G. H. Fecher, C. Felser, and S. C. Zhang, Tunable multifunctional topological insula- tors in ternary heusler compounds, Nature Materials 9, 541 (2010)

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.