REVIEW 2 cited by
High-dimensional Asymptotics of VAEs: Threshold of Posterior Collapse and Dataset-Size Dependence of Rate-Distortion Curve
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In variational autoencoders (VAEs), the variational posterior often collapses to the prior, known as posterior collapse, which leads to poor representation learning quality. An adjustable hyperparameter beta has been introduced in VAEs to address this issue. This study sharply evaluates the conditions under which the posterior collapse occurs with respect to beta and dataset size by analyzing a minimal VAE in a high-dimensional limit. Additionally, this setting enables the evaluation of the rate-distortion curve of the VAE. Our results show that, unlike typical regularization parameters, VAEs face "inevitable posterior collapse" beyond a certain beta threshold, regardless of dataset size. Moreover, the dataset-size dependence of the derived rate-distortion curve suggests that relatively large datasets are required to achieve a rate-distortion curve with high rates. These findings robustly explain generalization behavior observed in various real datasets with highly non-linear VAEs.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Generalization in VAE and Diffusion Models: A Unified Information-Theoretic Analysis
The authors derive information-theoretic generalization bounds for VAEs and diffusion models that expose a trade-off in the diffusion time T, and propose using the computable bound to select T and regularize training.
-
Multi-Stage Prompt Inference Attacks on Enterprise LLM Systems
Multi-stage prompt inference attacks against enterprise LLMs are formalized and defenses are proposed, but the preprint gives no reproducible evidence for its central claims.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.