pith. sign in

arxiv: 2502.14296 · v5 · pith:RGERRQACnew · submitted 2025-02-20 · 💻 cs.CY

On the Trustworthiness of Generative Foundation Models: Guideline, Assessment, and Perspective

classification 💻 cs.CY
keywords trustworthinesschallengesgenfmsmodelstrustgenacrossapplicationscritical
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Generative Foundation Models (GenFMs) have emerged as transformative tools. However, their widespread adoption raises critical concerns regarding trustworthiness across dimensions. This paper presents a comprehensive framework to address these challenges through three key contributions. First, we systematically review global AI governance laws and policies from governments and regulatory bodies, as well as industry practices and standards. Based on this analysis, we propose a set of guiding principles for GenFMs, developed through extensive multidisciplinary collaboration that integrates technical, ethical, legal, and societal perspectives. Second, we introduce TrustGen, the first dynamic benchmarking platform designed to evaluate trustworthiness across multiple dimensions and model types, including text-to-image, large language, and vision-language models. TrustGen leverages modular components--metadata curation, test case generation, and contextual variation--to enable adaptive and iterative assessments, overcoming the limitations of static evaluation methods. Using TrustGen, we reveal significant progress in trustworthiness while identifying persistent challenges. Finally, we provide an in-depth discussion of the challenges and future directions for trustworthy GenFMs, which reveals the complex, evolving nature of trustworthiness, highlighting the nuanced trade-offs between utility and trustworthiness, and consideration for various downstream applications, identifying persistent challenges and providing a strategic roadmap for future research. This work establishes a holistic framework for advancing trustworthiness in GenAI, paving the way for safer and more responsible integration of GenFMs into critical applications. To facilitate advancement in the community, we release the toolkit for dynamic evaluation.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Uncertainty Quantification for Distribution-to-Distribution Flow Matching in Scientific Imaging

    cs.LG 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Bayesian Stochastic Flow Matching augments flow models with stochastic diffusion for better generalization and uses Monte Carlo Dropout with antithetic sampling to disentangle uncertainties and detect out-of-distribut...

  2. Guardian-as-an-Advisor: Advancing Next-Generation Guardian Models for Trustworthy LLMs

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Guardian-as-an-Advisor prepends risk labels and explanations from a guardian model to queries, improving LLM safety compliance and reducing over-refusal while adding minimal compute overhead.

  3. Emergent Social Intelligence Risks in Generative Multi-Agent Systems

    cs.MA 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Generative multi-agent systems exhibit emergent collusion and conformity behaviors that cannot be prevented by existing agent-level safeguards.

  4. Towards provable probabilistic safety for scalable embodied AI systems

    eess.SY 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The paper proposes a paradigm of provable probabilistic safety to enable scalable, safe deployment of embodied AI in critical applications.