Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 minor 76 references

Laser-Liquid Interaction in Laser-Induced Forward Transfer (LIFT) Printing: A Multiscale Perspective on Bubble Dynamics and Material Ejection

T0 review · 0 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-27 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The cavitation bubble provides the transient mechanical bridge between optical energy deposition and the hydrodynamic ejection process in LIFT printing.

desk verdict This is a review chapter on LIFT that organizes existing bubble-dynamics literature into a multiscale frame but introduces no new data, derivations, or validation. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.12308 v1 pith:RH5EXVPO submitted 2026-06-10 physics.flu-dyn physics.app-ph

Shuqi Zhou , Abdol Hadi Mokarizadeh , Ben Xu This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.flu-dynphysics.app-ph
keywords LIFTprintingcavitationbubbledynamicslaser-inducedtransferjetformationmaterialejectiondonorlayermultiscalemodeling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review frames laser-induced forward transfer as a nozzle-free printing method where laser energy absorbed in a donor layer produces a cavitation bubble that drives the ejection of functional inks, polymers, and biological materials. The central argument is that bubble dynamics across multiple scales explain how donor architecture, laser settings, and material properties control jet formation, droplet breakup, and deposition. By comparing modeling frameworks for bubble inception and growth, the work shows routes to connect optical absorption to final print outcomes. A reader would care because this perspective offers ways to improve reliability when printing difficult-to-nozzle formulations.

What carries the argument

The cavitation bubble formed in the confined donor layer, acting as the mechanical intermediary that converts absorbed laser energy into hydrodynamic motion and material ejection.

What would settle it

A time-resolved measurement of early bubble pressure or radius evolution that quantitatively matches one inception framework while showing clear mismatch to the others.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The cavitation bubble provides the transient mechanical bridge between optical energy deposition and the hydrodynamic ejection process. This chapter presents LIFT from a multiscale perspective centered on bubble dynamics and material ejection. It first reviews major LIFT donor architectures. Then, it examines how donor ribbon design, absorbing-layer properties, laser parameters, material rheology, control bubble inception/growth, jet formation, droplet breakup, and final deposition. Modeling approaches are discussed as tools for connecting experimental observations across time and length scales.

Load-bearing premise

Comparisons of thermal-only, plasma-mediated, and coupled plasma-thermal-thermoelastic frameworks for early-stage bubble inception can usefully supply initial conditions for downstream jetting models without new quantitative validation data.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a multiscale review of laser-induced forward transfer (LIFT) printing. It positions the cavitation bubble as the transient mechanical bridge between optical energy deposition in a confined donor and the subsequent hydrodynamic ejection process. The text reviews major donor architectures, examines how ribbon design, absorbing-layer properties, laser parameters, and material rheology control bubble inception/growth, jet formation, droplet breakup, and deposition, discusses modeling approaches ranging from reduced-order estimates to interface-resolving simulations, and provides an illustrative comparison of thermal-only, plasma-mediated, and coupled plasma-thermal-thermoelastic frameworks for early-stage bubble inception as example initial conditions for downstream models. It concludes by identifying opportunities for bubble-aware donor design, time-resolved diagnostics, benchmark datasets, and predictive process maps.

Significance. If the synthesis of existing literature holds, the review supplies a coherent organizing framework that connects optical, thermal, plasma, and hydrodynamic scales in LIFT. By centering bubble dynamics, it can help researchers select appropriate inception models for jetting simulations and highlights concrete next steps (benchmark datasets, intermediate observables) that would improve reproducibility across experimental and computational studies in laser-assisted printing and related fluid-dynamics applications.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and introduction refer to the work as both a 'chapter' and a manuscript submitted to a journal; clarify the intended publication format and whether any sections are adapted from prior book-chapter material.
  2. Figure captions and axis labels for any schematic diagrams of donor architectures or bubble-evolution timelines should explicitly state the time and length scales represented so that readers can immediately map them to the multiscale discussion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed summary of the manuscript, positive assessment of its significance, and recommendation for minor revision. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity

full rationale

The manuscript is a review/perspective chapter that surveys existing LIFT donor architectures, rheology effects, and modeling frameworks drawn from external literature. It presents no original derivations, fitted parameters, or predictive equations of its own; the sole illustrative comparison of thermal/plasma/thermoelastic inception models is explicitly framed as a brief example supplying initial conditions for downstream models rather than a new quantitative claim. No self-citation load-bearing steps, self-definitional loops, or renamed empirical patterns appear in the provided text.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper. No new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced by the authors.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Laser-Liquid Interaction in Laser-Induced Forward Transfer (LIFT) Printing: A Multiscale Perspective on Bubble Dynamics and Material Ejection." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RH5EXVPO

@misc{pith2026260612308,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Laser-Liquid Interaction in Laser-Induced Forward Transfer (LIFT) Printing: A Multiscale Perspective on Bubble Dynamics and Material Ejection},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RH5EXVPO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.12308}
}
read the original abstract

Laser-induced forward transfer (LIFT) is a nozzle-free laser-assisted printing method that provides an advanced manufacturing route for spatially selective deposition of functional inks, nanoparticle suspensions, polymers, hydrogels, biological materials, and other difficult-to-nozzle formulations. The apparent simplicity of LIFT, however, conceals a strongly coupled laser-liquid interaction. Laser energy is absorbed within a confined donor architecture, converted into thermal and plasma responses, and then transformed into bubble-mediated motion of the donor material. The cavitation bubble provides the transient mechanical bridge between optical energy deposition and the hydrodynamic ejection process. This chapter presents LIFT from a multiscale perspective centered on bubble dynamics and material ejection. It first reviews major LIFT donor architectures. Then, it examines how donor ribbon design, absorbing-layer properties, laser parameters, material rheology, control bubble inception/growth, jet formation, droplet breakup, and final deposition. Modeling approaches are discussed as tools for connecting experimental observations across time and length scales, ranging from reduced-order estimates to interface-resolving simulations and data-driven process maps. As one illustrative mechanistic example, thermal-only, plasma-mediated, and coupled plasma-thermal-thermoelastic frameworks for early-stage bubble inception are briefly compared to show how different inception assumptions can provide initial conditions for downstream bubble growth and jetting models. This chapter concludes by identifying opportunities for bubble-aware donor design, time-resolved diagnostics, benchmark datasets, and predictive LIFT process maps based on intermediate bubble and jet observables.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.12308 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Representative LIFT donor architectures and actuation pathways. Direct LIFT relies on direct [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schematic donor energy-coupling and confinement map for LIFT. The horizontal axis represents laser pulse duration, and the vertical axis represents relative peak intensity or deposited loading. Short-pulse loading can generate stress-confined pressure transients when 𝜏𝐿 ≲ 𝑡𝑎 , where 𝑡𝑎 = 𝐿/𝑐 is the acoustic relaxation time, 𝐿 is the characteristic heated or absorbing length scale, and 𝑐 is the speed of sound. Stress… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Bubble-mediated jet formation in a forward-transfer geometry. After localized energy deposition, a bubble, vapor pocket, or blister-like expansion forms near the donor interface, grows under geometric confinement, deforms the free surface, initiates a jet, and drives stretching, breakup, impact, and deposition. Key intermediate observables include the initial bubble size 𝑅0 , maximum bubble response 𝑅𝑚𝑎𝑥, bubble lif… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: provides a conceptual process-window map based on bubble impulse and material resistance. The corresponding controllable parameters and their expected effects on bubble formation, jetting, and deposition are summarized in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Multiscale modeling hierarchy for bubble [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Representative validation case for early-stage bubble-inception modeling. Effective bubble￾radius evolution is compared among thermal-only, plasma-mediated, and coupled plasma-thermal models at selected pulse energies of (a) 2 mJ and (b) 10 mJ. Experimental data and co…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Pere Serra; Alberto Pique. (2019). Laser-Induced Forward Transfer: Fundamentals and Applications. Advanced Materials Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.201800099

    work page doi:10.1002/admt.201800099 2019

  2. [2]

    Philippe Delaporte; Anne-Patricia Alloncle. (2016). Laser-induced forward transfer: A high resolution additive manufacturing technology. Optics & Laser Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2015.09.022

    work page doi:10.1016/j.optlastec.2015.09.022 2016

  3. [3]

    Arnold; Pere Serra; Alberto Pique

    Craig B. Arnold; Pere Serra; Alberto Pique. (2007). Laser Direct -Write Techniques for Printing of Complex Materials. MRS Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs2007.11

    work page doi:10.1557/mrs2007.11 2007

  4. [4]

    Marcos Fernandez -Pradas; Pere Serra

    J. Marcos Fernandez -Pradas; Pere Serra. (2020). Laser -Induced Forward Transfer: A Method for Printing Functional Inks. Crystals. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10080651

    work page doi:10.3390/cryst10080651 2020

  5. [5]

    Christos Boutopoulos; Ioannis Kalpyris; Efthymis Serpetzoglou. (2014). Laser -induced forward transfer of silver nanoparticle ink: time -resolved imaging of the jetting dynamics and correlation with the printing quality. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-013-1248-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s10404-013-1248-z 2014

  6. [6]

    Claudia Unger; Martin Gruene; Lothar Koch. (2011). Time-resolved imaging of hydrogel printing via laser-induced forward transfer. Applied Physics A. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-010-6030-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s00339-010-6030-4 2011

  7. [7]

    Duocastella; J

    M. Duocastella; J. M. Fernandez -Pradas; J. L. Mor enza; P. Serra. (2010). Sessile droplet formation in the laser -induced forward transfer of liquids: A time -resolved imaging study. Thin Solid Films. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2010.03.082

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2010.03.082 2010

  8. [8]

    Schiele; David T

    Nathan R. Schiele; David T. Corr; Yong Huang. (2010). Laser -based direct-write techniques for cell printing. Biofabrication. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/2/3/032001

    work page doi:10.1088/1758-5082/2/3/032001 2010

Show all 76 references
  1. [9]

    Noack; A

    J. Noack; A. Vogel. (1999). Laser -induced plasma formation in water at nanosec ond to femtosecond time scales: calculation of thresholds, absorption coefficients, and energy density. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics. https://doi.org/10.1109/3.777215

    1999 doi

  2. [10]

    Hammer; Gary D

    Joachim Noack; Daniel X. Hammer; Gary D. Noojin. (1998). Influence of pulse d uration on mechanical effects after laser -induced breakdown in water. Journal of Applied Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.367512

    1998 doi

  3. [11]

    Alfred Vogel; Vasan Venugopalan. (2003). Mechanisms of Pulsed Laser Ablation of Biological Tissues. Chemical Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr010379n

    2003 doi

  4. [12]

    Bohandy; B

    J. Bohandy; B. F. Kim; F. J. Adrian. (1986). Metal deposition from a supported metal film using an excimer laser. Journal of Applied Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.337287

    1986 doi

  5. [13]

    Mayerhofer; F

    D. Mayerhofer; F. Keilmann; C. K. N. Pa tel. (1991). Laser -induced forward transfer of aluminium. Applied Surface Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-4332(91)90072-R

    1991 doi

  6. [14]

    Nakata; T

    Y. Nakata; T. Okada; M. Maeda. (2002). Experimental investigation of laser induced forward transfer process of metal thin films. Applied Surface Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-4332(01)00765-6

    2002 doi

  7. [15]

    Fabien Guillemot; Agnes Souquet; Sylvain Catros. (2010). Laser -Assisted Cell Printing: Principle, Physical Parameters Versus Cell Fate and Perspectives in Tissue Engineering. Nanomedicine. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm.10.14

    2010 doi

  8. [16]

    Sylvain Catros; Bertrand Guillotin; Marketa Bacakova. (2011). Effect of laser energy, substrate film thickness and bioink viscosity on viability of endothelial cells printed by Laser-Assisted Bioprinting. Applied Surface Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.11.049

    2011 doi

  9. [17]

    Bela Hopp. (2012). Femtosecond laser printing of living cells using absorbing film -assisted laser- induced forward transfer. Optical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.51.1.014302

    2012 doi

  10. [18]

    D. P. Banks; K. Kaur; R. Gazia. (2008). Triazene photopolymer dynamic release layer -assisted femtosecond laser-induced forward transfer with an active carrier substrate. EPL (Europhysics Letters). https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/83/38003

    2008 doi

  11. [19]

    James Shaw -Stewart; Thomas Lippert; Matthias Nagel. (2012). A simple model for flyer velocity from laser -induced forward transfer with a dynamic release layer. Applied Surface Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.08.111

    2012 doi

  12. [20]

    Yongxiang Hu; Han C heng; Jiaxi Xu. (2017). A coupling model to simulate the dynamic process of blister-actuated nanosecond laser -induced forward transfer. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/aa7b08

    2017 doi

  13. [21]

    Emre Turkoz; Romain Fardel; Craig B. Arnold. (2018). Advances in Blister-Actuated Laser-Induced Forward Transfer (BA -LIFT). Laser Printing of Functional Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527805105.ch5

    2018 doi

  14. [22]

    Lewis; Edward C

    Brent R. Lewis; Edward C. Kinzel; Normand M. Laurendeau. (2006). Planar laser im aging and modeling of matrix-assisted pulsed-laser evaporation direct write in the bubble regime. Journal of Applied Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2234542

    2006 doi

  15. [23]

    Yafu Lin; Kevin Foy; Yong Huang. (2008). Bubble Formation Modeling in Matrix -Assisted Pulsed- Laser Evaporation Direct Write. ASME International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference. https://doi.org/10.1115/MSEC_ICMP2008-72241

    2008 doi

  16. [24]

    Muhammad Ali; Emeline Pages; Alexandre Ducom. (2014). Controlling laser-induced jet formation for biopri nting mesenchymal stem cells with high viability and high resolution. Biofabrication. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/6/4/045001 20

    2014 doi

  17. [25]

    Jinlong Chang; Xuming Sun. (2023). Laser -induced forward transfer based laser bioprinting in biomedical applications. Fr ontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1255782

    2023 doi

  18. [26]

    Guenther Paltauf; Peter E. Dyer. (2003). Photomechanical Processes and Effects in Ablation. Chemical Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr010436c

    2003 doi

  19. [27]

    Zhigilei; Barbara J

    Leonid V. Zhigilei; Barbara J. Garrison. (2000). Microscopic mechanisms of laser ablation of organic solids in the thermal and stress confinement irradiation regimes. Journal of Applied Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.373816

    2000 doi

  20. [28]

    Papathanasiou

    Christos Boutopoulos; Marianneza Chat zipetrou; Athanasios G. Papathanasiou. (2014). Time - resolved imaging and immobilization study of biomaterials on hydrophobic and superhydrophobic surfaces by means of laser -induced forward transfer. Laser Physics Letters. https://doi.or...

    2014 doi

  21. [29]

    A. L. Yarin. (2006). Drop Impact Dynamics: Splashing, Spreading, Receding, Bouncing. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.38.050304.092144

    2006 doi

  22. [30]

    Shuqi Zhou; Chaoran Dou; Jianzhi Li; Qiqi Zhang; Qilin Dai; Ben Xu. (2023). Experimental investigation of various energy -absorbing layer materials and sodium alginate viscosities on the jet formation in laser -induced-forward-transfer (LIFT) bioprinting. Journal of Applied Ph...

    2023 doi

  23. [31]

    R. C. Y. Auyeung; H. Kim; N. A. Charipar; A. J. Birnbaum; S. A. Mathews; A. Pique. (2011). Laser forward transfer based on a spatial light modulator. Applied Physics A. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339- 010-6054-9

    2011 doi

  24. [32]

    R. Pohl; M. Jansink; G. R. B. E. Romer; A. J. Huis in 't Veld. (2015). Solid-phase laser-induced forward transfer of variable shapes using a liquid -crystal spatial light modulator. Applied Physics A. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-015-9212-2

    2015 doi

  25. [33]

    Moreno -Labella; R

    J. Moreno -Labella; R. Candorcio -Simon; D. Munoz -Martin. (2025). Blister -actuated laser-induced forward transfer (BA-LIFT): Understanding blister dynamics for enhanced process control. Optics & Laser Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2024.112087

    2025 doi

  26. [34]

    Kim; colleagues

    D. Kim; colleagues. (2024). Dynamics of Blister Actuation in Laser -Induced Forward Transfer for Contactless Microchip Transfer. Nanomaterials. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14231926

    2024 doi

  27. [35]

    Caupin; E

    F. Caupin; E. Herbert. (2 006). Cavitation in water: a review. Comptes Rendus Physique. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crhy.2006.10.015

    2006 doi

  28. [36]

    S. D. Lubetkin. (2004). Gas -vapor bubble nucleation -a unified approach. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2004.06.020

    2004 doi

  29. [37]

    Navon; E

    D. Navon; E. Shneidman; S. Brandon. (2015). Vapor -liquid nucleation: the solid touch. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2014.07.011

    2015 doi

  30. [38]

    Christopher Earls Brennen. (2013). Cavitation and Bubble Dynamic s. Cambridge University Press book. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107338760

    2013 doi

  31. [39]

    Werner Lauterborn; Thomas Kurz. (2010). Physics of bubble oscillations. Reports on Progress in Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/73/10/106501

    2010 doi

  32. [40]

    J. R. Blake; D. C. Gibson. (1987). Cavitation Bubbles Near Boundaries. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fl.19.010187.000531

    1987 doi

  33. [41]

    Rui Zhao; Zhong-cheng Liang; Rong-qing Xu. (2008). Dynamics of Laser-Induced Cavitation Bubble near Solid Boundary. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics. https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.47.5482

    2008 doi

  34. [42]

    Hammer; Robert J

    Daniel X. Hammer; Robert J. Thomas; Martin Frenz. (1996). Shock wave and cavitation bubble measurements of ultrashort -pulse laser -induced breakdown in water. SPIE Proceeding s. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.239605

    1996 doi

  35. [43]

    Candorcio-Simon; D

    R. Candorcio-Simon; D. Munoz-Martin; colleagues. (2021). Cavitation bubble evidence in BA -LIFT processes. Results in Physics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.103955

    2021 doi

  36. [44]

    Prentice; S

    P. Prentice; S. Zolotovskaya; E. Rafailov. (2010). Novel laser-induced cavitation: the constrained ring bubble. Proceedings of SPIE. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.837463

    2010 doi

  37. [45]

    Soare; R

    A. Soare; R. Dijkink; M. Rodriguez Pascual; C. Sun; P. W. Cains; D. Lohse; A. I. Stankiewicz; H. J. M. Kramer. (2011). Cryst al Nucleation by Laser -Induced Cavitation. Crystal Growth & Design. https://doi.org/10.1021/cg2000014

    2011 doi

  38. [46]

    Brian Derby. (2010). Inkjet Printing of Functional and Structural Materials: Fluid Property Requirements, Feature Stability, and Resolution. Annual R eview of Materials Research. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104502

    2010 doi

  39. [47]

    Detlef Lohse. (2022). Fundamental Fluid Dynamics Challenges in Inkjet Printing. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-022321-114001

    2022 doi

  40. [48]

    Hoath; Oliver G

    Stephen D. Hoath; Oliver G. Harlen; Ian M. Hutchings. (2012). Jetting behavior of polymer solutions in drop-on-demand inkjet printing. Journal of Rheology. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.4724331

    2012 doi

  41. [49]

    Nuno Reis; Chris Ainsley; Brian Derby. (2005). Ink-jet delivery of particle suspensions by piezoelectric droplet ejectors. Journal of Applied Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1888026 21

    2005 doi

  42. [50]

    Osman A. Basaran. (2002). Small -scale free surface flows with breakup: Drop formation and emerging applications. AIChE Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690480902

    2002 doi

  43. [51]

    Josserand; S

    C. Josserand; S. T. Thoroddsen. (2016). Drop Impact on a Solid Surface. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-122414-034401

    2016 doi

  44. [52]

    Qingfeng Li; David Grojo; Anne -Patricia Alloncle. (2019). Jetting regimes of double -pulse laser - induced forward transfer. Optical Materials Express. https://doi.org/10.1364/OME.9.003476

    2019 doi

  45. [53]

    Emre Turkoz; SeungYeon Kang; Luc Deike. (2018). Subthreshold laser jetting via flow -focusing in laser-induced forward transfer. Physical Review Fluids. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.3.082201

    2018 doi

  46. [54]

    Alfred Vogel; Joachim Noack. (1998). Shock -wave energy and acoustic energy dissipation after laser-induced breakdown. SPIE Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.308163

    1998 doi

  47. [55]

    Nakata; T

    Y. Nakata; T. Okada; M. Maeda. (2002). Optimization of laser -induced forward transfer process of metal thin films. Applied Surface Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-4332(02)00351-3

    2002 doi

  48. [56]

    Andrea Prosperetti. (1982). A generalization of the Rayleigh-Plesset equation of bubble dynamics. The Physics of Fluids. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.863775

    1982 doi

  49. [57]

    C. W. Hirt; B. D. Nichols. (1981). Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. Journal of Computational Physics. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5

    1981 doi

  50. [58]

    Mark Sussman; Peter Smereka; Stanley Osher. (1994). A Level Set Approach for Computing Solutions to Incompressible Two -Phase Flow. Journal of Computational Physics. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1994.1155

    1994 doi

  51. [59]

    R uben Scardovelli; Stephane Zaleski. (1999). Direct Numerical Simulation of Free -Surface and Interfacial Flow. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.31.1.567

    1999 doi

  52. [60]

    Jie Qu; Chaoran Dou; Ben Xu; Jianzhi Li; Zhonghao Rao; Andrew Tsin. (2021). Printing quality improvement for laser -induced forward transfer bioprinting: Numerical modeling and experimental validation. Physics of Fluids, 33, 071906. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0054675

    2021 doi

  53. [61]

    Esenaliev; Steven L

    Rinat O. Esenaliev; Steven L. Jacques. (1996). Transient and permanent cavitation in collagen gels by laser-induced thermoelastic pressure waves. SPIE Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.239572

    1996 doi

  54. [62]

    P. R. Williams; R. L. Williams. ( 2004). Cavitation and the tensile strength of liquids under dynamic stressing. Molecular Physics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00268970412331292786

    2004 doi

  55. [63]

    Yi Feng; Dui Qin; Mingxi Wan. (2015). Laser -Induced Cavitation and Photoacoustic Cavitation. Cavitation in Biomedicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7255-6_8

    2015 doi

  56. [64]

    Thorsten Wuest; Daniel Weimer; Christopher Irgens. (2016). Machine learning in manufacturing: advantages, challenges, and applications. Production & Manufacturing Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2016.1192517

    2016 doi

  57. [65]

    Mahadevan; P

    S. Mahadevan; P. Nath; Z. Hu. (2022). Uncertainty Quantification for Additive Manufacturing Process Improvement: Recent Advances. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4053184

    2022 doi

  58. [66]

    Shuqi Zhou; Abdol Hadi Mokarizadeh; Ben Xu. (2026). From Optical Breakdown to Bubble Inception: A Coupled Plasma-Thermal Framework for Nanosecond Laser-Induced Cavitation in Water. arXiv preprint. arXiv:2605.23620. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23620

    2026 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Shuqi Zhou; Ben Xu. (2025). A CFD Study of the Influence of Porous Structure Placement on Jet Formation in Laser-Induced-Forward-Transfer (LIFT) Printing. Conference presentation / conference-stage manuscript, SHTC 2025

    2025

  60. [68]

    Menzl; M

    G. Menzl; M. A. Gonzalez; P. Geiger; F. Caupin; J. L. F. Abascal; C. Valeriani; C. Dellago. (2016). Molecular mechanism for cavitation in water under tension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(48), 13582-13587. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1608421113

    2016 doi

  61. [69]

    B. R. Novak; E. J. Maginn; M. J. McCready. (2007). Comparison of heterogeneous and homogeneous bubble nucleation using molecular simulations. Physical Review B, 75(8), 085413. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.75.085413

    2007 doi

  62. [70]

    Maheshwari; M

    S. Maheshwari; M. van der Hoef; A. Prosperetti; D. Lohse. (2018). Dynamics of formation of a vapor nanobubble around a heated nanoparticle. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 122(36), 20571 -20580. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b04017

    2018 doi

  63. [71]

    L. V. Zhigilei; Z. Lin; D. S. Ivanov. (2009). Atomistic modeling of short pulse laser ablation of metals: Connections between melting, spallation, and phase explosion. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 113(27), 11892-11906. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp902294m

    2009 doi

  64. [72]

    R. Xu; J. Chen; Q. Meng. (2021). Probing laser-induced plasma generation in liquid water. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 143(27), 10382-10388. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c04675

    2021 doi

  65. [73]

    Otobe; M

    T. Otobe; M. Yamagiwa; J. -I. Iwata; K. Yabana; T. Nakano; G. F. Bertsch. (2 008). First -principles electron dynamics simulation for optical breakdown of dielectrics under an intense laser field. Physical Review B, 77(16), 165104. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.77.165104

    doi

  66. [74]

    K. P. Santo; M. L. Berkowitz. (2015). Shock wave induced collapse of arrays of nanobubbles located next to a lipid membrane: Coarse -grained computer simulations. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 119(29), 8879-8889. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp505720d 22

    2015 doi

  67. [75]

    Behler; G

    J. Behler; G. Csanyi. (2021). Machine learning potential s for extended systems: A perspective. European Physical Journal B, 94(7), 142. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/s10051-021-00156-1

    2021 doi

  68. [76]

    Ziwen Jia; Ding Li; Ye Tian; Haipeng Pan; Qiang Zhong; Zhifeng Yao; Yuan Lu; Jinjia Guo; Ronger Zheng. (2023). Early dynamics of laser-induced plasma and cavitation bubble in water. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, 206, 106713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2023.106713

    2023 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed June 27, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.