pith. sign in

arxiv: 0911.4352 · v1 · pith:RHEOAJ5Unew · submitted 2009-11-23 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft

Adams and Olmsted Reply to comment on article "A non-monotonic constitutive model is not necessary to obtain shear banding phenomena in entangled polymer solution" [Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 067801 (2009), arXiv:0805.0679]

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft
keywords lettonlyphyspointssteparxivbandingcessation
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Wang [Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 219801 (2009)] makes the following points about our Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 067801 (2009), arXiv:0805.0679]: (1) He infers that, "contrary to its title, shear banding emerged from monotonic curves only if there was a stress gradient", and he points out that nonquiescent relaxation was found (experimentally) after step strain in geometries without a stress gradient. (2) He disagrees with the values of the parameters we used. (3) In some recent experiments the flow was homogeneous after cessation of step strain, and only subsequently developed nonquiescent macroscopic motion. We only showed step strains that developed an inhomogeneity before cessation of flow. In this reply we address these points.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.