REVIEW 1 cited by
The M-Sigma Relation Derived from Sphere of Influence Arguments
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
The M-Sigma Relation Derived from Sphere of Influence Arguments
read the original abstract
The observed relation between supermassive black hole (SMBH) mass (M) and bulge stellar velocity dispersion (Sigma) is described by log(M) = alpha + beta*log(Sigma/200 km/s). As this relation has important implications for models of galaxy and SMBH formation and evolution, there continues to be great interest in adding to the M catalog. The "sphere of influence" (r) argument uses spatial resolution to exclude some M estimates and pre-select additional galaxies for further SMBH studies. This Letter quantifies the effects of applying the r argument to a population of galaxies and SMBHs that do not follow the M-Sigma relation. All galaxies with known values of Sigma, closer than 100 Mpc, are given a random M and selected when r is spatially resolved. These random SMBHs produce an M-Sigma relation of alpha=8.3, beta=4.0, consistent with observed values. Consequently, future proposed M estimates should not be justified solely on the basis of resolving r. This Letter shows the observed M-Sigma relation may simply be a result of available spatial resolution. However, it also implies the observed M-Sigma relation defines an upper limit. This potentially provides valuable new insight into the processes of galaxy and SMBH formation and evolution.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Uncertainties in the supermassive black hole abundance and implications for the GW background
Cross-catalog offsets in black hole mass proxies shift the predicted nHz gravitational wave background by factors comparable to PTA uncertainties; matching the observed amplitude requires a selection effect of about o...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.