Effective String Theory of three-dimensional SU(N) gauge theories beyond the Nambu--Got\=o approximation

Alessandro Nada; Dario Panfalone; Lorenzo Verzichelli; Marco Panero; Michele Caselle; Nicodemo Magnoli

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 27 references

Effective String Theory of three-dimensional SU(N) gauge theories beyond the Nambu--Got\=o approximation

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that the first two corrections beyond the Nambu-Goto action in three-dimensional SU(3) and SU(6) gauge theories are now measured, with k4 = -0.102(11)[50], k5 = 0.45(8)[25] for SU(3) and k4 = -0.173(30)[79], k5 =…

desk verdict Plausible first look at beyond-NG string coefficients for SU(3)/SU(6), with a real but openly acknowledged truncation systematic that keeps the headline numbers conditional. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.14204 v1 pith:RL6EQMDW submitted 2024-12-16 hep-lat hep-th

Michele Caselle , Nicodemo Magnoli , Alessandro Nada , Marco Panero , Dario Panfalone , Lorenzo Verzichelli This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-lathep-th

keywords effectivestringtheoryNambu-GotoactionSU(N)gaugePolyakovloopcorrelatordeconfinementtransitionlarge-NlimitlatticeMonteCarlofluxtubegroundstate

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to pin down the first corrections to the Nambu-Goto description of confining flux tubes in three-dimensional SU(3) and SU(6) Yang-Mills theories. Working from high-precision lattice measurements of Polyakov loop correlators, it claims that the ground-state energy of the flux tube deviates from the Nambu-Goto prediction through two coefficients, k4 and k5, with values k4 = -0.102(11)[50] and k5 = 0.45(8)[25] for SU(3), and k4 = -0.173(30)[79] and k5 = 0.98(23)[15] for SU(6). It also reports an improved SU(2) analysis and a large-N extrapolation. If these numbers are right, they give a concrete, gauge-group-dependent target that any effective string theory must reproduce, and they align with analytical bootstrap bounds for SU(3) and SU(6).

What carries the argument

The central object is the effective string expansion of the ground-state energy $E_0$ of the confining flux tube around the infinitely long string, written in terms of $N_t$, the lattice extent in the Euclidean time direction. Low-energy universality fixes the leading Nambu-Goto square-root term and delays model-dependent corrections to order $1/N_t^7$; the paper extracts the coefficients $k_4$ and $k_5$ by fitting high-precision Polyakov loop correlators to the modified-Bessel form $G(R) = k_l[K_0(R/\xi_l) + K_0((L_s - R)/\xi_l)]$, then combining fits across lattice spacings with $E_0 = 1/\xi_l$. The SU(3) analysis cross-checks $\xi_l$ against predictions from the two-dimensional three-state Potts model obtained by conformal perturbation theory, while the S-matrix bootstrap bounds on $\gamma_3,\gamma_5$ provide the analytical consistency test.

What would settle it

A future simulation at larger $N_t$ where the $1/N_t^{13}$ term is resolvable, or a repeat of the same fits with an added $1/N_t^{13}$ term, would settle the matter: if the fitted $k_4$ and $k_5$ move outside the quoted square-bracket uncertainties, the quoted values are truncation artifacts rather than physical coefficients.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The core claim is that the flux-tube ground-state energy $E_0$, extracted as the inverse correlation length of Polyakov loop correlators, follows the expansion $aE_0(N_t) = N_t \sigma_0 a^2 \sqrt{1 - \frac{\pi}{3 N_t^2 \sigma_0 a^2}} + \frac{k_4}{(\sigma_0 a^2)^3 N_t^7} + \frac{2\pi k_4}{3(\sigma_0 a^2)^4 N_t^9} + \frac{5\pi^2 k_4}{16(\sigma_0 a^2)^5 N_t^{11}} + \frac{k_5}{(\sigma_0 a^2)^5 N_t^{11}} + \cdots$, with the Nambu-Goto series truncated at the same order. The paper's contribution is to determine $k_4$ and $k_5$ from combined fits of data at multiple lattice spacings, giving the quoted values for SU(3) and SU(6), and to show that the coefficients translate into $\gamma_3,\gamma_5$ values that lie inside the S-matrix bootstrap bounds for those theories. An improved reanalysis of the SU(2) data gives $k_4 = 0.0386(95)[121]$ and $k_5 = -0.123(52)$, so the sign of $k_4$ changes between $N=2$ and $N=3$. For SU(3), the correlation length from a short-distance Potts-model fit agrees with the effective-string fit, which the paper takes as quantitative support for the Potts mapping of the deconfinement transition.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the truncated expansion in eq. (6), stopped at order $1/N_t^{11}$ with the Nambu-Goto series truncated at the same order, describes the data at the moderate $N_t$ values used; the paper reports that $k_4$ and $k_5$ move with the truncation order and does not estimate the size of the next $1/N_t^{13}$ correction.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A candidate effective string action must reproduce the measured $k_4$ and $k_5$ values, since they are now fixed by data rather than left as free parameters.
The coefficients translate into $\gamma_3,\gamma_5$ values that are consistent with the bootstrap bounds for SU(3) and SU(6), and the SU(2) point remains within uncertainty of the allowed region.
The ground-state energy dips below the Nambu-Goto curve near the critical temperature for SU(3) and SU(6), with $E_0 = 0$ occurring at a temperature consistent with the known critical point.
The SU(2) reanalysis gives new values $k_4 = 0.0386(95)[121]$ and $k_5 = -0.123(52)$, so the sign of $k_4$ changes between $N=2$ and $N=3$.
The Potts-model correlation-length fit for SU(3) agrees with the effective-string fit, providing a quantitative check of the deconfinement mapping.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The sign change in $k_4$ from positive for Z2 and SU(2) to negative for SU(3) and SU(6) looks like a trend in the rank of the gauge group; a direct measurement for SU(4) or SU(8) with the same method would test whether this is monotonic and consistent with the extrapolated large-N value.
The large-N extrapolation $\gamma_3^{(\infty)} = 1.54(13)\times 10^{-3}$ is a concrete prediction that future simulations at larger $N$ or improved bootstrap bounds could confirm or exclude.
If the Potts-model mapping cross-check is as clean as reported, the same conformal-perturbation machinery could be applied to other short-distance observables in SU(3), yielding independent estimates of the correlation length and perhaps of $k_4$ and $k_5$.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Bottom line: this is a solid proceedings summary of a real lattice campaign. The central numbers—k4 and k5 for SU(3), SU(6), plus the reanalyzed SU(2) values—look plausible to me, and the combined fits across lattice spacings with the string tension as a free parameter per beta is a sensible setup. The Svetitsky-Yaffe check using the Potts conformal perturbation is a nice addition, though the "perfectly agree" in the abstract is stronger than the "less than three sigma" in the body; that should be toned down.

The main weakness is the truncation issue. Eq. (6) is an asymptotic expansion, and the paper reports that the extracted k4 and k5 fluctuate strongly with the order at which you stop and with whether you truncate the NG series. The quoted systematic is built from the spread between N_t^-9 and N_t^-11 truncations under two prescriptions. There is no estimate of the N_t^-13 term, and since k5 sits at N_t^-11, a missing next-order piece could move it more than the quoted error. This is not hidden—Section 2 says it explicitly—but it means the headline numbers are conditional on an unverified truncation assumption. For a proceedings this is acceptable if it's said that clearly; for a claim of quantitative N-dependence, it deserves a caveat in the conclusions too.

Two smaller issues: the SU(2) k5 is quoted without a systematic error, inconsistent with the rest of the table; and the proceedings format omits the data tables and the exact simulation parameters, so the numbers cannot be reproduced from this document alone. The JHEP paper should be the reference for that.

Overall: serious, honest work. The comparison with the S-matrix bootstrap bounds is not circular—the bounds are independent—and the N-dependence discussion is interesting if the coefficients hold up.

Recommendation: this deserves a serious referee—the numbers are important enough that someone should poke at the truncation dependence before the community takes them as fixed. I would engage with it, but cite the JHEP version rather than the proceedings.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a LATTICE2024 proceedings contribution reporting an effective-string-theory (EST) analysis of the ground-state energy of confining flux tubes in three-dimensional SU(3) and SU(6) Yang--Mills theories, together with a reanalysis of SU(2) data. The central result is the extraction of the first two beyond-Nambu--Goto coefficients, k4 and k5, in the long-string expansion of E0, Eq. (6), from combined fits to lattice Polyakov-loop correlator data taken near the deconfinement transition. Quoted values are k4 = -0.102(11)[50], k5 = 0.45(8)[25] for SU(3) and k4 = -0.173(30)[79], k5 = 0.98(23)[15] for SU(6), plus an improved SU(2) determination. The paper also compares the coefficients with S-matrix bootstrap bounds, discusses the large-N limit, and tests the Svetitsky--Yaffe conjecture by fitting the short-distance SU(3) correlator with the conformal-perturbation prediction of the 2d three-state Potts model.

Significance. If the quoted k4 and k5 values are robust, the paper provides valuable quantitative constraints on the effective string action beyond the Nambu--Goto term and gives a concrete test of the S-matrix bootstrap bounds in a non-perturbative gauge-theory setting. Strengths of the analysis include the combined fits across multiple lattice spacings, the explicit separation of statistical and systematic errors, the consistency of the fitted zero-temperature string tensions with earlier determinations, and the independent Potts-model cross-check for SU(3). The paper does not ship machine-checked proofs or code, but the lattice-data analysis is reproducible in principle through the companion publication. The main weakness is that the quoted systematics do not probe the next truncation order, so the headline coefficients remain conditional on an unverified truncation assumption.

major comments (3)

The paper states in Sec. 2 that the values of k4 and k5 are strongly affected by the order of the last correction included and by the order at which the Nambu--Goto series is truncated, and Sec. 3.1 identifies the truncation systematic as the primary source of uncertainty. However, the systematic errors quoted in Eqs. (8) and (9) are obtained only by comparing fits truncated at N_t^{-9} and N_t^{-11}, under two prescriptions for the NG series. No estimate of the next term, N_t^{-13}, is given. Because the data sit at moderate N_t close to the deconfinement transition, the omitted term can plausibly shift both coefficients by amounts comparable to the quoted systematics. Since the central claim of the paper is precisely the numerical values of k4 and k5, this missing next-order estimate is load-bearing. Please add an explicit estimate of the N_t^{-13} contribution (or a demonstration that it is suppressed relative to the quoted errors) and report the range of N_t used in the fits.
The coefficient k5 is introduced only through the 1/N_t^{11} term, at the same order as the k4-controlled term 5 pi^2 k4/(16 (sigma0 a^2)^5 N_t^{11}). Separation of k4 and k5 therefore relies on the lower-order N_t^{-7} and N_t^{-9} k4 terms, and the two coefficients may be strongly correlated in the fit. The paper does not report the correlation between k4 and k5, nor any stability test for k5 under cuts in N_t or changes in the set of beta values. Given that k5 is a headline quantity, please quantify this near-degeneracy, for example by reporting the fit covariance matrix, the profile chi-square, or the stability of k5 under alternative truncation schemes and data windows.
The large-N extrapolation gamma_3(infinity) = 1.54(13) x 10^{-3} is obtained from a two-parameter fit of the assumed form gamma_3(N) = gamma_3(infinity) + c/N^2 to only three data points (N = 2, 3, 6). The assumed 1/N^2 scaling is not independently tested, and the statement that the result is within one standard deviation of the SU(6) value does not provide additional support for the extrapolation, since the SU(6) point is an input to the fit. Please state explicitly whether the systematic errors of the gamma_3 values were propagated in this fit, and discuss the reliability of the functional form when only three points are available.

minor comments (5)

The text says that the correlation lengths obtained from the short-range Potts fits are in 'good agreement (within less than three standard deviations)' with the long-range EST fits, but the abstract and conclusion describe the agreement as 'perfectly agree.' Please soften the wording to match the quantitative statement.
The SU(2) result k5 = -0.123(52) is quoted without a systematic error, while the SU(3) and SU(6) k5 values include systematic uncertainties. Please explain this asymmetry and provide the systematic contribution for the SU(2) value if one has been estimated.
In the table of gamma_3 and gamma_5 values, the SU(2) entry for gamma_5 is given as 0.159(66) with no square-bracket systematic, while gamma_3 for the same theory includes a systematic [89]. Please make the error bookkeeping consistent, or state that no systematic was computed for gamma_5.
As a standalone proceedings contribution, the paper does not provide the lattice parameters (beta values, lattice sizes, statistics) or the measured E0 values used in the fits. Please add a table with these data or give explicit pointers to the tables in the companion paper [6], so that the fits can be independently checked.
The phrase 'branon matryoshka' is used without definition; a brief explanation of this bound (or a more descriptive name) would help the non-specialist reader.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: k4 and k5 are fit parameters from independent lattice data, and all cross-checks are external or use distinct functional forms.

full rationale

The analysis is self-contained and not circular. The central quantities k4 and k5 are free parameters in the effective-string expansion, Eq. (6), and their values are obtained from least-squares fits to the ground-state energy E0 extracted from Monte Carlo correlators; nothing in the fit defines k4 or k5 in terms of the quoted final values or in terms of the bootstrap/Potts comparisons. The bootstrap bounds (refs. [16,17]) are used only after the fit, as external consistency constraints, and the mapping k4,k5 to gamma3,gamma5 is a linear change of variables, not a re-derivation of the fitted numbers. The Svetitsky-Yaffe/Potts cross-check uses a different functional form for the short-distance correlator and compares the resulting correlation length with the EST long-distance determination; although some Potts references share authors with the present paper, those cited results are independent analytical predictions, not fitted to the SU(3) data, so the agreement is a genuine cross-check rather than an imported conclusion. The paper's own warning that k4 and k5 depend on the truncation order in Eq. (6) concerns the size of omitted 1/N_t^13 corrections and is a systematic-uncertainty limitation, not a circular reduction; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing claim is justified solely by a self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central results depend on fitting several parameters to lattice data: k4 and k5 for each gauge group, plus the string tension at each lattice spacing, and the large-N extrapolation uses two additional parameters. The theoretical input consists of the effective string expansion, the S-matrix bootstrap bounds, and the Svetitsky-Yaffe mapping, all taken from prior literature. No new particles or new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (8)

k4 for SU(3) = -0.102(11)[50]
Fitted to Polyakov loop correlation data via eq. (6); controls the N_t^-7, N_t^-9, and part of the N_t^-11 terms.
k4 for SU(6) = -0.173(30)[79]
Fitted to new SU(6) lattice data via eq. (6).
k4 for SU(2) = 0.0386(95)[121]
Improved value from reanalysis of data published in ref. [7].
k5 for SU(3) = 0.45(8)[25]
Fitted to SU(3) data; k5 appears at order N_t^-11 in eq. (6).
k5 for SU(6) = 0.98(23)[15]
Fitted to SU(6) data.
k5 for SU(2) = -0.123(52)
Fitted to ref. [7] data; no systematic error is quoted.
String tension sigma0 a^2 per beta = multiple values, not individually listed
Left as free parameters in the combined fits for each lattice spacing, with four values for SU(3), three for SU(6), and three for SU(2). The results are checked against ref. [21].
gamma3(infinity) and coefficient c in eq. (11) = gamma3(infinity) = 1.54(13)e-3; c not quoted
Two-parameter 1/N^2 fit to the three gamma3 data points from SU(2), SU(3), and SU(6).

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The Polyakov loop correlator is described by effective string theory, and the ground-state energy has the truncated expansion eq. (6) with the universal Nambu-Goto term and k4 and k5 corrections.
Invoked in section 2; this is the theoretical framework being tested, not a theorem proven here.
domain assumption The S-matrix bootstrap bounds of refs. [16,17] constrain gamma3 and gamma5 as claimed.
Used in section 3.3 for compatibility comparison; the bounds are taken as established external results.
domain assumption The Svetitsky-Yaffe conjecture maps SU(3) gauge theory to the two-dimensional three-state Potts model, and the conformal perturbation correlator of refs. [19,20] gives the short-distance form used in the fit.
Assumed in section 3.1 as a conjecture to be tested; the Potts functional form is used to fit the SU(3) data.
domain assumption The lattice data are in a regime where the combined fit across lattice spacings is valid, with scale dependence fully absorbed by the sigma0 a^2 normalization.
Assumed in section 3.1 and 3.2; the authors note the absence of a clear trend in lattice spacing as support.
ad hoc to paper The large-N dependence of gamma3 follows the 1/N^2 scaling in eq. (11).
Introduced for the extrapolation to infinite N; it is a fit ansatz with two parameters and three data points, not derived from first principles.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Effective String Theory of three-dimensional SU(N) gauge theories beyond the Nambu--Got\=o approximation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RL6EQMDW

@misc{pith2026241214204,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Effective String Theory of three-dimensional SU(N) gauge theories beyond the Nambu--Got\=o approximation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RL6EQMDW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.14204}
}

read the original abstract

We study the effective bosonic string that describes confining flux tubes in three-dimensional SU(N) Yang--Mills theories. Although the low-energy properties are universal and well described by the Nambu--Got\=o action, the subtle dependence on the gauge group is embedded in a series of corrections, which remain undetermined, appearing in the expansion around the limit of an infinitely long string. We extract the first two of these corrections from a set of high-precision Monte Carlo simulations of Polyakov loop correlators at finite temperatures close to the deconfinement transition. We present and compare the results of new lattice simulations for theories with N=3 and N=6 color charges, along with an improved estimate for the N=2 case, discussing the approach to the large-N limit. We show that our results are compatible with analytical bounds derived from the S-matrix bootstrap approach. Additionally, we present a new test of the Svetitsky--Yaffe conjecture for the SU(3) theory in three dimensions, showing that our results for the correlator of Polyakov loops perfectly agree with the predictions obtained using a conformal perturbation approach to the two-dimensional three-state Potts model

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.14204 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** (a) Combined best fits of the SU(3) ground state energy 𝐸0 for different values of 𝛽. The data are expressed in units of √ 𝜎0 on both axes. In the zoomed inset we highlight the closest points to the critical temperature where the discrepancy between our data and the NG prediction becomes most pronounced. (b) Detail of the dependence of the ground state energy 𝐸0 on the temperature very close to 𝑇𝑐 for the SU(3) gaug… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Combined best fits of the ground-state energy 𝐸0 in the SU(6) theory, for different values of 𝛽, according to eq. (6) including all terms up to 1/𝑁 11 𝑡 . 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 T / √ σ0 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 E0 / √ σ0 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05 0.25 0.50 BNG N −11 t Nambu-Goto β = 9.00 β = 12.15 β = 13.42 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Combined best fits of the ground-state energy 𝐸0 in the SU(2), for different values of 𝛽, according to eq. (6) including all terms up to 1/𝑁 11 𝑡 . in fig. 2. Also in this case we report the final results of the first two BNG corrections both with statistical and systematic uncertainty: 𝑘4 = −0.173(30) [79], 𝑘5 = 0.98(23) [15]. (9) 3.3 Summary of SU(N) BNG corrections and comparison with bootstrap constraints In ord… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: (a) 𝑘4 values for different confining gauge theories in three spacetime dimensions. (b) Values of 𝛾3 and 𝛾5 for the SU(𝑁) theories considered in this contribution. The solid line represents the lower bound on 𝛾5 obtained from the bootstrap analysis, with the shaded reg…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages

[25]

Dubovsky, R

S. Dubovsky, R. Flauger and V. Gorbenko,Flux Tube Spectra from Approximate Integrability at Low Energies, J. Exp. Theor. Phys.120 (2015) 399–422, [1404.0037]

arXiv 2015
[15]

Aharony and Z

O. Aharony and Z. Komargodski,The Effective Theory of Long Strings, JHEP 1305 (2013) 118, [1302.6257]

arXiv 2013
[1]

Lüscher,Symmetry Breaking Aspects of the Roughening Transition in Gauge Theories, Nucl

M. Lüscher,Symmetry Breaking Aspects of the Roughening Transition in Gauge Theories, Nucl. Phys.B180(1981) 317

work page 1981
[2]

Lüscher, K

M. Lüscher, K. Symanzik and P. Weisz,Anomalies of the Free Loop Wave Equation in the WKB Approximation, Nucl. Phys.B173(1980) 365

1980
[3]

R. D. Pisarski and O. Alvarez,Strings at finite temperature and deconfinement, Phys. Rev. D26 (1982) 3735

work page 1982
[4]

Olesen,Strings, Tachyons and Deconfinement, Phys

P. Olesen,Strings, Tachyons and Deconfinement, Phys. Lett.160B(1985) 408–410

work page 1985
[5]

Caselle, E

M. Caselle, E. Cellini and A. Nada,Numerical determination of the width and shape of the effective string using Stochastic Normalizing Flows, 2409.15937

arXiv
[6]

Caselle, N

M. Caselle, N. Magnoli, A. Nada, M. Panero, D. Panfalone and L. Verzichelli,Confining strings in three-dimensional gauge theories beyond the nambu-got¯o approximation, Journal of High Energy Physics2024(Aug., 2024)

work page 2024

Show all 27 references

[7]

Caristo, M

F. Caristo, M. Caselle, N. Magnoli, A. Nada, M. Panero and A. Smecca,Fine corrections in the effective string describing SU(2) Yang-Mills theory in three dimensions, JHEP 03 (2022) 115, [2109.06212]

2022 arXiv
[8]

Lüscher and P

M. Lüscher and P. Weisz,String excitation energies in SU(N) gauge theories beyond the free-string approximation,JHEP0407 (2004) 014, [hep-th/0406205]

2004 arXiv
[9]

H. B. Meyer, Poincaré invariance in effective string theories, JHEP 0605 (2006) 066, [hep-th/0602281]

2006 arXiv
[10]

Aharony and E

O. Aharony and E. Karzbrun,On the effective action of confining strings, JHEP 0906 (2009) 012, [0903.1927]

2009 arXiv
[11]

Aharony and M

O. Aharony and M. Dodelson,Effective String Theory and Nonlinear Lorentz Invariance, JHEP1202 (2012) 008, [1111.5758]

2012 arXiv
[12]

Gliozzi,Dirac-Born-Infeld action from spontaneous breakdown of Lorentz symmetry in brane-world scenarios, Phys

F. Gliozzi,Dirac-Born-Infeld action from spontaneous breakdown of Lorentz symmetry in brane-world scenarios, Phys. Rev.D84 (2011) 027702, [1103.5377]

2011 arXiv
[13]

Gliozzi and M

F. Gliozzi and M. Meineri,Lorentz completion of effective string (and p-brane) action,JHEP 1208 (2012) 056, [1207.2912]

2012 arXiv
[14]

Dubovsky, R

S. Dubovsky, R. Flauger and V. Gorbenko,Effective String Theory Revisited, JHEP 1209 (2012) 044, [1203.1054]

2012 arXiv
[16]

Elias Miró, A

J. Elias Miró, A. L. Guerrieri, A. Hebbar, J. Penedones and P. Vieira,Flux Tube S-matrix Bootstrap,Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 221602, [1906.08098]. 9 EST of three-dimensionalSU(𝑁) gauge theories beyond NG approximation Dario Panfalone

2019 arXiv
[17]

Elias Miró and A

J. Elias Miró and A. Guerrieri,Dual EFT bootstrap: QCD flux tubes, JHEP 10 (2021) 126, [2106.07957]

2021 arXiv
[18]

Phys.B210(1982) 423

B.SvetitskyandL.G.Yaffe, CriticalBehavioratFiniteTemperatureConfinementTransitions , Nucl. Phys.B210(1982) 423

1982
[19]

Caselle, G

M. Caselle, G. Delfino, P. Grinza, O. Jahn and N. Magnoli,Potts correlators and the static three-quark potential, J. Stat. Mech.0603(2006) P03008, [hep-th/0511168]

2006 arXiv
[20]

R.GuidaandN.Magnoli, Allorderi.r.finiteexpansionforshortdistancebehaviorofmassless theories perturbed by a relevant operator,Nuclear Physics B471(1996) 361–385

1996
[21]

M. J. Teper,SU(N) gauge theories in (2+1)-dimensions, Phys. Rev.D59 (1999) 014512, [hep-lat/9804008]

1999 arXiv
[22]

Liddle and M

J. Liddle and M. Teper,The deconfining phase transition in D=2+1 SU(N) gauge theories, 0803.2128

arXiv
[23]

Baffigo and M

A. Baffigo and M. Caselle,Ising string beyond the Nambu-Goto action, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 034520, [2306.06966]

2024 arXiv
[24]

Guerrieri, A

A. Guerrieri, A. Homrich and P. Vieira, Multiparticle Flux Tube S-matrix Bootstrap, 2404.10812

arXiv
[26]

Lucini and M

B. Lucini and M. Panero,SU(N) gauge theories at large N, Phys. Rept.526 (2013) 93–163, [1210.4997]

2013 arXiv
[27]

Panero,Recent results in large-N lattice gauge theories, PoS Lattice 2012(2012) 010, [1210.5510]

M. Panero,Recent results in large-N lattice gauge theories, PoS Lattice 2012(2012) 010, [1210.5510]. 10

2012 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [25]

Dubovsky, R

S. Dubovsky, R. Flauger and V. Gorbenko,Flux Tube Spectra from Approximate Integrability at Low Energies, J. Exp. Theor. Phys.120 (2015) 399–422, [1404.0037]

arXiv 2015

[2] [15]

Aharony and Z

O. Aharony and Z. Komargodski,The Effective Theory of Long Strings, JHEP 1305 (2013) 118, [1302.6257]

arXiv 2013

[3] [1]

Lüscher,Symmetry Breaking Aspects of the Roughening Transition in Gauge Theories, Nucl

M. Lüscher,Symmetry Breaking Aspects of the Roughening Transition in Gauge Theories, Nucl. Phys.B180(1981) 317

work page 1981

[4] [2]

Lüscher, K

M. Lüscher, K. Symanzik and P. Weisz,Anomalies of the Free Loop Wave Equation in the WKB Approximation, Nucl. Phys.B173(1980) 365

1980

[5] [3]

R. D. Pisarski and O. Alvarez,Strings at finite temperature and deconfinement, Phys. Rev. D26 (1982) 3735

work page 1982

[6] [4]

Olesen,Strings, Tachyons and Deconfinement, Phys

P. Olesen,Strings, Tachyons and Deconfinement, Phys. Lett.160B(1985) 408–410

work page 1985

[7] [5]

Caselle, E

M. Caselle, E. Cellini and A. Nada,Numerical determination of the width and shape of the effective string using Stochastic Normalizing Flows, 2409.15937

arXiv

[8] [6]

Caselle, N

M. Caselle, N. Magnoli, A. Nada, M. Panero, D. Panfalone and L. Verzichelli,Confining strings in three-dimensional gauge theories beyond the nambu-got¯o approximation, Journal of High Energy Physics2024(Aug., 2024)

work page 2024