Pith. sign in

REVIEW 9 minor 98 references

Solar Orbiter and Parker Solar Probe: Multi-viewpoint messengers of the inner heliosphere

T0 review · 0 major / 9 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Parker Solar Probe and Solar Orbiter, reading the inner heliosphere together, trace solar wind streams and coronal mass ejections back to their coronal sources and turn close-up data into space-weather forecasts.

desk verdict A faithful, well-organized proceedings review of PSP–Solar Orbiter synergy; no new science, but a useful entry point to the current literature. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.09450 v1 pith:RLGL74VD submitted 2025-02-13 astro-ph.SR physics.space-ph

Stephanie L. Yardley This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRphysics.space-ph
keywords solarwindParkerProbeOrbitercoronalmassejectionsswitchbacksmagneticconnectivityinnerheliospherespaceweather
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review paper argues that Parker Solar Probe and Solar Orbiter are not just two close-up missions but a single observational system: one spacecraft measures the solar wind as it forms, while the other watches the coronal source regions and measures their plasma composition. Working together, the paper claims, they can trace slow and fast solar wind streams to specific magnetic structures on the Sun, watch coronal switchbacks being born, and follow coronal mass ejections from eruption to arrival at Earth. The payoff is a new ability to test theories of solar wind formation and to make use of inner-heliosphere data for space weather forecasting. The paper is a synthesis of published results rather than a new measurement, so its force rests on the reliability of the source-connection methods it assembles.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the source-connection chain: the magnetic connectivity tool and potential-field/MHD extrapolations compute where each spacecraft's measured plasma came from, while plasma composition from SPICE and SWA/HIS (first-ionisation-potential effects, Fe/O, charge states) and electron strahl properties verify that the wind actually carries the fingerprint of that source. Switchbacks function as structural markers in this chain, and the magnetic helicity-partial variance of increments (Hm-PVI) technique identifies flux-rope structure inside interplanetary coronal mass ejections. On the scheduling side, the Solar Orbiter Observing Plans (SOOPs) coordinate the ten instruments so remote-sensing and in situ data are taken at the same time and place.

What would settle it

One decisive test is statistical: compare connectivity-tool footpoints against composition fingerprints for a dozen or more PSP-SO radial alignments; if the predicted source region frequently disagrees with the observed Fe/O, charge-state, and strahl signature, the source-attribution chain fails. A second, targeted check is to re-observe a Metis-type S-shaped structure with two simultaneous viewpoints, for example Solar Orbiter plus STEREO or PSP/WISPR, to see whether the apparent fold is a real field-line switchback or a projection or density artifact.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that multi-viewpoint observations from Parker Solar Probe and Solar Orbiter have already begun closing the loop between the Sun and the solar wind. Composition diagnostics from Solar Orbiter (Fe/O ratios, charge states, alpha-to-proton abundance) combined with magnetic connectivity tracing place slow solar wind streams at active region boundaries, coronal hole edges, and S-web corridors, and fast streams inside coronal holes. The same combination identifies a white-light S-shaped structure in Metis images as the first switchback seen in the corona, and follows a far-side filament eruption into a flux rope detected in situ by Parker Solar Probe at 0.062 au. For coronal mass ejections, Solar Orbiter at about 0.5 au acted as an upstream monitor whose data reduced arrival-time errors at Earth to hours and whose measured flux-rope fields matched the geomagnetic response. The paper presents these as proof of concept that a Sun-to-Earth causal chain is now observable rather than merely inferable.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the field-line tracing and composition diagnostics point back to the correct coronal source of each measured solar wind stream; if those mappings are biased, the claimed source connections and the one coronal switchback image lose their anchor.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Slow solar wind is shown to be a mix of streams from active region boundaries, coronal hole edges, and narrow S-web corridors, not a single type of source.
  • Switchbacks can form in the corona through interchange reconnection, and their microstream patchiness is tied to supergranular boundaries; this narrows the debate about where they come from.
  • A spacecraft at about 0.5 au can serve as a real-time coronal mass ejection warning monitor, cutting arrival-time error at Earth to roughly one to three hours with simple speed estimates and to about one to two and a half hours with heliospheric imager modelling.
  • Far-side monitoring from Solar Orbiter gives several days of advanced warning before an active region rotates into Earth view, as happened with active region 13664 in May 2024.
  • Joint Parker Solar Probe-Solar Orbiter radial alignments allow the same solar wind stream to be sampled at two distances, revealing how wave energy and switchbacks heat and accelerate the wind.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the source-attribution chain is as reliable as the featured cases suggest, composition tracing could be extended into a routine product that predicts the Fe/O and charge-state signature of solar wind at L1 days ahead of arrival.
  • A statistical check of the Metis S-shaped result, looking for more white-light S-shapes in Metis and SoloHI data during later perihelia and triangulating with EUI, would tell whether coronal switchbacks are common or a single-event curiosity.
  • The success of Solar Orbiter as a roughly 0.5 au upstream monitor argues for placing operational space-weather monitors at L4/L5, where the same geometry can be maintained continuously.
  • The paper's methodology implicitly gives a testable prediction: streams labelled Alfvénic slow from active-region boundaries should show systematically higher Fe/O and charge states than fast streams from coronal hole centres; a larger PSP-SO conjunction catalogue can check this.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 9 minor

Summary. This proceedings paper surveys recent results from Parker Solar Probe and Solar Orbiter that illustrate the scientific synergy of the two missions. It describes how in situ solar wind and CME/ICME measurements, combined with remote-sensing observations and magnetic connectivity modeling, are used to trace solar wind source regions, study switchbacks, forecast CME arrival times, and monitor farside activity. The paper's central claim, stated in the abstract, is that PSP and SO are 'working together to significantly advance our understanding' of solar wind formation, CME eruption, and space weather effects.

Significance. The paper is a timely and clearly written review for a proceedings volume. It performs a useful synthesis of recent literature, and its quantitative statements (e.g., arrival-time errors of 1-3 hours for two March 2022 CMEs; reduction of ELEvoHI mean absolute error from 10.4 to 2.5 and from 2.7 to 1.1 hours; PSP perihelia of 0.048 au and 0.04 au; the 0.062 au ICME detection) align with the cited sources. The paper is appropriately cautious in several places: it lists competing switchback generation mechanisms, labels the Metis S-shaped structure as 'interpreted as' a switchback, and explicitly notes that the space-weather forecasting analysis is based on only two events. It also credits the roles of coordinated observing programs (SOOPs) and the magnetic connectivity tool. As a review, it does not present new data or testable predictions, and its conclusions are qualitative advances rather than quantitatively proven claims. Nevertheless, it serves as a reliable entry point to the current state of PSP-SO coordinated science.

minor comments (9)
  1. [Section 2.2] In the paragraph beginning 'During the mosaic observations', the cross-reference '(see Figure)' is incomplete; please insert the correct figure number.
  2. [Section 2.1] In the paragraph discussing Hou et al. (2024), 'chromspheric' is a typo for 'chromospheric'.
  3. [Section 2.1] In the paragraph on Horbury et al. (2021), the sentence 'further out reconnection occurs between the folded field line leads to the formation of a flux rope later observed by SO' is grammatically garbled; please revise, for example, to 'further out, reconnection between folded field lines leads to the formation of a flux rope'.
  4. [Section 2.2] In the paragraph beginning 'The final SOOP to operate during RSW2', 'The SOOP ran between between 25 March 2022' contains a duplicated 'between'; please delete the repetition.
  5. [Section 2.2] In the paragraph on the coronal dimming and filament eruption, 'allowing the first spectrosopic analysis' contains a typo: 'spectrosopic' should be 'spectroscopic'.
  6. [Section 3] In the paragraph beginning 'In this section, we focus only on studies that involve ICMEs detected along the Sun-Earth line', the term 'geoffectiveness' is a typo and should read 'geo-effectiveness'.
  7. [Section 3] In the paragraph beginning 'There have also been multiple CMEs observed by Metis', the citation 'SoloHI Bemporad et al. (2022)' is missing an opening parenthesis; it should read 'SoloHI (Bemporad et al. 2022)'.
  8. [References] The reference list entry for 'Amerstorfer, T., & Jürgen, H. 2021' appears to have an incorrect or placeholder second author name; please verify the author list for the ELEvoHI Zenodo release.
  9. [Section 2] The review repeatedly relies on magnetic connectivity footpoints and potential-field/MHD extrapolations for source attribution. A brief explicit note on the model-dependence and its uncertainties (e.g., PFSS sensitivity to boundary conditions) would help the uninitiated reader calibrate the strength of these connections.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper is a synthesis review that derives no new result from fitted inputs or self-cited constraints.

full rationale

This is a conference proceedings review describing coordinated Parker Solar Probe and Solar Orbiter science. It makes no new derivations, fits no parameters, and offers no model predictions of its own. The load-bearing content consists of summaries of published observational studies (e.g., Bale et al. 2019 for switchbacks; Telloni et al. 2022 for the coronal S-shaped structure; Laker et al. 2024 for CME arrival predictions; Yardley et al. 2024 for slow wind source connection). Those citations are used as external evidence, not as an unverified self-citation chain; the author's own prior work is cited in the same descriptive manner as other groups' work and is independently grounded in spacecraft data. The review explicitly notes competing switchback mechanisms (Section 2.1) and cautions that the CME forecasting demonstration rests on only two events and requires a larger sample (Section 3.1), so the interpretive premises are flagged rather than smuggled in as forced conclusions. No equation or claim reduces to its own input by construction, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the author's prior papers to make a choice appear forced. Accordingly, the circularity burden is zero.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters and no invented entities; it is a review. Its claims rest on standard domain methods taken from the cited literature without new validation: FIP-effect composition diagnostics, magnetic connectivity modeling, and the interpretation of in situ field reversals as switchbacks. These are listed as domain assumptions.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The First Ionisation Potential (FIP) effect reliably traces in situ plasma composition back to coronal source regions.
    Invoked in Section 2.2 as the main diagnostic linking SPICE and SWA/HIS composition measurements to solar wind origin, citing Laming 2017.
  • domain assumption Magnetic connectivity tools and potential field/MHD extrapolations correctly map spacecraft footpoints to coronal sources.
    Used throughout Sections 2.1 to 2.3 and Section 3 (Ervin et al. 2024, Yardley et al. 2024, Long et al. 2023) to identify source regions of in situ streams; a modeling assumption with no direct validation in this paper.
  • domain assumption In situ magnetic field reversals ('switchbacks') observed by PSP are folded magnetic field lines rather than genuine changes of magnetic connectivity.
    Section 2.1 relies on electron pitch angle distributions to argue for reversals, while noting that the generation mechanisms are heavily debated.
  • domain assumption The S-shaped structure imaged by Metis on 25 March 2022 is a coronal switchback produced by interchange reconnection.
    Section 2.2 adopts the Telloni et al. 2022 interpretation; single-event, interpretive, and load-bearing for the claim that switchback origins can be observed remotely.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Solar Orbiter and Parker Solar Probe: Multi-viewpoint messengers of the inner heliosphere." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RLGL74VD

@misc{pith2026250209450,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Solar Orbiter and Parker Solar Probe: Multi-viewpoint messengers of the inner heliosphere},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RLGL74VD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.09450}
}
read the original abstract

NASA's Parker Solar Probe and ESA/NASA's Solar Orbiter are encounter missions that are currently both in their nominal science phases, venturing closer to the Sun than ever before. These complementary spacecraft are operating together in order to combine in situ measurements of solar wind plasma in the inner heliosphere with high-resolution remote sensing observations of their source regions in the solar atmosphere. This paper highlights the synergetic science that these multi-viewpoint messengers of the inner heliosphere enable and how they are working together to significantly advance our understanding of the physical processes that are important for solar wind formation, the eruption of coronal mass ejections and their space weather effects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.09450 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. PSP and SO are multi-viewpoint messengers of the inner heliosphere work￾ing together to understand the complexities of our star. Image courtesy of ESA/S.Poletti https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Images/2020/01/Extreme_exploration_with_ Solar_Orbiter_and_Parker_Solar_Probe on 6 November 2024 before making the first of its three final closest approaches to the Sun beginning 24 December 2024 (with subsequent approache… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The microstream structure of switchbacks and their postulated origins. Top panel: The radial velocity of the solar wind and the thermal alpha particle abundance as measured by the SWEAP instrument during the period of 20-21 November 2021 during PSP encounter 10 (Figure adapted from Bale et al. 2023). The microstream structure of the velocity spikes are shown by the arcs. Bottom panel: An illustration of how the micr… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Observations taken during PSP-SO conjunction during PSP encounter 11. Top panel: SDO/AIA images of the source regions of the two fast and one Alfvenic slow solar wind streams highlighted in the ´ bottom panel. The diamonds represent the connectivity footpoints of PSP. Bottom panel (a): The Fe/O ratio as measured by SO SWA/HIS, where the values have been normalised (Asplund et al. 2021). The shaded regions correspond… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Remote-sensing observations and in situ measurements taken at the time of the Slow Wind Connection Science SOOP during SO’s first perihelion. Left panel: The connectivity foot￾points of SO taken from the magnetic connectivity tool are overlayed on a composite image of …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Remote-sensing observations taken during SO’s first perihelion passage and the CH Boundary Expansion SOOP on 25 March 2022, showing the S-shaped structure identified as a switchback and the proposed mechanism behind its formation. Top panel: Composite image of EUI/FSI …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The position and in situ measurements taken by SO during the first perihelion passage. Left panel: SO’s orbit in GSE coordinates between 1 February 2022 and 31 March 2022. Case 1 and Case 2 refer to the two CMEs that occurred on 7 March 2022 and 11 March 2022, just aft…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The SO observations and PSP measurements of a filament eruption on 5 September 2022. Left panel: A running difference image using SO EUI/FSI 174 A to show the plasma flows along the filament ˚ prior to eruption, indicating the presence of a flux rope structure. The lin…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The observations and activity measured by Solar Orbiter during May 2024. Left panel: SO/EUI FSI 174 A image of AR 13664 as seen on the farside of the Sun. Right ˚ panel: Timeline of X-class flares from AR 13664 during its first solar rotation. Image courtesy of ESA htt…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    K., et al

    Abbo , L., Ofman , L., Antiochos , S. K., et al. 2016, Space Science Reviews, 201, 55, 10.1007/s11214-016-0264-1

    doi:10.1007/s11214-016-0264-1 2016

  4. [4]

    2021, tamerstorfer/ELEvoHI: ELEvoHI\_v2.0.0.0 , v2.0.0.0, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.5045415

    Amerstorfer , T., & J \"u rgen , H. 2021, tamerstorfer/ELEvoHI: ELEvoHI\_v2.0.0.0 , v2.0.0.0, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.5045415

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.5045415 2021

  5. [5]

    2021, Astron

    Andretta , V., Bemporad , A., De Leo , Y., et al. 2021, Astron. Astrophys., 656, L14, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142407

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142407 2021

  6. [6]

    K., Miki \'c , Z., Titov , V

    Antiochos , S. K., Miki \'c , Z., Titov , V. S., Lionello , R., & Linker , J. A. 2011, Astrophys. J., 731, 112, 10.1088/0004-637X/731/2/112

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/731/2/112 2011

  7. [7]

    2020, Astron

    Antonucci , E., Romoli , M., Andretta , V., et al. 2020, Astron. Astrophys., 642, A10, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935338

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935338 2020

  8. [8]

    M., & Grevesse , N

    Asplund , M., Amarsi , A. M., & Grevesse , N. 2021, Astron. Astrophys., 653, A141, 10.1051/0004-6361/202140445

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140445 2021

Show all 98 references
  1. [9]

    2020, Astron

    Auch \`e re , F., Andretta , V., Antonucci , E., et al. 2020, Astron. Astrophys., 642, A6, 10.1051/0004-6361/201937032

    2020 doi

  2. [10]

    T., Bale , S

    Badman , S. T., Bale , S. D., Mart \' nez Oliveros , J. C., et al. 2020, Astrophys. J.s, 246, 23, 10.3847/1538-4365/ab4da7

    2020 doi

  3. [11]

    D., Goetz , K., Harvey , P

    Bale , S. D., Goetz , K., Harvey , P. R., et al. 2016, Space Sci. Rev., 204, 49, 10.1007/s11214-016-0244-5

    2016 doi

  4. [12]

    D., Badman , S

    Bale , S. D., Badman , S. T., Bonnell , J. W., et al. 2019, Nature, 576, 237, 10.1038/s41586-019-1818-7

    2019 doi

  5. [13]

    D., Horbury , T

    Bale , S. D., Horbury , T. S., Velli , M., et al. 2021, Astrophys. J., 923, 174, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2d8c

    2021 doi

  6. [14]

    D., Drake , J

    Bale , S. D., Drake , J. F., McManus , M. D., et al. 2023, Nature, 618, 252, 10.1038/s41586-023-05955-3

    2023 doi

  7. [15]

    J., Lucek , E

    Balogh , A., Forsyth , R. J., Lucek , E. A., Horbury , T. S., & Smith , E. J. 1999, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 631, 10.1029/1999GL900061

    1999 doi

  8. [16]

    2021, Space Weather, 19, e02873, 10.1029/2021SW002873

    Bauer , M., Amerstorfer , T., Hinterreiter , J., et al. 2021, Space Weather, 19, e02873, 10.1029/2021SW002873

    2021 doi

  9. [17]

    2022, Astron

    Bemporad , A., Andretta , V., Susino , R., et al. 2022, Astron. Astrophys., 665, A7, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243162

    2022 doi

  10. [18]

    2023, Astron

    Berghmans , D., Antolin , P., Auch \`e re , F., et al. 2023, Astron. Astrophys., 675, A110, 10.1051/0004-6361/202245586

    2023 doi

  11. [19]

    Borovsky , J. E. 2016, Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 121, 5055, 10.1002/2016JA022686

    2016 doi

  12. [20]

    R., & Vourlidas , A

    Braga , C. R., & Vourlidas , A. 2021, Astron. Astrophys., 650, A31, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039490

    2021 doi

  13. [21]

    2023, Journal of Korean Astronomical Society, 56, 263, 10.5303/JKAS.2023.56.2.263

    Cho , K.-S., Hwang , J., Han , J.-Y., et al. 2023, Journal of Korean Astronomical Society, 56, 263, 10.5303/JKAS.2023.56.2.263

    2023 doi

  14. [22]

    R., Gibson , S

    Cranmer , S. R., Gibson , S. E., & Riley , P. 2017, Space Science Reviews, 212, 1345, 10.1007/s11214-017-0416-y

    2017 doi

  15. [23]

    2021, Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 126, e28996, 10.1029/2020JA028996

    D'Amicis , R., Perrone , D., Bruno , R., & Velli , M. 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 126, e28996, 10.1029/2020JA028996

    2021 doi

  16. [24]

    E., R \"u disser , H

    Davies , E. E., R \"u disser , H. T., Amerstorfer , U. V., et al. 2024, Astrophys. J., 973, 51, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad64cb

    2024 doi

  17. [25]

    M., Lemen , J

    De Pontieu , B., Title , A. M., Lemen , J. R., et al. 2014, Sol. Phys., 289, 2733, 10.1007/s11207-014-0485-y

    2014 doi

  18. [26]

    F., Agapitov , O., Swisdak , M., et al

    Drake , J. F., Agapitov , O., Swisdak , M., et al. 2021, Astron. Astrophys., 650, A2, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039432

    2021 doi

  19. [27]

    V., Bale , S

    Dudok de Wit , T., Krasnoselskikh , V. V., Bale , S. D., et al. 2020, Astrophys. J.s, 246, 39, 10.3847/1538-4365/ab5853

    2020 doi

  20. [28]

    D., Badman , S

    Ervin , T., Bale , S. D., Badman , S. T., et al. 2024, Astrophys. J., 969, 83, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4604

    2024 doi

  21. [29]

    P., et al

    Fargette , N., Lavraud , B., Rouillard , A. P., et al. 2021, Astrophys. J., 919, 96, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1112

    2021 doi

  22. [30]

    J., et al

    Fedorov , A., Louarn , P., Owen , C. J., et al. 2021, Astron. Astrophys., 656, A40, 10.1051/0004-6361/202141246

    2021 doi

  23. [31]

    Fisk , L. A. 2005, Astrophys. J., 626, 563, 10.1086/429957

    2005 doi

  24. [32]

    A., & Kasper , J

    Fisk , L. A., & Kasper , J. C. 2020, Astrophys. J.l, 894, L4, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab8acd

    2020 doi

  25. [33]

    J., Velli , M

    Fox , N. J., Velli , M. C., Bale , S. D., et al. 2016, Space Science Reviews, 204, 7, 10.1007/s11214-015-0211-6

    2016 doi

  26. [34]

    2021, Astron

    Garc \' a Marirrodriga , C., Pacros , A., Strandmoe , S., et al. 2021, Astron. Astrophys., 646, A121, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038519

    2021 doi

  27. [35]

    T., McComas , D

    Gosling , J. T., McComas , D. J., Roberts , D. A., & Skoug , R. M. 2009, Astrophys. J.l, 695, L213, 10.1088/0004-637X/695/2/L213

    2009 doi

  28. [36]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.07665, 10.48550/arXiv.2407.07665

    Hayakawa , H., Ebihara , Y., Mishev , A., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.07665, 10.48550/arXiv.2407.07665

    2024 doi arXiv

  29. [37]

    C., Vourlidas , A., Howard , R

    Hess , P., Colaninno , R. C., Vourlidas , A., Howard , R. A., & Stenborg , G. 2023, Astron. Astrophys., 679, A149, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346907

    2023 doi

  30. [38]

    P., Kouloumvakos , A., et al

    Hess , P., Rouillard , A. P., Kouloumvakos , A., et al. 2020, Astrophys. J.s, 246, 25, 10.3847/1538-4365/ab4ff0

    2020 doi

  31. [39]

    S., Matteini , L., & Stansby , D

    Horbury , T. S., Matteini , L., & Stansby , D. 2018, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 478, 1980, 10.1093/mnras/sty953

    2018 doi

  32. [40]

    S., O'Brien , H., Carrasco Blazquez , I., et al

    Horbury , T. S., O'Brien , H., Carrasco Blazquez , I., et al. 2020, Astron. Astrophys., 642, A9, 10.1051/0004-6361/201937257

    2020 doi

  33. [41]

    S., Laker , R., Rodriguez , L., et al

    Horbury , T. S., Laker , R., Rodriguez , L., et al. 2021, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2104.14960, 10.48550/arXiv.2104.14960

    2021 doi arXiv

  34. [42]

    2024, Nature Astronomy, 10.1038/s41550-024-02321-9

    Hou , C., He , J., Duan , D., et al. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 10.1038/s41550-024-02321-9

    2024 doi

  35. [43]

    A., Stenborg , G., Vourlidas , A., et al

    Howard , R. A., Stenborg , G., Vourlidas , A., et al. 2022, Astrophys. J., 936, 43, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7ff5

    2022 doi

  36. [44]

    A., Vourlidas , A., Bothmer , V., et al

    Howard , R. A., Vourlidas , A., Bothmer , V., et al. 2019, Nature, 576, 232, 10.1038/s41586-019-1807-x

    2019 doi

  37. [45]

    A., Vourlidas , A., Colaninno , R

    Howard , R. A., Vourlidas , A., Colaninno , R. C., et al. 2020, Astron. Astrophys., 642, A13, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935202

    2020 doi

  38. [46]

    R., et al

    Janvier , M., Mzerguat , S., Young , P. R., et al. 2023, Astron. Astrophys., 677, A130, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346321

    2023 doi

  39. [47]

    C., Abiad , R., Austin , G., et al

    Kasper , J. C., Abiad , R., Austin , G., et al. 2016, Space Sci. Rev., 204, 131, 10.1007/s11214-015-0206-3

    2016 doi

  40. [48]

    C., Bale , S

    Kasper , J. C., Bale , S. D., Belcher , J. W., et al. 2019, Nature, 576, 228, 10.1038/s41586-019-1813-z

    2019 doi

  41. [49]

    2007, Sol

    Kosugi , T., Matsuzaki , K., Sakao , T., et al. 2007, Sol. Phys., 243, 3, 10.1007/s11207-007-9014-6

    2007 doi

  42. [50]

    J., Grimm , O., et al

    Krucker , S., Hurford , G. J., Grimm , O., et al. 2020, Astron. Astrophys., 642, A15, 10.1051/0004-6361/201937362

    2020 doi

  43. [51]

    S., O'Brien , H., et al

    Laker , R., Horbury , T. S., O'Brien , H., et al. 2024, Space Weather, 22, e2023SW003628, 10.1029/2023SW003628

    2024 doi

  44. [52]

    Laming , J. M. 2017, Astrophys. J., 844, 153, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7cf1

    2017 doi

  45. [53]

    C., Qiu , J., Penteado , P., et al

    Liewer , P. C., Qiu , J., Penteado , P., et al. 2020, Sol. Phys., 295, 140, 10.1007/s11207-020-01715-y

    2020 doi

  46. [54]

    M., Green , L

    Long , D. M., Green , L. M., Pecora , F., et al. 2023, Astrophys. J., 955, 152, 10.3847/1538-4357/acefd5

    2023 doi

  47. [55]

    D., Chust , T., et al

    Maksimovic , M., Bale , S. D., Chust , T., et al. 2020, Astron. Astrophys., 642, A12, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936214

    2020 doi

  48. [56]

    Mallet , A., Squire , J., Chandran , B. D. G., Bowen , T., & Bale , S. D. 2021, Astrophys. J., 918, 62, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0c12

    2021 doi

  49. [57]

    J., Alexander , N., Angold , N., et al

    McComas , D. J., Alexander , N., Angold , N., et al. 2016, Space Sci. Rev., 204, 187, 10.1007/s11214-014-0059-1

    2016 doi

  50. [58]

    J., Reiss , M

    M \"o stl , C., Weiss , A. J., Reiss , M. A., et al. 2022, Astrophys. J.l, 924, L6, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac42d0

    2022 doi

  51. [59]

    M \"u ller , D., St. Cyr , O. C., Zouganelis , I., et al. 2020, Astron. Astrophys., 642, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038467

    2020 doi

  52. [60]

    M., Baker , D., et al

    Ngampoopun , N., Long , D. M., Baker , D., et al. 2023, Astrophys. J., 950, 150, 10.3847/1538-4357/acd44e

    2023 doi

  53. [61]

    V., Mulligan , T., Kilpua , E

    Nitta , N. V., Mulligan , T., Kilpua , E. K. J., et al. 2021, Space Sci. Rev., 217, 82, 10.1007/s11214-021-00857-0

    2021 doi

  54. [62]

    J., Bruno , R., Livi , S., et al

    Owen , C. J., Bruno , R., Livi , S., et al. 2020, Astron. Astrophys., 642, A16, 10.1051/0004-6361/201937259

    2020 doi

  55. [63]

    J., Crooker , N

    Owens , M. J., Crooker , N. U., & Lockwood , M. 2013, Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 118, 1868, 10.1002/jgra.50259

    2013 doi

  56. [64]

    J., Lockwood , M., & Barnard , L

    Owens , M. J., Lockwood , M., & Barnard , L. A. 2020, Space Weather, 18, e02507, 10.1029/2020SW002507

    2020 doi

  57. [65]

    2022, in 44th COSPAR Scientific Assembly

    Palomba , M., & Luntama , J.-P. 2022, in 44th COSPAR Scientific Assembly. Held 16-24 July, Vol. 44, 3544

    2022

  58. [66]

    2022, Sol

    Patel , R., Majumdar , S., Pant , V., & Banerjee , D. 2022, Sol. Phys., 297, 27, 10.1007/s11207-022-01957-y

    2022 doi

  59. [67]

    Pecora , F., Servidio , S., Greco , A., & Matthaeus , W. H. 2021, Astron. Astrophys., 650, A20, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039639

    2021 doi

  60. [68]

    E., Matteini , L., Squire , J., et al

    Raouafi , N. E., Matteini , L., Squire , J., et al. 2023, Space Sci. Rev., 219, 8, 10.1007/s11214-023-00952-4

    2023 doi

  61. [69]

    E., Hoeksema , J

    Raouafi , N. E., Hoeksema , J. T., Newmark , J. S., et al. 2023 b , in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 55, 333, 10.3847/25c2cfeb.c647a83d

    2023 doi

  62. [70]

    R., Warner , M., Keil , S

    Rimmele , T. R., Warner , M., Keil , S. L., et al. 2020, Sol. Phys., 295, 172, 10.1007/s11207-020-01736-7

    2020 doi

  63. [71]

    J., Badman , S

    Rivera , Y. J., Badman , S. T., Stevens , M. L., et al. 2024, Science, 385, 962, 10.1126/science.adk6953

    2024 doi

  64. [72]

    2020, Astron

    Rochus , P., Auch \`e re , F., Berghmans , D., et al. 2020, Astron. Astrophys., 642, A8, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936663

    2020 doi

  65. [73]

    F., Mason , G

    Rodr \' guez-Pacheco , J., Wimmer-Schweingruber , R. F., Mason , G. M., et al. 2020, Astron. Astrophys., 642, A7, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935287

    2020 doi

  66. [74]

    P., Pinto , R

    Rouillard , A. P., Pinto , R. F., Vourlidas , A., et al. 2020, Astron. Astrophys., 642, A2, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935305

    2020 doi

  67. [75]

    H., Chhiber , R., et al

    Ruffolo , D., Matthaeus , W. H., Chhiber , R., et al. 2020, Astrophys. J., 902, 94, 10.3847/1538-4357/abb594

    2020 doi

  68. [76]

    M., Nieves-Chinchilla , T., Jian , L

    Salman , T. M., Nieves-Chinchilla , T., Jian , L. K., et al. 2024, Astrophys. J., 966, 118, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad320c

    2024 doi

  69. [77]

    B., Bjelksjo , K., Korhonen , T

    Scharmer , G. B., Bjelksjo , K., Korhonen , T. K., Lindberg , B., & Petterson , B. 2003, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 4853, Innovative Telescopes and Instrumentation for Solar Astrophysics, ed. S. L. Keil & S. V. Avakyan ...

    2003 doi

  70. [78]

    A., & McComas , D

    Schwadron , N. A., & McComas , D. J. 2021, Astrophys. J., 909, 95, 10.3847/1538-4357/abd4e6

    2021 doi

  71. [79]

    Shoda , M., Chandran , B. D. G., & Cranmer , S. R. 2021, Astrophys. J., 915, 52, 10.3847/1538-4357/abfdbc

    2021 doi

  72. [80]

    K., del Toro Iniesta , J

    Solanki , S. K., del Toro Iniesta , J. C., Woch , J., et al. 2020, Astron. Astrophys., 642, A11, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935325

    2020 doi

  73. [81]

    2020, Astron

    Spice Consortium , Anderson , M., Appourchaux , T., et al. 2020, Astron. Astrophys., 642, A14, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935574

    2020 doi

  74. [82]

    Squire , J., Chandran , B. D. G., & Meyrand , R. 2020, Astrophys. J.l, 891, L2, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab74e1

    2020 doi

  75. [83]

    C., & Moore , R

    Sterling , A. C., & Moore , R. L. 2020, Astrophys. J.l, 896, L18, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab96be

    2020 doi

  76. [84]

    P., Stangalini , M., et al

    Telloni , D., Zank , G. P., Stangalini , M., et al. 2022, Astrophys. J.l, 936, L25, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac8104

    2022 doi

  77. [85]

    2024, Astrophys

    Trotta , D., Larosa , A., Nicolaou , G., et al. 2024, Astrophys. J., 962, 147, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad187d

    2024 doi

  78. [86]

    M., Zambrana Prado , N., et al

    Varesano , T., Hassler , D. M., Zambrana Prado , N., et al. 2024, Astron. Astrophys., 685, A146, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347637

    2024 doi

  79. [87]

    K., Vourlidas , A., et al

    Velli , M., Harra , L. K., Vourlidas , A., et al. 2020, Astron. Astrophys., 642, A4, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038245

    2020 doi

  80. [88]

    M., & Borovsky , J

    Viall , N. M., & Borovsky , J. E. 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 125, e26005, 10.1029/2018JA026005

    2020 doi

  81. [89]

    A., Plunkett , S

    Vourlidas , A., Howard , R. A., Plunkett , S. P., et al. 2016, Space Sci. Rev., 204, 83, 10.1007/s11214-014-0114-y

    2016 doi

  82. [90]

    P., Horbury , T

    Walsh , A. P., Horbury , T. S., Maksimovic , M., et al. 2020, Astron. Astrophys., 642, A5, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936894

    2020 doi

  83. [91]

    Wang , Y. M. 2016, Astrophys. J., 833, 121, 10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/121

    2016 doi

  84. [92]

    E., Hess , P., Howard , R

    Wood , B. E., Hess , P., Howard , R. A., Stenborg , G., & Wang , Y.-M. 2020, Astrophys. J.s, 246, 28, 10.3847/1538-4365/ab5219

    2020 doi

  85. [93]

    L., Suess , S

    Yamauchi , Y., Moore , R. L., Suess , S. T., Wang , H., & Sakurai , T. 2004, Astrophys. J., 605, 511, 10.1086/381240

    2004 doi

  86. [94]

    L., Owen , C

    Yardley , S. L., Owen , C. J., Long , D. M., et al. 2023, Astrophys. J.s, 267, 11, 10.3847/1538-4365/acd24b

    2023 doi

  87. [95]

    L., Brooks , D

    Yardley , S. L., Brooks , D. H., D'Amicis , R., et al. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 953, 10.1038/s41550-024-02278-9

    2024 doi

  88. [96]

    P., Nakanotani , M., Zhao , L

    Zank , G. P., Nakanotani , M., Zhao , L. L., Adhikari , L., & Kasper , J. 2020, Astrophys. J., 903, 1, 10.3847/1538-4357/abb828

    2020 doi

  89. [97]

    P., et al

    Zouganelis , I., De Groof , A., Walsh , A. P., et al. 2020, Astron. Astrophys., 642, A3, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038445

    2020 doi

  90. [98]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry add.period write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence '...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.