Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 77 references

Rigid-Body Anisotropy in Noncollinear Antiferromagnets

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read One spin-orbit vector, the rigid rotation between lattice and spin frames, organizes anisotropy in noncollinear antiferromagnets.

desk verdict Solid spin-group extension to noncollinear antiferromagnets with a genuinely new first-order anisotropy term, but the quantitative checks are all in-sample fits; recommend peer review with requests for out-of-sample tests. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.10238 v1 pith:RLOPVSVY submitted 2025-07-14 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el

Zheng Liu , Yang Gao , Qian Niu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el
keywords noncollinearantiferromagnetsspin-orbitcouplingspingroupsymmetrymagneticanisotropyenergyanomalousHalleffectMn3SnMn3Irrigid-bodyrotation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that all anisotropy effects arising from rigid-body rotations of spin order in noncollinear antiferromagnets can be described as polynomial functions of a single geometric object: the spin-orbit vector, a rotation matrix connecting the lattice and spin frames. If true, this offers a systematic recipe, based on spin-group representation theory, for deriving exact functional forms of anisotropic observables, going beyond the yes/no predictions of magnetic point groups. The payoff is demonstrated for Mn$_3$Sn and Mn$_3$Ir, where the derived expressions for the magnetic anisotropy energy and anomalous Hall conductivity fit first-principles calculations, including a first-order-in-spin-orbit term in Mn$_3$Sn that collinear magnets forbid. The authors argue the same machinery extends to ferromagnets, altermagnets, and other spin-orbit-driven effects.

What carries the argument

The central object is the spin-orbit vector $O^i_j$, the SO(3) rotation matrix that maps each spin axis from its reference orientation to its rotated orientation in the lattice frame; its components enter the spin-orbit coupling Hamiltonian. The carrier of the argument is the spin-group representation theory of the spin-only and nontrivial spin groups, used to enumerate polynomial basis functions of $O$ in each irreducible representation of the Hamiltonian's symmetry group. The expansion $F_i = \sum_{n,k} c_{nk} f^i_{nk}(O)$ is what turns a symmetry classification into concrete quantitative formulas: the $n$-th power of $O$ scales like the $n$-th power of spin-orbit coupling, so low-order terms dominate. For scalar energy and pseudovector Hall conductivity, the paper tabulates the relevant basis functions that produce Eqs. (4) and (6).

What would settle it

Compute the magnetic anisotropy energy of Mn$_3$Sn under a dense set of rigid spin rotations at several spin-orbit coupling strengths, say $\lambda = \lambda_0, 2\lambda_0, 3\lambda_0$, and decompose the energy differences into powers of $\lambda$: the out-of-plane barrier should scale linearly in $\lambda$, while the in-plane $\alpha-\gamma$ dependence should scale quadratically. If the fitted exponents deviate from the orders predicted by the basis functions, or if an observable in the listed irreducible representations cannot be fitted by the polynomial basis, the claimed completeness of the expansion is contradicted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that anisotropy under rigid-body rotation of a noncollinear spin texture can be classified by basis functions of the spin-orbit vector $O$, which takes values in SO(3) and encodes how the spin frame is rotated relative to the lattice. Treating spin-orbit coupling as a perturbation of a spin-group-symmetric Hamiltonian, the paper derives that any physical observable decomposes into irreducible representations of the spin group and couples to invariant polynomials of $O$. Applied to coplanar Mn$_3$Sn, this predicts a magnetic anisotropy energy that starts at first order in spin-orbit coupling, $\Delta E \sim 1-\cos\beta$ for out-of-plane tilts, a term tied to the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction and absent in collinear magnets; second-order terms account for biaxial in-plane anisotropy and free in-plane rotation. Applied to Mn$_3$Ir, the anomalous Hall conductivity along the [111] direction is captured only when nonlinear terms up to third order are included, giving $\sigma^H_{111} = \alpha_0 \cos\theta + \beta_0 \cos\theta \cos 2\theta$, which fits the calculated data.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes that rigid-body rotation of the entire spin order is the only relevant low-energy degree of freedom and that a low-order polynomial expansion in the spin-orbit vector $O$, through third or fourth order, is quantitatively sufficient; if internal spin-texture distortion, strain relaxation, or higher-order terms contribute significantly, the derived functional forms will fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In Mn$_3$Sn, the first-order anisotropy term stabilizes the in-plane spin order through a Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya-like mechanism, while the vanishing in-plane anisotropy allows free rotation of the spin order within the plane.
  • In Mn$_3$Ir, the anomalous Hall conductivity's dependence on spin orientation requires third-order spin-orbit terms, giving a nontrivial angular pattern, $\cos\theta \cos 2\theta$, that can serve as a sensitive electrical probe of spin texture.
  • For coplanar antiferromagnets such as Mn$_3$Sn and Mn$_3$Ir, the anomalous Hall conductivity vanishes at zeroth order in spin-orbit coupling, whereas noncoplanar antiferromagnets can have a spin-orbit-independent Hall component.
  • The analytical forms of anisotropy provide a basis for identifying magnetic ground states and for exploring magnetic dynamics and spin-texture control.
  • The theory is argued to apply broadly to ferromagnets, altermagnets, and phenomena including anisotropic magnetoresistance, the anomalous Nernst effect, the nonlinear Hall effect, and spin-orbit-coupling-induced magnetism.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An implication the authors leave implicit is that the same spin-group basis functions should constrain other spin-orbit-driven responses, such as anisotropic magnetoresistance and the anomalous Nernst effect, for the same materials; computing those responses from the same first-principles electronic structure would be a direct test.
  • The predicted free in-plane rotation in Mn$_3$Sn suggests that spin-orbit torques could reorient the spin order in-plane with nearly no energy cost, which may change switching scenarios, although the paper does not address dynamics.
  • Because the basis functions depend only on the spin group and the rotation representation, the method could be used as a lookup recipe: list the irreps, enumerate invariant polynomials of the rotation matrix, and fit leading coefficients to a handful of first-principles rotations.
  • The contrast between coplanar and noncoplanar antiferromagnets implies a practical classification rule for Hall-based readout: in coplanar systems the Hall anisotropy is locked to spin-orbit coupling order, while noncoplanar textures supply a spin-orbit-independent contribution that survives rigid rotations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a spin-group representation-theory framework for characterizing how physical observables of a noncollinear antiferromagnet depend on rigid-body rotations of its spin order. The misalignment between spin and lattice frames is encoded in a 'spin-orbit vector' O (the rotation matrix of the spin order), and observables are expanded in spin-group-adapted polynomials of O [Eq. (3)]. For Mn3Sn, the anisotropy energy is shown to start at first order in O, ΔE = a(1−cosβ)+b sin²β+c sin⁴(β/2)sin²(α−γ) [Eq. (4)]; three coefficients fitted to density-functional data reproduce the energy along three Euler-angle paths, and spin-orbit-coupling-strength scaling confirms the first- and second-order character of the leading terms. The first-order term is mapped to a Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya-type interaction. For Mn3Ir, the anomalous Hall conductivity under rotation about [111] requires nonlinear terms, σH_111 = α0 cosθ + β0 cosθ cos2θ [Eq. (6)], again fitted to first-principles data. The framework is contrasted with magnetic point-group and cluster-multipole analyses, and generalization to other observables and materials is sketched.

Significance. The central construction is sound and non-circular: the basis functions in Table I are fixed by spin-group representation theory independently of the DFT data, and only the scalar coefficients are material-specific. The predicted first-order MAE term in a noncollinear antiferromagnet—forbidden in collinear magnets by the C∞z and IsC2x elements—is a clean qualitative result, and its identification with the DM interaction is physically natural. The λ-scaling checks (Fig. 1(d)) are a genuine test of the perturbative order of the leading terms, the (α,0,0) flatness is a symmetry-enforced output consistent with experiment, and the σH ∥ [111] constraint is a nontrivial symmetry consequence verified by construction of the fit. The framework is clearly transferable to other observables (AMR, Nernst, nonlinear Hall). Its main weakness is that the quantitative validation is in-sample: agreement is shown only on the curves used to fix the coefficients, so the claim of predictive power is presently stronger than the evidence. If the authors add an out-of-sample test or temper the claim, the paper would be a solid contribution to antiferromagnetic spintronics.

major comments (4)
  1. [Energy magnetic anisotropy, Eq. (4)] Equation (4), as printed, reads 'ΔE = a − a cos β + b sin2 β + c sin4 β /2 sin2(α − γ)' and is syntactically garbled: the superscripts and the grouping of the last factor are lost, and the equation is ambiguous enough that a reader could conclude the c-term is α-independent, in direct contradiction to the text's claim that at (α, π, 0) ΔE ~ sin²α. The intended form is presumably ΔE = a(1 − cos β) + b sin²β + c sin⁴(β/2) sin²(α − γ), which reduces to 2a + c sin²α at (α, π, 0) and is consistent with the invariant (O^2_1 + O^1_2)²/4 in Table I. Please restore the equation unambiguously and state the reduced expressions along (α,0,0), (0,β,0), and (α,π,0) explicitly, since these paths carry the main quantitative verification of the paper.
  2. [Figs. 1(c) and 2(b), quantitative verification] The quantitative verification of the central claim is in-sample. In the MAE section, a, b, and c are fitted using energies along (α,0,0), (0,β,0), and (α,π,0), and Fig. 1(c) displays exactly these three curves; in the Hall section, α0 and β0 in Eq. (6) are fitted to σH_111(θ), and Fig. 2(b) shows that same curve. The λ-scaling checks in Figs. 1(d) and 2(a) validate the dominant perturbative order along selected paths, and the (α,0,0) flatness is a partial symmetry-enforced check, but neither tests the angular structure of the basis functions at generic unmeasured orientations. Since the letter describes Eq. (6) as demonstrating 'the predictive power of our theory,' please either add an out-of-sample check—for example, ΔE at one or two generic (α, β, γ) points with both α and γ varying, or σH under rotation about a [001]/[110] axis with the same fitted coefficients—or explicitly limit the claim to reproducing the calculated data on the fitted paths.
  3. [Anomalous Hall magnetic anisotropy, Eq. (6)] The sufficiency of the truncation is asserted but not tested in the Hall case. With only two parameters in Eq. (6), the fit cannot distinguish the assumed third-order angular form from other functional shapes, and the third-order term itself shifts the θ = 0 value by roughly 20% (473.5 from α0 versus 377.2 S/cm from α0 + β0), so a fourth-order contribution of comparable size cannot be excluded a priori. Please include a convergence check, for instance by adding the next allowed invariant to the fit and showing that its coefficient is small, or by verifying the predicted λ³ scaling of the β0 term at a fixed θ.
  4. [Methods / first-principles calculations] No computational details are provided for the first-principles calculations behind Figs. 1 and 2: the code, exchange-correlation functional, k-mesh, basis set or plane-wave cutoff, structural relaxation protocol, and the procedure for scaling λ in Figs. 1(d) and 2(a) are all absent, and the cited Supplemental Material does not list numerical parameters. Without these, the quantitative results cannot be reproduced or independently assessed. Please add a methods paragraph or include the numerical parameters in the Supplemental Material.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Energy magnetic anisotropy, fitting paragraph] The sentence 'as illustrated by dashed lines in Fig. 1(b)' is incorrect: Fig. 1(b) is an energy surface in magnetization space, whereas the fitted curves and data points appear in Fig. 1(c). Please correct the cross-reference and state the point-versus-line conventions in the caption.
  2. [Spin group analysis / Table I] The object O is a rank-2 rotation matrix (Oj_i = Rij), but it is called a 'spin-orbit vector' throughout, while Table I builds basis functions from its tensor elements. Please either introduce the term 'spin-orbit tensor' or justify the vector terminology explicitly to avoid confusion.
  3. [Abstract and Introduction] Calling the framework a 'microscopic theory' is stronger than what is derived: the angular structure follows from spin-group symmetry, but the coefficients a, b, c, α0, and β0 are fitted to first-principles data. A more conservative description, such as 'symmetry-based theory,' would better match the content.
  4. [Fig. 1(b)] The axes and color scale of Fig. 1(b) are not described in the text; stating explicitly which Euler angles are varied (apparently α and β with γ = 0) and providing a color scale would make the claimed structure of ΔE in Euler-angle space checkable.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the symmetry-derived functional forms are independent of the fitted coefficients, and the in-sample agreement is a validation weakness rather than a circular reduction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The angular forms in Eqs. (4)-(6) are obtained from spin-group representation theory: physical observables are expanded in the spin-orbit vector O (Eq. 3), and the allowed polynomials are fixed by the irreducible representations of the spin group (Table I and Supplemental Material), not by the DFT results. The coefficients a, b, c and alpha0, beta0 are explicitly fitted to first-principles energies and conductivities, which is the standard and non-circular role of parameters in a symmetry expansion; these fitted values are not fed back into the construction of the basis functions. The lambda-scaling checks in Figs. 1(d) and 2(a) confirm the perturbative order of the dominant terms along selected paths, providing an additional independent constraint. The wording 'demonstrating the predictive power of our theory' in the anomalous Hall section overstates what is shown, because the agreement in Figs. 1(c) and 2(b) is in-sample after fitting the same curves; that is a validation weakness, not a circularity. The only self-citation (ref. [36]) announces an extension of the authors' prior collinear framework, but the present paper re-derives the needed group-theoretic content, so the self-citation is not load-bearing. I therefore find no step in which a 'prediction' is equivalent by construction to a fitted input or to a self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The framework depends on the perturbative expansion in the spin-orbit vector, a rigid-body rotation assumption, and the completeness of the group-theoretic basis functions. The fitted coefficients a, b, c, α0, β0 are the only free parameters; they are material-specific and fitted to DFT data. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • a = 3.159 meV
    Coefficient of the first-order term a(1 - cos β) in the Mn3Sn anisotropy energy, Eq. (4). Obtained by fitting to DFT anisotropy energies at three representative Euler angles.
  • b = 0.351 meV
    Coefficient of the sin²β term in Eq. (4), fitted to DFT data for Mn3Sn.
  • c = 0.890 meV
    Coefficient of the sin⁴β sin²(α-γ) term in Eq. (4) (as extracted), fitted to DFT data for Mn3Sn.
  • α0 = 473.5 S/cm
    Coefficient of the cos θ term in Eq. (6) for the anomalous Hall conductivity of Mn3Ir, fitted to DFT data.
  • β0 = -96.3 S/cm
    Coefficient of the cos θ cos 2θ term in Eq. (6), fitted to DFT data for Mn3Ir.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The spin order in noncollinear antiferromagnets can be treated as a rigid body whose rotations are the low-energy degree of freedom.
    Introduced in 'Spin group analysis'; strong exchange coupling stabilizes the spin texture, allowing SO(3) rigid rotations.
  • domain assumption Anisotropy effects can be expanded in powers of the spin-orbit vector O, with the n-th order term proportional to the n-th power of spin-orbit coupling.
    Stated in 'Spin group analysis'; this is the perturbation expansion that the entire framework relies on.
  • domain assumption The spin group of H0 (without spin-orbit coupling) is the appropriate symmetry group for classifying the expansion.
    The paper uses spin group formalism from refs [27-31, 49, 50]; the spin group is invariant under rigid-body rotation in the chosen spin frame.
  • standard math The basis functions listed in Table I and in the Supplemental Material are complete to the stated order.
    This follows from representation theory, but the derivation is deferred to the Supplemental Material, so it is taken as an input here.
  • domain assumption The mapping between the spin-orbit vector and the spin order (used to identify the DM interaction) is correct.
    The mapping is given in the Supplemental Material; the identification of the first-order term with the in-plane DM interaction relies on it.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Rigid-Body Anisotropy in Noncollinear Antiferromagnets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RLOPVSVY

@misc{pith2026250710238,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Rigid-Body Anisotropy in Noncollinear Antiferromagnets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RLOPVSVY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.10238}
}
abstract

Characterizing the anisotropic structure in noncollinear antiferromagnets is essential for antiferromagnetic spintronics. In this work, we provide a microscopic theory linking the anisotropy effects induced by the rigid-body rotation of spin order to spin-orbit coupling. Our method goes beyond the conventional magnetic group theory, offering a concise yet powerful tool to characterize diverse anisotropy effects in complex magnetic systems. Using the group representation theory of the spin group, we obtain a set of basis functions formed from tensor elements of spin-orbit vector--which originates from spin-orbit coupling and is tied to the rigid-body rotation of the spin order--to systematically describe the structure of anisotropy effects. As a concrete example, we apply our framework to coplanar antiferromagnets Mn$_3$Sn and Mn$_3$Ir, demonstrating that the corresponding basis functions can well capture both the geometric and magnitude dependencies of the magnetic anisotropy energy and anomalous Hall conductivity. Finally, we discuss the generalization of our framework to broader classes of anisotropy phenomena in magnetic systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.10238 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Magnetic properties and magnetic anisotropy energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Anomalous Hall effect of Mn [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. H. MacDonald, J. Sinova, S. Nakatsuji, and T. Jungwirth, Anomalous Hall antiferromagnets, Nat. Rev. Mater. 7, 482 (2022)

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    B. H. Rimmler, B. Pal, and S. S. P. Parkin, Non-collinear antiferromagnetic spintronics, Nat. Rev. Mater. 10, 109 (2025)

    2025

  3. [3]

    The first-order anisotropy energy term is ∆ E1 ∼ 1 − cos β, where β denotes the tilt of magnetic moments out of the xy-plane

    Under the rigid-body rota- tion of Euler angles ( α, β, γ), the spin-orbit vector has the form O = Rz(α)Ry(β)Rz (γ), where Ri(θ) denotes the rotation matrix about axis i through angle θ. The first-order anisotropy energy term is ∆ E1 ∼ 1 − cos β, where β denotes the tilt of magnetic moments out of the xy-plane. Summing over the basis functions in Table I, ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Points and solid lines represent cal- culated and fitted results, respectively

    (c) Magnetic anisotropy energy ∆ E as a function of Euler angles ( α, 0, 0), (0, β, 0), and ( α, π, 0). Points and solid lines represent cal- culated and fitted results, respectively. (d) Energy differe nce of E0,π,0 − E0,0,0 and Eπ/2,π,0 − E0,π,0 as a function of the coupling strength, where λ0 represents the actual strength of spin-orbit coupling. appeara...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Baltz, A

    V. Baltz, A. Manchon, M. Tsoi, T. Moriyama, T. Ono, and Y. Tserkovnyak, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015005 (2018)

    2018

  6. [6]

    Jungwirth, J

    T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, A. Manchon, X. Marti, J. Wun- derlich, and C. Felser, The multiple directions of antifer- romagnetic spintronics, Nat. Phys. 14, 200 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    H. Chen, Q. Niu, and A. H. MacDonald, Anomalous Hall Effect Arising from Noncollinear Antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 017205 (2014)

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    Kiyohara, T

    N. Kiyohara, T. Tomita, and S. Nakatsuji, Giant Anoma- lous Hall Effect in the Chiral Antiferromagnet Mn 3Ge, Phys. Rev. Appl. 5, 064009 (2016)

    work page 2016

Show all 77 references
  1. [9]

    Zhang, Y

    Y. Zhang, Y. Sun, H. Yang, J. ˇZelezn´ y, S. P. P. Parkin, C. Felser, and B. Yan, Strong anisotropic anomalous Hall effect and spin Hall effect in the chiral antiferromagnetic compounds Mn 3X (X = Ge, Sn, Ga, Ir, Rh, and Pt), Phys. Rev. B 95, 075128 (2017)

    2017

  2. [10]

    H. Yang, Y. Sun, Y. Zhang, W.-J. Shi, S. S. P. Parkin, and B. Yan, Topological Weyl semimetals in the chiral antiferromagnetic materials Mn 3Ge and Mn 3Sn, New J. Phys. 19, 015008 (2017)

    2017

  3. [11]

    Z. Q. Liu, H. Chen, J. M. Wang, J. H. Liu, K. Wang, Z. X. Feng, H. Yan, X. R. Wang, C. B. Jiang, J. M. D. Coey, and A. H. MacDonald, Electrical switching of the topological anomalous hall effect in a non-collinear antiferromagnet above room temperature, Nat. Electron. 1, 172 (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    Nakatsuji, N

    S. Nakatsuji, N. Kiyohara, and T. Higo, Large anomalous Hall effect in a non-collinear antiferromagnet at room temperature, Nature 527, 212 (2015)

    2015

  5. [13]

    A. K. Nayak, J. E. Fischer, Y. Sun, B. Yan, J. Karel, A. C. Komarek, C. Shekhar, N. Kumar, W. Schnelle, J. K¨ ubler, C. Felser, and S. S. P. Parkin, Large anomalous Hall effect driven by a nonvanishing Berry curvature in the noncolinear antiferromagnet Mn 3Ge, Sci. Adv. 2, e150...

    2016

  6. [14]

    T. Chen, T. Tomita, S. Minami, M. Fu, T. Koretsune, M. Kitatani, I. Muhammad, D. Nishio-Hamane, R. Ishii, F. Ishii, R. Arita, and S. Nakatsuji, Anomalous trans- port due to Weyl fermions in the chiral antiferromagnets Mn3X, X = Sn, Ge, Nat. Commun. 12, 572 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    Ikhlas, S

    M. Ikhlas, S. Dasgupta, F. Theuss, T. Higo, S. Kittaka, B. J. Ramshaw, O. Tchernyshyov, C. W. Hicks, and S. Nakatsuji, Piezomagnetic switching of the anomalous Hall effect in an antiferromagnet at room temperature, Nat. Phys. 18, 1086 (2022)

    2022

  8. [16]

    Pradhan, K

    S. Pradhan, K. Samanta, K. Saha, and A. K. Nandy, Vector-chirality driven topological phase transitions in noncollinear antiferromagnets and its impact on anoma- 6 lous Hall effect, Commun. Phys. 6, 272 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    H. Tsai, T. Higo, K. Kondou, T. Nomoto, A. Sakai, A. Kobayashi, T. Nakano, K. Yakushiji, R. Arita, S. Miwa, Y. Otani, and S. Nakatsuji, Electrical ma- nipulation of a topological antiferromagnetic state, Nature 580, 608 (2020)

    2020

  10. [18]

    T. Higo, K. Kondou, T. Nomoto, M. Shiga, S. Sakamoto, X. Chen, D. Nishio-Hamane, R. Arita, Y. Otani, S. Miwa, and S. Nakatsuji, Perpendicular full switch- ing of chiral antiferromagnetic order by current, Nature 607, 474 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    B. Pal, B. K. Hazra, B. G¨ obel, J.-C. Jeon, A. K. Pandeya, A. Chakraborty, O. Busch, A. K. Srivastava, H. Deniz, J. M. Taylor, H. Meyerheim, I. Mertig, S.-H. Yang, and S. S. P. Parkin, Setting of the magnetic structure of chiral kagome antiferromagnets by a seeded spin-orbit ...

    2022

  12. [20]

    Zheng, L

    Z. Zheng, L. Jia, Z. Zhang, Q. Shen, G. Zhou, Z. Cui, L. Ren, Z. Chen, N. F. Jamaludin, T. Zhao, R. Xiao, Q. Zhang, Y. Du, L. Liu, S. Gradeˇ cak, K. S. Novoselov, W. Zhao, X. Xu, Y. Zhang, and J. Chen, All-electrical perpendicular switching of chiral antiferromagnetic or- der,...

    2025 doi

  13. [21]

    Takeuchi, Y

    Y. Takeuchi, Y. Yamane, J.-Y. Yoon, R. Itoh, B. Jinnai, S. Kanai, J. Ieda, S. Fukami, and H. Ohno, Chiral-spin rotation of non-collinear antiferromagnet by spin–orbit torque, Nat. Mater. 20, 1364 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    H. Tsai, T. Higo, K. Kondou, A. Kobayashi, T. Nakano, K. Yakushiji, S. Miwa, Y. Otani, and S. Nakatsuji, Spin–orbit torque switching of the antiferromagnetic state in polycrystalline Mn 3Sn/Cu/heavy metal het- erostructures, AIP Adv. 11, 045110 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    G. K. Krishnaswamy, G. Sala, B. Jacot, C.-H. Lambert, R. Schlitz, M. D. Rossell, P. N¨ oel, and P. Gambardella, Time-Dependent Multistate Switch- ing of Topological Antiferromagnetic Order in Mn 3Sn, Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 024064 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    Arpaci, V

    S. Arpaci, V. Lopez-Dominguez, J. Shi, L. S´ anchez- Tejerina, F. Garesci, C. Wang, X. Yan, V. K. Sang- wan, M. A. Grayson, M. C. Hersam, G. Finoc- chio, and P. Khalili Amiri, Observation of current- induced switching in non-collinear antiferromag- netic IrMn 3 by differential ...

    2021

  17. [25]

    Shubnikov, Symmetry and Antisymmetry of Finite Figures (USSR Press, Moscow, 1951)

    A. Shubnikov, Symmetry and Antisymmetry of Finite Figures (USSR Press, Moscow, 1951)

    1951

  18. [26]

    Zamorzaev, Generalization of Fedorov Groups , Can- didate dissertation, Leningrad State University (1953)

    A. Zamorzaev, Generalization of Fedorov Groups , Can- didate dissertation, Leningrad State University (1953)

    1953

  19. [27]

    W. H. Kleiner, Space-Time Symmetry of Transport Co- efficients, Phys. Rev. 142, 318 (1966)

    1966

  20. [28]

    C. J. BRADLEY and B. L. DA VIES, Mag- netic Groups and Their Corepresentations, Rev. Mod. Phys. 40, 359 (1968)

    1968

  21. [29]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond Con- ventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromagnetism: A Phase with Nonrelativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation Symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    P. Liu, J. Li, J. Han, X. Wan, and Q. Liu, Spin-Group Symmetry in Magnetic Materials with Negligible Spin- Orbit Coupling, Phys. Rev. X 12, 021016 (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    X. Chen, J. Ren, Y. Zhu, Y. Yu, A. Zhang, P. Liu, J. Li, Y. Liu, C. Li, and Q. Liu, Enumeration and Representation Theory of Spin Space Groups, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031038 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Z. Xiao, J. Zhao, Y. Li, R. Shindou, and Z.-D. Song, Spin Space Groups: Full Classification and Applications, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031037 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    Jiang, Z

    Y. Jiang, Z. Song, T. Zhu, Z. Fang, H. Weng, Z.-X. Liu, J. Yang, and C. Fang, Enumeration of Spin-Space Groups: Toward a Complete Description of Symmetries of Magnetic Orders, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031039 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    K¨ ubler, Theory of itinerant electron magnetism , Vol

    J. K¨ ubler, Theory of itinerant electron magnetism , Vol. 172 (Oxford University Press, 2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    G. H. O. Daalderop, P. J. Kelly, and M. F. H. Schuurmans, Magnetocrystalline anisotropy and orbital moments in transition-metal compounds, Phys. Rev. B 44, 12054 (1991)

    1991

  28. [36]

    Heide, G

    M. Heide, G. Bihlmayer, and S. Bl¨ ugel, Dzyaloshinskii - Moriya interaction accounting for the orientation of magnetic domains in ultrathin films: Fe/W(110), Phys. Rev. B 78, 140403 (2008)

    2008

  29. [37]

    A. B. Shick, S. Khmelevskyi, O. N. Mryasov, J. Wun- derlich, and T. Jungwirth, Spin-orbit coupling in- duced anisotropy effects in bimetallic antiferromag- nets: A route towards antiferromagnetic spintronics, Phys. Rev. B 81, 212409 (2010)

    2010

  30. [38]

    Z. Liu, M. Wei, W. Peng, D. Hou, Y. Gao, and Q. Niu, Multipolar Anisotropy in Anomalous Hall Effect from Spin-Group Symmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. X 15, 031006 (2025)

    2025

  31. [39]

    P. A. McClarty and J. G. Rau, Landau Theory of Alter- magnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 176702 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    R.-C. Xiao, H. Li, H. Han, W. Gan, M. Yang, D.- F. Shao, S.-H. Zhang, Y. Gao, M. Tian, and J. Zhou, Anomalous-Hall N´ eel textures in altermagnetic materi- als (2025), arXiv:2411.10147

    2025 arXiv

  33. [41]

    M. Roig, Y. Yu, R. C. Ekman, A. Kreisel, B. M. Andersen, and D. F. Agterberg, Quasisymmetry- Constrained Spin Ferromagnetism in Altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 016703 (2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    R. D. Cowan, The theory of atomic structure and spectra , 3 (Univ of California Press, 1981)

    1981

  35. [43]

    St¨ ohr and H

    J. St¨ ohr and H. C. Siegmann, Magnetism, Solid-State Sciences. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 5, 236 (2006)

    2006

  36. [44]

    Nov´ ak, Transition metal oxides: Magnetism, in Encyclopedia of Materials: Science and Technology , edited by K

    P. Nov´ ak, Transition metal oxides: Magnetism, in Encyclopedia of Materials: Science and Technology , edited by K. J. Buschow, R. W. Cahn, M. C. Flemings, B. Ilschner, E. J. Kramer, S. Mahajan, and P. Veyssi` ere (Elsevier, Oxford, 2001) pp. 9397–9402

    2001

  37. [45]

    T. M. Dunn, Spin-orbit coupling in the first and second transition series, Trans. Faraday Soc. 57, 1441 (1961)

    1961

  38. [46]

    B. Yuan, J. P. Clancy, A. M. Cook, C. M. Thomp- son, J. Greedan, G. Cao, B. C. Jeon, T. W. Noh, M. H. Upton, D. Casa, T. Gog, A. Paramekanti, and Y.-J. Kim, Determination of Hund’s coupling in 5d oxides using resonant inelastic x-ray scattering, Phys. Rev. B 95, 235114 (2017)

    2017

  39. [47]

    G. L. Stamokostas and G. A. Fiete, Mixing of t2g − eg orbitals in 4 d and 5 d transition metal oxides, Phys. Rev. B 97, 085150 (2018)

    2018

  40. [48]

    Tanaka, H

    T. Tanaka, H. Kontani, M. Naito, T. Naito, D. S. Hi- rashima, K. Yamada, and J. Inoue, Intrinsic spin Hall effect and orbital Hall effect in 4 d and 5 d transition met- als, Phys. Rev. B 77, 165117 (2008)

    2008

  41. [49]

    Naito, D

    T. Naito, D. S. Hirashima, and H. Kontani, Tight-bindin g study of anomalous Hall effect in ferromagnetic 3 d tran- sition metals, Phys. Rev. B 81, 195111 (2010)

    2010

  42. [50]

    Herman, S

    F. Herman, S. Skillman, et al. , Atomic structure cal- 7 culations, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1963)

    1963

  43. [51]

    Yang, Z.-X

    J. Yang, Z.-X. Liu, and C. Fang, Symmetry in- variants and classes of quasiparticles in magneti- cally ordered systems having weak spin-orbit coupling, Nat. Commun. 15, 10203 (2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    X. Chen, Y. Liu, P. Liu, Y. Yu, J. Ren, J. Li, A. Zhang, and Q. Liu, Unconventional magnons in collinear magnets dictated by spin space groups, Nature 640, 349 (2025)

    2025

  45. [53]

    Suzuki, T

    M.-T. Suzuki, T. Koretsune, M. Ochi, and R. Arita, Clus- ter multipole theory for anomalous Hall effect in antifer- romagnets, Phys. Rev. B 95, 094406 (2017)

    2017

  46. [54]

    Suzuki, T

    M.-T. Suzuki, T. Nomoto, R. Arita, Y. Yanagi, S. Hayami, and H. Kusunose, Multipole expansion for magnetic structures: A generation scheme for a symmetry-adapted orthonormal basis set in the crystal- lographic point group, Phys. Rev. B 99, 174407 (2019)

    2019

  47. [55]

    Bhowal and N

    S. Bhowal and N. A. Spaldin, Ferroically Or- dered Magnetic Octupoles in d-Wave Altermagnets, Phys. Rev. X 14, 011019 (2024)

    2024

  48. [56]

    Yatsushiro, H

    M. Yatsushiro, H. Kusunose, and S. Hayami, Multipole classification in 122 magnetic point groups for unified un- derstanding of multiferroic responses and transport phe- nomena, Phys. Rev. B 104, 054412 (2021)

    2021

  49. [57]

    Watanabe and Y

    H. Watanabe and Y. Yanase, Group-theoretical classifi- cation of multipole order: Emergent responses and can- didate materials, Phys. Rev. B 98, 245129 (2018)

    2018

  50. [58]

    Hayami, M

    S. Hayami, M. Yatsushiro, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Classification of atomic-scale multipoles under crystallo - graphic point groups and application to linear response tensors, Phys. Rev. B 98, 165110 (2018)

    2018

  51. [59]

    See Supplemental Material for the spin point group el- ements and character tables of Mn 3Sn and Mn 3Ir, the effective spin Hamiltonian of Mn 3Sn, the correspondence between spin-orbit vector and spin order, anisotropy en- ergy of Mn 3Ir, anomalous Hall conductivity in Mn 3Sn, ...

  52. [60]

    Moriya, Anisotropic Superexchange Interaction and Weak Ferromagnetism, Phys

    T. Moriya, Anisotropic Superexchange Interaction and Weak Ferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. 120, 91 (1960)

    1960

  53. [61]

    D. Wang, X. Bo, F. Tang, and X. Wan, First- principles study of the spin-orbit coupling con- tribution to anisotropic magnetic interactions, Phys. Rev. B 108, 085140 (2023)

    2023

  54. [62]

    Tomiyoshi and Y

    S. Tomiyoshi and Y. Yamaguchi, Magnetic Structure and Weak Ferromagnetism of Mn 3Sn Studied by Polarized Neutron Diffraction, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 51, 2478 (1982)

    1982

  55. [63]

    Karplus and J

    R. Karplus and J. M. Luttinger, Hall Effect in Ferromag- netics, Phys. Rev. 95, 1154 (1954)

    1954

  56. [64]

    Nagaosa, J

    N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A. H. Mac- Donald, and N. P. Ong, Anomalous Hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1539 (2010)

    2010

  57. [65]

    N. J. Ghimire, A. S. Botana, J. S. Jiang, J. Zhang, Y.-S. Chen, and J. F. Mitchell, Large anomalous Hall effect in the chiral-lattice antiferromagnet CoNb 3S6, Nat. Commun. 9, 3280 (2018)

    2018

  58. [66]

    Takagi, R

    H. Takagi, R. Takagi, S. Minami, T. Nomoto, K. Ohishi, M.-T. Suzuki, Y. Yanagi, M. Hirayama, N. D. Khanh, K. Karube, H. Saito, D. Hashizume, R. Kiyanagi, Y. Tokura, R. Arita, T. Nakajima, and S. Seki, Sponta- neous topological Hall effect induced by non-coplanar an- tiferromagn...

    2023

  59. [67]

    P. Park, W. Cho, C. Kim, Y. An, Y.-G. Kang, M. Avdeev, R. Sibille, K. Iida, R. Kajimoto, K. H. Lee, W. Ju, E.-J. Cho, H.-J. Noh, M. J. Han, S.-S. Zhang, C. D. Batista, and J.-G. Park, Tetrahedral triple-Q mag- netic ordering and large spontaneous Hall conductivity in the metal...

    2023

  60. [68]

    Mazin, Altermagnetism—A New Punch Line of Fun- damental Magnetism, Phys

    I. Mazin, Altermagnetism—A New Punch Line of Fun- damental Magnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040002 (2022)

    2022

  61. [69]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerg- ing Research Landscape of Altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

  62. [70]

    Q. Liu, X. Dai, and S. Bl¨ ugel, Different facets of uncon- ventional magnetism, Nat. Phys. 21, 329 (2025)

    2025

  63. [71]

    Ritzinger and K

    P. Ritzinger and K. V´ yborn´ y, Anisotropic mag- netoresistance: materials, models and applications, R. Soc. Open Sci. 10, 230564 (2023)

    2023

  64. [72]

    Ikhlas, T

    M. Ikhlas, T. Tomita, T. Koretsune, M.-T. Suzuki, D. Nishio-Hamane, R. Arita, Y. Otani, and S. Nakat- suji, Large anomalous nernst effect at room temperature in a chiral antiferromagnet, Nat. Phys. 13, 1085 (2017)

    2017

  65. [73]

    Shao, S.-H

    D.-F. Shao, S.-H. Zhang, G. Gurung, W. Yang, and E. Y. Tsymbal, Nonlinear Anomalous Hall Effect for N´ eel Vec- tor Detection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 067203 (2020)

    2020

  66. [74]

    C. Wang, Y. Gao, and D. Xiao, Intrinsic nonlin- ear hall effect in antiferromagnetic tetragonal cumnas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 277201 (2021)

    2021

  67. [75]

    H. Liu, J. Zhao, Y.-X. Huang, W. Wu, X.-L. Sheng, C. Xiao, and S. A. Yang, Intrinsic Second-Order Anoma- lous Hall Effect and Its Application in Compensated An- tiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 277202 (2021)

    2021

  68. [76]

    J. Wang, H. Zeng, W. Duan, and H. Huang, In- trinsic Nonlinear Hall Detection of the N´ eel Vec- tor for Two-Dimensional Antiferromagnetic Spintronics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 056401 (2023)

    2023

  69. [77]

    Y. Liu, X. Chen, Y. Yu, and Q. Liu, Symmetry Classifi- cation of Magnetic Orders and Emergence of Spin-Orbit Magnetism (2025), arXiv:2506.20739

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.