Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

ATLASv2: ATLAS Attack Engagements, Version 2

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.01341 v1 pith:RLZTKXFA submitted 2023-10-03 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords logsatlasatlasv2attacksystemdatasetactivitywork
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

ATLASv2 is based on a previously generated dataset included in "ATLAS: A Sequence-based Learning Approach for Attack Investigation." The original ATLAS dataset is comprised of Windows Security Auditing system logs, Firefox logs, and DNS logs via WireShark. In ATLASv2, we aim to enrich the ATLAS dataset with higher quality background noise and additional logging vantage points. This work replicates the ten attack scenarios described in ATLAS, but extends the logging to include Sysmon logs and events tracked through VMware Carbon Black Cloud. The main contribution of ATLASv2 is to improve the quality of the benign system activity and the integration of the attack scenarios. Instead of relying on automated scripts to generate activity, we had two researchers use the victim machines as their primary work stations throughout the course of the engagement. This allowed us to capture system logs on actual user behavior. Additionally, the researchers conducted the attacks in a lab setup allowing the integration of the attack into the work flow of the victim user. This allows the ATLASv2 dataset to provide realistic system logs that mirror the system log activity generated in real-world attacks.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. How Benchmarks and Evaluation Protocols Shape Conclusions in Provenance-Based Intrusion Detection

    cs.CR 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A simple lexical allowlist matches or beats learned provenance-based detectors on three of four audited E3 datasets, showing that measured PIDS gains often reflect benchmark shortcuts rather than richer modeling.

  2. From Alerts to Intelligence: A Novel LLM-Aided Framework for Host-based Intrusion Detection

    cs.CR 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SHIELD, an LLM-aided pipeline combining a masked autoencoder, deterministic data augmentation, and multi-level prompting, detects host-based attacks with high precision on three public datasets.

Pith tools