Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 63 references

Upside/Downside statistical mechanics of nonequilibrium Brownian motion. II. Heat transfer and energy partitioning of a free particle

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For a free Brownian particle in contact with multiple reservoirs, each bath contributes a fraction gamma_k T_k / (gamma T) of the particle's energy change during both energy-gaining (upside) and energy-losing (downside) events.

desk verdict Solid upside/downside heat-current results, but the energy-partition ratio rests on a plausible yet unproved per-bath factorization, and the master-equation check has a sign error. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.00502 v1 pith:RNC4SOQP submitted 2019-08-01 cond-mat.stat-mech

Galen T. Craven , Renai Chen , Abraham Nitzan This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords energydownsideupsidebrownianeventspartitioningthermalactivation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Imagine a tiny particle jiggling in a fluid that is actually a mixture of several heat reservoirs at different temperatures. The particle constantly exchanges energy with each reservoir. This paper looks at such a particle in a steady state, and separates all possible random motions into two groups at every moment: motions where the particle's energy is above a chosen threshold, and motions where it is below. The first group is called upside and corresponds to activation events; the second is called downside and corresponds to relaxation events. The authors use a mathematical method from their earlier paper to compute, for each group separately, the average heat flowing between each reservoir and the particle. They obtain explicit formulas for these restricted heat currents, and they verify the formulas with computer simulations. The key result is surprisingly simple: whenever the particle gains energy, each reservoir supplies a share equal to its friction coefficient times its temperature, divided by the total friction-weighted temperature. The same share applies when the particle loses energy: each reservoir absorbs that same fraction of the released energy. This decomposition is useful because it lets a researcher ask not just how much heat flows between the baths overall, but how much of that heat is carried by activation events and how much by relaxation events. The paper also discusses situations where, during a short stretch of an upside trajectory, the hot bath may release energy and the cold bath may receive it, before the overall second law is restored at longer times.
Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the restricted heat currents for a free Brownian particle driven by N thermal baths are given by Q_up_k = J_ss_k t - 2 gamma_k k_B T_k / (gamma pi) G(t) and Q_down_k = J_ss_k t + 2 gamma_k k_B T_k / (gamma pi) G(t) (Eqs. 51-52), and that the energy partitioning ratio is R_up_DeltaE_k = R_down_DeltaE_k = gamma_k T_k / (gamma T) (Eqs. 86, 93, 106). If correct, the heat exchanged with each bath during activation and relaxation events can be decomposed into a heat-current term and an energy-change term, with each bath's share of the energy change set by its friction-temperature product.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the restricted noise-velocity correlation for each bath k factorizes as k_B gamma_k T_k D(t) with a single, temperature-independent D(t) for all baths (Eqs. 45-50). This permits splitting the total heat into per-bath contributions and leads directly to the gamma_k T_k / (gamma T) partition. The argument in Appendix B shows that a linear function with independent temperature terms can be decomposed term-by-term, but it does not prove that the restricted averages generated by the nonlinear conditioning E(t) > E(0) or E(t) > <E> contain no cross-temperature terms. If this factorization fails, the Q_k formulas and the partition ratio would not hold exactly.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript considers a free Brownian particle driven by N thermal baths at different temperatures and uses the upside/downside trajectory classification of the companion paper (Ref. 30) to split, at time t, the ensemble into trajectories whose energy is above or below a threshold (the initial energy E(0) or the average energy <E>). It derives restricted heat currents Q^up_k and Q^down_k (Eqs. (51)-(52) for E^‡=E(0), Eqs. (71)-(72) for E^‡=<E>), restricted energy fluxes, flux ratios, heat ratios, and claims the energy-partition ratio R^up_ΔE_k = R^down_ΔE_k = γ_k T_k/(γ T) (Eqs. (86), (93)). The heat-current formulas are validated against Euler-Maruyama simulations for N=2; the paper explicitly notes that the energy-partition ratio itself cannot be measured directly in simulation.

Significance. If the underlying factorization assumptions hold, the paper provides the first closed-form per-bath decomposition of heat into a heat-current part and a system-energy-change part for conditioned Brownian trajectories, together with a strikingly simple, parameter-free partition ratio. The derivation has no fitted parameters, and the unrestricted heat currents reduce to the known Lebowitz result. The simulation agreement for Q_k and the flux ratios in Figs. 2, 4, and 6-9 is a genuine strength. The main limitation is that the central partition ratio rests on the per-bath factorization of the restricted noise-velocity correlation, which is asserted rather than rigorously proved, and the paper itself states that this ratio cannot be measured in simulation. The significance is therefore conditional on closing that proof gap, although the result is plausibly correct and a Gaussian-conditioning argument would likely establish it.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III.B, Eqs. (45)-(50), and Appendix B] The load-bearing step is the per-bath factorization of the restricted noise-velocity correlation, Eqs. (49)-(50): ∫ m <ξ_k v>_up dt' = k_B γ_k T_k D_up(t) and the analogous downside expression. Appendix B attempts to justify this by a linear-function decomposition, but the argument assumes that the restricted averages are linear in the bath temperatures with no cross-temperature terms. The nonlinear conditioning E(t) > E(0) (or E(t) > <E>) is a function of the Gaussian noises, and the limit T_l → 0 does not exclude cross-temperature terms at finite T_l; the condition g_l → 0 in that limit only fixes the behavior on a low-dimensional boundary. Because Eqs. (51)-(52), (71)-(72), and the energy-partition ratios (86), (93) all follow from this factorization, the proof is incomplete as written. I ask the authors to supply a rigorous derivation (for example, by Gaussian regression/conditioning on v(t) and v(0), which shows the coefficient of T_k is independent of the other bath temperatures) or to state the factorization explicitly as a conjecture and mark the downstream results as conditional.
  2. [Sec. IV.A-IV.B, Eqs. (84)-(86) and (93)] The derivation of the central ratio R^up_ΔE_k = R^down_ΔE_k = γ_k T_k/(γ T) proceeds by 'identifying the terms ... proportional to a temperature gradient between baths, i.e., Q^(hc)_k ∝ J_ss_k' and subtracting them to obtain <ΔE_k>. This identification is not independently derived; <ΔE_k> is defined only through the per-bath split of the noise-velocity correlation used in Eqs. (49)-(50). In other words, Eq. (86) is a restatement of the assumed factorization rather than an independent consequence of energy conservation. Since the paper explicitly states that the energy ratio cannot be measured in simulation, the analytical proof is the only support for this claim, and it needs to be made rigorous.
  3. [Sec. IV.C, Eqs. (97)-(101)] The master-equation corroboration contains sign and notation errors. In Eq. (97) the loss term should carry a minus sign, and the bracket in γ_k [(n_k(ΔE)+1] P(E) is unbalanced; as written, combining Eq. (97) with the steady-state condition Eq. (98) gives P(E) < 0 for positive rates. Eq. (100) should be written as (1-P(E))/P(E) = Σ γ_k n_k e^{ΔE/k_B T_k} / Σ γ_k n_k, which follows from the corrected steady-state balance. Please fix these errors and clarify whether this section is intended as a rigorous derivation for general systems or as a heuristic analogy; in its present form it cannot support the statement that the result 'appears to be valid for a robust class of systems.'
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III.B.1, Eq. (33)] In the definition of <ΔE>_↓, the second term on the right-hand side conditions on E(t) > E^‡; it should condition on E(t) < E^‡.
  2. [Sec. IV, Eq. (79)] The second displayed ratio repeats R^up_ΔE_k; it should be R^down_ΔE_k = <ΔE_k>_↓ / <ΔE>_↓.
  3. [Sec. IV.C, Eq. (97)] The bracket in γ_k [(n_k(ΔE)+1] P(E) is missing a closing parenthesis or bracket; please correct the typesetting.
  4. [Sec. III.B, Eqs. (40)-(41) and (65)-(66)] It would help to state explicitly that the restricted second velocity moments are for the case t' < t with the upside/downside constraint imposed at t, since the notation is otherwise easy to misread.
Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the prior restricted-moment results of Ref 30 and on a per-bath factorization of noise-velocity correlations; the latter is the least externally supported piece.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The restricted noise-velocity correlation integral for each bath k factorizes as k_B gamma_k T_k D(t) with a common D(t); see Eqs. (45)-(50).
    This per-bath decomposition is central to deriving Q_k and the energy partition ratio. Appendix B provides a conditional linearity argument, but does not fully prove the absence of cross-temperature terms in the restricted averages.
  • standard math The Ornstein-Uhlenbeck transition density (Eq. 3) and steady-state velocity distribution (Eq. 7) for the multi-bath Langevin equation (Eq. 1) are valid.
    Standard result for additive white-noise baths; used throughout Sections II and III.
  • domain assumption The restricted moments and energy-change expressions from Ref 30 (Eqs. 37-41, 63-66) are assumed correct.
    These inputs are cited from the companion paper by the same authors; the present paper does not re-derive them, so the central derivation inherits any errors in Ref 30.
  • domain assumption Energy conservation holds for each restricted ensemble, i.e., <Delta E>_up = -sum_k Q_up_k (Eq. 34).
    This is exact per trajectory, so conditioning on upside/downside at time t preserves the relation; used in Appendix A to solve for D(t).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Upside/Downside statistical mechanics of nonequilibrium Brownian motion. II. Heat transfer and energy partitioning of a free particle." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RNC4SOQP

@misc{pith2026190800502,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Upside/Downside statistical mechanics of nonequilibrium Brownian motion. II. Heat transfer and energy partitioning of a free particle},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RNC4SOQP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.00502}
}
read the original abstract

The energy partitioning during activation and relaxation events under steady-state conditions for a Brownian particle driven by multiple thermal reservoirs of different local temperatures is investigated. Specifically, we apply the formalism derived in a previous article [G. T. Craven and A. Nitzan, J. Chem. Phys. 148, 044101 (2018)] to examine the thermal transport properties of two sub-ensembles of Brownian processes, distinguished at any given time by the specification that all the trajectories in each group have, at that time, energy either above (upside) or below (downside) a preselected energy threshold. Dynamical properties describing energy accumulation and release during activation/relaxation events and relations for upside/downside energy partitioning between thermal reservoirs are derived. The implications for heat transport induced by upside and downside events are discussed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.00502 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Heat obtained/released by each bath ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Heat obtained/released by each bath ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Heat obtained/released by each bath ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Upside and downside energy flux of each bath ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Ratio of the heat obtained/released [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Ratio of the heat obtained/released [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author R. F. Rodr \' guez and author L. De la Pe \ n a-Auerbach , journal Physica A volume 123 , pages 609 ( year 1984 ), doi:10.1016/0378-4371(84)90177-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0378-4371(84)90177-8 1984

  2. [2]

    author D. J. Evans , author E. G. D. Cohen , and author G. P. Morriss , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 71 , pages 2401 ( year 1993 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.2401

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.71.2401 1993

  3. [3]

    Jarzynski , journal Phys

    author C. Jarzynski , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 78 , pages 2690 ( year 1997 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2690

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.2690 1997

  4. [4]

    Kurchan , journal J

    author J. Kurchan , journal J. Phys. A volume 31 , pages 3719 ( year 1998 ), http://stacks.iop.org/0305-4470/31/i=16/a=003

    1998

  5. [5]

    author G. E. Crooks , journal Phys. Rev. E volume 61 , pages 2361 ( year 2000 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.61.2361

    doi:10.1103/physreve.61.2361 2000

  6. [6]

    Harada and author S.-I

    author T. Harada and author S.-I. Sasa , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 95 , pages 130602 ( year 2005 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.130602

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.130602 2005

  7. [7]

    Teramoto and author S.-I

    author H. Teramoto and author S.-I. Sasa , journal Phys. Rev. E volume 72 , pages 060102 ( year 2005 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.72.060102

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.72.060102 2005

  8. [8]

    Seifert and author T

    author U. Seifert and author T. Speck , journal Europhys. Lett. volume 89 , pages 10007 ( year 2010 ), doi:10.1209/0295-5075/89/10007

    work page doi:10.1209/0295-5075/89/10007 2010

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    Seifert , journal Rep

    author U. Seifert , journal Rep. Prog. Phys. volume 75 , pages 126001 ( year 2012 ), http://stacks.iop.org/0034-4885/75/i=12/a=126001

    2012

  2. [10]

    Lippiello , author M

    author E. Lippiello , author M. Baiesi , and author A. Sarracino , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 112 , pages 140602 ( year 2014 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.140602

    2014 doi

  3. [11]

    Onsager , journal Phys

    author L. Onsager , journal Phys. Rev. volume 37 , pages 405 ( year 1931 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRev.37.405

    1931 doi

  4. [12]

    Sekimoto , journal Prog

    author K. Sekimoto , journal Prog. Theor. Phys. Supp. volume 130 , pages 17 ( year 1998 ), doi:10.1143/PTPS.130.17

    1998 doi

  5. [13]

    Seifert , journal Phys

    author U. Seifert , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 95 , pages 040602 ( year 2005 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.040602

    2005 doi

  6. [14]

    Van den Broeck , in booktitle Physics of Complex Colloids ( publisher IOS Press , year 2013 ), vol

    author C. Van den Broeck , in booktitle Physics of Complex Colloids ( publisher IOS Press , year 2013 ), vol. volume 184 , pp. pages 155--193

    2013

  7. [15]

    author J. L. Lebowitz , journal Phys. Rev. volume 114 , pages 1192 ( year 1959 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRev.114.1192

    1959 doi

  8. [16]

    Rieder , author J

    author Z. Rieder , author J. L. Lebowitz , and author E. Lieb , journal J. Math. Phys. volume 8 , pages 1073 ( year 1967 ), doi:10.1063/1.1705319

    1967 doi

  9. [17]

    Casher and author J

    author A. Casher and author J. L. Lebowitz , journal J. Math. Phys. volume 12 , pages 1701 ( year 1971 ), doi:10.1063/1.1665794

    1971 doi

  10. [18]

    Segal , author A

    author D. Segal , author A. Nitzan , and author P. H\"anggi , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 119 , pages 6840 ( year 2003 ), doi:10.1063/1.1603211

    2003 doi

  11. [19]

    Segal and author A

    author D. Segal and author A. Nitzan , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 94 , pages 034301 ( year 2005 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.034301

    2005 doi

  12. [20]

    Dhar and author J

    author A. Dhar and author J. L. Lebowitz , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 100 , pages 134301 ( year 2008 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.134301

    2008 doi

  13. [21]

    Kannan , author A

    author V. Kannan , author A. Dhar , and author J. L. Lebowitz , journal Phys. Rev. E volume 85 , pages 041118 ( year 2012 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.85.041118

    2012 doi

  14. [22]

    Sabhapandit , journal Phys

    author S. Sabhapandit , journal Phys. Rev. E volume 85 , pages 021108 ( year 2012 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.85.021108

    2012 doi

  15. [23]

    Dhar and author R

    author A. Dhar and author R. Dandekar , journal Physica A volume 418 , pages 49 ( year 2015 ), doi:10.1016/j.physa.2014.06.002

    2015 doi

  16. [24]

    author K. A. Velizhanin , author S. Sahu , author C.-C. Chien , author Y. Dubi , and author M. Zwolak , journal Sci. Rep. volume 5 ( year 2015 ), doi:10.1038/srep17506

    2015 doi

  17. [25]

    Murashita and author M

    author Y. Murashita and author M. Esposito , journal Phys. Rev. E volume 94 , pages 062148 ( year 2016 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.94.062148

    2016 doi

  18. [26]

    author G. T. Craven and author A. Nitzan , journal Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. volume 113 , pages 9421 ( year 2016 ), doi:10.1073/pnas.1609141113

    2016 doi

  19. [27]

    author G. T. Craven and author A. Nitzan , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 146 , pages 092305 ( year 2017 a ), doi:10.1063/1.4971293

    2017 doi

  20. [28]

    author G. T. Craven and author A. Nitzan , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 118 , pages 207201 ( year 2017 b ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.207201

    2017 doi

  21. [29]

    Chen , author G

    author R. Chen , author G. T. Craven , and author A. Nitzan , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 147 , pages 124101 ( year 2017 ), doi:10.1063/1.4990410

    2017 doi

  22. [30]

    author G. T. Craven and author A. Nitzan , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 148 , pages 044101 ( year 2018 ), doi:10.1063/1.5007854

    2018 doi

  23. [31]

    author M. J. Harrison and author M. I. Reiman , journal Ann. Prob. volume 8 , pages 302 ( year 1981 )

    1981

  24. [32]

    Lin , author J

    author B. Lin , author J. Yu , and author S. A. Rice , journal Phys. Rev. E volume 62 , pages 3909 ( year 2000 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.62.3909

    2000 doi

  25. [33]

    author D. C. Morse , journal Adv. Chem. Phys. volume 128 , pages 110 ( year 2004 ), doi:10.1002/0471484237.ch2

    2004 doi

  26. [34]

    author D. S. Grebenkov , journal Rev. Mod. Phys. volume 79 , pages 1077 ( year 2007 ), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.79.1077

    2007 doi

  27. [35]

    Dieker , journal Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science ( year 2010 ), doi:10.1002/9780470400531.eorms0711

    author A. Dieker , journal Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science ( year 2010 ), doi:10.1002/9780470400531.eorms0711

    2010 doi

  28. [36]

    author R. A. Marcus , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 24 , pages 966 ( year 1956 ), doi:10.1063/1.1742723

    1956 doi

  29. [37]

    author R. A. Marcus , journal Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. volume 15 , pages 155 ( year 1964 ), doi:10.1146/annurev.pc.15.100164.001103

    1964

  30. [38]

    author R. A. Marcus and author N. Sutin , journal Biochim. Biophys. Acta volume 811 , pages 265 ( year 1985 ), doi:10.1016/0304-4173(85)90014-X

    1985 doi

  31. [39]

    author R. A. Marcus , journal Rev. Mod. Phys. volume 65 , pages 599 ( year 1993 ), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.65.599

    1993 doi

  32. [40]

    H \"a nggi , author P

    author P. H \"a nggi , author P. Talkner , and author M. Borkovec , journal Rev. Mod. Phys. volume 62 , pages 251 ( year 1990 ), 10.1103/RevModPhys.62.251

    1990 doi

  33. [41]

    author D. G. Truhlar , author B. C. Garrett , and author S. J. Klippenstein , journal J. Phys. Chem. volume 100 , pages 12771 ( year 1996 )

    1996

  34. [42]

    Komatsuzaki and author R

    author T. Komatsuzaki and author R. S. Berry , journal Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. volume 98 , pages 7666 ( year 2001 ), doi:10.1073/pnas.131627698

    2001 doi

  35. [43]

    Bartsch , author R

    author T. Bartsch , author R. Hernandez , and author T. Uzer , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 95 , pages 058301(1) ( year 2005 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.058301

    2005 doi

  36. [44]

    Nitzan , title Chemical Dynamics in Condensed Phases: Relaxation, Transfer, and Reactions in Condensed Molecular Systems ( publisher Oxford University Press , year 2006 )

    author A. Nitzan , title Chemical Dynamics in Condensed Phases: Relaxation, Transfer, and Reactions in Condensed Molecular Systems ( publisher Oxford University Press , year 2006 )

    2006

  37. [45]

    Hernandez , author T

    author R. Hernandez , author T. Bartsch , and author T. Uzer , journal Chem. Phys. volume 370 , pages 270 ( year 2010 ), doi:10.1016/j.chemphys.2010.01.016

    2010 doi

  38. [46]

    Peters , journal J

    author B. Peters , journal J. Phys. Chem. B volume 119 , pages 6349 ( year 2015 ), doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b02547

    2015 doi

  39. [47]

    author G. T. Craven and author R. Hernandez , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 115 , pages 148301 ( year 2015 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.148301

    2015 doi

  40. [48]

    Junginger , author G

    author A. Junginger , author G. T. Craven , author T. Bartsch , author F. Revuelta , author F. Borondo , author R. M. Benito , and author R. Hernandez , journal Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. volume 18 , pages 30270 ( year 2016 ), doi:10.1039/C6CP02519F

    2016 doi

  41. [49]

    Revuelta , author G

    author F. Revuelta , author G. T. Craven , author T. Bartsch , and author R. Hernandez , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 147 , pages 074104 ( year 2017 ), doi:10.1063/1.4997571

    2017 doi

  42. [50]

    author W. H. Greene , title Econometric Analysis ( publisher Prentice Hall , year 2002 )

    2002

  43. [51]

    Ranganatham , title Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management ( publisher Pearson Education India , year 2006 )

    author M. Ranganatham , title Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management ( publisher Pearson Education India , year 2006 )

    2006

  44. [52]

    author F. K. Reilly and author K. C. Brown , title Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management ( publisher Cengage Learning , year 2011 )

    2011

  45. [53]

    author F. A. Sortino and author R. Van Der Meer , journal J. Portfolio Manage. volume 17 , pages 27 ( year 1991 )

    1991

  46. [54]

    author F. A. Sortino and author L. N. Price , journal J. Invest. volume 3 , pages 59 ( year 1994 )

    1994

  47. [55]

    Keating and author W

    author C. Keating and author W. F. Shadwick , journal J. Perf. Measure. volume 6 , pages 59 ( year 2002 )

    2002

  48. [56]

    Ang , author J

    author A. Ang , author J. Chen , and author Y. Xing , journal Rev. Financ. Stud. volume 19 , pages 1191 ( year 2006 ), doi:10.1093/rfs/hhj035

    2006 doi

  49. [57]

    author G. E. Uhlenbeck and author L. S. Ornstein , journal Phys. Rev. volume 36 , pages 823 ( year 1930 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRev.36.823

    1930 doi

  50. [58]

    Zwanzig , title Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics ( publisher Oxford University Press , address London , year 2001 )

    author R. Zwanzig , title Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics ( publisher Oxford University Press , address London , year 2001 )

    2001

  51. [59]

    Cohen , in booktitle Mathematical Analysis, Probability and Applications - Plenary Lectures ISAAC 2015 ( organization Springer , year 2015 ), pp

    author L. Cohen , in booktitle Mathematical Analysis, Probability and Applications - Plenary Lectures ISAAC 2015 ( organization Springer , year 2015 ), pp. pages 1--35

    2015

  52. [60]

    ( eq:heatrel ) is calculated, E_k is the contribution of heat bath k to the system energy change E and Q ^ ( hc ) _k E_k + Q _k

    note It will become more clear later what we mean is that for the given time interval over which Eq. ( eq:heatrel ) is calculated, E_k is the contribution of heat bath k to the system energy change E and Q ^ ( hc ) _k E_k + Q _k

  53. [61]

    author D. V. Matyushov , journal Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. volume 113 , pages 9401 ( year 2016 ), doi:10.1073/pnas.1610542113

    2016 doi

  54. [62]

    note The simulations were performed using the Euler - Maruyama method

  55. [63]

    note In the previous article in this series we denoted the case t'<t with the superscript `` < '' indicating that the property of interest is calculated at time t'<t from the group of trajectories that are upside/downside at future time t . Here, for notational convenience, we...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.