REVIEW 3 cited by
Do Deep Convolutional Nets Really Need to be Deep and Convolutional?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Yes, they do. This paper provides the first empirical demonstration that deep convolutional models really need to be both deep and convolutional, even when trained with methods such as distillation that allow small or shallow models of high accuracy to be trained. Although previous research showed that shallow feed-forward nets sometimes can learn the complex functions previously learned by deep nets while using the same number of parameters as the deep models they mimic, in this paper we demonstrate that the same methods cannot be used to train accurate models on CIFAR-10 unless the student models contain multiple layers of convolution. Although the student models do not have to be as deep as the teacher model they mimic, the students need multiple convolutional layers to learn functions of comparable accuracy as the deep convolutional teacher.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
BEST-Route: Adaptive LLM Routing with Test-Time Optimal Compute
A routing system that chooses both the model and the number of samples per query to meet a quality threshold, yielding up to 60% cost savings.
-
Pan-infection Foundation Framework Enables Multiple Pathogen Prediction
A teacher-student knowledge distillation framework trained on 11,247 blood transcriptomes reports high AUCs for pan-infection, four pathogens, and sepsis diagnosis.
-
Deep evolving semi-supervised anomaly detection
The paper formalizes continual semi-supervised anomaly detection and presents a VAE-based baseline with generative replay and outlier rejection, reporting AUC scores on three image datasets.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.