Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Containers as the Quantum Leap in Software Development

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.07204 v1 pith:RNL3OWQZ submitted 2025-01-13 cs.SE

Iftikhar Ahmad , Teemu Autto , Teerath Das , Joonas Hämäläinen , Pasi Jalonen , Viljami Järvinen , Harri Kallio , Tomi Kankainen
show 20 more authors
Taija Kolehmainen Pertti Kontio Pyry Kotilainen Matti Kurittu Tommi Mikkonen Rahul Mohanani Niko Mäkitalo Jari Partanen Roope Pajasmaa Jarkko Pellikka Manu Setälä Jari Siukonen Anssi Sorvisto Maha Sroor Teppo Suominen Salla Timonen Muhammad Waseem Yuriy Yevstihnyeyev Verneri Äberg Leif {AA}strand
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.SE
keywords containersprojectcompaniesconcernshybridparticipatedsystemsaddition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The goal of the project QLEAP (2022-24), funded by Business Finland and participating organizations, was to study using containers as elements of architecture design. Such systems include containerized AI systems, using containers in a hybrid setup (public/hybrid/private clouds), and related security concerns. The consortium consists of four companies that represent different concerns over using containers (Bittium, M-Files, Solita/ADE Insights, Vaadin) and one research organization (University of Jyv\"askyl\"a). In addition, it has received support from two Veturi companies - Nokia and Tietoevry - who have also participated in steering the project. Moreover, the SW4E ecosystem has participated in the project. This document gathers the key lessons learned from the project.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Navigating the Socio-Technical Complexity Challenge in Quantum Software Ecosystems

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A socio-technical framework identifies 'gravity wells' (e.g., Kubernetes, Slurm) and four desiderata to guide quantum software environment choices.

Pith tools