Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Feebly-Interacting Peccei-Quinn Model

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A large wave-function renormalization of the Peccei-Quinn scalar, with all other parameters at the TeV scale, yields a large axion decay constant and a light, feebly coupled PQ Higgs.

desk verdict A genuinely new and simple route to large f_a with a light PQ Higgs; the cosmology is preliminary and the quality-problem claim is partly prospective. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.17802 v2 pith:RQTJNOGY submitted 2024-12-23 hep-ph astro-ph.COhep-ex

Wen Yin This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phastro-ph.COhep-ex
keywords QCDaxionPeccei-Quinnsymmetrywave-functionrenormalizationdecayconstantPQHiggsdarkmattercosmicstringsqualityproblem
topics Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes that the QCD axion's large decay constant can come from a large wave-function renormalization $Z$ of the Peccei-Quinn (PQ) scalar instead of from a high PQ-breaking scale. In a basis where every other parameter is $\mathcal{O}(1)$ at a TeV-scale mass $\Lambda$, canonical normalization gives $f_a \sim \sqrt{Z}\,\mathrm{TeV}$, so $Z\gtrsim 10^{10}$ satisfies the supernova bound while all dimensionful scales stay near the weak scale. The central prediction is a very light, very weakly coupled PQ Higgs boson with mass $m_s \sim \Lambda^2/f_a \lesssim 10\,\mathrm{MeV}$, alongside TeV-scale PQ quarks. The author argues this alleviates both electroweak fine-tuning and the PQ quality problem, and shows that the resulting spectrum opens new dark-matter production channels, including slim axions from fat cosmic strings, axions from condensate fragmentation, and PQ Higgs dark matter.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the large wave-function renormalization $Z$ of the PQ scalar, defined by $L = Z|\partial\Phi|^2$. After redefining to a canonical field, every PQ coupling is suppressed by a power of $Z^{-1/2}$, so the PQ Higgs decouples and becomes extremely light while the PQ quarks stay near the TeV scale. The carrying relations are the scaling laws $f_a \sim \sqrt{Z}\,\Lambda$ and $m_s \sim \Lambda^2/f_a$, which make a large decay constant and a light Higgs two sides of the same coin. The author notes the analogy to the weak-coupling limit of a gauge theory, in which the gauge-field wave-function coefficient is large when the coupling is small.

What would settle it

A fifth-force or stellar-cooling experiment that excludes every scalar in the predicted band $m_s\lesssim 10\,\mathrm{MeV}$ with mixing $\sin\theta_{hs}\sim m_s/m_h$ would falsify the central prediction, since the light feeble PQ Higgs is the model's unavoidable consequence.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The author's central claim is that replacing a high PQ-breaking scale with a large wave-function renormalization $Z$ yields a viable, natural QCD-axion model. With the Lagrangian $L = Z|\partial\Phi|^2$ and all other parameters $\mathcal{O}(1)$ in units of $\Lambda\sim\mathrm{TeV}$, the canonically normalized couplings become $m_\Phi \sim \Lambda/\sqrt{Z}$, $\lambda_P\sim 1/Z$, $y\sim 1/\sqrt{Z}$, and $\lambda\sim 1/Z^2$. Consequently $f_a = \sqrt{2}\langle\Phi\rangle \sim \sqrt{Z}\,\Lambda$, and the PQ Higgs mass is $m_s \simeq \sqrt{2}m_\Phi \sim \Lambda^2/f_a$, making $s$ light and feebly coupled while the PQ quark mass stays $\sim\Lambda$. The paper further claims that electroweak-scale corrections to the Standard Model Higgs are only of order $\Lambda$, and that higher-dimensional PQ-breaking operators are suppressed by $Z^{-d/2}$, alleviating the quality problem for non-gravitational breaking; gravitational wormhole effects are assumed to be cured by a UV completion. It then derives three distinct dark-matter cosmologies from this spectrum and supports the fragmentation scenario with lattice simulations.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a UV completion exists that realizes $Z\gg1$ without reintroducing a hierarchy or destroying the global PQ symmetry through gravitational effects; the paper sketches one extra-dimensional example and explicitly assumes such a completion for wormhole-induced breaking.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim holds, every QCD-axion model of this type has a sub-$10\,\mathrm{MeV}$ PQ Higgs for $f_a\gtrsim 10^9\,\mathrm{GeV}$, with a Higgs-mixing angle $\theta_{hs}\sim m_s/m_h$ that places it in the reach of fifth-force and stellar-cooling searches.
  • The fat-string scenario predicts a slim-axion dark-matter mass about half the usual cosmic-string prediction, shifting the preferred range to roughly $20\text{--}30\,\mu\mathrm{eV}$ under one recent calibration, which current and planned haloscopes can test.
  • If reheating is short, the PQ Higgs condensate can fragment into axions and PQ Higgs particles, producing axion dark matter with $\Omega_a\sim 1$ for $\Lambda\sim\mathrm{TeV}$ and gravitational waves peaked near $10^4\,\mathrm{Hz}$.
  • For $f_a\gtrsim 10^{11}\,\mathrm{GeV}$, thermal misalignment during a long reheating phase can make the PQ Higgs the dominant dark matter, and in part of the parameter space both axion and PQ Higgs contribute, with their masses related by $m_a/m_s \sim 10^{-8}$.
  • The exotic PQ quarks remain at $\Lambda\sim\mathrm{TeV}$ and can be pair-produced at colliders, providing a direct accelerator test of the framework.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The large-$Z$ trick is, on its face, portable: any global or gauged symmetry whose scalar is nearly decoupled would enjoy the same $f \sim \sqrt{Z}\Lambda$ and low-mass-Higgs structure, so the paper's mechanism could apply to a generic dark Higgs sector rather than only the axion.
  • The author's heavy reliance on an assumed UV completion for the wormhole contribution means the naturalness story is only as strong as that completion; a no-go theorem against $Z\gg 1$ with an exact global PQ symmetry would collapse the quality-problem claim.
  • If the fat-string prediction is sharpened by better lattice statistics, the factor-of-two axion-mass shift becomes a clean discriminating observable: a confirmed axion at $40\text{--}95\,\mu\mathrm{eV}$ from a standard string network would disfavor this scenario, while $20\text{--}30\,\mu\mathrm{eV}$ would favor it.
  • The broken-phase sphaleron idea in fat string cores suggests a possible low-scale baryogenesis route, but the paper notes only that an existing no-go theorem assumes a thin core; a dedicated simulation of baryon number washout in a fat string would test whether the loophole is real.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a KSVZ-like Peccei-Quinn model in which the PQ scalar has a large wave-function renormalization constant Z in a basis where all other couplings are O(1) at a scale Λ ~ TeV. After canonical normalization, the axion decay constant scales as f_a ~ sqrt(Z) Λ and the PQ Higgs mass as m_s ~ Λ^2/f_a, giving a light, weakly coupled PQ Higgs while keeping the PQ fermion mass near Λ. The paper argues that this setup alleviates the electroweak fine-tuning problem and the non-gravitational part of the PQ quality problem, and it studies several dark-matter production mechanisms: slim axions from a fat string network, axions from fragmentation of the PQ Higgs condensate, PQ Higgs dark matter from thermal/vacuum misalignment, and axion-PQ Higgs co-dark-matter. It also discusses fifth-force, accelerator, and gravitational-wave signatures, with a 512^3 lattice simulation used for the fragmentation scenario.

Significance. The central mass relations, Eqs. (6)-(9), follow directly from canonical normalization and are sound; they offer a conceptually new way to obtain f_a ≳ 10^8 GeV without introducing a new high mass scale, and they predict a testable light PQ Higgs. The suppression of non-gravitational PQ-breaking operators in Eq. (19) is a genuine and interesting mechanism. The paper is also candid about several limitations, including the need for a UV completion for gravitational PQ breaking and the deferral of detailed lattice studies to a companion paper. However, the abstract's unqualified claim that the model alleviates both the PQ quality and electroweak fine-tuning problems is stronger than what the body demonstrates, and the quantitative cosmological predictions rest on preliminary numerical support.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. 2 (Quality Problem)] The abstract's claim that the model 'alleviates both the PQ quality and EW scale fine-tuning problems' is stronger than the body of the paper demonstrates. In Sec. 2, under 'Quality Problem', the author states that the model 'may not, by itself, alleviate the quality problem arising from (1)' (gravitational effects) because large Z does not alter the universal gravitational coupling, and that a UV completion resolving this issue is assumed. Since gravitational wormholes are one of the two sources of explicit PQ breaking listed, the unqualified quality claim in the abstract should be revised to refer specifically to non-gravitational PQ breaking, with the gravitational part stated as an assumption.
  2. [Footnote 2 and Sec. 2 (UV completion)] The UV completion that is asked to carry the gravitational quality suppression and the large-Z hierarchy is sketched in one sentence: a massless free complex 5D bulk field with Φ → Φ + α and all other fields localized on a 4D brane, giving Z ~ L Λ_5D. This sketch does not show that all other dimensionless parameters remain O(1) at Λ ~ TeV, that the Kaluza-Klein spectrum has no states below Λ, or that wormhole-induced PQ breaking is suppressed to the level needed in Eq. (20). As the manuscript stands, the gravitational part of the quality-problem advantage is an assumption rather than a prediction; this should be stated prominently wherever the quality problem is advertised.
  3. [Sec. 3.5, Figs. 2-3, Eqs. (37)-(42)] The quantitative content of scenario (Ib) rests on a single 512^3 lattice simulation run in machine units (λ = 0.001, initial homogeneous mode ℜΦ = 0.1d, ℑΦ = 0, and a specific initial fluctuation spectrum), with no resolution study, no scan over coupling parameters, and no mapping from machine units to physical units. The paper explicitly defers the detailed numerical study to a separate paper [107] 'to appear'. Consequently, the central quantitative claims of this section, including ρ_s ~ ρ_a ~ 10^-2 T^4 in Eq. (37), the abundance in Eqs. (39)-(40), and the gravitational-wave amplitude in Eq. (42), are not yet established. These results should either be supported by convergence and parameter-dependence tests in this paper or explicitly labeled as preliminary estimates.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 1] The phrase 'lattice simultion' should read 'lattice simulation'.
  2. [Fig. 3 caption] The word 'correspnds' should be 'corresponds'; the caption would also benefit from stating explicitly that all dimensionful quantities are in machine units and that the horizontal axis is the comoving momentum in units of d.
  3. [Sec. 3.5 and Sec. 4] There are several typos: 'equlitbirum' in Sec. 3.5, 'produc ed' and 'equlitbirum' in Sec. 4, and 'anhormonic' in footnote 6; these should be corrected.
  4. [Sec. 3.4, Eq. (33)] The claimed distinguishability of the fat-string scenario via a factor-of-two shift in the axion mass should be softened, because the string-simulation predictions in Refs. [18-22] still carry large systematic uncertainties and the comparison to [20] is based on a specific logarithmic estimate.
  5. [References] Reference [107] is listed as 'To appear soon' with no arXiv number or date; the paper should cite the companion work properly or avoid relying on it for the main quantitative conclusions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the FIPQ scaling relations are algebraic consequences of the large-Z Lagrangian, the explicit quality-problem suppression is derived by field redefinition, and the self-citations used are to prior independent published results that are not load-bearing.

full rationale

I walked the derivation chain of the paper. The central relations in Eqs. (6)-(9) follow from canonical normalization of the defining kinetic term L = Z|dPhi|^2 with all other parameters of O(1) in units of Lambda: mPhi ~ Lambda/sqrt(Z), fa ~ sqrt(Z) Lambda, and ms ~ sqrt(2) mPhi ~ Lambda/sqrt(Z). These are not fits and they do not use the target predictions as inputs; Z and Lambda are the input parameters, while fa and ms are derived observables. The advertised relation ms ~ Lambda^2/fa is a consistency relation between two derived quantities, not an input, so it is not circular by construction. The quality-problem suppression in Eq. (19) is obtained by an explicit field redefinition: a d-dimensional operator (Phi)^d/M^(d-4) in the original basis becomes Z^(-d/2)(Phi_c)^d/M^(d-4) in the canonical basis, giving an amplitude Lambda^d/M^(d-4) independent of fa; this is a direct derivation rather than an assumption of the conclusion. The cosmological scenarios use external or previously published results (stochastic axion scenario [12,13], thermal misalignment [28,29], cosmic string simulations [18-22], and the public CosmoLattice code [108,109]) together with the paper's own lattice simulation; none of these ingredients are fitted to the FIPQ predictions. The gravitational wormhole contribution to the quality problem is explicitly delegated to an assumed UV completion (Sec. 2: 'I assume a UV completion of the model that resolves this issue'), which is a stated limitation rather than a circular step. Many citations are to the author's prior work, but they concern independently published and externally falsifiable results, and they are not the sole justification for the FIPQ-specific claims. I therefore find no step in which a prediction is equivalent by construction to its input, and no self-citation chain that forces the paper's conclusions.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The ledger reflects that the model's core scaling is parameter-free given Z and Lambda, but the naturalness, quality, and numerical predictions rest on a UV completion assumption, the 't Hooft naturalness criterion, and a single unpublished lattice simulation. No genuinely new particles are introduced; the PQ Higgs and PQ fermions are the standard KSVZ field content.

free parameters (7)
  • Z (wave-function renormalization) = assumed >> 1 (e.g. > 10^10)
    The key parameter; chosen large to make f_a > 10^9 GeV while Lambda ~ TeV. Not fitted to data.
  • Lambda (PQ sector mass scale) = ~ 10^3 GeV
    Chosen around the EW scale to avoid hierarchy; Eqs. (6)-(9) scale with Lambda.
  • lambda_P (Higgs portal coupling, original basis) = O(1), sign determines thermal-mass case
    In canonical basis lambda_P ~ 1/Z; its sign selects DM scenarios (a) or (b) in Sec. 3.2.
  • y (PQ quark Yukawa) = O(1)
    In canonical basis y ~ 1/sqrt(Z); sets PQ fermion mass m_Psi ~ Lambda.
  • lambda (PQ quartic) = O(1), but lattice uses 0.001
    In canonical basis lambda ~ 1/Z^2; controls self-interactions of Phi.
  • H_inf (inflationary Hubble scale) = free, constrained by Eq. (23)
    Determines stochastic distribution of Phi and isocurvature; assumed small enough for the scenarios.
  • T_R (reheating temperature) = free; fixed from DM abundance in (IIb)
    Controls dilution and the PQ Higgs DM abundance Eq. (47).
assumptions (5)
  • ad hoc to paper A UV completion (e.g., a 5D bulk field with Z ~ L Lambda_5D, footnote 2) realizes large Z without introducing additional hierarchies.
    Needed for the claim that the FIPQ setup is natural; no explicit model is worked out.
  • ad hoc to paper The PQ symmetry is global and its explicit breaking from gravitational effects (wormholes) is suppressed by the assumed UV completion.
    Sec. 2: 'Consequently, I assume a UV completion of the model that resolves this issue.' This is required for the quality-problem alleviation claim.
  • domain assumption Large Z is technically natural in the 't Hooft sense because Z -> infinity enhances symmetries.
    Sec. 2 invokes the 't Hooft criterion; this justifies not treating Z itself as fine-tuned.
  • domain assumption Thermal potential can be approximated by a quadratic expansion with daisy resummation and c = 1.
    Sec. 3.2 and footnote 7; used throughout the DM abundance estimates.
  • ad hoc to paper The single lattice simulation of Sec. 3.5 captures the generic fragmentation dynamics and extrapolates to physical parameters.
    The paper states 'with an O(1) oscillation, s settles into a minimum...' based on one simulation; detailed study deferred to [107].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Feebly-Interacting Peccei-Quinn Model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RQTJNOGY

@misc{pith2026241217802,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Feebly-Interacting Peccei-Quinn Model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RQTJNOGY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.17802}
}
abstract

The QCD axion is widely studied as a dark matter (DM) candidate and as a solution to the strong CP problem of the Standard Model. In conventional field-theoretic models, a much larger mass scale than the electroweak (EW) scale is typically introduced to spontaneously break Peccei-Quinn (PQ) symmetry with a large enough axion decay constant, $f_a$, thereby avoiding constraints from star cooling. In this paper, I propose an alternative approach to achieving the large decay constant: a PQ scalar field with a large wave function renormalization constant, analogous to a feebly coupled gauge theory. Other dimensionless parameters are ${O}(1)$ in the unit of the EW scale for the naturalness. This framework predicts a light PQ Higgs boson with a mass $\sim (\mathrm{EW~scale})^2 / f_a$. Exotic particles associated with the PQ anomaly are expected to have masses around the EW scale. The proposed model alleviates both the PQ quality and EW scale fine-tuning problems and introduces interesting axion-PQ Higgs cosmologies, encompassing: slim axion DM from a fat string network, heavy axion DM from PQ Higgs condensate fragmentation, PQ Higgs DM, and axion-PQ Higgs co-DM scenarios. Potential experimental signatures are explored, including fifth-force tests, DM detections, accelerator searches, and gravitational wave observations by employing lattice simulation. Possible extensions of the scenario are also discussed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.17802 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The prediction is shown in the s mass and Higgs mixing parameter plane (red band). Constraints from the fifth forces (green-shaded region), star cooling (blue-shaded region), and accelerator searches (gray-shaded region) are also indicated. Assuming s as the dominant DM, the excluded region from DM decaying into two photons is shown in the yellow-shaded region. Additionally, we present the prediction of the CP-even … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Lattice simulation for the spatially averaged [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Fig.3.). This may be because [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The snapshot at conformal time = 141/d [left panel], and the spectra of the gravitational wave at different conformal time slices [right panel], where the horizontal axis denotes the comoving momentum. Again, d is the machine unit. The simulation correspnds to (Ib), wh…
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The reheating temperature prediction assuming the dominant thermal mass at the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Constant Scaling Fails for Global Monopole Networks

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Global monopole networks exhibit logarithmic growth in the number-density parameter ξ rather than constant scaling, with fractional response γ ≈ 0.5 for blue-tilted initial spectra.

  2. Direct Detection of Cosmic Walls with Paleo Detectors

    hep-ph 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Ancient minerals could preserve parallel damage tracks left by a passing cosmic wall, enabling a direct search for these rare objects with paleo detectors.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

130 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [107]

    Yin, To appear soon,

    W. Yin, To appear soon,

  2. [1]

    Particle Data Groupcollaboration, P. A. Zyla et al., Review of Particle Physics , PTEP 2020 (2020) 083C01

    2020

  3. [2]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons , Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 1440. 17

    1977

  4. [3]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons , Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 1791

    1977

  5. [4]

    Weinberg, A New Light Boson? , Phys

    S. Weinberg, A New Light Boson? , Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 223

    1978

  6. [5]

    Wilczek, Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons , Phys

    F. Wilczek, Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons , Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 279

    1978

  7. [6]

    Mayle, J

    R. Mayle, J. R. Wilson, J. R. Ellis, K. A. Olive, D. N. Schramm and G. Steigman, Constraints on Axions from SN 1987a , Phys. Lett. B 203 (1988) 188

    1988

  8. [7]

    Raffelt and D

    G. Raffelt and D. Seckel, Bounds on Exotic Particle Interactions from SN 1987a , Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 (1988) 1793

    1988

Show all 130 references
  1. [8]

    J. H. Chang, R. Essig and S. D. McDermott, Supernova 1987A Constraints on Sub-GeV Dark Sectors, Millicharged Particles, the QCD Axion, and an Axion-like Particle , JHEP 09 (2018) 051 [ 1803.00993]

    2018 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Preskill, M

    J. Preskill, M. B. Wise and F. Wilczek, Cosmology of the Invisible Axion , Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 127

    1983

  3. [10]

    L. F. Abbott and P. Sikivie, A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion , Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 133

    1983

  4. [11]

    Dine and W

    M. Dine and W. Fischler, The Not So Harmless Axion , Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 137

    1983

  5. [12]

    P. W. Graham and A. Scherlis, Stochastic axion scenario , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 035017 [1805.07362]

    2018 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Takahashi, W

    F. Takahashi, W. Yin and A. H. Guth, QCD axion window and low-scale inflation , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 015042 [ 1805.08763]

    2018 arXiv

  7. [14]

    J. E. Kim, Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance , Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 (1979) 103

    1979

  8. [15]

    M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein and V. I. Zakharov, Can Confinement Ensure Natural CP Invariance of Strong Interactions? , Nucl. Phys. B 166 (1980) 493

    1980

  9. [16]

    M. Dine, W. Fischler and M. Srednicki, A Simple Solution to the Strong CP Problem with a Harmless Axion , Phys. Lett. B 104 (1981) 199

    1981

  10. [17]

    A. R. Zhitnitsky, On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions. (In Russian), Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 31 (1980) 260

    1980

  11. [18]

    Saikawa, J

    K. Saikawa, J. Redondo, A. Vaquero and M. Kaltschmidt, Spectrum of global string networks and the axion dark matter mass , JCAP 10 (2024) 043 [ 2401.17253]

    2024 arXiv

  12. [19]

    H. Kim, J. Park and M. Son, Axion dark matter from cosmic string network , JHEP 07 (2024) 150 [ 2402.00741]

    2024 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Buschmann, Sledgehamr: Simulating Scalar Fields with Adaptive Mesh Refinement , 2404.02950

    M. Buschmann, Sledgehamr: Simulating Scalar Fields with Adaptive Mesh Refinement , 2404.02950

    arXiv

  14. [21]

    J. N. Benabou, M. Buschmann, J. W. Foster and B. R. Safdi, Axion mass prediction from adaptive mesh refinement cosmological lattice simulations , 2412.08699

    arXiv

  15. [22]

    Kim and M

    H. Kim and M. Son, More Scalings from Cosmic Strings , 2411.08455. 18

  16. [23]

    Sikivie, Of Axions, Domain Walls and the Early Universe , Phys

    P. Sikivie, Of Axions, Domain Walls and the Early Universe , Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 1156

    1982

  17. [24]

    Vilenkin and A

    A. Vilenkin and A. E. Everett, Cosmic Strings and Domain Walls in Models with Goldstone and PseudoGoldstone Bosons , Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 1867

    1982

  18. [25]

    Harari and P

    D. Harari and P. Sikivie, On the Evolution of Global Strings in the Early Universe , Phys. Lett. B 195 (1987) 361

    1987

  19. [26]

    R. L. Davis, Cosmic Axions from Cosmic Strings , Phys. Lett. B 180 (1986) 225

    1986

  20. [27]

    M. Dine, N. Fernandez, A. Ghalsasi and H. H. Patel, Comments on axions, domain walls, and cosmic strings , JCAP 11 (2021) 041 [ 2012.13065]

    2021 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Batell and A

    B. Batell and A. Ghalsasi, Thermal misalignment of scalar dark matter , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) L091701 [ 2109.04476]

    2023 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Batell, A

    B. Batell, A. Ghalsasi and M. Rai, Dynamics of dark matter misalignment through the Higgs portal, JHEP 01 (2024) 038 [ 2211.09132]

    2024 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Choi and S

    K. Choi and S. H. Im, Realizing the relaxion from multiple axions and its UV completion with high scale supersymmetry , JHEP 01 (2016) 149 [ 1511.00132]

    2016 arXiv

  24. [31]

    D. E. Kaplan and R. Rattazzi, Large field excursions and approximate discrete symmetries from a clockwork axion , Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 085007 [ 1511.01827]

    2016 arXiv

  25. [32]

    G. F. Giudice and M. McCullough, A Clockwork Theory , JHEP 02 (2017) 036 [1610.07962]

    2017 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Higaki, K

    T. Higaki, K. S. Jeong, N. Kitajima and F. Takahashi, Quality of the Peccei-Quinn symmetry in the Aligned QCD Axion and Cosmological Implications , JHEP 06 (2016) 150 [1603.02090]

    2016 arXiv

  27. [34]

    CMS collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., Search for electroweak production of a vector-like T quark using fully hadronic final states , JHEP 01 (2020) 036 [ 1909.04721]

    2020 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Aad et al., Search for single production of a vectorlike T quark decaying into a Higgs boson and top quark with fully hadronic final states using the ATLAS detector, Phys

    ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for single production of a vectorlike T quark decaying into a Higgs boson and top quark with fully hadronic final states using the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 092012 [ 2201.07045]

    2022 arXiv

  29. [36]

    ’t Hooft, Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking , NATO Sci

    G. ’t Hooft, Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking , NATO Sci. Ser. B 59 (1980) 135

    1980

  30. [37]

    Piazza and M

    F. Piazza and M. Pospelov, Sub-eV scalar dark matter through the super-renormalizable Higgs portal, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 043533 [ 1003.2313]

    2010 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Leutwyler and M

    H. Leutwyler and M. A. Shifman, GOLDSTONE BOSONS GENERATE PECULIAR CONFORMAL ANOMALIES, Phys. Lett. B 221 (1989) 384

    1989

  32. [39]

    Cortina Gil et al., Measurement of the very rare K +→π+νν decay, JHEP 06 (2021) 093 [ 2103.15389]

    NA62 collaboration, E. Cortina Gil et al., Measurement of the very rare K +→π+νν decay, JHEP 06 (2021) 093 [ 2103.15389]

    2021 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Cortina Gil et al., Search for π0 decays to invisible particles , JHEP 02 (2021) 201 [ 2010.07644]

    NA62 collaboration, E. Cortina Gil et al., Search for π0 decays to invisible particles , JHEP 02 (2021) 201 [ 2010.07644]

    2021 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Cortina Gil et al., Search for a feebly interacting particle X in the decay K + → π+X, JHEP 03 (2021) 058 [ 2011.11329]

    NA62 collaboration, E. Cortina Gil et al., Search for a feebly interacting particle X in the decay K + → π+X, JHEP 03 (2021) 058 [ 2011.11329]. 19

    2021 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Bergsma et al., Search for Axion Like Particle Production in 400-GeV Proton - Copper Interactions , Phys

    CHARM collaboration, F. Bergsma et al., Search for Axion Like Particle Production in 400-GeV Proton - Copper Interactions , Phys. Lett. B 157 (1985) 458

    1985

  36. [43]

    Aaij et al., Differential branching fraction and angular analysis of the B+ → K +µ+µ− decay, JHEP 02 (2013) 105 [ 1209.4284]

    LHCb collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Differential branching fraction and angular analysis of the B+ → K +µ+µ− decay, JHEP 02 (2013) 105 [ 1209.4284]

    2013 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Acciarri et al., Search for neutral Higgs boson production through the process e+ e- – > Z* H0 , Phys

    L3 collaboration, M. Acciarri et al., Search for neutral Higgs boson production through the process e+ e- – > Z* H0 , Phys. Lett. B 385 (1996) 454

    1996

  38. [45]

    P. S. B. Dev, R. N. Mohapatra and Y. Zhang, Revisiting supernova constraints on a light CP-even scalar , JCAP 08 (2020) 003 [ 2005.00490]

    2020 arXiv

  39. [46]

    E. J. Salumbides, W. Ubachs and V. I. Korobov, Bounds on fifth forces at the sub-Angstrom length scale, J. Molec. Spectrosc. 300 (2014) 65 [ 1308.1711]

    2014 arXiv

  40. [47]

    E. G. Adelberger, J. H. Gundlach, B. R. Heckel, S. Hoedl and S. Schlamminger, Torsion balance experiments: A low-energy frontier of particle physics , Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 62 (2009) 102

    2009

  41. [48]

    E. J. Salumbides, J. C. J. Koelemeij, J. Komasa, K. Pachucki, K. S. E. Eikema and W. Ubachs, Bounds on fifth forces from precision measurements on molecules , Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 112008 [ 1304.6560]

    2013 arXiv

  42. [49]

    Yin et al., First Result for Dark Matter Search by WINERED , 2402.07976

    W. Yin et al., First Result for Dark Matter Search by WINERED , 2402.07976

    arXiv

  43. [50]

    Wadekar and Z

    D. Wadekar and Z. Wang, Strong constraints on decay and annihilation of dark matter from heating of gas-rich dwarf galaxies , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 075007 [ 2111.08025]

    2022 arXiv

  44. [51]

    Janish and E

    R. Janish and E. Pinetti, Hunting Dark Matter Lines in the Infrared Background with the James Webb Space Telescope , 2310.15395

    arXiv

  45. [52]

    Calore, A

    F. Calore, A. Dekker, P. D. Serpico and T. Siegert, Constraints on light decaying dark matter candidates from 16 yr of INTEGRAL/SPI observations , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 520 (2023) 4167 [ 2209.06299]

    2023

  46. [53]

    Y. Sun, J. W. Foster, H. Liu, J. B. Mu˜ noz and T. R. Slatyer, Inhomogeneous Energy Injection in the 21-cm Power Spectrum: Sensitivity to Dark Matter Decay , 2312.11608

    arXiv

  47. [54]

    Caputo, H.-T

    A. Caputo, H.-T. Janka, G. Raffelt and E. Vitagliano, Low-Energy Supernovae Severely Constrain Radiative Particle Decays , Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (2022) 221103 [ 2201.09890]

    2022 arXiv

  48. [55]

    Nakayama and W

    K. Nakayama and W. Yin, Anisotropic cosmic optical background bound for decaying dark matter in light of the LORRI anomaly , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 103505 [2205.01079]

    2022 arXiv

  49. [56]

    Carenza, G

    P. Carenza, G. Lucente and E. Vitagliano, Probing the blue axion with cosmic optical background anisotropies, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 083032 [ 2301.06560]

    2023 arXiv

  50. [57]

    Sakurai and W

    K. Sakurai and W. Yin, Phenomenology of CP-even ALP , JHEP 04 (2022) 113 [2111.03653]

    2022 arXiv

  51. [58]

    cajohare/axionlimits: Axionlimits

    C. O’Hare, “cajohare/axionlimits: Axionlimits.” https://cajohare.github.io/AxionLimits/, 2020. 10.5281/zenodo.3932430. 20

    2020 doi

  52. [59]

    Haghighat, M

    G. Haghighat, M. Mohammadi Najafabadi, K. Sakurai and W. Yin, Probing a light dark sector at future lepton colliders via invisible decays of the SM-like and dark Higgs bosons, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 035033 [ 2209.07565]

    2023 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Lee, Wormholes and Goldstone Bosons , Phys

    K.-M. Lee, Wormholes and Goldstone Bosons , Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 (1988) 263

    1988

  54. [61]

    S. B. Giddings and A. Strominger, Axion Induced Topology Change in Quantum Gravity and String Theory , Nucl. Phys. B 306 (1988) 890

    1988

  55. [62]

    L. F. Abbott and M. B. Wise, Wormholes and Global Symmetries , Nucl. Phys. B 325 (1989) 687

    1989

  56. [63]

    Kallosh, A

    R. Kallosh, A. D. Linde, D. A. Linde and L. Susskind, Gravity and global symmetries , Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 912 [ hep-th/9502069]

    1995 arXiv

  57. [64]

    Alvey and M

    J. Alvey and M. Escudero, The axion quality problem: global symmetry breaking and wormholes, JHEP 01 (2021) 032 [ 2009.03917]

    2021 arXiv

  58. [65]

    Hamaguchi, Y

    K. Hamaguchi, Y. Kanazawa and N. Nagata, Axion quality problem alleviated by nonminimal coupling to gravity , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 076008 [ 2108.13245]

    2022 arXiv

  59. [66]

    Dine and N

    M. Dine and N. Seiberg, String Theory and the Strong CP Problem , Nucl. Phys. B 273 (1986) 109

    1986

  60. [67]

    Kitano and W

    R. Kitano and W. Yin, Strong CP problem and axion dark matter with small instantons , JHEP 07 (2021) 078 [ 2103.08598]

    2021 arXiv

  61. [68]

    Poppitz and Y

    E. Poppitz and Y. Shirman, The Strength of small instanton amplitudes in gauge theories with compact extra dimensions , JHEP 07 (2002) 041 [ hep-th/0204075]

    2002 arXiv

  62. [69]

    Gherghetta, V

    T. Gherghetta, V. V. Khoze, A. Pomarol and Y. Shirman, The Axion Mass from 5D Small Instantons , JHEP 03 (2020) 063 [ 2001.05610]

    2020 arXiv

  63. [70]

    Agrawal and K

    P. Agrawal and K. Howe, Factoring the Strong CP Problem , JHEP 12 (2018) 029 [1710.04213]

    2018 arXiv

  64. [71]

    Agrawal and K

    P. Agrawal and K. Howe, A Flavorful Factoring of the Strong CP Problem , JHEP 12 (2018) 035 [ 1712.05803]

    2018 arXiv

  65. [72]

    Fuentes-Mart ´ ın, M

    J. Fuentes-Mart ´ ın, M. Reig and A. Vicente,Strong CP problem with low-energy emergent QCD: The 4321 case , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 115028 [ 1907.02550]

    2019 arXiv

  66. [73]

    Cs´ aki, M

    C. Cs´ aki, M. Ruhdorfer and Y. Shirman, UV Sensitivity of the Axion Mass from Instantons in Partially Broken Gauge Groups , JHEP 04 (2020) 031 [ 1912.02197]

    2020 arXiv

  67. [74]

    Takahashi and W

    F. Takahashi and W. Yin, Challenges for heavy QCD axion inflation , JCAP 10 (2021) 057 [2105.10493]

    2021 arXiv

  68. [75]

    K. S. Babu, B. Dutta and R. N. Mohapatra, Hybrid SO(10) Axion Model Without Quality Problem, 2410.07323

    arXiv

  69. [76]

    Gherghetta and M

    T. Gherghetta and M. D. Nguyen, A Composite Higgs with a Heavy Composite Axion , JHEP 12 (2020) 094 [ 2007.10875]

    2020 arXiv

  70. [77]

    T. Aoki, M. Ibe, S. Shirai and K. Watanabe, Small instanton effects on composite axion mass, JHEP 07 (2024) 269 [ 2404.19342]. 21

    2024 arXiv

  71. [78]

    Wada and W

    J. Wada and W. Yin, Gauge coupling jump and small instantons from a large non-minimal coupling, 2411.00768

  72. [79]

    F. L. Bezrukov and M. Shaposhnikov, The Standard Model Higgs boson as the inflaton , Phys. Lett. B 659 (2008) 703 [ 0710.3755]

    2008 arXiv

  73. [80]

    F. L. Bezrukov, A. Magnin and M. Shaposhnikov, Standard Model Higgs boson mass from inflation, Phys. Lett. B 675 (2009) 88 [ 0812.4950]

    2009 arXiv

  74. [81]

    Takahashi and W

    F. Takahashi and W. Yin, ALP inflation and Big Bang on Earth , JHEP 07 (2019) 095 [1903.00462]

    2019 arXiv

  75. [82]

    Yin, Weak-scale Higgs inflation , JCAP 05 (2024) 060 [ 2210.15680]

    W. Yin, Weak-scale Higgs inflation , JCAP 05 (2024) 060 [ 2210.15680]

    2024 arXiv

  76. [83]

    Jaeckel and W

    J. Jaeckel and W. Yin, Boosted Neutrinos and Relativistic Dark Particles as Messengers from Reheating, JCAP 02 (2021) 044 [ 2007.15006]

    2021 arXiv

  77. [84]

    A. A. Starobinsky, STOCHASTIC DE SITTER (INFLATIONARY) STAGE IN THE EARLY UNIVERSE, Lect. Notes Phys. 246 (1986) 107

    1986

  78. [85]

    A. A. Starobinsky and J. Yokoyama, Equilibrium state of a selfinteracting scalar field in the De Sitter background , Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 6357 [ astro-ph/9407016]

    1994 arXiv

  79. [86]

    R. J. Hardwick, V. Vennin, C. T. Byrnes, J. Torrado and D. Wands, The stochastic spectator, JCAP 10 (2017) 018 [ 1701.06473]

    2017 arXiv

  80. [87]

    S.-Y. Ho, F. Takahashi and W. Yin, Relaxing the Cosmological Moduli Problem by Low-scale Inflation, JHEP 04 (2019) 149 [ 1901.01240]

    2019 arXiv

  81. [88]

    Alonso- ´Alvarez, T

    G. Alonso- ´Alvarez, T. Hugle and J. Jaeckel, Misalignment \& Co.: (Pseudo-)scalar and vector dark matter with curvature couplings , JCAP 02 (2020) 014 [ 1905.09836]

    2020 arXiv

  82. [89]

    Akrami et al., Planck 2018 results

    Planck collaboration, Y. Akrami et al., Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A10 [ 1807.06211]

    2020 arXiv

  83. [90]

    BICEP, Keckcollaboration, P. A. R. Ade et al., Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season , Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 151301 [ 2110.00483]

    2021

  84. [91]

    Kobayashi, R

    T. Kobayashi, R. Kurematsu and F. Takahashi, Isocurvature Constraints and Anharmonic Effects on QCD Axion Dark Matter , JCAP 09 (2013) 032 [ 1304.0922]

    2013 arXiv

  85. [92]

    Nakayama and W

    K. Nakayama and W. Yin, Hidden photon and axion dark matter from symmetry breaking, JHEP 10 (2021) 026 [ 2105.14549]

    2021 arXiv

  86. [93]

    Kawasaki, K

    M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri, T. Moroi and Y. Takaesu, Revisiting Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis Constraints on Long-Lived Decaying Particles , Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 023502 [1709.01211]

    2018 arXiv

  87. [94]

    Poulin, J

    V. Poulin, J. Lesgourgues and P. D. Serpico, Cosmological constraints on exotic injection of electromagnetic energy , JCAP 03 (2017) 043 [ 1610.10051]

    2017 arXiv

  88. [95]

    Moroi and W

    T. Moroi and W. Yin, Light Dark Matter from Inflaton Decay , JHEP 03 (2021) 301 [2011.09475]

    2021 arXiv

  89. [96]

    Moroi and W

    T. Moroi and W. Yin, Particle Production from Oscillating Scalar Field and Consistency of Boltzmann Equation , JHEP 03 (2021) 296 [ 2011.12285]. 22

    2021 arXiv

  90. [97]

    Choi, J.-O

    K.-Y. Choi, J.-O. Gong, J. Joh, W.-I. Park and O. Seto, Light cold dark matter from non-thermal decay, Phys. Lett. B 845 (2023) 138126 [ 2304.07462]

    2023 arXiv

  91. [98]

    hot dark matter

    W. Yin, Thermal production of cold “hot dark matter” around eV , JHEP 05 (2023) 180 [2301.08735]

    2023 arXiv

  92. [99]

    Sakurai and W

    K. Sakurai and W. Yin, Stimulated Emission of Dark Matter via Thermal Scattering: Novel Limits for Freeze-In and eV Cold Dark Matter , 2410.18968

    arXiv

  93. [100]

    Rettaroli et al., Search for axion dark matter with the QUAX–LNF tunable haloscope , Phys

    QUAX collaboration, A. Rettaroli et al., Search for axion dark matter with the QUAX–LNF tunable haloscope , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 022008 [ 2402.19063]

    2024 arXiv

  94. [101]

    Beurthey et al., MADMAX Status Report , 2003.10894

    S. Beurthey et al., MADMAX Status Report , 2003.10894

    2003 arXiv

  95. [102]

    Lawson, A

    M. Lawson, A. J. Millar, M. Pancaldi, E. Vitagliano and F. Wilczek, Tunable axion plasma haloscopes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 141802 [ 1904.11872]

    2019 arXiv

  96. [103]

    Stern, ADMX Status , PoS ICHEP2016 (2016) 198 [ 1612.08296]

    I. Stern, ADMX Status , PoS ICHEP2016 (2016) 198 [ 1612.08296]

    2016 arXiv

  97. [104]

    W. Yin, S. Nakagawa, T. Murokoshi and M. Hattori, Asymmetric Warm Dark Matter: from Cosmological Asymmetry to Chirality of Life , 2405.10303

    arXiv

  98. [105]

    G. N. Felder, J. Garcia-Bellido, P. B. Greene, L. Kofman, A. D. Linde and I. Tkachev, Dynamics of symmetry breaking and tachyonic preheating , Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 011601 [hep-ph/0012142]

    2001 arXiv

  99. [106]

    G. N. Felder, L. Kofman and A. D. Linde, Tachyonic instability and dynamics of spontaneous symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 123517 [ hep-th/0106179]

    2001 arXiv

  100. [108]

    D. G. Figueroa, A. Florio, F. Torrenti and W. Valkenburg, The art of simulating the early Universe – Part I , JCAP 04 (2021) 035 [ 2006.15122]

    2021 arXiv

  101. [109]

    D. G. Figueroa, A. Florio, F. Torrenti and W. Valkenburg, CosmoLattice: A modern code for lattice simulations of scalar and gauge field dynamics in an expanding universe , Comput. Phys. Commun. 283 (2023) 108586 [ 2102.01031]

    2023 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Gonzalez, N

    D. Gonzalez, N. Kitajima, F. Takahashi and W. Yin, Stability of domain wall network with initial inflationary fluctuations and its implications for cosmic birefringence , Phys. Lett. B 843 (2023) 137990 [ 2211.06849]

    2023 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Kitajima, J

    N. Kitajima, J. Lee, F. Takahashi and W. Yin, Stability of domain walls with inflationary fluctuations under potential bias, and gravitational wave signatures , 2311.14590

    arXiv

  104. [112]

    Kitajima, F

    N. Kitajima, F. Kozai, F. Takahashi and W. Yin, Power spectrum of domain-wall network, and its implications for isotropic and anisotropic cosmic birefringence , JCAP 10 (2022) 043 [ 2205.05083]

    2022 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Aghanim et al., Planck 2018 results

    Planck collaboration, N. Aghanim et al., Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6 [ 1807.06209]

    2020 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Babichev, D

    E. Babichev, D. Gorbunov, S. Ramazanov and A. Vikman, Gravitational shine of dark domain walls , JCAP 04 (2022) 028 [ 2112.12608]. 23

    2022 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Babichev, D

    E. Babichev, D. Gorbunov, S. Ramazanov, R. Samanta and A. Vikman, NANOGrav spectral index γ=3 from melting domain walls , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 123529 [2307.04582]

    2023 arXiv

  108. [116]

    Dankovsky, S

    I. Dankovsky, S. Ramazanov, E. Babichev, D. Gorbunov and A. Vikman, Numerical analysis of melting domain walls and their gravitational waves , 2410.21971

    arXiv

  109. [117]

    W. T. Emond, S. Ramazanov and R. Samanta, Gravitational waves from melting cosmic strings, JCAP 01 (2022) 057 [ 2108.05377]

    2022 arXiv

  110. [118]

    I. I. Tkachev, Phase transitions at preheating , Phys. Lett. B 376 (1996) 35 [hep-th/9510146]

    1996 arXiv

  111. [119]

    P. B. Greene, L. Kofman, A. D. Linde and A. A. Starobinsky, Structure of resonance in preheating after inflation , Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 6175 [ hep-ph/9705347]

    1997 arXiv

  112. [120]

    Daido, F

    R. Daido, F. Takahashi and W. Yin, The ALP miracle: unified inflaton and dark matter, JCAP 05 (2017) 044 [ 1702.03284]

    2017 arXiv

  113. [121]

    Daido, F

    R. Daido, F. Takahashi and W. Yin, The ALP miracle revisited , JHEP 02 (2018) 104 [1710.11107]

    2018 arXiv

  114. [122]

    R. T. Co, L. J. Hall and K. Harigaya, QCD Axion Dark Matter with a Small Decay Constant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 211602 [ 1711.10486]

    2018 arXiv

  115. [123]

    Harigaya and J

    K. Harigaya and J. M. Leedom, QCD Axion Dark Matter from a Late Time Phase Transition, JHEP 06 (2020) 034 [ 1910.04163]

    2020 arXiv

  116. [124]

    J. M. Cline, J. R. Espinosa, G. D. Moore and A. Riotto, String mediated electroweak baryogenesis: A Critical analysis , Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 065014 [ hep-ph/9810261]

    1999 arXiv

  117. [125]

    Agrawal, A

    P. Agrawal, A. Hook and J. Huang, A CMB Millikan experiment with cosmic axiverse strings, JHEP 07 (2020) 138 [ 1912.02823]

    2020 arXiv

  118. [126]

    Takahashi and W

    F. Takahashi and W. Yin, Kilobyte Cosmic Birefringence from ALP Domain Walls , JCAP 04 (2021) 007 [ 2012.11576]

    2021 arXiv

  119. [127]

    W. W. Yin, L. Dai and S. Ferraro, Probing cosmic strings by reconstructing polarization rotation of the cosmic microwave background , JCAP 06 (2022) 033 [ 2111.12741]

    2022 arXiv

  120. [128]

    M. Jain, R. Hagimoto, A. J. Long and M. A. Amin, Searching for axion-like particles through CMB birefringence from string-wall networks , JCAP 10 (2022) 090 [2208.08391]

    2022 arXiv

  121. [129]

    Masia-Roig et al., Analysis method for detecting topological defect dark matter with a global magnetometer network , Phys

    H. Masia-Roig et al., Analysis method for detecting topological defect dark matter with a global magnetometer network , Phys. Dark Univ. 28 (2020) 100494 [ 1912.08727]

    2020 arXiv

  122. [130]

    Afach et al., What Can a GNOME Do? Search Targets for the Global Network of Optical Magnetometers for Exotic Physics Searches , Annalen Phys

    GNOME collaboration, S. Afach et al., What Can a GNOME Do? Search Targets for the Global Network of Optical Magnetometers for Exotic Physics Searches , Annalen Phys. 2023 (2023) 2300083 [ 2305.01785]. 24

    2023 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.