Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Promptly Yours? A Human Subject Study on Prompt Inference in AI-Generated Art

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.08406 v1 pith:RQTLHASF submitted 2024-10-10 cs.HC cs.AI

classification cs.HCcs.AI
keywords promptpromptshumansinferai-generatedimagesmarketplacesoriginal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The emerging field of AI-generated art has witnessed the rise of prompt marketplaces, where creators can purchase, sell, or share prompts for generating unique artworks. These marketplaces often assert ownership over prompts, claiming them as intellectual property. This paper investigates whether concealed prompts sold on prompt marketplaces can be considered as secure intellectual property, given that humans and AI tools may be able to approximately infer the prompts based on publicly advertised sample images accompanying each prompt on sale. Specifically, our survey aims to assess (i) how accurately can humans infer the original prompt solely by examining an AI-generated image, with the goal of generating images similar to the original image, and (ii) the possibility of improving upon individual human and AI prompt inferences by crafting human-AI combined prompts with the help of a large language model. Although previous research has explored the use of AI and machine learning to infer (and also protect against) prompt inference, we are the first to include humans in the loop. Our findings indicate that while humans and human-AI collaborations can infer prompts and generate similar images with high accuracy, they are not as successful as using the original prompt.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Picture is Worth a Thousand Prompts? Efficacy of Iterative Human-Driven Prompt Refinement in Image Regeneration Tasks

    cs.AI 2025-04 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Human-driven iterative prompt refinement improves image regeneration similarity in a 20-person study, while image similarity metrics show only moderate agreement with human rankings.

Pith tools