pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1611.06455 · v4 · pith:RQYUGWO3new · submitted 2016-11-20 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.NE· stat.ML

Time Series Classification from Scratch with Deep Neural Networks: A Strong Baseline

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.NEstat.ML
keywords baselineclassificationdeepmodelsnetworksneuralconvolutionaldata
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We propose a simple but strong baseline for time series classification from scratch with deep neural networks. Our proposed baseline models are pure end-to-end without any heavy preprocessing on the raw data or feature crafting. The proposed Fully Convolutional Network (FCN) achieves premium performance to other state-of-the-art approaches and our exploration of the very deep neural networks with the ResNet structure is also competitive. The global average pooling in our convolutional model enables the exploitation of the Class Activation Map (CAM) to find out the contributing region in the raw data for the specific labels. Our models provides a simple choice for the real world application and a good starting point for the future research. An overall analysis is provided to discuss the generalization capability of our models, learned features, network structures and the classification semantics.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Concurrence: A dependence criterion for time series, applied to biological data

    eess.SP 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Concurrence detects dependence between time series by training a classifier to separate aligned from misaligned segments.

  2. ASTRAFier: A Novel and Scalable Transformer-based Stellar Variability Classifier

    astro-ph.IM 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    ASTRAFier is a Transformer-BiLSTM-CNN model that classifies stellar variability from light curves, reporting 94.26% accuracy on Kepler data and 88.22% on TESS, then applied to 2.8 million TESS curves to release a catalog.