Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 49 references

Spinon Singlet: Microscopic Mechanism of $d$-Wave Pairing in a Partially-Filled Stripe

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that a partially filled stripe in the t-J and Hubbard models is organized by spinon singlets—pairs of opposite-chirality spin defects—and that this organization is what fixes the d-wave sign of electron pairing.

desk verdict A genuinely new spinon-singlet mechanism for d-wave pairing in stripes, supported by solid DMRG data but with a causal claim that is not yet closed in the Hubbard model. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.18892 v1 pith:RR6RJM7H submitted 2025-07-25 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.quant-gasquant-ph

Jia-Long Wang , Shi-Jie Hu , Xue-Feng Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.quant-gasquant-ph PACS 71.27.+a74.20.Mn
keywords spinonsingletd-wavepairingstripeorderquantumcoloredstringt-JmodelFermi-Hubbardperfectsamplingpair-paircorrelation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish a microscopic route from stripe order to d-wave pairing in strongly correlated electron models. Using DMRG together with a perfect-sampling technique that mimics quantum gas microscopy, the authors examine the ground-state wavefunctions of partially filled stripes in the t-J and Hubbard models. They find that the dominant two-spinon configurations form singlet pairs of opposite chirality, and that the sign structure of the wavefunction amplitudes is fixed by the order of chiralities in each pair. Through an effective quantum colored string theory, the paper shows this spinon-singlet sign structure produces the observed negative pair-pair correlations between y-bonds and x-bonds; if correct, it identifies the spinon singlet as the elementary pairing object, with the fluctuating stripe serving as the glue.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the spinon singlet on a quantum colored string. A quantum colored string is the fluctuating one-dimensional phase-shift domain wall that forms a hole-rich stripe, built from colored particles (spinons, holons, and dual-holes) each carrying a chirality determined by its leftmost spin. The spinon singlet is the bound state of two spinons of opposite chirality in adjacent rows; the spin-exchange term $H_o^{(ex2)}$ interchanges chiralities and is what makes the pair a singlet. The machinery works by restricting the Hilbert space to one colored particle per row with an effective spin field $\Gamma^z$, deriving an effective Hamiltonian whose ground state reproduces the DMRG pattern, and then using the sign rule $\mathrm{Sgn}\,s=\mp 1$ for the two chirality orders to evaluate the pair-pair correlation sign.

What would settle it

In the effective quantum colored string model, turn off the chirality-exchange term $H_o^{(ex2)}$ that turns a spinon pair into a singlet; if the negative y-x pair-pair correlation survives, the spinon singlet is not the mechanism that fixes the d-wave sign.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that a partially filled stripe in the t-J and Hubbard models is a fluctuating quantum colored string whose two-spinon sectors organize into spinon singlets, and that this organization dictates the sign of the electron pair-pair correlations. In the DMRG wavefunctions, spin-flip overlap analyses show that for a spinon pair $|s_0\rangle$, the two states obtained by exchanging adjacent spins have negative overlaps, marking the pair as a singlet; snapshots show the most probable spinon separation is $(\delta_x,\delta_y)=(0,1)$. In the effective quantum colored string model, the expansion coefficients obey $\mathrm{Sgn}\,s=\mp 1$ for the two opposite chirality orders, matching the spinon-singlet sign, and the reconstructed wavefunction has about $91.6\%$ fidelity to the DMRG state within the restricted Hilbert space. The sign of a long-distance pair-pair correlation between a y-bond and an x-bond is then $\mathrm{Sgn}\,s\,\mathrm{Sgn}\,s'\,\mathrm{Sgn}\,\Delta$, and the spinon-singlet rule forces $\mathrm{Sgn}\,\Delta$ to compensate so that y-x correlations are negative while y-y and x-x correlations stay positive: the d-wave pattern.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the small staggered magnetic field placed on the two edge columns only quiets background spin noise and does not by itself create or strengthen the opposite-chirality spinon pairs whose sign structure produces the d-wave pattern.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The negative pair-pair correlation between a y-bond and an x-bond, which is the defining feature of d-wave pairing in these striped cylinders, is determined by the spinon-singlet sign rule, so any state with the same two-spinon sign structure will exhibit d-wave pairing.
  • Both the t-J model (with $J=0.6$) and the Hubbard model (with $U=12$, $t'=-0.2$) show the same spinon-singlet statistics, so the mechanism is not tied to one particular form of the exchange term.
  • The effective quantum colored string theory reproduces the d-wave pattern semi-quantitatively and gives a renormalized fidelity of about $91.6\%$ to the DMRG wavefunction within the restricted Hilbert space, showing that the two-spinon sector carries the essential sign structure.
  • In a two-stripe system, spinon singlet pairs from one stripe can tunnel into a neighboring stripe, establishing a long-range pair-pair correlation between stripes; the paper conjectures the spinon singlet is the elementary quasiparticle of d-wave superconductivity with the quantum colored string as the glue.
  • At leading order the pair-pair correlation strengths obey x-x < x-y < y-y, so the d-wave pattern is spatially anisotropic on the thin cylinders, and the paper expects the anisotropy to weaken as $t/J$ grows.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the chirality-order sign rule may be a general organizing principle for striped superconductors—if the two-spinon sector always dominates, any fluctuating stripe with opposite-chirality spinon pairs would show the same negative y-x pair-pair correlation regardless of microscopic details.
  • Editorial inference: the spinon singlet acts as a pre-formed local pair of defects, so this mechanism may connect naturally to the pre-formed-pair picture of underdoped cuprates, with global phase coherence emerging when spinon singlets from neighboring quantum colored strings develop inter-string coherence.
  • Editorial inference: a direct cold-atom test would be to measure the two-spinon distance distribution and chirality overlap in quantum gas microscopy snapshots of a fluctuating stripe; the mechanism predicts a dominant peak at $(\delta_x,\delta_y)=(0,1)$ and negative overlap under adjacent spin exchange.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies partially filled stripes in the t-J and Hubbard models on cylinders, using DMRG with perfect sampling of the ground-state wavefunction. From the sampled Fock states the authors identify pairs of spinons with opposite chiralities along a fluctuating quantum colored string, define a 'spinon singlet' via the sign of overlap under spin-exchange processes, and show that in the t-J 1/2-doped stripe this sector carries roughly 96% of the sampled weight. They then introduce an effective quantum colored string model whose ground state reproduces the DMRG pair-pair correlation (PPC) patterns and the spinon correlation function semi-quantitatively, and they use the sign structure of the effective wavefunction to argue that the spinon-singlet sign rule Sgn = -1 for chirality sequences produces the negative y-x PPC that defines d-wave pairing. A two-stripe DMRG calculation is added to suggest long-range pair-pair correlations mediated by spinon singlets.

Significance. If the proposed mechanism is correct, the paper provides a concrete, falsifiable organizing principle for the sign structure of the stripe ground state and connects it to d-wave pairing, which would be a substantial step beyond the phenomenological coexistence of stripes and superconductivity. The numerical part is careful: DMRG truncation errors are below roughly 1e-4, the perfect-sampling statistics are benchmarked in bond dimension, and the effective-theory wavefunction has high overlap with the projected DMRG state. The explicit sign analysis of the two- and three-spinon sector is a testable statement about the wavefunction. The main weaknesses are quantitative: the spinon-singlet sector is a minority of the Hubbard weight, the central sampling is performed in a pinning-field-modified model, and the effective model is tuned before being used to explain the pattern. These weaknesses do not invalidate the approach, but they currently prevent the paper from supporting its universal 'both Hubbard and t-J' conclusion.

major comments (4)
  1. [SM Table III and the Conclusion] The claim that the spinon singlet is the microscopic mechanism of d-wave pairing in both the Hubbard and t-J models is not supported by the reported statistics in the Hubbard case. Table III gives a spinon-singlet weight ratio of only 38.5-41.8% for the Hubbard 2/3-doped stripe at V0 = 0.3, and 55.6-56.1% for the t-J 2/3-doped stripe, whereas the 96.0-96.2% value quoted in the main text applies only to the t-J 1/2-doped stripe. The sign analysis in the 'd-wave pairing' section is constructed entirely from two- and three-spinon bases in the restricted space Omega, and the paper does not quantify the contribution of the 'unpaired' and 'invalid' snapshots, which carry the majority of the Hubbard weight. To substantiate the causal claim, the authors should either compute G_{b,b'} by category from the existing perfect-sampling data, or demonstrate that the excluded sectors cancel or reproduce the same sign structure.
  2. [SM Sec. C and Table I] The pinning field changes the statistics on which the central conclusion rests. In the t-J 1/2-doped stripe, increasing V0 from 0.1 to 0.3 raises the spinon-singlet count ratio from 26.2% to 42.4% and the weight ratio from 93.0% to 96.2% (Table I); for the 2/3-doped stripe the count ratio rises from 15.7% to 21.2%. The energy-gap argument in SM Sec. C is qualitative, and the magnetization curves in Fig. S6 do not by themselves show that the spinon-pairing correlations are unchanged in the V0 to 0 limit. The authors should benchmark the spinon-singlet ratios and the category-resolved PPC at smaller V0 and, if V0 dependence persists, restrict the mechanism claim to the pinned model.
  3. [End Matter: Effective Hamiltonian of a QCS] The effective-theory evidence is partly tuned: the authors state that 'with the spin exchange interaction strength doubled, we successfully reproduce a d-wave pattern.' Since the same doubled J_plus-minus model is then used to read off the sign structure of the wavefunction and to conclude that spinon singlets cause d-wave pairing, the argument is not a parameter-free confirmation. A robustness check over a range of the spin-exchange renormalization, showing that the sign rule Sgn_s = -1 and the sign of the y-x PPC are stable, would separate the mechanism from the fitting. The high fidelity F_R of about 91.6% between the effective wavefunction and the projected DMRG state is reassuring and should be kept, but it does not remove the need for this check.
  4. ['Spinon Pairing' section and Fig. 2(c)] The identification of the object as a 'spinon singlet' is based on negative overlaps under two specific spin-exchange processes in a symmetry-broken context, not on a direct measurement of the pair's total spin. Given that the pinning field breaks spin-rotation symmetry and the effective model explicitly contains an Ising-like Gamma^z field, the authors should clarify in what precise sense the two-spinon object is a singlet, or rename it to avoid implying a conserved spin quantum number that has not been established.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Conclusion and Fig. 5 caption] The text uses 'PCC function' in the Conclusion and in the Fig. 5 caption; this should be 'PPC function' for consistency.
  2. [Fig. 4 caption] The caption contains the typo 'dule-hole-spinon'; it should read 'dual-hole-spinon'.
  3. [End Matter, Eqs. (M3) and (M4)] The notation n_y^{(r)} used in Eqs. (M3) and (M4) is not defined in the text; a brief definition of this occupation operator would make the effective Hamiltonian self-contained.
  4. [SM Sec. D] The benchmarks report truncation errors for V0 = 0, but the main sampling results use V0 = 0.3; a one-sentence statement of the truncation errors for the pinned runs would strengthen the quantitative basis of the sampling data.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The QCS effective model is tuned to reproduce the DMRG d-wave pattern before that same pattern is presented as confirmation; the spinon-singlet statistics themselves are independent, but the mechanism claim is partly a consistency argument.

  1. fitted input called prediction [End Matter, 'Effective Hamiltonian of a QCS', final paragraph]
    "Following the above-mentioned instructions, with the spin exchange interaction strength doubled, we successfully reproduce a d-wave pattern for a 1/2 hole-doped stripe, as shown in Fig. 3(c), which closely resembles the DMRG-calculated pattern in Fig. 1(b)."

    The DMRG d-wave pattern is the target to be reproduced. The effective QCS model is not parameter-free: the spin-exchange interaction is doubled, and this is the same interaction that controls spinon-singlet formation, until the model yields the target d-wave pattern. The paper then presents the resulting PPC pattern as confirmation that the effective theory describes d-wave pairing, and reads the spinon-singlet mechanism off the tuned wavefunction. Thus the 'prediction' of the d-wave pattern from the QCSM is forced by the fit; it does not independently validate the causal claim that spinon singlets generate d-wave pairing. The independent content lies in the DMRG perfect-sampling statistics, which are not circular.

full rationale

The spinon-singlet observation is not circular as a measurement: the paper uses perfect sampling of a DMRG MPS to obtain Fock-space statistics, identifies spinons by local color-string patterns, and shows that spinon pairs with opposite chirality dominate in the t-J model and appear with substantial weight in the Hubbard model. These statistics are independent of the d-wave pattern being explained and do not reduce to the conclusion by construction. The d-wave sign argument in the main text is a consistency analysis of the same wavefunction: it verifies that the sign of the expansion coefficient for two-spinon bases, combined with the chirality-exchange sign SgnDelta, reproduces the negative y-x PPC. That is not a circular equation, because the sign of alpha_s is read from the wavefunction rather than from the PPC, but it is a post-hoc explanation rather than an out-of-sample prediction. The concrete circularity is in the QCS effective-model portion. The paper explicitly adjusts the spin-exchange interaction, doubling its strength, until the effective model reproduces the DMRG d-wave pattern (Fig. 3(c) versus Fig. 1(b)). The same tuned model is then used to confirm the d-wave pattern and to extract the spinon-singlet sign structure. Thus the QCSM d-wave pattern is a fitted input called a prediction; it cannot independently establish that spinon singlets cause d-wave pairing. The independent support for the mechanism rests on the perfect-sampling statistics from the original DMRG wavefunctions, which are not circular. Self-citations to Ref. [41] are present and load-bearing for the effective-theory interpretation, but the framework is extended here with explicit terms and is not used as an unverified uniqueness theorem, so it does not by itself raise the score beyond the fitted-input issue. Separately, the Hubbard-model spinon-singlet weight of only about 40% is a quantitative concern about dominance of the proposed mechanism, but that is a correctness or completeness gap rather than a circularity. Overall, one fitted input in the effective-theory leg justifies a moderate score; the central claim still has substantial independent numerical content.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claim depends on two fitted parameters (the doubled spin-exchange strength in the effective model and the pinning field magnitude V0), on the restricted one-color-particle-per-row Hilbert space, on the neglect of AF-domain spin fluctuations, and on the completeness of the leading-order basis-pair analysis. The spinon singlet is a new composite object with a proposed experimental signature, while the QCS is carried over from prior work by the same authors.

free parameters (2)
  • Effective spin-exchange strength in QCSM = doubled relative to the microscopic t-J value (J± = αJ/2 with the interaction strength doubled)
    The End Matter states that 'with the spin exchange interaction strength doubled, we successfully reproduce a d-wave pattern'; this hand-tuned parameter is needed to match DMRG and underlies the wavefunction whose sign structure is then used to explain d-wave.
  • Pinning field magnitude V0 = 0.3 (used in main text; 0.1 also benchmarked)
    A staggered magnetic field is applied to the edge columns of the t-J cylinder during perfect sampling; the spinon-singlet snapshot weights change with V0 (Table I), so the chosen value is an ad hoc numerical parameter affecting the central statistics.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The low-energy stripe subspace is spanned by states with exactly one color particle per row (Σ_c n_c = 1)
    The effective QCS Hilbert space relies on this constraint, inherited from Ref [41]; if multiple CPs per row are important, the effective theory and its sign analysis may miss relevant processes. Invoked in the Theory of QCS section.
  • domain assumption Local spin fluctuations inside the AF domains do not affect the spinon pairing physics, and only renormalize the effective model parameters
    The effective derivation neglects spin fluctuations in the AF domains and accounts for them only by adjusting the spin-exchange strength; stated in the End Matter.
  • domain assumption The leading-order basis pairs fully determine the sign of the PPC at long distances; contributions from higher-order processes or Nr>3 spinon bases are negligible
    The d-wave sign argument relies on identifying 'all the contributing pairs' among restricted basis states; if omitted configurations contribute significant opposite-sign amplitudes, the mechanism is incomplete.
  • ad hoc to paper The pinning field preserves the physics of the unpinned model because the AF domains are protected by finite energy gaps
    SM Sec. C invokes finite gaps to argue the pinning field only selects one of the degenerate states; Table I shows quantitative sensitivity to V0, making this an assumption rather than a proven equivalence.
invented entities (2)
  • Spinon singlet independent evidence
    purpose: A bound state of two oppositely-chiral spinons on a quantum colored string, proposed as the elementary object generating d-wave electron pairing
    The paper provides an observable handle: the authors predict that spinon singlet pairs and their distance distribution can be directly observed in quantum gas microscopy snapshots; the sign structure is also checkable in the computed wavefunction.
  • Quantum colored string (QCS)
    purpose: Topological line defect describing the stripe as a chain of color particles; used as the organizing framework
    The QCS is taken from the authors' previous work [41] and has no independent experimental confirmation; it is a theoretical construction in this program.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spinon Singlet: Microscopic Mechanism of $d$-Wave Pairing in a Partially-Filled Stripe." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RR6RJM7H

@misc{pith2026250718892,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spinon Singlet: Microscopic Mechanism of $d$-Wave Pairing in a Partially-Filled Stripe},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RR6RJM7H}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.18892}
}
abstract

Significant research advances have led to a consensus that the Fermi-Hubbard model and its extended variants are archetypal frameworks for elucidating the intertwined relationship between stripe orders and superconductivity in hole-doped high-$T_c$ materials. Notably, the Hubbard quantum simulator has recently achieved several remarkable breakthroughs, e.g., being successfully cooled down to the cryogenic regime and enabling the observation of stable fluctuating stripes. However, the microscopic mechanism behind $d$-wave pairing of electrons in the presence of stripes at low temperatures remains poorly understood due to the intricate interplay among the strongly correlated effects and non-negligible thermal fluctuations. Here, we conduct a close investigation of a partially-filled stripe in the representative $t$-$J$ and Fermi-Hubbard models with both numerical and analytical methods. Analogous to quantum gas microscopy, the perfect sampling technique allows us to obtain the high-confidence statistics of the Fock basis states appearing in the ground-state wavefunction. In a refreshing physical paradigm, these data demonstrate that two spinons with opposite chiralities tend to spontaneously pair into a singlet state, which naturally gives rise to the $d$-wave pairing pattern. Then, using the effective theory of quantum colored string, we reconstruct the wavefunction and determine the nature of spinon pairing and its connection to the $d$-wave pairing pattern. Furthermore, spinon singlet pairs enable the establishment of a long-range pair-pair correlation between double stripes. Our work offers new insights into the role of stripe orders in mediating $d$-wave superconductivity and paves the way for further exploration of multi-stripe-mediated pairing mechanisms in the Fermi-Hubbard model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.18892 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The PPC function, starting from the target [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a,b) Spinon correlation function with spinon distances [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) A schematic diagram shows the dynamics of QCS. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) The PPC function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Theory of su- perconductivity,

    J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, and J. R. Schrie ffer, “Theory of su- perconductivity,” Phys. Rev.108, 1175–1204 (1957)

    1957

  2. [2]

    Correlated electrons in high-temperature super- conductors,

    Elbio Dagotto, “Correlated electrons in high-temperature super- conductors,” Rev. Mod. Phys.66, 763 (1994)

    1994

  3. [3]

    Magnetic, transport, and optical properties of monolayer cop- per oxides,

    M. A. Kastner, R. J. Birgeneau, G. Shirane, and Y . Endoh, “Magnetic, transport, and optical properties of monolayer cop- per oxides,” Reviews of Modern Physics70, 897–928 (1998)

    work page 1998

  4. [4]

    Doping a mott insulator: Physics of high-temperature superconductiv- ity,

    Patrick A. Lee, Naoto Nagaosa, and Xiao-Gang Wen, “Doping a mott insulator: Physics of high-temperature superconductiv- ity,” Rev. Mod. Phys.78, 17 (2006)

    2006

  5. [5]

    From quantum matter to high-temperature super- conductivity in copper oxides,

    B. Keimer, S. A. Kivelson, M. R. Norman, S. Uchida, and J. Zaanen, “From quantum matter to high-temperature super- conductivity in copper oxides,” Nature (London) 518, 179–186 (2015)

    2015

  6. [6]

    When superconductivity crosses over: From bcs to bec,

    Qijin Chen, Zhiqiang Wang, Rufus Boyack, Shuolong Yang, and K. Levin, “When superconductivity crosses over: From bcs to bec,” Rev. Mod. Phys.96, 025002 (2024)

    2024

  7. [7]

    Detection of a Cooper-pair density wave in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x,

    M. H. Hamidian, S. D. Edkins, Sang Hyun Joo, A. Kostin, H. Eisaki, S. Uchida, M. J. Lawler, E. A. Kim, A. P. MacKen- zie, K. Fujita, Jinho Lee, and J. C. S´eamus Davis, “Detection of a Cooper-pair density wave in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x,” Nature (Lon- don) 532, 343–347 (2016), arXiv:1511.08124 [cond-mat.supr- con]

    arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    Pre-formed Cooper pairs in copper oxides and LaAlO 3—SrTiO3 heterostructures,

    Ivan Bo ˇzovi´c and Jeremy Levy, “Pre-formed Cooper pairs in copper oxides and LaAlO 3—SrTiO3 heterostructures,” Nature Physics 16, 712–717 (2020)

    2020

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    The emergence of global phase coherence from local pairing in underdoped cuprates,

    Shusen Ye, Changwei Zou, Hongtao Yan, Yu Ji, Miao Xu, Ze- hao Dong, Yiwen Chen, Xingjiang Zhou, and Yayu Wang, “The emergence of global phase coherence from local pairing in underdoped cuprates,” Nature Physics 19, 1301–1307 (2023), arXiv:2306.05926 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    2023 arXiv

  2. [10]

    One-dimensional nature of the magnetic fluctuations in YBa 2Cu3O6.6,

    H. A. Mook, Pengcheng Dai, F. Dogan, and R. D. Hunt, “One-dimensional nature of the magnetic fluctuations in YBa 2Cu3O6.6,” Nature (London) 404, 729–731 (2000), arXiv:cond-mat/0004362 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    2000 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Imaging the energy gap modulations of the cuprate pair-density-wave state,

    Zengyi Du, Hui Li, Sang Hyun Joo, Elizabeth P. Donoway, Jinho Lee, J. C. S ´eamus Davis, Genda Gu, Peter D. Johnson, and Kazuhiro Fujita, “Imaging the energy gap modulations of the cuprate pair-density-wave state,” Nature (London)580, 65– 70 (2020), arXiv:2109.14033 [cond-mat....

    2020 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Colloquium: Theory of intertwined orders in high temperature superconductors,

    Eduardo Fradkin, Steven A. Kivelson, and John M. Tranquada, “Colloquium: Theory of intertwined orders in high temperature superconductors,” Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 457–482 (2015)

    2015

  5. [13]

    Spins, stripes, and superconductivity in hole-doped cuprates,

    John M. Tranquada, “Spins, stripes, and superconductivity in hole-doped cuprates,” in AIP Conference Proceedings (AIP, 2013)

    2013

  6. [14]

    Stripe order in the underdoped region of the two-dimensional hubbard model,

    B. Zheng, Chia-Min Chung, Philippe Corboz, Georg Ehlers, Mingpu Qin, Reinhard M. Noack, Hao Shi, Steven R. White, Shiwei Zhang, and Garnet Kin-Lic Chan, “Stripe order in the underdoped region of the two-dimensional hubbard model,” Science 358, 1155 – 1160 (2016)

    2016

  7. [15]

    Tangent space approach for thermal tensor net- work simulations of the 2d hubbard model,

    Qiaoyi Li, Yuan Gao, Yuan-Yao He, Yang Qi, Bin-Bin Chen, and Wei Li, “Tangent space approach for thermal tensor net- work simulations of the 2d hubbard model,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 226502 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    Stripes, antiferromag- netism, and the pseudogap in the doped hubbard model at finite temperature,

    Alexander Wietek, Yuan-Yao He, Steven R. White, Antoine Georges, and E. Miles Stoudenmire, “Stripes, antiferromag- netism, and the pseudogap in the doped hubbard model at finite temperature,” Phys. Rev. X11, 031007 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Coexistence of su- perconductivity with partially filled stripes in the Hubbard model,

    Hao Xu, Chia-Min Chung, Mingpu Qin, Ulrich Schollw ¨ock, Steven R. White, and Shiwei Zhang, “Coexistence of su- perconductivity with partially filled stripes in the Hubbard model,” Science 384, eadh7691 (2024), arXiv:2303.08376 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Temperature Dependence of Spin and Charge Orders in the Doped Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model,

    Bo Xiao, Yuan-Yao He, Antoine Georges, and Shiwei Zhang, “Temperature Dependence of Spin and Charge Orders in the Doped Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model,” Physical Review X 13, 011007 (2023), arXiv:2202.11741 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2023 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Energetics of domain walls in the 2d t- j model,

    Steven R. White and D. J. Scalapino, “Energetics of domain walls in the 2d t- j model,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3227–3230 (1998)

    1998

  12. [20]

    Robust d-wave superconductivity in the square-lattice t- j model,

    Shoushu Gong, W. Zhu, and D. N. Sheng, “Robust d-wave superconductivity in the square-lattice t- j model,” Physical Re- view Letters 127, 097003 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    Plaquette versus ordinary d- wave pairing in the t ′ -hubbard model on a width-4 cylinder,

    Chia-Min Chung, Mingpu Qin, Shiwei Zhang, Ulrich Schollw¨ock, and Steven R. White (The Simons Collaboration on the Many-Electron Problem), “Plaquette versus ordinary d- wave pairing in the t ′ -hubbard model on a width-4 cylinder,” Phys. Rev. B 102, 041106 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    Emergent superconductivity and competing charge or- ders in hole-doped square-lattice t- j model,

    Xin Lu, Feng Chen, W. Zhu, D. N. Sheng, and Shou-Shu Gong, “Emergent superconductivity and competing charge or- ders in hole-doped square-lattice t- j model,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 066002 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    Ground-state phase diagram and superconductivity of the doped hubbard model on six-leg square cylinders,

    Yi-Fan Jiang, Thomas P. Devereaux, and Hong-Chen Jiang, “Ground-state phase diagram and superconductivity of the doped hubbard model on six-leg square cylinders,” Phys. Rev. 6 B 109, 085121 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Superconductiv- ity in the doped hubbard model and its interplay with next- nearest hopping t’,

    Hong-Chen Jiang and Thomas P. Devereaux, “Superconductiv- ity in the doped hubbard model and its interplay with next- nearest hopping t’,” Science 365, 1424–1428 (2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    Ground state phase diagram of the doped hub- bard model on the four-leg cylinder,

    Yi-Fan Jiang, Jan Zaanen, Thomas P. Devereaux, and Hong- Chen Jiang, “Ground state phase diagram of the doped hub- bard model on the four-leg cylinder,” Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033073 (2020)

    2020

  18. [26]

    d-wave superconduc- tivity, pseudogap, and the phase diagram oft-t′- j model at finite temperature,

    Dai-Wei Qu, Bin-Bin Chen, Xin Lu, Qiaoyi Li, Shou-Shu Gong, Yang Qi, Wei Li, and Gang Su, “ d-wave superconduc- tivity, pseudogap, and the phase diagram oft-t′- j model at finite temperature,” (2023), arXiv:2211.06322 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Fragmented cooper pair condensation in striped superconductors,

    Alexander Wietek, “Fragmented cooper pair condensation in striped superconductors,” Physical Review Letters129, 177001 (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    The resonating valence bond state in La2CuO4 and superconductivity,

    P. W. Anderson, “The resonating valence bond state in La2CuO4 and superconductivity,” Science 235, 1196–1198 (1987)

    1987

  21. [29]

    Direct evidence for Cooper pairing without a spectral gap in a disor- dered superconductor above Tc,

    Koen M. Bastiaans, Damianos Chatzopoulos, Jian-Feng Ge, Doohee Cho, Willem O. Tromp, Jan M. van Ruitenbeek, Mark H. Fischer, Pieter J. de Visser, David J. Thoen, Eduard F. C. Driessen, Teunis M. Klapwijk, and Milan P. Allan, “Direct evidence for Cooper pairing without a spectr...

    2021 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Origin and fate of the pseudogap in the doped Hub- bard model,

    Fedor ˇSimkovic, Riccardo Rossi, Antoine Georges, and Michel Ferrero, “Origin and fate of the pseudogap in the doped Hub- bard model,” Science 385, eade9194 (2024), arXiv:2209.09237 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    String patterns in the doped Hub- bard model,

    Christie S. Chiu, Geo ffrey Ji, Annabelle Bohrdt, Muqing Xu, Michael Knap, Eugene Demler, Fabian Grusdt, Markus Greiner, and Daniel Greif, “String patterns in the doped Hub- bard model,” Science 365, 251–256 (2019), arXiv:1810.03584 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2019 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Frustration- and doping-induced magnetism in a Fermi-Hubbard simulator,

    Muqing Xu, Lev Haldar Kendrick, Anant Kale, Youqi Gang, Geoffrey Ji, Richard T. Scalettar, Martin Lebrat, and Markus Greiner, “Frustration- and doping-induced magnetism in a Fermi-Hubbard simulator,” Nature (London) 620, 971–976 (2023), arXiv:2212.13983 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2023 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Formation of individual stripes in a mixed-dimensional cold- atom fermi–hubbard system,

    Dominik Bourgund, Thomas Chalopin, Petar Bojovi ´c, Hen- ning Schl¨omer, Si Wang, Titus Franz, Sarah Hirthe, Annabelle Bohrdt, Fabian Grusdt, Immanuel Bloch, and Timon A. Hilker, “Formation of individual stripes in a mixed-dimensional cold- atom fermi–hubbard system,” Nature 6...

    2025

  26. [34]

    Antiferromagnetic phase transition in a 3d fermionic hubbard model,

    Hou-Ji Shao, Yu-Xuan Wang, De-Zhi Zhu, Yan-Song Zhu, Hao-Nan Sun, Si-Yuan Chen, Chi Zhang, Zhi-Jie Fan, You- jin Deng, Xing-Can Yao, Yu-Ao Chen, and Jian-Wei Pan, “Antiferromagnetic phase transition in a 3d fermionic hubbard model,” Nature 632, 267–272 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    A neutral-atom hubbard quantum simu- lator in the cryogenic regime,

    Muqing Xu, Lev Haldar Kendrick, Anant Kale, Youqi Gang, Chunhan Feng, Shiwei Zhang, Aaron W. Young, Martin Lebrat, and Markus Greiner, “A neutral-atom hubbard quantum simu- lator in the cryogenic regime,” Nature (2025), 10.1038/s41586- 025-09112-w

    2025 doi

  28. [36]

    Observation of generalized t-J spin dynamics with tunable dipolar interactions,

    Annette N. Carroll, Henrik Hirzler, Calder Miller, David Well- nitz, Sean R. Muleady, Junyu Lin, Krzysztof P. Zamarski, Reuben R. W. Wang, John L. Bohn, Ana Maria Rey, and Jun Ye, “Observation of generalized t-J spin dynamics with tunable dipolar interactions,” Science 388, 38...

    2025 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy of a Fermi–Hubbard system,

    Peter T. Brown, Elmer Guardado-Sanchez, Benjamin M. Spar, Edwin W. Huang, Thomas P. Devereaux, and Waseem S. Bakr, “Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy of a Fermi–Hubbard system,” Nature Physics16, 26–31 (2020), arXiv:1903.05678 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2020 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Quantum gas mi- croscopy for single atom and spin detection,

    Christian Gross and Waseem S. Bakr, “Quantum gas mi- croscopy for single atom and spin detection,” Nature Physics 17, 1316–1323 (2021), arXiv:2010.15407 [cond-mat.quant- gas]

    2021 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Time-resolved observation of spin-charge deconfinement in fermionic Hub- bard chains,

    Jayadev Vijayan, Pimonpan Sompet, Guillaume Salomon, Joannis Koepsell, Sarah Hirthe, Annabelle Bohrdt, Fabian Grusdt, Immanuel Bloch, and Christian Gross, “Time-resolved observation of spin-charge deconfinement in fermionic Hub- bard chains,” Science 367, 186–189 (2020), arXiv...

    2020 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Perfect sampling with uni- tary tensor networks,

    Andrew J. Ferris and Guifre Vidal, “Perfect sampling with uni- tary tensor networks,” Phys. Rev. B85, 165146 (2012)

    2012

  33. [41]

    Quantum colored strings in the hole-doped t−Jz model,

    Jia-Long Wang, Shi-Jie Hu, and Xue-Feng Zhang, “Quantum colored strings in the hole-doped t−Jz model,” Phys. Rev. B 111, 205121 (2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    Strong pairing in mixed- dimensional bilayer antiferromagnetic Mott insulators,

    Annabelle Bohrdt, Lukas Homeier, Immanuel Bloch, Eu- gene Demler, and Fabian Grusdt, “Strong pairing in mixed- dimensional bilayer antiferromagnetic Mott insulators,” Nature Physics 18, 651–656 (2022), arXiv:2108.04118 [cond-mat.str- el]

    2022 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Magnetically medi- ated hole pairing in fermionic ladders of ultracold atoms,

    Sarah Hirthe, Thomas Chalopin, Dominik Bourgund, Petar Bo- jovi´c, Annabelle Bohrdt, Eugene Demler, Fabian Grusdt, Im- manuel Bloch, and Timon A. Hilker, “Magnetically medi- ated hole pairing in fermionic ladders of ultracold atoms,” Na- ture (London) 613, 463–467 (2023), arXi...

    2023 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Local control and mixed dimensions: Exploring high-temperature supercon- ductivity in optical lattices,

    Henning Schl ¨omer, Hannah Lange, Titus Franz, Thomas Chalopin, Petar Bojovi´c, Si Wang, Immanuel Bloch, Timon A. Hilker, Fabian Grusdt, and Annabelle Bohrdt, “Local control and mixed dimensions: Exploring high-temperature supercon- ductivity in optical lattices,” PRX Quantum ...

    2024

  37. [45]

    Strings in strongly correlated electron systems,

    P. Fulde and F. Pollmann, “Strings in strongly correlated electron systems,” Annalen der Physik 520, 441–449 (2008), arXiv:0711.2129 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2008 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Chiral edge states and fractional charge separation in a system of interacting bosons on a kagome lattice,

    Xue-Feng Zhang and Sebastian Eggert, “Chiral edge states and fractional charge separation in a system of interacting bosons on a kagome lattice,” Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 147201 (2013)

    2013

  39. [47]

    Quantum dynamics of topological strings in a frustrated Ising antiferromagnet,

    Zheng Zhou, Changle Liu, Zheng Yan, Yan Chen, and Xue- Feng Zhang, “Quantum dynamics of topological strings in a frustrated Ising antiferromagnet,” npj Quantum Materials 7, 60 (2022), arXiv:2010.01750 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2022 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Quantum strings in quan- tum spin ice,

    Yuan Wan and Oleg Tchernyshyov, “Quantum strings in quan- tum spin ice,” Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 247210 (2012)

    2012

  41. [49]

    Quantum domain walls induce incommensurate super- solid phase on the anisotropic triangular lattice,

    Xue-Feng Zhang, Shijie Hu, Axel Pelster, and Sebastian Eg- gert, “Quantum domain walls induce incommensurate super- solid phase on the anisotropic triangular lattice,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 193201 (2016). END MATTER DMRG.–For consistency in the following discussions, we always...

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.