REVIEW 2 cited by
Should you use a probabilistic duration model in TTS? Probably! Especially for spontaneous speech
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Converting input symbols to output audio in TTS requires modelling the durations of speech sounds. Leading non-autoregressive (NAR) TTS models treat duration modelling as a regression problem. The same utterance is then spoken with identical timings every time, unlike when a human speaks. Probabilistic models of duration have been proposed, but there is mixed evidence of their benefits. However, prior studies generally only consider speech read aloud, and ignore spontaneous speech, despite the latter being both a more common and a more variable mode of speaking. We compare the effect of conventional deterministic duration modelling to durations sampled from a powerful probabilistic model based on conditional flow matching (OT-CFM), in three different NAR TTS approaches: regression-based, deep generative, and end-to-end. Across four different corpora, stochastic duration modelling improves probabilistic NAR TTS approaches, especially for spontaneous speech. Please see https://shivammehta25.github.io/prob_dur/ for audio and resources.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Continuous Autoregressive Modeling with Stochastic Monotonic Alignment for Speech Synthesis
Continuous autoregressive text-to-speech with a Gaussian-mixture codec matches or beats a discrete-codec VALL-E baseline with a fraction of the language model parameters.
-
Investigating Stochastic Methods for Prosody Modeling in Speech Synthesis
Rectified flows with a tunable sampling temperature offer the best naturalness-diversity trade-off among stochastic prosody predictors for text-to-speech.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.