Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 42 references

From Tensor Algebras to Hyperbolic Kac-Moody Algebras

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes that the consecutive coset Virasoro actions on the tensor algebra commute, so the level-ℓ tensor algebra carries a simultaneous action of the affine algebra and ℓ−1 Virasoro algebras, and uses this to organize the…

desk verdict Theorem 1 is a genuine advance; the abstract overstates the level-five completeness, but the paper deserves refereeing after revision. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.03815 v1 pith:RRWLDMX5 submitted 2025-08-05 hep-th math.QAmath.RT

Axel Kleinschmidt , Hannes Malcha , Hermann Nicolai This is my paper
classification hep-thmath.QAmath.RT MSC 17B6717B6981R1081T30 PACS 11.25.-w11.30.-j02.20.-a
keywords hyperbolicKac-MoodyalgebrasFeingold-FrenkelalgebracosetVirasoroDDFstatestensorvertexoperatoraffineLierootmultiplicities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes to study a hyperbolic Kac-Moody algebra—the Feingold-Frenkel algebra $\mathfrak{F}$—not by building it level by level as a quotient, but by first analyzing the tensor algebra of level-one states and only at the end converting tensor products into multi-commutators. The payoff is that the level-$\ell$ tensor algebra carries a simultaneous action of the affine algebra $A_1^{(1)}$ together with $\ell-1$ mutually commuting coset Virasoro algebras, a structure that is invisible in the Lie algebra itself. The authors prove the commuting action (Theorem 1), give the complete decomposition of $\hat{T}(\ell)$ for $\ell\leq 5$, list the maximal tensor ground states, and show how the map to $\mathfrak{F}$ loses the Virasoro structure through virtual states. If correct, this gives a new organizing principle for the root spaces of $\mathfrak{F}$ and a concrete computational route to higher levels.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the tensor algebra $T=\bigoplus_{\ell>0}T(\ell)$, with $T(\ell)=L\otimes\cdots\otimes L$ ($\ell$ factors) where $L$ is the level-one basic representation of $A_1^{(1)}$, realized by transversal DDF states. The key identity is the definition of the consecutive coset Virasoro action $$[\ell]$L^{{\mathrm{coset}}$}_m(u\otimes v)=[1]$L^{{\mathrm{sug}}$}_m u\otimes v+u\otimes[\ell-1]$L^{{\mathrm{sug}}$}_m v-[\ell]$L^{{\mathrm{sug}}$}_m(u\otimes v),$$ together with Theorem 1, which makes all such actions commute for different $\ell$. Maximal tensor ground states (MTGs) are defined as simultaneous ground states for the affine algebra and all lower coset Virasoro algebras; the finite set of MTGs at each level, with count $n_{\ell+1}=(\lfloor(\ell+1)/2\rfloor+1)n_\ell$, characterizes $T(\ell)$ completely. The conversion to the Lie algebra is carried by the vertex-operator map $J_\ell$, which sends $u_1\otimes\cdots\otimes u_\ell$ to $[u_1,[u_2,\dots[u_{\ell-1},u_\ell]\cdots]]$ and automatically respects the Jacobi and Serre relations.

What would settle it

Take an explicit level-three tensor state, say $u_1\otimes(u_2\otimes v)$ with $u_i\in T(1)$, evaluate both sides of the Theorem 1 identity (2.17) in the DDF basis; any non-zero difference would disprove the commuting-action claim. Alternatively, compute the character of $T(6)$ by iterating (2.15) and compare with a direct DDF Fock-space count; a mismatch at any order in $q=e^{-\delta}$ would show the claimed complete control over all levels fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central result is Theorem 1: for $\ell\geq 3$ and $m,n\in\mathbb{Z}$, $$[\ell]$L^{{\mathrm{coset}}$}_m\left(u_1\otimes [\ell-1]$L^{{\mathrm{coset}}$}_n(u_2\otimes v)\right)=\left(1\otimes [\ell-1]$L^{{\mathrm{coset}}$}_n\right)\left([\ell]$L^{{\mathrm{coset}}$}_m(u_1\otimes (u_2\otimes v))\right),$$ so all consecutive coset Virasoro actions commute and the level-$\ell$ tensor algebra $T(\ell)$ is a representation of the commuting product $\mathrm{Vir}\oplus\cdots\oplus\mathrm{Vir}\oplus A_1^{(1)}$ with $\ell-1$ Virasoro factors. Using the tensor-product decomposition theorem (2.15), the paper obtains the full decompositions of the antisymmetrized tensor algebra $\hat{T}(\ell)$ into Virasoro minimal-model and affine modules for $\ell\leq 5$ (18 terms at level five), and constructs the maximal tensor ground states that generate all of $T(\ell)$ under the joint action. The map $J_\ell$ from tensor products to multi-commutators commutes with the affine action and gives $F(\ell)=\hat{T}(\ell)/\mathrm{Ker}\,J_\ell$, in which all affine modules survive but Virasoro modules develop holes. The paper thereby explains the failure of previous single-coset Virasoro methods and reinterprets the Feingold-Frenkel algebra as the image of a multi-string Fock space.

Load-bearing premise

The construction assumes that the DDF and vertex-operator realization imported from earlier work gives a complete description of the level-one module $L$ and of the affine generators, so that every element of $\mathfrak{F}$ is represented by a DDF state; if that realization were incomplete, the tensor-algebra framework would not describe the actual algebra.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The level-$\ell$ tensor algebra is fully controlled for arbitrary $\ell$ by iterating the one-factor tensor-product decomposition, with all multiplicities equal to one.
  • At each level, finitely many maximal tensor ground states generate every element of $T(\ell)$, and hence redundantly every element of $F(\ell)$, under the joint affine and coset Virasoro action.
  • Because $J_\ell$ commutes with the affine action, every affine module of $\hat{T}(\ell)$ appears in $F(\ell)$, while Virasoro modules acquire holes; root multiplicity formulas for $\ell\geq 3$ must therefore be more intricate than previously thought.
  • The decompositions imply new character identities, and their higher-level generalizations point toward Rogers-Ramanujan-type identities.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that the tensor-first strategy could be tried on $E_{10}$ and other hyperbolic algebras, but its own analysis shows the approach would fail qualitatively beyond the levels where coset central charges exceed one and the finite spectrum of Virasoro eigenvalues is lost.
  • The virtual-state analysis points toward a DDF-only algorithm for finding a minimal subset of $\hat{T}(\ell)$ on which $J_\ell$ is bijective, which would bypass the Free Lie Algebra intermediate step entirely.
  • The unbounded pile-up of Virasoro algebras suggests that the $\ell\to\infty$ limit is governed by an infinite product of Virasoro algebras, a structure that could serve as a toy model for tensor hierarchies with infinitely many form degrees of freedom.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a new approach to the hyperbolic Kac-Moody algebra F, based on the tensor algebra T = ⊕_{ℓ>0} T(ℓ), where T(ℓ) is the ℓ-fold tensor product of the level-one basic module. The authors define consecutive coset Virasoro actions [ℓ]Lcoset on T(ℓ) and prove (Theorem 1) that these actions for different consecutive levels commute, so that T(ℓ) carries a simultaneous action of A_1^(1) and ℓ−1 commuting Virasoro algebras. Using the Kac-Wakimoto tensor product theorem, they present decompositions of the subalgebra \hat T(ℓ) for ℓ≤5, introduce maximal tensor ground states (MTGs), and compute some of them explicitly at low levels via DDF states. In Section 4 they map tensor products to F by multi-commutators using a vertex-operator construction, discuss the kernel of this map and the appearance of 'virtual' states, and give character-level checks. The final parts sketch potential applications to F and to E10.

Significance. The main conceptual contribution — the simultaneous, mutually commuting coset Virasoro action on tensor products — is interesting and appears correct. The proof of Theorem 1 is a direct computation using (2.10), and the decompositions (3.1)–(3.3) are supported by the cited theorem of Kac-Wakimoto and by the character matching in Appendix B. The explicit DDF expressions and the use of the public Mathematica package [40] make the low-level MTG computations checkable. If the framework can be developed to the point where the kernel of J_ℓ is understood, it would give a new handle on root multiplicities of F and other hyperbolic algebras. However, the advertised completeness at level five is not delivered: only 8 of 18 level-5 MTGs are presented, and no level-5 element of F is constructed.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; §3.2; §4.2] The abstract claims a complete decomposition of the tensor algebra for all levels ℓ≤5 and MTGs from which all elements of F up to level five can be generated. This is not supported by the body: §3.2 states 'Of the 18 MTG at level 5 we have computed 8', and §4.2 states 'The level 5 states of F are currently out of reach for our computational tools.' Thus no level-5 element of F is constructed, and the missing 10 MTGs are not shown to generate anything. Please revise the abstract and the relevant statements to distinguish the complete character decomposition of \hat T(5) from the incomplete list of explicit MTGs and from the absence of level-5 F elements.
  2. [Abstract; §3.1] The displayed 'complete decomposition' (3.3) is for the subalgebra \hat T(5), not for the full tensor algebra T(5); the abstract's phrase 'tensor algebra' is therefore too broad. The text says the full T(5) expressions are 'similar but twice as long' but they are not given. The scope of the claimed completeness should be stated precisely in the abstract and in Section 3.1.
  3. [§2.4] The claim that the finite set of MTGs 'completely characterizes' T(ℓ) — that is, that every element of T(ℓ) is reachable from an MTG by the joint affine and coset Virasoro action — is asserted without proof. The recursive count (2.31) is stated but not derived, and no argument shows that conditions (2.28)–(2.30) select exactly one state (up to normalization) per module in the decomposition, nor that the MTG conditions are sufficient to generate the module. Since this is the mechanism behind the claimed generation of F elements, a proof or a precise reference is needed.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§3.1] The word 'arbirary' in 'arbirary levels' should be 'arbitrary'.
  2. [§4.3] The word 'tradtitional' should be 'traditional'.
  3. [§4.4] The passage 'Onlevel4eachofthethreeaffinemodules...' is missing spaces and should be typeset as normal prose.
  4. [§4.2] In (4.24) and (4.25), the notation and references do not match Section 3.2: the state written as `¯Ψ⊗(4)2,1,1` should presumably be `¯Ψ⊗(4)2,1,0` from (3.18), and the reference to 'the first fiveplet MTG (3.18)' should point to (3.22).
  5. [§3.2, Eq. (3.22)] The subscript `2,5.2` in `Ψ⊗(4)2,5.2` uses a dot where the rest of the paper uses commas; this should be `2,5,2` for consistency.
  6. [§4.4, Eq. (4.40)] The blue and red terms are described by color, but the typeset text is not color-coded; please use explicit labels or notation for these terms.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the new commutativity theorem is proved from definitions and the standard GKO commutativity relation, while the level-by-level decompositions rest on an external tensor-product theorem and independent character checks.

full rationale

The paper's central new result, Theorem 1 (eq. 2.17), is an algebraic proof from the definitions (2.8), distributivity of the affine action, and the standard coset/affine commutativity (2.10); it does not assume the conclusion. The decompositions (3.1)–(3.3) are obtained by iterating the Kac–Wakimoto tensor-product formula (2.15), attributed to [18], with an independent character-matching check in Appendix B; they are not read off from the MTG construction. The MTGs themselves are produced by imposing the three linear conditions (2.28)–(2.30), and no parameter is fitted and then renamed as a prediction. The paper does rely on the authors' earlier work [1] for the DDF realization of the level-one module and for the recursive generation (1.3), and on [8] for the vertex-operator bracket (4.12); these are external inputs that could fail, which would be a correctness risk, but they are not restatements of the new claims and do not make the derivation circular. The abstract's promise of a complete ℓ≤5 decomposition and generation of all F elements up to level five is stronger than what is delivered (section 3.2: 'Of the 18 MTG at level 5 we have computed 8'; section 4.2: 'The level 5 states of F are currently out of reach'), but this is an unsupported completeness claim, not a circularity. No self-definitional, fitted-input, or imported-uniqueness pattern is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; the construction is an exact algebraic one. The main inputs are the Kac-Wakimoto decomposition theorem and the DDF and VOA realization of F inherited from prior work. The only new organizational notion is the maximal tensor ground state, which is not a new physical entity.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Kac-Wakimoto tensor product theorem (Theorem 4.1 of [18]) giving the decomposition (2.15) of L(Lambda0+2delta) tensor L(mLambda0+2nLambda1+pdelta).
    Used to compute all tensor decompositions (3.1)-(3.3), with delta-shifts fixed by character matching in appendix B.
  • domain assumption The DDF construction of [8,9,1] realizes L and the affine generators in a physical Fock space H=P1/L-1 P0.
    All explicit MTG computations and the map J_l use this string-theoretic realization; the paper cites rather than derives it.
  • standard math The vertex operator bracket (4.12) defines a Lie bracket satisfying the Jacobi identities and Serre relations on the quotient H.
    Imported from Borcherds and Frenkel-Lepowsky-Meerman [15-17,8], used to identify J_l with the KMA bracket.
  • domain assumption Level-by-level generation F(l)=[F(1),F(l-1)] as in (1.3).
    Proof is in appendix A of [1], not repeated; it justifies restricting to consecutive coset Virasoro algebras with k=1.
  • domain assumption Only consecutive coset definitions with k=1 are used, because [F(k),F(l-k)] is a proper subspace for k>1.
    Stated in section 2.1 and demonstrated by an explicit DDF example in appendix A.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of From Tensor Algebras to Hyperbolic Kac-Moody Algebras." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RRWLDMX5

@misc{pith2026250803815,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: From Tensor Algebras to Hyperbolic Kac-Moody Algebras},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RRWLDMX5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.03815}
}
abstract

We propose a novel approach to study hyperbolic Kac-Moody algebras, and more specifically, the Feingold-Frenkel algebra $\mathfrak{F}$, which is based on considering the tensor algebra of level-one states before descending to the Lie algebra by converting tensor products into multiple commutators. This method enables us to exploit the presence of mutually commuting coset Virasoro algebras, whose number grows without bound with increasing affine level. We present the complete decomposition of the tensor algebra under the affine and coset Virasoro symmetries for all levels $\ell\leq 5$, as well as the maximal tensor ground states from which all elements of $\mathfrak{F}$ up to level five can be (redundantly) generated by the joint action of the affine and coset Virasoro generators, and subsequent conversion to multi-commutators, which are then expressed in terms of transversal and longitudinal DDF states. We outline novel directions for future work.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.03815 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Different methods of obtaining (the positive half of) a hyperbolic Kac-Moody algebra. It is instructive to compare our approach with the more traditional method of investigating hyperbolic KMAs [2,3,10–14], which we also review in section 4.3. There one starts from the Free Lie Algebra, and then divides out level by level the relevant ideals associated to the Serre relations, see fig. 1. This approach becomes rather… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Partial visualization of F (2) (left) and F (4) (right). The top right root of the left character is [−2,−2,−1] and the top root of the right character is [−4,−4,−3]. The numbers in the figure indicate the multiplicities. Recall that F has a basis in terms of standard multi-commutators, i.e. F (ℓ) = span{fi1...in | with ℓ generators f−1 and n ≥ ℓ}, (A.1) which implies that the inclusion [F (k) ,F (ℓ−k) ] ⊆ F (ℓ) (fo… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

  1. [40]

    Malcha, DDF: A Mathematica Package for the DDF Construction of the Feingold-Frenkel Algebra (2024), https://github.com/hmalcha/DDF

    H. Malcha, DDF: A Mathematica Package for the DDF Construction of the Feingold-Frenkel Algebra (2024), https://github.com/hmalcha/DDF

    work page 2024

  2. [1]

    A string-like realization of hyperbolic Kac-Moody algebras

    S. Capolongo, A. Kleinschmidt, H. Malcha and H. Nicolai,A string-like realization of hyperbolic Kac-Moody algebras, arXiv:2411.18754 [hep-th] , to appear in Commun. Math. Phys

    work page Pith review arXiv

  3. [2]

    A. J. Feingold and I. B. Frenkel,A hyperbolic Kac-Moody algebra and the theory of Siegel modular forms of genus 2, Math. Ann.263, 87–144 (1983)

    1983

  4. [3]

    V. G. Kac,Infinite-Dimensional Lie algebras, 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press 1990

    1990

  5. [4]

    Goddard, A

    P. Goddard, A. Kent and D. I. Olive,Virasoro Algebras and Coset Space Models, Phys. Lett. B 152 (1985), 88-92

    1985

  6. [5]

    Goddard and D

    P. Goddard and D. I. Olive,Kac-Moody and Virasoro Algebras in Relation to Quantum Physics, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A1 (1986), 303

    1986

  7. [6]

    Witten,Topological tools in ten-dimensional physics, Int

    E. Witten,Topological tools in ten-dimensional physics, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A1 (1986), 39

    1986

  8. [7]

    Del Giudice, P

    E. Del Giudice, P. Di Vecchia and S. Fubini,General properties of the dual resonance model, Annals Phys.70 (1972), 378-398

    1972

Show all 42 references
  1. [8]

    R. W. Gebert and H. Nicolai,On E(10) and the DDF construction, Commun. Math. Phys.172 (1995), 571-622, arXiv:hep-th/9406175

    1995 arXiv

  2. [9]

    R. W. Gebert and H. Nicolai,An affine string vertex operator construction at arbitrary level, J. Math. Phys.38 (1997), 4435-4450, arXiv:hep-th/9608014. 31

    1997 arXiv

  3. [10]

    V. G. Kac, R. V. Moody and M. Wakimoto,On E10, in eds. K. Bleuler and M. WernerDiffer- ential Geometrical Methods in Theoretical Physics, Springer Dordrecht 1988

    1988

  4. [11]

    S. J. Kang,Root Multiplicities of the Hyperbolic Kac-Moody Lie AlgebraHA (1) 1 , Journal of Al- gebra 160, 492-523 (1993)

    1993

  5. [12]

    S. J. Kang,Root Multiplicities of Kac-Moody Algebras, Duke Math. J.74, 635-666 (1994)

    1994

  6. [13]

    S. J. Kang,Kac-Moody Lie Algebras, Spectral Sequences and the Witt Formula, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.339 (1993), 463-493

    1993

  7. [14]

    Bauer and D

    M. Bauer and D. Bernard,On root multiplicities of some hyperbolic Kac-Moody algebras, Lett. Math. Phys.42 (1997), 153-166, arXiv:hep-th/9612210

    1997 arXiv

  8. [15]

    R. E. Borcherds Vertex algebras, Kac-Moody algebras, and the Monster, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences83, 10 (1986), 3068-3071

    1986

  9. [16]

    I. B. Frenkel,Representations of Kac-Moody algebras and dual resonance models, inApplications of Group Theory in Physics and Mathematical Physics(Chicago, 1982), 325-353, Lectures in Appl. Math.21, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1985

    1982

  10. [17]

    I. B. Frenkel, J. Lepowsky and A. Meurman,Vertex Operator Algebras and the Monster, Pure and Applied Mathematics Vol. 134, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1988

    1988

  11. [18]

    V. G. Kac and M. Wakimoto,Unitarizable highest weight representations of the Virasoro, Neveu- Schwarz and Ramond algebras, Lecture Notes in Physics 261 (1986), 345-372

    1986

  12. [19]

    V. G. Kac and D. H. Peterson,Infinite-dimensional Lie algebras, theta functions and modular forms, Adv. Math. 53, 125-264 (1984)

    1984

  13. [20]

    Julia, Infinite Lie algebras in physics, in Johns Hopkins Workshop on Current Problems in Particle Physics: Unified theories and Beyond, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (1981)

    B. Julia, Infinite Lie algebras in physics, in Johns Hopkins Workshop on Current Problems in Particle Physics: Unified theories and Beyond, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (1981)

    1981

  14. [21]

    Breitenlohner and D

    P. Breitenlohner and D. Maison,On the Geroch group, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré. Phys. Théor.46 (1987) 215

    1987

  15. [22]

    Nicolai,Two-dimensional gravities and supergravities as integrable systems, in Springer Lec- ture Notes in Physics 396 (1991), eds

    H. Nicolai,Two-dimensional gravities and supergravities as integrable systems, in Springer Lec- ture Notes in Physics 396 (1991), eds. H. Mitter and H. Gausterer

    1991

  16. [23]

    Samtleben and M

    H. Samtleben and M. Weidner,Gauging hidden symmetries in two dimensions, JHEP08 (2007), 076, arXiv:0705.2606 [hep-th]

    2007 arXiv

  17. [24]

    König, k-Structure of Basic Representation of Affine Algebras, Commun

    B. König, k-Structure of Basic Representation of Affine Algebras, Commun. Math. Phys.406 (2025) no.4, 82,arXiv:2407.12748 [math.RT]

    2025 arXiv

  18. [25]

    de Wit, H

    B. de Wit, H. Samtleben and H. Nicolai, Gauged Supergravities, Tensor Hierachies and M- Theory, JHEP02 (2008) 044, arXiv:0801.1294 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Bossard, F

    G. Bossard, F. Ciceri, G. Inverso, A. Kleinschmidt and H. Samtleben,E9 exceptional field theory. Part II. The complete dynamics, JHEP05 (2021), 107, arXiv:2103.12118 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Bossard, M

    G. Bossard, M. Cederwall and J. Palmkvist,Teleparallel Geroch geometry, JHEP08 (2024), 076, arXiv:2402.04055 [hep-th] . 32

    2024 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Cederwall and J

    M. Cederwall and J. Palmkvist, Tensor Hierarchy Algebra Extensions of Over-Extended Kac–Moody Algebras, Commun. Math. Phys. 389 (2022) no.1, 571-620, arXiv:2103.02476 [math.RT]

    2022 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Damour, M

    T. Damour, M. Henneaux and H. Nicolai,E(10) and a ’small tension expansion’ of M theory Phys. Rev. Lett.89 (2002) 221601, arXiv:hep-th/0207267

    2002 arXiv

  23. [30]

    V. A. Belinskii, I. M. Khalatnikov and E. M. Lifshitz,Oscillatory approach to a singular point in the relativistic cosmology, Adv. Phys.19 (1970) 525

    1970

  24. [31]

    Damour, M

    T. Damour, M. Henneaux and H. Nicolai,Cosmological billiards, Class. Quant. Grav.20 (2003), R145-R200, arXiv:hep-th/0212256

    2003 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Nicolai, Complexity and the Big Bang , Class

    H. Nicolai, Complexity and the Big Bang , Class. Quant. Grav. 38 (2021) no.18, 187001, arXiv:2104.09626 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  26. [33]

    P. C. West, E(11) and M theory , Class. Quant. Grav. 18 (2001), 4443-4460, arXiv:hep-th/0104081

    2001 arXiv

  27. [34]

    P.P.CookandM.Fleming, Gravitational Coset Models, JHEP07(2014), 115,arXiv:1309.0757 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Glennon and P

    K. Glennon and P. West,Gravity, Dual Gravity andA+++ 1 , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A35 (2020) no.14, 2050068, arXiv:2004.03363 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Boulanger, P

    N. Boulanger, P. P. Cook, J. A. O’Connor and P. West,Higher dualisations of linearised gravity and theA+++ 1 algebra, JHEP12 (2022), 152, arXiv:2208.11501 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Di Francesco, P

    P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu and D. Senechal,Conformal Field Theory, Springer-Verlag, 1997

    1997

  31. [38]

    I. B. Frenkel and V. G. Kac,Basic Representations of Affine Lie Algebras and Dual Resonance Models, Invent Math 62, 23–66 (1980)

    1980

  32. [39]

    T. A. Welsh,Fermionic expressions for minimal model Virasoro characters, Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 827 (2005), 1-160, arXiv:math/0212154

    2005 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Scherk,An Introduction to the Theory of Dual Models and Strings, Rev

    J. Scherk,An Introduction to the Theory of Dual Models and Strings, Rev. Mod. Phys.47 (1975), 123-164

    1975

  34. [42]

    R. W. Gebert, H. Nicolai and P. C. West,Multistring vertices and hyperbolic Kac-Moody algebras, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A11 (1996), 429-514, arXiv:hep-th/9505106. 33

    1996 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.