Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

MVA: Initial Margin Valuation Adjustment by Replication and Regression

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1405.0508 v2 pith:RS2UDJBO submitted 2014-05-02 q-fin.PR q-fin.GNq-fin.RM

classification q-fin.PRq-fin.GNq-fin.RM
keywords margininitialvaluationadjustmentburgard2011calculationcostsgreen2014
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Initial margin requirements are becoming an increasingly common feature of derivative markets. However, while the valuation of derivatives under collateralisation (Piterbarg 2010, Piterbarg2012), under counterparty risk with unsecured funding costs (FVA) (Burgard2011, Burgard2011, Burgard2013) and in the presence of regulatory capital (KVA) (Green2014) are established through valuation adjustments, hitherto initial margin has not been considered. This paper further extends the semi-replication framework of (Burgard2013a), itself later extended by (Green2014), to cover the cost of initial margin, leading to Margin Valuation Adjustment (MVA). Initial margin requirements are typically generated through the use of VAR or CVAR models. Given the form of MVA as an integral over the expected initial margin profile this would lead to excessive computational costs if a brute force calculation were to be used. Hence we also propose a computationally efficient approach to the calculation of MVA through the use of regression techniques, Longstaff-Schwartz Augmented Compression (LSAC).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Robust Hedging Valuation Adjustment for Deep Hedging Policies under Market Frictions

    q-fin.RM 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A common-stress reserve framework for deep hedgers shows classical trading bands usually beat learned policies, with sparse learned execution winning only under a strict low-liquidity budget.

Pith tools