REVIEW 1 cited by
The SuperCOSMOS Sky Survey. Paper II: Image detection, parameterisation, classification and photometry
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
The SuperCOSMOS Sky Survey. Paper II: Image detection, parameterisation, classification and photometry
read the original abstract
In this, the second in a series of three papers concerning the SuperCOSMOS Sky Survey, we describe the methods for image detection, parameterisation, classification and photometry. We demonstrate the internal and external accuracy of our object parameters. Using examples from the first release of data, the South Galactic Cap survey, we show that our image detection completeness is close to 100% to within 1.5 mag of the nominal plate limits. We show that for the Bj survey data, the image classification is externally > 99% reliable to Bj = 19.5. Internally, the image classification is reliable at a level of > 90% to Bj=21, R=19. The photometric accuracy of our data is typically 0.3 mag with respect to external data for m > 15. Internally, the relative photometric accuracy in restricted position and magnitude ranges can be as accurate as 5% for well exposed stellar images. Colours (B-R or R-I) are externally accurate to 0.07 mag at Bj = 16.5 rising to 0.16 mag at Bj = 20.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Low-redshift constraints on structure growth from CMB lensing tomography
Low-redshift galaxy clustering and CMB lensing tomography with hybrid effective field theory gives S8=0.79±0.06, consistent with Planck, while data alone prefer Ωm=0.245±0.024.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.