REVIEW 1 cited by
Offline Runtime Verification of Safety Requirements using CSP
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Dynamic formal verification is a key tool for providing ongoing confidence that a system is meeting its requirements while in use, especially when paired with static formal verification before the system is in use. This paper presents a workflow and Runtime Verification (RV) toolchain, Varanus, and their application to an industrial case study. Using the workflow we manually derive a Communicating Sequential Processes (CSP) model from natural-language safety requirements documents, which Varanus uses as the monitor oracle. This reuse of the model means that the monitor oracle does not have to be developed separately, risking inconsistencies between it and the model for static verification. The approach is demonstrated by the offline RV of a teleoperated manipulation system, called MASCOT, which enables remote operations inside the Joint European Torus (JET) fusion reactor. We describe our model of the MASCOT safety design documents (including how the modelling process revealed an underspecification in the design) and evaluate the Varanus toolchain's utility. The workflow and tool provide validation of the safety documents, traceability of the safety properties from the documentation to the system, and a verified oracle for RV.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Additional Food Enhances the Bifurcation Structure of Predator Competition Models
An additional-food predator-prey model with generalized predator competition is claimed to exhibit a cusp-type Bogdanov–Takens bifurcation of codimension 4 and a focus-type one of codimension 3, with up to three limit...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.