TB or not TB? Contrasting properties of twisted bilayer graphene and the alternating twist $n$-layer structures ($n=3, 4, 5, \dots$)

The emergence of alternating twist multilayer graphene (ATMG) as a generalization of twisted bilayer graphene (TBG) raises the question - in what important ways do these systems differ? Here, we utilize ab-initio relaxation and single-particle theory, analytical strong coupling analysis, and Hartree-Fock to contrast ATMG with $n=3,4,5,\ldots$ layers and TBG. $\textbf{I}$: We show how external fields enter in the decomposition of ATMG into TBG and graphene subsystems. The parallel magnetic field has little effect for $n$ odd due to mirror symmetry, but surprisingly also for any $n > 2$ if we are are the largest magic angle. $\textbf{II}$: We compute the relaxation of the multilayers leading to effective parameters for each TBG subsystem. We find that the second magic angle for $n=5$, $\theta = 1.14$ is closest to the "chiral" model and thus may be an optimal host for fractional Chern insulators. $\textbf{III}$: We integrate out non-magic subsystems and reduce ATMG to its magic angle TBG subsystem with a screened interaction. $\textbf{IV}$: We perform an analytic strong coupling analysis of the external fields and corroborate it with Hartree-Fock. An in-plane magnetic field in TBG drives a transition to a valley Hall state or a gapless "magnetic semimetal." A displacement field $V$ has little effect on TBG, but induces a gapped phase in ATMG for small $V$ for $n = 4$ and above a critical $V$ for $n = 3$. For $n\geq 3$, we find the superexchange coupling - believed to set the scale of superconductivity in the skyrmion mechanism - increases with $V$ at angles near and below the magic angle. $\textbf{V}$: We complement our strong coupling approach with a weak coupling theory of ATMG pair-breaking. While for $n=2$ orbital effects of the in-plane magnetic field can give a critical field of the same order as the Pauli field, for $n>2$ we expect the critical field to exceed the Pauli limit.