Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 57 references

Effects of Flagellar Morphology on Swimming Performance and Directional Control in Microswimmers

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single-flagellated microswimmer with a 1 µm spherical body swims fastest and most efficiently when its flagellar helix radius is 0.2–0.3 µm and its pitch angle lies between 30° and 45°, with the speed-maximizing pitch angle up to 4.5°…

desk verdict A systematic design map whose quantitative claims rest on an unvalidated, self-cited solver and a few overreaching biological extrapolations. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.07224 v2 pith:RTDPMYWO submitted 2025-02-11 physics.flu-dyn physics.bio-ph

Baopi Liu , Lu Chen , Wenjun Xu This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.flu-dynphysics.bio-ph
keywords flagellarmorphologymicroswimmerswimmingefficiencyyawanglehelixradiuspitchStokesflowmicrorobotdesign
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish quantitative design rules for the shape of a single helical flagellum on a microswimmer. Using Stokes-flow simulations of a 1 µm spherical body with a rigid left-handed helical flagellum, it argues that forward speed and swimming efficiency are set by filament radius, pitch angle, and contour length, while directional control (the yaw angle) is set by helix radius and contour length. It identifies an optimal helix radius of 0.2–0.3 µm and an optimal pitch angle of 30–45°, and finds that the pitch angle giving maximum forward speed is up to 4.5° smaller than the one giving maximum efficiency. If correct, these numbers give engineers concrete targets for microrobot propulsion and help explain why bacteria can switch between fast and efficient swimming by small morphological adjustments.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Twin Multipole Moment (TMM) resistance matrix, which solves the linear Stokes equations (Eq. 2) for the coupled system of a spherical cell body and a chain of spheres forming a rigid helical flagellum. The matrix encodes the hydrodynamic interactions between every pair of elements, and with the force/torque balance conditions (Eq. 6) it yields the swimming velocity, rotation, and the resulting forward speed U_f, efficiency ε = F_f·U_f/|T_b·Ω_m|, and yaw angle β for each geometry. The parameter sweep then varies filament radius a, helix radius R, pitch angle θ, and contour length Λ while reading off these three performance metrics, producing the contour maps and optimum ranges.

What would settle it

Recompute the same morphology sweep using a higher-order boundary-element solver or a fully resolved immersed-boundary simulation at helix radii 0.05, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.6 µm; if the plateau in maximum efficiency beyond 0.3 µm disappears, or the optimum shifts outside 0.2–0.3 µm, the central design rule is wrong. Experimentally, one could track the speed and yaw of a bead–flagellum construct with adjustable helix radius and pitch angle in a viscous fluid and check whether the fastest geometry indeed falls in the predicted ranges.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is a morphological optimum map for a single-flagellated microswimmer: forward speed and propulsive efficiency are governed by the flagellum's filament radius, pitch angle, and contour length, whereas the yaw angle—the deviation of the swimming direction from the flagellar axis—is governed by helix radius and contour length. For a 1 µm-radius cell body rotating its flagellum at 100 Hz, the simulations show maximum forward speed and maximum efficiency improve with contour length up to about 10 µm, then plateau; increasing helix radius beyond approximately 0.3 µm no longer improves efficiency and instead enlarges the yaw angle and the diameter of the helical trajectory, so the optimal helix radius is 0.2–0.3 µm. The optimal pitch angle lies in 30–45° for filament radii of 0.01–0.02 µm, and within this range the pitch angle for peak speed is up to 4.5° below the pitch angle for peak efficiency. The paper further reports that accounting for hydrodynamic interaction between the cell body and flagellum increases the propulsive force by roughly 1.5 times while lowering forward speed and raising efficiency.

Load-bearing premise

Every result depends on the numerical method that computes how the cell body and the rotating flagellum push on each other through the fluid; if that method is inaccurate for some flagellum shapes, the reported optimum ranges could shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A 1 µm-scale synthetic microswimmer should target a helix radius of 0.2–0.3 µm and a pitch angle of 30–45° to balance speed, efficiency, and directional stability.
  • Because the speed-optimal and efficiency-optimal pitch angles differ by at most 4.5°, a single flagellum design can switch between fast and efficient modes with a small bending or rotation of the pitch angle.
  • Extending contour length beyond about 10 µm gives little efficiency gain, so longer flagella are not automatically better.
  • Hydrodynamic interaction between the cell body and the flagellum raises propulsive force by roughly 1.5×, so any model or microrobot that neglects this interaction will mispredict both speed and efficiency.
  • Smaller helix radii give smaller yaw angles and tighter helical trajectories, which improves directional control and nutrient capture, but only down to the point where speed and efficiency drop.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One extension the paper does not make: if the 4.5° speed–efficiency pitch offset is robust, it predicts that bacterial populations under selection for speed versus efficiency should show measurably different flagellar pitch distributions clustered around 30–45°.
  • The parameter sweep is restricted to a rigid flagellum with no hook and Newtonian fluid; in viscoelastic fluids or with a flexible hook the optimal radius and pitch could shift, so the 0.2–0.3 µm rule should be treated as a Newtonian-rigid baseline.
  • The claim that yaw angle depends only on helix radius and contour length, not pitch angle, is a sharp falsifiable scaling that could be checked by tracking fluorescently labeled flagella of swimming bacteria with varied geometry.
  • For microrobot manufacturing, the narrow optimum ranges imply that pitch angle must be controlled within a few degrees and helix radius within roughly ±0.05 µm to stay in the high-performance window.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports a computational study of a single-flagellated microswimmer composed of a spherical cell body (Rb = 1 μm) and a rigid helical flagellum. The hydrodynamics are solved with the Twin Multipole Moment (TMM) resistance matrix, and the force/torque balance is used to compute the swimmer's translation, rotation, trajectory, and induced flow field. Parameter sweeps over the flagellar helix radius, pitch angle, contour length, and filament radius yield the claims that the optimal helix radius is 0.2–0.3 μm, the optimal pitch angle is 30–45°, and the pitch angle maximizing forward speed is up to 4.5° smaller than that maximizing efficiency. The paper also argues that flagellar orientation gives directional control and that the results explain the high Young's modulus of bacterial flagella.

Significance. The paper addresses a relevant problem in low-Reynolds-number locomotion, and if the quantitative design rules are correct, they would be practically useful for microrobot design and for interpreting morphological trends in bacteria. The systematic parameter sweeps are a strength, and the main qualitative conclusions—that helix radius and contour length affect yaw while pitch angle and filament radius affect speed and efficiency—are plausible and broadly consistent with earlier work in the literature. The optima are produced without fitted parameters, which makes them falsifiable. However, the central numbers are computed with a single, unvalidated numerical solver, and the evolutionary/elasticity interpretation is not supported by the model as presented.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II A, Eq. (2); Sec. III C, Figs. 8–11] The headline quantitative results—optimal helix radius 0.2–0.3 μm, optimal pitch angle 30–45°, and the ≤4.5° separation between speed- and efficiency-maximizing pitch angles—all come from the TMM resistance matrix, whose implementation is cited only to the authors' ref. 38. The manuscript does not report the number of spheres N used to discretize the flagellum, the bead spacing or overlap treatment, any grid-convergence study, or a comparison with an independent method (boundary element, slender body, or experimental data). Because the reported optima are extracted from this resistance matrix, an unquantified discretization error could shift all of them. Please add convergence tests with respect to N and at least one benchmark validation case before the quantitative design rules can be accepted.
  2. [Sec. III C and Sec. IV] The statements that a low Young's modulus would be detrimental to bacterial survival and that the results explain why the Young's modulus of most flagella is relatively high go beyond the model, which treats the flagellum as a rigid body and contains no elasticity or buckling mechanics. This conclusion is not derived from the simulations; it should be removed or explicitly labelled as speculation, or supported by a separate model of flagellar compliance.
  3. [Sec. III B, Eq. (17)] The flow-field visualization relies on a Stokeslet/rotlet superposition over the spheres, but the manuscript does not specify whether the per-sphere forces and torques inserted into Eqs. (14)–(17) come from the full TMM resistance matrix or from isolated-sphere formulas, nor how the phase average is taken. This ambiguity matters because Figs. 5 and 6 are used to claim that hydrodynamic interaction enhances the flagellar flow field and propulsive force. Please clarify the computation and, ideally, verify the flow-field reconstruction against the TMM forces.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. III C, text near Fig. 8] The phrase "when the helix radius R ≤ 3 µm" appears to be a typo for R ≤ 0.3 µm; please correct it.
  2. [Sec. II B and Eq. (4)] The symbol φ is used both for the initial phase in Eq. (4) and for the precession angle in Sec. II B; please use distinct symbols for these two quantities.
  3. [Sec. III B, after Eq. (17)] The text says the flow field consists of N spheres along the flagellum plus a spherical cell body, but Sec. II A states that the flagellum has N−1 spheres and the total number of spheres is N; please make the counting consistent.
  4. [Abstract and Sec. III C] The abstract states that forward speed is closely related to filament radius, but Fig. 11(a) shows that the filament radius has minimal impact on maximum forward speed; please reconcile the wording with the data.
  5. [Sec. IV] The claim that the optimal contour length is around 10 μm and that improvements beyond 9 μm are negligible needs a quantitative criterion for what counts as "negligible," since no error estimates are provided.
  6. [Acknowledgments] The word "umder" should be "under."

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Central claims rest on the authors' self-cited TMM solver with no external validation, but the optima are not fitted to the target quantities; the derivation is self-contained modulo the cited method.

  1. self citation load bearing [Sec. II A, Eq. (2) and text following; ref. 38]
    "The resistance matrix of the system, denoted as R, can be calculated using TMM 38."

    The quantitative design rules (optimal helix radius 0.2-0.3 um, pitch angle 30-45 deg, <=4.5 deg pitch-angle offset) are all outputs of the TMM resistance matrix sweep. The TMM is cited only to the authors' own prior work (ref. 38), which is code-reproduced here in the sense that the same authors apply it, but this paper provides no independent benchmark, convergence test, bead-number sensitivity, or comparison to boundary-element, slender-body, or experimental results. This is a load-bearing self-citation: the central quantitative predictions inherit all their numerical content from an unvalidated in-house solver. It is not definitional circularity because the target quantities (speed, efficiency, yaw angle) are computed from the Stokes equations, not fitted to those quantities.

  2. other [Sec. III C, Figs. 8-11 and corresponding text]
    "Therefore, for a cell body radius of Rb = 1 um, the optimal helix radius is approximately in the range of 0.2 <= R <= 0.3 um, and the corresponding optimal pitch angles range from 30 to 45 deg."

    These headline optima are obtained by maximizing forward speed and efficiency as computed from the TMM resistance matrix with no independent check of the solver's accuracy in the relevant geometric regime (filament radius a << helix radius R and pitch lambda). The absence of convergence or external validation means the numbers are as trustworthy as the self-cited TMM; however, the optimization is not fitted to the claimed outputs, so the circularity is methodological reliance rather than definitional equivalence.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular by construction: it solves the Stokes equations for a prescribed flagellar geometry, imposes force/torque balance, and extracts forward speed, efficiency, and yaw angle. No parameter is fitted to the claimed optimal ranges, and the pitch-angle offset (<=4.5 deg) is a computed difference, not an input. The only significant circularity concern is the sole reliance on the authors' own Twin Multipole Moment method (ref. 38) for the resistance matrix in Eq. (2). Because the paper offers no convergence test, bead-resolution study, or comparison against boundary-element, slender-body, or experimental data, the quantitative optima are entirely inherited from that self-cited solver. That is a load-bearing self-citation, but it is not a logical tautology: the target outputs are not defined in terms of the input parameters, and the model is self-contained given the cited method. The qualitative trends (e.g., smaller filament radius increases efficiency, smaller helix radius improves directional stability) are physically plausible and are not enforced by the definitions. I therefore set the circularity score to 2: one important self-citation that is load-bearing but not equivalent-to-input circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No data fitting is used to produce the claimed optima. The load-bearing inputs are standard geometry and motor parameters plus the self-cited TMM solver, which is not independently benchmarked in this paper. The free parameters listed are hand-chosen model constants, not fit-to-data values.

free parameters (2)
  • cell body radius Rb = 1.0 µm
    Fixed model input chosen by hand; quantitative optimal helix radius range (0.2 to 0.3 µm) may depend on this choice.
  • motor rotation frequency f = 100 Hz
    Fixed model input chosen as a typical bacterial flagellar motor frequency; absolute speeds scale with f, and optimal morphology may shift if f changes.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Stokes equations and linear resistance/mobility relations describe the fluid (Eqs. 1 to 3).
    Invoked in Sec. II A; standard for low-Reynolds-number flow.
  • domain assumption Flagellum is a rigid left-handed helix of Stokeslet spheres; hook flexibility and Brownian fluctuations are neglected.
    Stated in Sec. II A and Table I; load-bearing because flexibility is known to affect flagellar buckling and turning (refs 54 to 55).
  • domain assumption TMM resistance matrix from ref 38 accurately models near- and far-field hydrodynamic interactions.
    Used in Eq. (2) without independent validation in this paper; central numerical foundation.
  • standard math A freely swimming microswimmer has zero net force and torque (Eq. 6).
    Standard low-Reynolds-number free-swimming condition.
  • domain assumption Phase-averaged Stokeslet/rotlet superposition represents the full flow field (Eqs. 14 to 17).
    Approximation used for flow visualization; neglects multi-body reflection details beyond TMM.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Effects of Flagellar Morphology on Swimming Performance and Directional Control in Microswimmers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RTDPMYWO

@misc{pith2026250207224,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Effects of Flagellar Morphology on Swimming Performance and Directional Control in Microswimmers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RTDPMYWO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.07224}
}
read the original abstract

In a fluid environment, flagellated microswimmers propel themselves by rotating their flagella. The morphology of these flagella significantly influences forward speed, swimming efficiency, and directional stability, which are critical for their survival. This study begins by simulating the three-dimensional motion trajectories of microswimmers to analyze their kinematic characteristics. The simulation results demonstrate that microswimmers can actively adjust their forward direction by modifying the orientation of their flagella. We subsequently perform numerical simulations to visualize the flow fields generated by a microswimmer and examine the hydrodynamic interactions between the cell body and the flagella, focusing on their impacts on forward speed and swimming efficiency. We conclude that forward speed and swimming efficiency are closely related to the filament radius, pitch angle, and contour length of the flagella, while the yaw angle of locomotion is determined by the helix radius and contour length of the flagella. We conclude that the pitch angle for maximum forward speed is slightly smaller than that for maximum swimming efficiency, which suggests that microswimmers can effectively alternate between states of maximum forward speed and maximum swimming efficiency by fine-tuning their pitch angle and adapting to varying ecological conditions. These morphological characteristics of microswimmers may result from species competition and natural selection. This research establishes an optimized model for microswimmers, providing valuable insights for the design of enhanced microrobots tailored to specific applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.07224 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic representation of a microswimmer model featur [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Schematic diagram of the microswimmer in its initial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Closed trajectory of a microswimmer’s four-step locomotion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a), (b), (c) Flow fields generated by the cell body, flagellum, and the entire microswimmer, respectively, without considering the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a), (c) Contours illustrating the forward speed of the mi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (a) Variation of the yaw angle with contour length [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. (a) Forward speed contours in the filament radius-pitch [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. (a) Maximum forward speed as a function of filament radius [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Silverman \ and\ author M

    author author M. Silverman \ and\ author M. Simon ,\ title title Flagellar rotation and the mechanism of bacterial motility , \ @noop journal journal Nature \ volume 249 ,\ pages 73--74 ( year 1974 ) NoStop

    work page 1974

  2. [2]

    Lauga \ and\ author T

    author author E. Lauga \ and\ author T. R. \ Powers ,\ title title The hydrodynamics of swimming microorganisms , \ @noop journal journal Reports on progress in physics \ volume 72 ,\ pages 096601 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    2009

  3. [3]

    Lauga ,\ title title Bacterial hydrodynamics , \ @noop journal journal Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics \ volume 48 ,\ pages 105--130 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    author author E. Lauga ,\ title title Bacterial hydrodynamics , \ @noop journal journal Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics \ volume 48 ,\ pages 105--130 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016

  4. [4]

    author author J. S. \ Guasto , author R. Rusconi , \ and\ author R. Stocker ,\ title title Fluid mechanics of planktonic microorganisms , \ @noop journal journal Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics \ volume 44 ,\ pages 373--400 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    Roszak \ and\ author R

    author author D. Roszak \ and\ author R. Colwell ,\ title title Survival strategies of bacteria in the natural environment , \ @noop journal journal Microbiological reviews \ volume 51 ,\ pages 365--379 ( year 1987 ) NoStop

    work page 1987

  6. [6]

    author author K. D. \ Young ,\ title title The selective value of bacterial shape , \ @noop journal journal Microbiology and molecular biology reviews \ volume 70 ,\ pages 660--703 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    work page 2006

  7. [7]

    author author J. G. \ Mitchell \ and\ author K. Kogure ,\ title title Bacterial motility: links to the environment and a driving force for microbial physics , \ @noop journal journal FEMS microbiology ecology \ volume 55 ,\ pages 3--16 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    work page 2006

  8. [8]

    author author S. S. \ Justice , author D. A. \ Hunstad , author L. Cegelski , \ and\ author S. J. \ Hultgren ,\ title title Morphological plasticity as a bacterial survival strategy , \ @noop journal journal Nature Reviews Microbiology \ volume 6 ,\ pages 162--168 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    work page 2008

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    author author S. E. \ Spagnolie \ and\ author E. Lauga ,\ title title Comparative hydrodynamics of bacterial polymorphism , \ @noop journal journal Physical review letters \ volume 106 ,\ pages 058103 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011

  2. [10]

    author author M. C. \ van Teeseling , author M. A. \ de Pedro , \ and\ author F. Cava ,\ title title Determinants of bacterial morphology: from fundamentals to possibilities for antimicrobial targeting , \ @noop journal journal Frontiers in microbiology \ volume 8 ,\ pages 126...

    2017

  3. [11]

    Maki , author J

    author author N. Maki , author J. E. \ Gestwicki , author E. M. \ Lake , author L. L. \ Kiessling , \ and\ author J. Adler ,\ title title Motility and chemotaxis of filamentous cells of escherichia coli , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Bacteriology \ volume 182 ,\ pages 43...

    2000

  4. [12]

    Stocker \ and\ author J

    author author R. Stocker \ and\ author J. R. \ Seymour ,\ title title Ecology and physics of bacterial chemotaxis in the ocean , \ @noop journal journal Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews \ volume 76 ,\ pages 792--812 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012

  5. [13]

    author author E. M. \ Purcell ,\ title title The efficiency of propulsion by a rotating flagellum , \ @noop journal journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences \ volume 94 ,\ pages 11307--11311 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

    1997

  6. [14]

    Li \ and\ author J

    author author G. Li \ and\ author J. X. \ Tang ,\ title title Low flagellar motor torque and high swimming efficiency of caulobacter crescentus swarmer cells , \ @noop journal journal Biophysical journal \ volume 91 ,\ pages 2726--2734 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    2006

  7. [15]

    Chattopadhyay , author R

    author author S. Chattopadhyay , author R. Moldovan , author C. Yeung , \ and\ author X. Wu ,\ title title Swimming efficiency of bacterium escherichia coli , \ @noop journal journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences \ volume 103 ,\ pages 13712--13717 ( year 2006...

    2006

  8. [16]

    Najafi , author M

    author author J. Najafi , author M. R. \ Shaebani , author T. John , author F. Altegoer , author G. Bange , \ and\ author C. Wagner ,\ title title Flagellar number governs bacterial spreading and transport efficiency , \ @noop journal journal Science advances \ volume 4 ,\ pag...

    2018

  9. [17]

    author author F. T. \ Nguyen \ and\ author M. D. \ Graham ,\ title title Impacts of multiflagellarity on stability and speed of bacterial locomotion , \ @noop journal journal Physical Review E \ volume 98 ,\ pages 042419 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018

  10. [18]

    author author L. J. \ Fauci \ and\ author R. Dillon ,\ title title Biofluidmechanics of reproduction , \ @noop journal journal Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. \ volume 38 ,\ pages 371--394 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    2006

  11. [19]

    Bianchi , author F

    author author S. Bianchi , author F. Saglimbeni , \ and\ author R. Di Leonardo ,\ title title Holographic imaging reveals the mechanism of wall entrapment in swimming bacteria , \ @noop journal journal Physical Review X \ volume 7 ,\ pages 011010 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017

  12. [20]

    Thawani \ and\ author M

    author author A. Thawani \ and\ author M. S. \ Tirumkudulu ,\ title title Trajectory of a model bacterium , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics \ volume 835 ,\ pages 252--270 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018

  13. [21]

    Z \"o ttl \ and\ author J

    author author A. Z \"o ttl \ and\ author J. M. \ Yeomans ,\ title title Enhanced bacterial swimming speeds in macromolecular polymer solutions , \ @noop journal journal Nature Physics \ volume 15 ,\ pages 554--558 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019

  14. [22]

    Colin , author B

    author author R. Colin , author B. Ni , author L. Laganenka , \ and\ author V. Sourjik ,\ title title Multiple functions of flagellar motility and chemotaxis in bacterial physiology , \ @noop journal journal FEMS microbiology reviews \ volume 45 ,\ pages fuab038 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021

  15. [23]

    Drescher , author R

    author author K. Drescher , author R. E. \ Goldstein , author N. Michel , author M. Polin , \ and\ author I. Tuval ,\ title title Direct measurement of the flow field around swimming microorganisms , \ @noop journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 105 ,\ pages 168101 ...

    2010

  16. [24]

    Drescher , author J

    author author K. Drescher , author J. Dunkel , author L. H. \ Cisneros , author S. Ganguly , \ and\ author R. E. \ Goldstein ,\ title title Fluid dynamics and noise in bacterial cell--cell and cell--surface scattering , \ @noop journal journal Proceedings of the National Acade...

    2011

  17. [25]

    author author A. J. \ Mathijssen , author D. O. \ Pushkin , \ and\ author J. M. \ Yeomans ,\ title title Tracer trajectories and displacement due to a micro-swimmer near a surface , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics \ volume 773 ,\ pages 498--519 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  18. [26]

    Shum , author E

    author author H. Shum , author E. A. \ Gaffney , \ and\ author D. J. \ Smith ,\ title title Modelling bacterial behaviour close to a no-slip plane boundary: the influence of bacterial geometry , \ @noop journal journal Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical...

    2010

  19. [27]

    Son , author F

    author author K. Son , author F. Menolascina , \ and\ author R. Stocker ,\ title title Speed-dependent chemotactic precision in marine bacteria , \ @noop journal journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences \ volume 113 ,\ pages 8624--8629 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016

  20. [28]

    author author S. M. \ Mousavi , author G. Gompper , \ and\ author R. G. \ Winkler ,\ title title Wall entrapment of peritrichous bacteria: a mesoscale hydrodynamics simulation study , \ @noop journal journal Soft Matter \ volume 16 ,\ pages 4866--4875 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020

  21. [29]

    Tang , author L

    author author J. Tang , author L. W. \ Rogowski , author X. Zhang , \ and\ author M. J. \ Kim ,\ title title Flagellar nanorobot with kinetic behavior investigation and 3d motion , \ @noop journal journal Nanoscale \ volume 12 ,\ pages 12154--12164 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020

  22. [30]

    Tok \'a rov \'a , author A

    author author V. Tok \'a rov \'a , author A. Sudalaiyadum Perumal , author M. Nayak , author H. Shum , author O. Ka s par , author K. Rajendran , author M. Mohammadi , author C. Tremblay , author E. A. \ Gaffney , author S. Martel , et al. ,\ title title Patterns of bacterial ...

    2021

  23. [31]

    author author B. J. \ Nelson , author I. K. \ Kaliakatsos , \ and\ author J. J. \ Abbott ,\ title title Microrobots for minimally invasive medicine , \ @noop journal journal Annual review of biomedical engineering \ volume 12 ,\ pages 55--85 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010

  24. [32]

    author author F. Z. \ Temel \ and\ author S. Yesilyurt ,\ title title Confined swimming of bio-inspired microrobots in rectangular channels , \ @noop journal journal Bioinspiration & biomimetics \ volume 10 ,\ pages 016015 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  25. [33]

    author author C. S. X. \ Ng , author M. W. M. \ Tan , author C. Xu , author Z. Yang , author P. S. \ Lee , \ and\ author G. Z. \ Lum ,\ title title Locomotion of miniature soft robots , \ @noop journal journal Advanced Materials \ volume 33 ,\ pages 2003558 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021

  26. [34]

    Palagi \ and\ author P

    author author S. Palagi \ and\ author P. Fischer ,\ title title Bioinspired microrobots , \ @noop journal journal Nature Reviews Materials \ volume 3 ,\ pages 113--124 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018

  27. [35]

    Zhou , author C

    author author H. Zhou , author C. C. \ Mayorga-Martinez , author S. Pan \'e , author L. Zhang , \ and\ author M. Pumera ,\ title title Magnetically driven micro and nanorobots , \ @noop journal journal Chemical Reviews \ volume 121 ,\ pages 4999--5041 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021

  28. [36]

    \ Huang , author F

    author author H.-W. \ Huang , author F. E. \ Uslu , author P. Katsamba , author E. Lauga , author M. S. \ Sakar , \ and\ author B. J. \ Nelson ,\ title title Adaptive locomotion of artificial microswimmers , \ @noop journal journal Science advances \ volume 5 ,\ pages eaau1532...

    2019

  29. [37]

    Jeffrey \ and\ author Y

    author author D. Jeffrey \ and\ author Y. Onishi ,\ title title Calculation of the resistance and mobility functions for two unequal rigid spheres in low-reynolds-number flow , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics \ volume 139 ,\ pages 261--290 ( year 1984 ) NoStop

    1984

  30. [38]

    Liu , author L

    author author B. Liu , author L. Chen , \ and\ author J. Zhang ,\ title title Effective and efficient modeling of the hydrodynamics for bacterial flagella , \ @noop journal journal Physics of Fluids \ volume 37 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    2025

  31. [39]

    Happel \ and\ author H

    author author J. Happel \ and\ author H. Brenner ,\ @noop title Low Reynolds number hydrodynamics: with special applications to particulate media ,\ Vol. volume 1 \ ( publisher Springer Science & Business Media ,\ year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012

  32. [40]

    Kim \ and\ author S

    author author S. Kim \ and\ author S. J. \ Karrila ,\ @noop title Microhydrodynamics: principles and selected applications \ ( publisher Butterworth-Heinemann ,\ year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013

  33. [41]

    author author A. L. \ Nord , author A. Biquet-Bisquert , author M. Abkarian , author T. Pigaglio , author F. Seduk , author A. Magalon , \ and\ author F. Pedaci ,\ title title Dynamic stiffening of the flagellar hook , \ @noop journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 13 ...

    2022

  34. [42]

    author author J. J. \ Abbott , author K. E. \ Peyer , author M. C. \ Lagomarsino , author L. Zhang , author L. Dong , author I. K. \ Kaliakatsos , \ and\ author B. J. \ Nelson ,\ title title How should microrobots swim? \ @noop journal journal The international journal of Robo...

    2009

  35. [43]

    Acemoglu \ and\ author S

    author author A. Acemoglu \ and\ author S. Yesilyurt ,\ title title Effects of geometric parameters on swimming of micro organisms with single helical flagellum in circular channels , \ @noop journal journal Biophysical journal \ volume 106 ,\ pages 1537--1547 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014

  36. [44]

    Vizsnyiczai , author G

    author author G. Vizsnyiczai , author G. Frangipane , author S. Bianchi , author F. Saglimbeni , author D. Dell’Arciprete , \ and\ author R. Di Leonardo ,\ title title A transition to stable one-dimensional swimming enhances e. coli motility through narrow channels , \ @noop j...

    2020

  37. [45]

    author author M. A. \ Constantino , author M. Jabbarzadeh , author H. C. \ Fu , \ and\ author R. Bansil ,\ title title Helical and rod-shaped bacteria swim in helical trajectories with little additional propulsion from helical shape , \ @noop journal journal Science Advances \...

    2016

  38. [46]

    Benhal , author D

    author author P. Benhal , author D. Quashie , author U. K. \ Cheang , \ and\ author J. Ali ,\ title title Propulsion kinematics of achiral microswimmers in viscous fluids , \ @noop journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 118 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021

  39. [47]

    Kamdar , author S

    author author S. Kamdar , author S. Shin , author P. Leishangthem , author L. F. \ Francis , author X. Xu , \ and\ author X. Cheng ,\ title title The colloidal nature of complex fluids enhances bacterial motility , \ @noop journal journal Nature \ volume 603 ,\ pages 819--823 ...

    2022

  40. [48]

    author author J. S. \ Dai ,\ title title Euler--rodrigues formula variations, quaternion conjugation and intrinsic connections , \ @noop journal journal Mechanism and Machine Theory \ volume 92 ,\ pages 144--152 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  41. [49]

    author author R. M. \ Murray , author Z. Li , \ and\ author S. S. \ Sastry ,\ @noop title A mathematical introduction to robotic manipulation \ ( publisher CRC press ,\ year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017

  42. [50]

    author author M. J. \ K \"u hn , author F. K. \ Schmidt , author B. Eckhardt , \ and\ author K. M. \ Thormann ,\ title title Bacteria exploit a polymorphic instability of the flagellar filament to escape from traps , \ @noop journal journal Proceedings of the National Academy ...

    2017

  43. [51]

    author author T. H. \ Tan , author A. Mietke , author J. Li , author Y. Chen , author H. Higinbotham , author P. J. \ Foster , author S. Gokhale , author J. Dunkel , \ and\ author N. Fakhri ,\ title title Odd dynamics of living chiral crystals , \ @noop journal journal Nature ...

    2022

  44. [52]

    Yawata , author O

    author author Y. Yawata , author O. X. \ Cordero , author F. Menolascina , author J.-H. \ Hehemann , author M. F. \ Polz , \ and\ author R. Stocker ,\ title title Competition--dispersal tradeoff ecologically differentiates recently speciated marine bacterioplankton populations...

    2014

  45. [53]

    author author N. C. \ Darnton \ and\ author H. C. \ Berg ,\ title title Force-extension measurements on bacterial flagella: triggering polymorphic transformations , \ @noop journal journal Biophysical journal \ volume 92 ,\ pages 2230--2236 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007

  46. [54]

    Son , author J

    author author K. Son , author J. S. \ Guasto , \ and\ author R. Stocker ,\ title title Bacteria can exploit a flagellar buckling instability to change direction , \ @noop journal journal Nature physics \ volume 9 ,\ pages 494--498 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013

  47. [55]

    Vogel \ and\ author H

    author author R. Vogel \ and\ author H. Stark ,\ title title Rotation-induced polymorphic transitions in bacterial flagella , \ @noop journal journal Physical review letters \ volume 110 ,\ pages 158104 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013

  48. [56]

    Koyasu \ and\ author Y

    author author S. Koyasu \ and\ author Y. Shirakihara ,\ title title Caulobacter crescentus flagellar filament has a right-handed helical form , \ @noop journal journal Journal of molecular biology \ volume 173 ,\ pages 125--130 ( year 1984 ) NoStop

    1984

  49. [57]

    Fujii , author S

    author author M. Fujii , author S. Shibata , \ and\ author S.-I. \ Aizawa ,\ title title Polar, peritrichous, and lateral flagella belong to three distinguishable flagellar families , \ @noop journal journal Journal of molecular biology \ volume 379 ,\ pages 273--283 ( year 20...

    2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.