Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Non-exchangeable diffusions share the same fluctuation limit as mean field

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · glm-5.2

2026-07-09 05:29 UTC pith:RVQE5VXW

load-bearing objection Universal CLT for non-exchangeable interacting diffusions — solid result, deterministic conditions, sharp threshold

arxiv 2607.07598 v1 pith:RVQE5VXW submitted 2026-07-08 math.PR math.AP

Universal Central Limit Theorem for non-exchangeable interacting diffusions

Mykhaylo Shkolnikov , Lane Chun Yeung This is my paper
classification math.PR math.AP
keywords limitmatricescentraldensenessdiffusionsfieldinteractinginteraction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper proves that when particles interact through a heterogeneous weighted graph, rather than all-to-all with equal weights, the statistical fluctuations around the large-population limit are still governed by the same Gaussian stochastic PDE that arises in the fully symmetric mean field case. The authors consider n interacting diffusions whose pairwise interaction strengths are encoded by an n x n matrix xi. In the classical mean field setting, every particle influences every other equally (xi_ij = 1/(n-1)), and the system is exchangeable. Here, xi is arbitrary subject to structural conditions: each row sums to one (each particle's total incoming influence is normalized), column sums are uniformly bounded (no single particle is disproportionately influential), and the largest entry of xi shrinks faster than n^{-1/2} (the graph is dense enough). Under these conditions, the rescaled fluctuation field eta^n = sqrt(n)(mu^n_t - mu_t), where mu^n_t is the empirical measure of the particle system and mu_t is the McKean-Vlasov limit, converges in distribution to the unique solution of a linear fluctuation SPDE driven by space-time white noise. This is the same limiting SPDE as in the exchangeable case. The result applies to scaled adjacency matrices of regular graphs with degree m_n growing faster than sqrt(n), Erdos-Renyi graphs with expected degree np_n growing faster than sqrt(n), and spatial interaction models in their subcritical regime. A spatial interaction model in the supercritical regime shows the n^{-1/2} threshold is sharp: when the largest interaction weight decays more slowly, the sqrt(n)-scaled fluctuations diverge and a different scaling is needed. The proof proceeds by establishing tightness of the fluctuation fields in negative Sobolev spaces using a Poincare inequality and sharp quantitative propagation of chaos estimates, identifying subsequential limits as weak solutions of the fluctuation SPDE, and proving pathwise uniqueness via a Gronwall-type energy inequality in weighted Sobolev norms.

Core claim

The central discovery is that the universality of the mean field fluctuation SPDE extends well beyond exchangeable systems to any interaction matrix satisfying deterministic structural and denseness conditions, with the threshold condition max_{i,j} xi_{ij} = o(n^{-1/2}) being both sufficient and sharp. The key mechanism is that the Poincare inequality for the n-particle system (with constant independent of n) controls the variance term in the fluctuation field, while the transport inequality for the McKean-Vlasov limit combined with quantitative propagation of chaos bounds the bias term arising from heterogeneity. Together these yield tightness, and the heterogeneous error terms in the semm

What carries the argument

The proof uses three tools in sequence: (1) a Poincare inequality for the n-particle law with dimension-free constant, combined with a quadratic transport inequality for the limiting measure and sharp relative entropy bounds from quantitative propagation of chaos, to establish tightness in negative Sobolev spaces H^{-k}; (2) a cutoff-and-tail-control argument using weighted Sobolev spaces and Bessel kernel estimates to pass to the limit in the drift term despite non-decaying coefficients on unbounded state space; (3) a Gronwall energy inequality in weighted negative Sobolev norms for the difference of two solutions driven by the same noise, yielding pathwise uniqueness.

Load-bearing premise

The column sum condition requires that no single particle is the target of too much total influence from others, uniformly across all n. This excludes directed interaction structures where influence concentrates on a few nodes, such as sequential models where particle i is influenced only by its predecessors.

What would settle it

Construct an interaction matrix satisfying the row-sum and denseness conditions but violating the column sum bound, for which the fluctuation field fails to converge to the mean field SPDE. The sequential interacting diffusion model (lower-triangular xi) is a natural candidate: it satisfies row sums equal to one and max xi_{ij} = O(1/n) = o(n^{-1/2}), but has diverging column sums, and the paper notes it is not covered. If this model's fluctuations were to converge to the same SPDE, the column sum condition would be unnecessary.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • For any network-structured interacting particle system (opinion dynamics, systemic risk models, neural networks) where each node has normalized total influence and the graph is dense enough (max edge weight o(n^{-1/2})), the global fluctuation behavior is universal and does not depend on the specific network topology.
  • The n^{-1/2} denseness threshold identifies a phase transition: above it, Gaussian fluctuations universal to mean field; below it, the fluctuation structure changes, potentially to deterministic or non-Gaussian limits depending on the graph structure.
  • The deterministic nature of the assumptions (no reliance on graph randomness) means the result holds path-by-path (quenched) for random graph models, including Erdos-Renyi graphs, as long as the degree grows faster than sqrt(n).
  • The column sum condition identifies a structural constraint on directed influence: systems where a few particles are disproportionately influential (diverging column sums) may exhibit different fluctuation behavior and require separate analysis.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 0 minor

Summary. This paper proves a universal Central Limit Theorem for the global fluctuation field of non-exchangeable interacting diffusions on R^d, where pairwise interaction strengths are encoded by a sequence of n×n matrices ξ. Under structural conditions on ξ (nonnegativity, zero diagonal, unit row sums, bounded column sums) and a denseness condition (max_{i,j} ξ_{ij} = o(n^{-1/2})), the fluctuation field η^n = √n(μ^n_t - μ_t) converges in distribution in C([0,T]; H^{-k}) to the unique solution of the fluctuation SPDE (1.4), which is the same Gaussian limit as in the exchangeable mean-field case. The result applies to scaled adjacency matrices of m_n-regular graphs when √n/m_n → 0 and Erdős–Rényi graphs G(n,p_n) when np_n/√n → ∞. A spatial interaction model shows the n^{-1/2} threshold is sharp. The proof follows the tightness–limit–uniqueness route, combining Poincaré inequalities, transport inequalities, entropy bounds from quantitative propagation of chaos (via [58]), Fourier-based compactness, and a cutoff argument for the noncompact state space.

Significance. The paper makes a substantial contribution to the fluctuation theory of non-exchangeable interacting diffusions. The universality result—showing that the same Gaussian SPDE limit arises across a broad class of interaction matrices satisfying deterministic conditions—is a notable advance over prior work. The deterministic assumptions on ξ are a strength: they avoid reliance on the randomness of an underlying graph and yield a quenched CLT for Erdős–Rényi graphs under the weaker threshold np_n/√n → ∞ (with degree normalization), improving on the np_n^4 → ∞ threshold of [31]. The sharpness of the n^{-1/2} threshold, demonstrated via the spatial interaction model of [64], is a valuable addition. The proof is technically demanding, particularly the cutoff argument in Proposition 5.3 handling the noncompact state space and the energy inequality argument for uniqueness (Proposition 6.2) in weighted Sobolev spaces. The paper provides complete, rigorous proofs with all auxiliary results either proved in the appendices or clearly attributed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

The referee report is entirely positive, recommending minor revision, but contains no specific major or minor comments requiring changes to the manuscript. We thank the referee for the careful reading and positive assessment.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: REFEREE SUMMARY (positive assessment of the main result, proof strategy, and examples)

    Authors: We thank the referee for the careful and accurate summary of our paper. The description of the main result, the proof strategy, and the examples is correct in all details. revision: no

  2. Referee: REFEREE SIGNIFICANCE (substantial contribution, universality result, deterministic assumptions, sharp threshold, technical difficulty of Propositions 5.3 and 6.2, complete proofs)

    Authors: We are grateful for the referee's positive assessment of the paper's significance. We note in particular the referee's recognition of the deterministic assumptions as a strength, the improvement over the np_n^4 threshold of [31], and the sharpness of the n^{-1/2} threshold. We also appreciate the acknowledgment of the technical contributions in Propositions 5.3 and 6.2. revision: no

  3. Referee: REFEREE RECOMMENDATION: minor_revision (no specific comments listed under MAJOR COMMENTS)

    Authors: The referee report does not contain any specific comments or requests for revision under the MAJOR COMMENTS section. We have carefully re-examined the manuscript in light of the recommendation of minor revision and have made minor stylistic and expositional improvements for clarity, but no substantive changes were requested or needed. We are happy to address any specific concerns the referee may have if communicated to us directly. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity found; the derivation is self-contained with one minor, non-load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The paper proves a universal CLT for non-exchangeable interacting diffusions via a tightness-convergence-uniqueness route. The central derivation chain is self-contained: tightness (Section 4) relies on functional inequalities (Poincaré, transport) and entropy bounds (Lemma 3.2); convergence (Section 5) uses a cutoff argument and semimartingale decomposition (Lemma 3.4); uniqueness (Section 6) uses an energy inequality and Gronwall. The only self-citation is to [58] (Lacker, Yeung, Zhou) for the quantitative propagation of chaos estimates in Lemma 3.2. While Yeung is a co-author of both this paper and [58], the cited result provides parameter-free entropy bounds under Assumption A, whose hypotheses (Lipschitz coefficients, i.i.d. initial data satisfying a transport inequality, nonnegative interaction matrix with row sums equal to one) do not include the target result of the present paper. The estimates in [58] are mathematical theorems with complete proofs, and their application here (Appendix D) is transparent: the independent projection is identified as the McKean-Vlasov equation, and the entropy bounds are applied with k=2,3. No step in the derivation reduces to its inputs by construction, no prediction is a renamed fit, and no uniqueness theorem is invoked to forbid alternatives. The self-citation to [58] provides genuine independent support and does not raise the circularity score beyond 1.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted. No invented entities. The axioms are standard domain assumptions for interacting diffusion models, with the transport inequality being the most restrictive.

axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Row sums of interaction matrix equal to 1: Σ_j ξ_{ij} = 1 for all i
    Assumption 2.1(i) (rows). Normalizes total influence on each particle. Natural for the mean field limit to be McKean-Vlasov.
  • domain assumption Bounded column sums: max_j Σ_i ξ_{ij} ≤ C and lim sup (1/n) Σ_j (Σ_i ξ_{ij})² ≤ 1
    Assumption 2.1(i) (columns). Controls concentration of incoming influences. Excludes sequential models. Load-bearing for entropy bounds.
  • domain assumption Denseness condition: (1/n^{3/2}) Σ|ξ̂_{ij}| · max_{i,j} ξ_{ij} → 0 and lim sup Σ_i (Σ_j (ξ²_{ij} + ξ²_{ji}))² < ∞
    Assumption 2.1(i), equations (2.4)-(2.5). Satisfied when max ξ_{ij} = o(n^{-1/2}). Sharp threshold shown via Example 2.7.
  • domain assumption Coefficients b_0 ∈ L∞([0,T]; C^{k+1}_b) and b ∈ L∞([0,T]; C^{k+1}_b) with k ≥ λ_d + 2
    Assumption 2.1(ii). Regularity needed for Sobolev embedding and operator bounds. Less restrictive than [64] for d ≥ 2.
  • domain assumption Initial distribution μ_0 satisfies quadratic transport inequality W²₂(ν,μ_0) ≤ γ_0 H(ν|μ_0)
    Assumption 2.1(iii), equation (2.6). Accommodates singular laws like Dirac masses but excludes heavy tails. Not directly comparable to L^p conditions in [64].
  • standard math Quantitative propagation of chaos estimates from [58]
    Lemma 3.2. Entropy bounds on k-particle marginals in terms of interaction matrix entries. Proven in [58] under stated assumptions independent of this paper's target result.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-glm · 67772 in / 3794 out tokens · 253878 ms · 2026-07-09T05:29:51.361870+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study non-exchangeable interacting diffusions with pairwise interaction strengths encoded by a sequence of matrices. Under suitable structural and denseness conditions on these matrices, we prove a universal Central Limit Theorem for the global fluctuation field. As the number of particles $n$ becomes large, it converges in distribution to the unique solution of a stochastic partial differential equation (SPDE), the same Gaussian limit as in the exchangeable mean field case. The result applies, for instance, to scaled adjacency matrices of $m_n$-regular graphs when $m_n/\sqrt{n}\to\infty$. A spatial interaction model shows that the $n^{-1/2}$ denseness threshold is sharp. The proof proceeds with an analysis in negative Sobolev spaces, building on sharp quantitative propagation of chaos results together with functional inequalities.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Logarithmic Fluctuation Hierarchy for Sequential Interacting Diffusions

    math.PR 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    For lower-triangular interacting diffusions, the N^{-1/2} fluctuation field converges to an infinite logarithmic hierarchy that couples Y^n to Y^{n+1}, not to the closed fluctuation SPDE of exchangeable mean-field systems.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 85 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    R. A. Adams and J. J. F. Fournier,Sobolev spaces, vol. 140, Elsevier, 2003

    work page 2003

  2. [2]

    Allen and D

    F. Allen and D. Gale,Financial contagion, Journal of Political Economy108(2000), no. 1, 1–33

    work page 2000

  3. [3]

    Ambrosio, N

    L. Ambrosio, N. Gigli, and G. Savar´ e,Gradient flows: in metric spaces and in the space of probability measures, Springer, 2005

    work page 2005

  4. [4]

    Aronszajn and K

    N. Aronszajn and K. T. Smith,Theory of Bessel potentials. I, Annales de l’Institut Fourier11(1961), 385–475

    work page 1961

  5. [5]

    Ayi and N

    N. Ayi and N. Pouradier Duteil,Mean-field and graph limits for collective dynamics models with time- varying weights, Journal of Differential Equations299(2021), 65–110

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Bayraktar, S

    E. Bayraktar, S. Chakraborty, and R. Wu,Graphon mean field systems, The Annals of Applied Proba- bility33(2023), no. 5, 3587–3619

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Bayraktar and R

    E. Bayraktar and R. Wu,Stationarity and uniform in time convergence for the graphon particle system, Stochastic Processes and their Applications150(2022), 532–568

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Ben-Porat, J

    I. Ben-Porat, J. A. Carrillo, and S. T. Galtung,Mean field limit for one dimensional opinion dynamics with Coulomb interaction and time dependent weights, Nonlinear Analysis240(2024), 113462

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Benci and D

    V. Benci and D. Fortunato,Second order elliptic operators on unbounded domains, Boll. Un. Mat. Ital. 15(1978), no. 5, 193–209

    work page 1978

  10. [10]

    Bernou and M

    A. Bernou and M. Duerinckx,Uniform-in-time estimates on corrections to mean field for interacting Brownian particles, Probability Theory and Related Fields194(2026), no. 3–4, 1601–1710

    work page 2026

  11. [11]

    G. Bet, F. Coppini, and F. R. Nardi,Weakly interacting oscillators on dense random graphs, Journal of Applied Probability61(2024), no. 1, 255–278

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Bhamidi, A

    S. Bhamidi, A. Budhiraja, and R. Wu,Weakly Interacting Particle Systems on Inhomogeneous Random Graphs, Stochastic Processes and their Applications129(2019), no. 6, 2174–2206

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    S. G. Bobkov and F. G¨ otze,Exponential integrability and transportation cost related to logarithmic Sobolev inequalities, Journal of Functional Analysis163(1999), no. 1, 1–28

    work page 1999

  14. [14]

    Bodineau and A

    T. Bodineau and A. Guionnet,About the stationary states of vortex systems, Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e (B) Probability and Statistics35(1999), no. 2, 205–237

    work page 1999

  15. [15]

    Bolley and C

    F. Bolley and C. Villani,Weighted Csisz´ ar-Kullback-Pinsker inequalities and applications to transporta- tion inequalities, Annales de la Facult´ e des sciences de Toulouse: Math´ ematiques14(2005), no. 3, 331–352

    work page 2005

  16. [16]

    M. Boss, H. Elsinger, M. Summer, and S. Thurner,Network topology of the interbank market, Quanti- tative Finance4(2004), no. 6, 677–684

    work page 2004

  17. [17]

    Uniform-in-time quantitative fluctuations of large scale interacting particle systems

    S. Bourguin and K. Spiliopoulos,Uniform-in-time quantitative fluctuations of large scale interacting particle systems, arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.03057 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  18. [18]

    Braun and K

    W. Braun and K. Hepp,The Vlasov dynamics and its fluctuations in the (1/N) limit of interacting classical particles, Communications in Mathematical Physics56(1977), no. 2, 101–113

    work page 1977

  19. [19]

    Brunel,Dynamics of sparsely connected networks of excitatory and inhibitory spiking neurons, Jour- nal of Computational Neuroscience8(2000), no

    N. Brunel,Dynamics of sparsely connected networks of excitatory and inhibitory spiking neurons, Jour- nal of Computational Neuroscience8(2000), no. 3, 183–208

    work page 2000

  20. [20]

    Budhiraja and R

    A. Budhiraja and R. Wu,Some fluctuation results for weakly interacting multi-type particle systems, Stochastic Processes and their Applications126(2016), no. 8, 2253–2296

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    Carmona and F

    R. Carmona and F. Delarue,Probabilistic theory of mean field games with applications I-II, vol. 3, Springer, 2018

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    Cattiaux and A

    P. Cattiaux and A. Guillin,Semi log-concave Markov diffusions, S´ eminaire de Probabilit´ es XLVI (Catherine Donati-Martin, Antoine Lejay, and Alain Rouault, eds.), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 2123, Springer, 2014, pp. 231–292

    work page 2014

  23. [23]

    Convergence rate for Fluctuations of mean field interacting diffusion and application to 2D viscous Vortex model and Coulomb potential

    A. Cecchin and P. Nikolaev,Convergence rate for fluctuations of mean field interacting diffusion and application to 2D viscous vortex model and Coulomb potential, arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.01266 (2025). UNIVERSAL CENTRAL LIMIT THEOREM FOR NON-EXCHANGEABLE DIFFUSIONS 61

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Cecchin and G

    A. Cecchin and G. Pelino,Convergence, fluctuations and large deviations for finite state mean field games via the Master Equation, Stochastic Processes and their Applications129(2019), no. 11, 4510– 4555

    work page 2019

  25. [25]

    Chaintron and A

    L.-P. Chaintron and A. Diez,Propagation of Chaos: A Review of Models, Methods and Applications. I. Models and Methods, Kinetic and Related Models15(2022), no. 6, 895–1015

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    ,Propagation of Chaos: A Review of Models, Methods and Applications. II. Applications, Kinetic and Related Models15(2022), no. 6, 1017–1173

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Chen and W.-T

    Z.-Q. Chen and W.-T. L. Fan,Fluctuation limit for interacting diffusions with partial annihilations through membranes, Journal of Statistical Physics164(2016), no. 4, 890–936

    work page 2016

  28. [28]

    Chiba and G

    H. Chiba and G. S. Medvedev,The mean field analysis of the Kuramoto model on graphs I. The mean field equation and transition point formulas, Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems. Series A39 (2019), no. 1, 131–155

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    R. Cont, A. Moussa, and E. B. Santos,Network structure and systemic risk in banking systems, Hand- book on Systemic Risk (J.-P. Fouque and J. A. Langsam, eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013, pp. 327–368

    work page 2013

  30. [30]

    Coppini, H

    F. Coppini, H. Dietert, and G. Giacomin,A law of large numbers and large deviations for interacting diffusions on Erd˝ os–R´ enyi graphs, Stochastics and Dynamics20(2020), no. 2, 2050010

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    Coppini, E

    F. Coppini, E. Lu¸ con, and C. Poquet,Central Limit Theorems for global and local empirical measures of diffusions on Erd˝ os–R´ enyi graphs, Electronic Journal of Probability28(2023), 1–63, Article no. 147

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    Deb and S

    N. Deb and S. Mukherjee,Fluctuations in mean-field Ising models, The Annals of Applied Probability 33(2023), no. 3, 1961–2003

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    Delarue, D

    F. Delarue, D. Lacker, and K. Ramanan,From the master equation to mean field game limit theory: a central limit theorem, Electronic Journal of Probability24(2019), Paper No. 51, 54 pp., doi:10.1214/19- EJP298

    work page doi:10.1214/19- 2019

  34. [34]

    Delattre, G

    S. Delattre, G. Giacomin, and E. Lu¸ con,A note on dynamical models on random graphs and Fokker– Planck equations, Journal of Statistical Physics165(2016), no. 4, 785–798

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    K. Du, Y. Jiang, and X. Li,Sequential propagation of chaos, arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.09913 (2023)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    Dudley,Real analysis and probability, Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2018

    R. Dudley,Real analysis and probability, Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2018

    work page 2018

  37. [37]

    Elliott, B

    M. Elliott, B. Golub, and M. O. Jackson,Financial networks and contagion, American Economic Review 104(2014), no. 10, 3115–3153

    work page 2014

  38. [38]

    Fernandez and S

    B. Fernandez and S. M´ el´ eard,A Hilbertian Approach for Fluctuations on the McKean–Vlasov Model, Stochastic Processes and their Applications71(1997), no. 1, 33–53

    work page 1997

  39. [39]

    Fouque,La convergence en loi pour les processus ` a valeurs dans un espace nucl´ eaire, Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e, Section B20(1984), no

    J.-P. Fouque,La convergence en loi pour les processus ` a valeurs dans un espace nucl´ eaire, Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e, Section B20(1984), no. 3, 225–245

    work page 1984

  40. [40]

    Gawarecki and V

    L. Gawarecki and V. Mandrekar,Stochastic Differential Equations in Infinite Dimensions: with Appli- cations to Stochastic Partial Differential Equations, Probability and Its Applications, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011

    work page 2011

  41. [41]

    Geldhauser and M

    C. Geldhauser and M. Romito,Limit theorems and fluctuations for point vortices of generalized Euler equations, Journal of Statistical Physics182(2021), no. 3, 1–27

    work page 2021

  42. [42]

    Gozlan and C

    N. Gozlan and C. L´ eonard,Transport inequalities. A survey, Markov Processes and Related Fields16 (2010), no. 4, 635–736

    work page 2010

  43. [43]

    Grotto and M

    F. Grotto and M. Romito,A Central Limit Theorem for Gibbsian invariant measures of (2d) Euler equations, Communications in Mathematical Physics376(2020), no. 3, 2197–2228

    work page 2020

  44. [44]

    Gu, J.-C

    C. Gu, J.-C. Mourrat, and M. Nitzschner,Quantitative equilibrium fluctuations for interacting particle systems, Annals of Applied Probability36(2026), no. 3, 2499–2528

    work page 2026

  45. [45]

    Hitsuda and I

    M. Hitsuda and I. Mitoma,Tightness Problem and Stochastic Evolution Equation Arising from Fluctu- ation Phenomena for Interacting Diffusions, Journal of Multivariate Analysis19(1986), 311–328

    work page 1986

  46. [46]

    Itˆ o,Distribution-valued processes arising from independent Brownian motions, Mathematische Zeitschrift182(1983), no

    K. Itˆ o,Distribution-valued processes arising from independent Brownian motions, Mathematische Zeitschrift182(1983), no. 1, 17–33

    work page 1983

  47. [47]

    Jabin, D

    P.-E. Jabin, D. Poyato, and J. Soler,Mean-field limit of non-exchangeable systems, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics78(2025), no. 4, 651–741

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    Jourdain and S

    B. Jourdain and S. M´ el´ eard,Propagation of chaos and fluctuations for a moderate model with smooth initial data, Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e (B) Probability and Statistics34(1998), no. 6, 727– 766

    work page 1998

  49. [49]

    Jourdain and A

    B. Jourdain and A. Tse,Central Limit Theorem over Non-linear Functionals of Empirical Measures with Applications to the Mean-field Fluctuation of Interacting Diffusions, Electronic Journal of Probability 26(2021), 1–34, Article no. 154

    work page 2021

  50. [50]

    Kallenberg,Foundations of modern probability, Springer, 2021

    O. Kallenberg,Foundations of modern probability, Springer, 2021. 62 MYKHAYLO SHKOLNIKOV AND LANE CHUN YEUNG

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    Karatzas and S

    I. Karatzas and S. E. Shreve,Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus, 2nd ed., Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 113, Springer, New York, 1991

    work page 1991

  52. [52]

    Kolli and M

    P. Kolli and M. Shkolnikov,SPDE limit of the global fluctuations in rank-based models, The Annals of Probability46(2018), no. 2, 1042–1069

    work page 2018

  53. [53]

    V. N. Kolokoltsov,Nonlinear Markov Processes and Kinetic Equations, Cambridge Tracts in Mathe- matics, vol. 182, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010

    work page 2010

  54. [54]

    38, De Gruyter, Berlin, 2011

    ,Markov Processes, Semigroups and Generators, De Gruyter Studies in Mathematics, vol. 38, De Gruyter, Berlin, 2011

    work page 2011

  55. [55]

    T. G. Kurtz and J. Xiong,A stochastic evolution equation arising from the fluctuations of a class of interacting particle systems, Communications in Mathematical Sciences2(2004), no. 3, 325–358

    work page 2004

  56. [56]

    Lacker,Hierarchies, entropy, and quantitative propagation of chaos for mean field diffusions, Prob- ability and Mathematical Physics4(2023), no

    D. Lacker,Hierarchies, entropy, and quantitative propagation of chaos for mean field diffusions, Prob- ability and Mathematical Physics4(2023), no. 2, 377–432

    work page 2023

  57. [57]

    1, 638–666

    ,Independent projections of diffusions: Gradient flows for variational inference and optimal mean field approximations, Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e, Probabilit´ es et Statistiques62(2026), no. 1, 638–666

    work page 2026

  58. [58]

    Quantitative propagation of chaos for non-exchangeable diffusions via first-passage percolation

    D. Lacker, L. C. Yeung, and F. Zhou,Quantitative propagation of chaos for non-exchangeable diffusions via first-passage percolation, Courant Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics (2026), To appear, arXiv:2409.08882v2

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  59. [59]

    Lancellotti,On the fluctuations about the Vlasov limit for (N)-particle systems with mean-field in- teractions, Journal of Statistical Physics136(2009), no

    C. Lancellotti,On the fluctuations about the Vlasov limit for (N)-particle systems with mean-field in- teractions, Journal of Statistical Physics136(2009), no. 4, 643–665

    work page 2009

  60. [60]

    Lebl´ e and S

    T. Lebl´ e and S. Serfaty,Fluctuations of two dimensional Coulomb gases, Geometric and Functional Analysis28(2018), no. 2, 443–508

    work page 2018

  61. [61]

    Ledoux and M

    M. Ledoux and M. Talagrand,Probability in Banach Spaces: isoperimetry and processes, vol. 23, Springer, 1991

    work page 1991

  62. [62]

    Lov´ asz,Large Networks and Graph Limits, American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, vol

    L. Lov´ asz,Large Networks and Graph Limits, American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, vol. 60, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2012

    work page 2012

  63. [63]

    Lu¸ con and W

    E. Lu¸ con and W. Stannat,Mean field limit for disordered diffusions with singular interactions, The Annals of Applied Probability24(2014), no. 5, 1946–1993

    work page 2014

  64. [64]

    6, 3840–3909

    ,Transition from Gaussian to Non-Gaussian Fluctuations for Mean-Field Diffusions in Spatial Interaction, The Annals of Applied Probability26(2016), no. 6, 3840–3909

    work page 2016

  65. [65]

    H. P. McKean,Propagation of chaos for a class of non-linear parabolic equations, Stochastic Differential Equations (Lecture Series in Differential Equations, Session 7, Catholic Univ., 1967) (1967), 41–57

    work page 1967

  66. [66]

    G. S. Medvedev,The nonlinear heat equation on dense graphs and graph limits, SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis46(2014), no. 4, 2743–2766

    work page 2014

  67. [67]

    4, 883–898

    ,The continuum limit of the Kuramoto model on sparse random graphs, Communications in Mathematical Sciences17(2019), no. 4, 883–898

    work page 2019

  68. [68]

    M´ el´ eard,Asymptotic behaviour of some interacting particle systems; McKean–Vlasov and Boltzmann models, Probabilistic Models for Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations (D

    S. M´ el´ eard,Asymptotic behaviour of some interacting particle systems; McKean–Vlasov and Boltzmann models, Probabilistic Models for Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations (D. Talay and L. Tubaro, eds.), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1627, Springer, 1996, pp. 42–95

    work page 1996

  69. [69]

    Mitoma,An∞-dimensional inhomogeneous Langevin’s equation, Journal of Functional Analysis61 (1985), no

    I. Mitoma,An∞-dimensional inhomogeneous Langevin’s equation, Journal of Functional Analysis61 (1985), no. 3, 342–359

    work page 1985

  70. [70]

    Nikolaev,Fluctuation behaviour for interacting particle systems with common noise, Stoch

    P. Nikolaev,Fluctuation behaviour for interacting particle systems with common noise, Stoch. PDE: Anal. Comp. (2026), doi:10.1007/s40072-026-00431-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s40072-026-00431-1 2026

  71. [71]

    Oelschl¨ ager,A fluctuation theorem for moderately interacting diffusion processes, Probability theory and related fields74(1987), no

    K. Oelschl¨ ager,A fluctuation theorem for moderately interacting diffusion processes, Probability theory and related fields74(1987), no. 4, 591–616

    work page 1987

  72. [72]

    R. I. Oliveira and G. H. Reis,Interacting diffusions on random graphs with diverging average degrees: hydrodynamics and large deviations, Journal of Statistical Physics176(2019), no. 5, 1057–1087

    work page 2019

  73. [73]

    Pouradier Duteil,Mean-field limit of collective dynamics with time-varying weights, Networks and Heterogeneous Media17(2022), no

    N. Pouradier Duteil,Mean-field limit of collective dynamics with time-varying weights, Networks and Heterogeneous Media17(2022), no. 2, 129–161

    work page 2022

  74. [74]

    B. L. Rozovsky and S. V. Lototsky,Stochastic Evolution Systems: Linear Theory and Applications to Non-Linear Filtering, 2nd ed., Probability Theory and Stochastic Modelling, vol. 89, Springer, Cham, 2018

    work page 2018

  75. [75]

    Serfaty,Gaussian fluctuations and free energy expansion for Coulomb gases at any temperature, Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e, Probabilit´ es et Statistiques59(2023), no

    S. Serfaty,Gaussian fluctuations and free energy expansion for Coulomb gases at any temperature, Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e, Probabilit´ es et Statistiques59(2023), no. 2, 1074–1142

    work page 2023

  76. [76]

    Shao and X

    Y. Shao and X. Zhao,The fluctuation behaviour of the stochastic point vortex model with common noise, Potential Anal.64(2026), Article 62, doi:10.1007/s11118-026-10302-y. UNIVERSAL CENTRAL LIMIT THEOREM FOR NON-EXCHANGEABLE DIFFUSIONS 63

    work page doi:10.1007/s11118-026-10302-y 2026

  77. [77]

    Shiga and H

    T. Shiga and H. Tanaka,Central limit theorem for a system of Markovian particles with mean field interactions, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verwandte Gebiete69(1985), no. 3, 439– 459

    work page 1985

  78. [78]

    Sznitman,A fluctuation result for nonlinear diffusions, Infinite Dimensional Analysis and Sto- chastic Processes (S

    A.-S. Sznitman,A fluctuation result for nonlinear diffusions, Infinite Dimensional Analysis and Sto- chastic Processes (S. Albeverio, ed.), Research Notes in Mathematics, vol. 124, Pitman, Boston, 1985, pp. 145–160

    work page 1985

  79. [79]

    Hennequin, ed.), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol

    ,Topics in Propagation of Chaos, ´Ecole d’ ´Et´ e de Probabilit´ es de Saint-Flour XIX—1989 (P.-L. Hennequin, ed.), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1464, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1991, pp. 165– 251

    work page 1989

  80. [80]

    Tanaka,Limit theorems for certain diffusion processes with interaction, Stochastic Analysis, North- Holland Mathematical Library, vol

    H. Tanaka,Limit theorems for certain diffusion processes with interaction, Stochastic Analysis, North- Holland Mathematical Library, vol. 32, Elsevier, 1984, pp. 469–488

    work page 1984

Showing first 80 references.