Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Fairness Assessment for Artificial Intelligence in Financial Industry

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1912.07211 v1 pith:RVVBUEFS submitted 2019-12-16 stat.ML cs.LGstat.AP

classification stat.MLcs.LGstat.AP
keywords fairnessartificialbiasevaluationfinancialindustryintelligencemethods
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is an important driving force for the development and transformation of the financial industry. However, with the fast-evolving AI technology and application, unintentional bias, insufficient model validation, immature contingency plan and other underestimated threats may expose the company to operational and reputational risks. In this paper, we focus on fairness evaluation, one of the key components of AI Governance, through a quantitative lens. Statistical methods are reviewed for imbalanced data treatment and bias mitigation. These methods and fairness evaluation metrics are then applied to a credit card default payment example.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Data and AI governance: Promoting equity, ethics, and fairness in large language models

    cs.CL 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper proposes a lifecycle governance framework, built on the authors' BEATS benchmark, to quantify and mitigate bias, ethics, fairness, and factuality failures in large language models.

Pith tools