REVIEW 2 cited by
Self-supervised Learning: Generative or Contrastive
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Deep supervised learning has achieved great success in the last decade. However, its deficiencies of dependence on manual labels and vulnerability to attacks have driven people to explore a better solution. As an alternative, self-supervised learning attracts many researchers for its soaring performance on representation learning in the last several years. Self-supervised representation learning leverages input data itself as supervision and benefits almost all types of downstream tasks. In this survey, we take a look into new self-supervised learning methods for representation in computer vision, natural language processing, and graph learning. We comprehensively review the existing empirical methods and summarize them into three main categories according to their objectives: generative, contrastive, and generative-contrastive (adversarial). We further investigate related theoretical analysis work to provide deeper thoughts on how self-supervised learning works. Finally, we briefly discuss open problems and future directions for self-supervised learning. An outline slide for the survey is provided.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
From Pixels to Components: Eigenvector Masking for Visual Representation Learning
Masking principal components instead of pixel patches in masked autoencoders yields better image classification representations across CIFAR10, TinyImageNet, and three MedMNIST datasets.
-
Self-supervised Spatial-Temporal Learner for Precipitation Nowcasting
SpaT-SparK, a SparK-based masked-image-modeling pretrainer with a translation network, reduces pMSE for short-term precipitation nowcasting but sacrifices recall and skill scores versus the smaller SmaAt-UNet.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.