REVIEW 17 cited by
Living at the Edge: A Critical Look at the Cosmological Neutrino Mass Bound
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Cosmological neutrino mass bounds are becoming increasingly stringent. The latest limit within $\Lambda$CDM from Planck 2018+ACT lensing+DESI is $\sum m_\nu < 0.072\,{\rm eV}$ at 95\% CL, very close to the minimum possible sum of neutrino masses ($\sum m_\nu > 0.06\,{\rm eV}$), hinting at vanishing or even ``negative'' cosmological neutrino masses. In this context, it is urgent to carefully evaluate the origin of these cosmological constraints. In this paper, we investigate the robustness of these results in three ways: i) we check the role of potential anomalies in Planck CMB and DESI BAO data; ii) we compare the results for frequentist and Bayesian techniques, as very close to physical boundaries subtleties in the derivation and interpretation of constraints can arise; iii) we investigate how deviations from $\Lambda$CDM, potentially alleviating these anomalies, can alter the constraints. From a profile likelihood analysis, we derive constraints in agreement at the $\sim 10\%$ level with Bayesian posteriors. We find that the weak preference for negative neutrino masses is mostly present for Planck 18 data, affected by the well-known `lensing anomaly'. It disappears when the new Planck 2020 HiLLiPoP is used, leading to significantly weaker constraints. Additionally, the pull towards negative masses in DESI data stems from the $z=0.7$ bin, which contains a BAO measurement in $\sim 3\sigma$ tension with Planck expectations. Without this bin, and in combination with HiLLiPoP, the bound relaxes to $\sum m_\nu < 0.11\,{\rm eV}$ at 95\% CL. The recent preference for dynamical dark energy alleviates this tension and further weakens the bound. As we are at the dawn of a neutrino mass discovery from cosmology, it will be very exciting to see if this trend is confirmed by future data.
Forward citations
Cited by 17 Pith papers
-
Radiative corrections in neutral-current (anti)neutrino elastic scattering at $\text{GeV}$ energies I: Nucleon targets
Radiative corrections to neutral-current (anti)neutrino-nucleon elastic scattering are computed within low-energy EFT and reach a few percent, comparable to the strange-quark effects they must be disentangled from.
-
Radiative Breaking of Two-Zero Neutrino Mass Minors: Revisiting the $\mathrm{U}(1)_{L_\mu-L_\tau}$ Model
One-loop threshold corrections in the minimal U(1)_{L_mu-L_tau} seesaw model break the tree-level two-zero minor structure, relaxing the lower bound on total neutrino mass and easing cosmological tension.
-
Neutrino mass limits and decaying dark matter: background evolution versus perturbations
Decaying dark matter can hide neutrino mass from expansion-history data, but CMB lensing unmasks it and restores ∑mν ≲ 0.079 eV.
-
Cosmological neutrino mass: a frequentist overview in light of DESI
A frequentist profile-likelihood analysis of DESI, Planck, ACT, and eBOSS Lyman-alpha data yields Σmν < 53 meV (95% C.L.) in flat ΛCDM and a CMB-independent bound of 285 meV.
-
Turning a negative neutrino mass into a positive optical depth
The DESI-CMB tension that looks like negative neutrino mass or evolving dark energy is actually a tension in the optical depth tau; freeing tau resolves it within standard cosmology.
-
Tuning the cosmic instrument: robust cosmology through combined probes
Low-redshift large-scale structure data pull the dark-energy equation-of-state posterior toward a cosmological constant and yield S8=0.777±0.017.
-
Impact of DESI BAO Data on Inflationary Parameters: stability against late-time new physics
Using CMB, supernova, and DESI BAO data, this study finds that inflationary parameters n_s and A_s remain stable (shifts under 1%) when SDSS BAO data is replaced by DESI BAO data across several late-time models.
-
Neutrino masses from large-scale structures: future sensitivity and theory dependence
Forecasted 1-sigma sensitivity to the sum of neutrino masses is 15 meV for Planck+DESI and 7 meV for CMB-S4+MegaMapper, with the one-loop bispectrum providing 10% and 30% of the constraining power.
-
Towards a multi-tracer neutrino mass measurement with line-intensity mapping
AtLAST [CII] line-intensity mapping, combined with CMB-S4 and DESI BAO forecasts, could reach sigma(sum m_nu) ~ 18 meV, and ~11.5 meV with a 21-cm tau prior.
-
Revisiting the impact of neutrino mass hierarchies on neutrino mass constraints in light of recent DESI data
Bayesian and frequentist analyses show the equal-mass approximation for neutrino masses remains adequate for Planck+DESI data, provided the oscillation-motivated lower bounds on the neutrino mass sum are imposed.
-
New parameter region in sterile neutrino searches: a scenario to alleviate cosmological neutrino mass bound and its testability at oscillation experiments
IceCube can test massless sterile neutrinos lighter than active neutrinos in the inverted-ordering regime, with sensitivity to sin^2 2theta24 ~ 10^-2 at |Delta m^2_41| ~ 0.2 eV^2, a region opened by the Farzan-Hannest...
-
Origin of cosmological neutrino mass bounds: background $\textit{versus}$ perturbations
The CMB bound on the sum of neutrino masses comes mostly from the background energy density of massive neutrinos, not from their free-streaming effects.
-
Another relation among the neutrino mass-squared differences?
The ratio (√Δm²31 + √Δm²21)/(√Δm²31 − √Δm²21) is claimed to be exactly √2, implying m1 ≈ 0 and absolute neutrino masses near 0.009 eV and 0.050 eV.
-
Robust Preference for Dark Sector Interactions
Interacting dark matter–dark energy models fit DESI BAO and CMB data as well as evolving-dark-energy (CPL) models, with a coupling preference that persists under DES-Dovekie supernova recalibration.
-
Can the sound horizon-free measurement of $H_0$ constrain early new physics?
Mock galaxy-survey analyses show that sound-horizon-free H0 measurements do not currently rule out BAO-compatible early dark energy models, and LambdaCDM-derived priors can bias the result.
-
Dynamic Neutrino Mass Ordering and Its Imprint on the Diffuse Supernova Neutrino Background
A toy model where neutrino mass ordering flips with redshift reshapes the electron-neutrino part of the diffuse supernova neutrino background in an energy-dependent way, but the effect is below near-future experimental reach.
-
Integral representation of the neutrino mass-squared differences
The claimed m1 < 0.0023 eV bound is an artifact of assuming the trapezoid error is small enough to force the result; the integral representation gives no independent constraint.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.