Decentralized Coordination of Autonomous Traffic Through Advanced Air Mobility Corridors

Hamsa Balakrishnan; Jasmine Jerry Aloor

arxiv: 2606.23832 · v1 · pith:RWR6BMIInew · submitted 2026-06-22 · 💻 cs.MA · cs.AI· cs.ET· cs.RO· cs.SY· eess.SY

Decentralized Coordination of Autonomous Traffic Through Advanced Air Mobility Corridors

Jasmine Jerry Aloor , Hamsa Balakrishnan This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 05:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.MA cs.AIcs.ETcs.ROcs.SYeess.SY

keywords decentralized coordinationadvanced air mobilityair corridorsautonomous aircraftself-organizationtraffic managementcorridor flowsfixed-wing aircraft

0 comments

The pith

Autonomous aircraft can learn to self-organize into corridor flows in decentralized settings with only local information.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates that fixed-wing aircraft operating without centralized control can conform to advanced air mobility corridor boundaries more than 94 percent of the time while reaching goals efficiently. This result is shown across three corridor setups: a single corridor with exit metering, two consecutive corridors, and one corridor that splits into two. Aircraft rely solely on local information to achieve this self-organization. Tactical interventions to maintain separation remain infrequent except at high traffic densities.

Core claim

Contrary to the belief that corridor-based operations may be inefficient without centralized traffic management, it is possible for autonomous aircraft to learn to self-organize into corridor flows in decentralized settings. In the tested scenarios, the aircraft conform to the corridor boundaries more than 94% of the time and reach their goal in a relatively efficient manner, with tactical interventions needed only infrequently in low- and medium-density settings.

What carries the argument

Decentralized learning of local behaviors that enable aircraft to conform to corridor boundaries and self-organize into flows.

If this is right

Corridor-based advanced air mobility operations can remain efficient without requiring centralized management.
The same decentralized approach applies to metering, sequential, and splitting corridor geometries.
Separation violations can be resolved with infrequent tactical interventions when traffic density is low or medium.
High-density traffic increases the need for tactical interventions even with learned self-organization.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Existing airspace integration efforts could incorporate these self-organizing corridor behaviors to reduce coordination overhead.
Extending the approach to mixed aircraft types or dynamic weather would test whether the 94 percent conformity holds in more variable conditions.
Corridor networks might be designed with fewer central oversight points if decentralized learning proves robust at scale.

Load-bearing premise

The simulated scenarios with fixed-wing aircraft and the three corridor configurations are representative of real advanced air mobility operations and the learned behaviors will generalize beyond the tested densities and geometries.

What would settle it

Running higher-fidelity simulations or real flight tests at varying densities and geometries to measure whether corridor boundary conformity stays above 94 percent and tactical interventions stay infrequent at low and medium densities.

read the original abstract

The use of dedicated corridors for Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) traffic is one of the most commonly proposed pathways to integrating them into existing airspace operations. Most prior research has focused on the design of networks of AAM corridors and conflict resolution for aircraft within corridors. It is also generally believed that while attractive from an implementation perspective, corridor-based operations may be inefficient, especially in the absence of centralized traffic management. In this paper, we show that contrary to this belief, it is possible for autonomous aircraft to learn to self-organize into corridor flows in decentralized settings. We illustrate our approach using scenarios in which fixed-wing aircraft need to safely and efficiently traverse (1) a single corridor with metering after the exit, (2) a sequence of two consecutive corridors, and (3) a corridor that splits into two. We find that in decentralized settings with only local information, the aircraft are able to conform to the corridor boundaries more than 94% of the time and reach their goal in a relatively efficient manner. Furthermore, tactical interventions to handle violations of the separation minimum are needed only infrequently in low- and medium-density settings. However, such tactical interventions become more frequently necessary only when traffic density is high.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Simulations show decentralized learning can produce high corridor conformance in three fixed geometries, but no algorithm or stats details means the numbers are hard to trust.

read the letter

The paper's core result is that fixed-wing aircraft using only local information can learn to stay inside AAM corridors more than 94 percent of the time in three specific setups: a single corridor with exit metering, two corridors in sequence, and a corridor that splits. Tactical interventions stay infrequent at low and medium densities. This is offered as evidence that self-organization is possible without central control, against the usual assumption that corridors need it to stay efficient.

The work is straightforward in laying out those three corridor geometries and reporting the conformance and intervention numbers from the runs. That gives a concrete, if limited, demonstration that local learning can produce the desired flow behavior under the tested conditions.

The main weakness is the complete absence of any description of the learning algorithm, training procedure, number of trials, variance across runs, or how the tactical interventions were actually triggered. Without those, it is impossible to judge whether the 94 percent figure is robust or sensitive to small changes in setup. The scenarios also use fixed densities and aircraft types, so the claim that the behaviors will hold in more variable real operations rests on an untested assumption.

This is the sort of paper that would interest people working on multi-agent control for air traffic or AAM corridor design. A reader looking for existence proofs in simulation might find the scenarios useful as a starting point. Anyone trying to replicate or extend the result will need the missing methods details first.

I would send it to peer review. The question is relevant to current AAM planning, and the simulations address a narrow but real claim. Referees can check the experimental setup and ask for the reproducibility information that is currently missing.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that, contrary to the prevailing belief that centralized traffic management is required for efficient corridor-based AAM operations, autonomous aircraft can learn to self-organize into corridor flows using only decentralized control and local information. This is illustrated via simulations of fixed-wing aircraft in three scenarios: (1) a single corridor with metering after the exit, (2) a sequence of two consecutive corridors, and (3) a corridor that splits into two. The reported outcomes are >94% conformance to corridor boundaries, relatively efficient goal reaching, and infrequent tactical interventions at low/medium densities (with interventions increasing at high density).

Significance. If the empirical results hold under the stated conditions, the work supplies concrete simulation evidence for an existential claim: decentralized learning suffices for self-organization in these corridor geometries. This directly challenges assumptions about the necessity of centralization and could inform scalable AAM designs. The paper's strength is its focus on controlled simulations that falsify the 'centralization required' view rather than claiming universality or parameter-free generality.

major comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: The abstract reports summary performance numbers (>94% boundary conformance, infrequent tactical interventions) but provides no information on the learning algorithm, training procedure, number of trials, variance across runs, state/action spaces, reward function, or the precise triggering logic for tactical interventions. These details are load-bearing for the central claim that the observed self-organization emerges from decentralized learning; without them the reported percentages cannot be verified or reproduced.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: The qualifier 'relatively efficient manner' is undefined; the manuscript should report concrete metrics (e.g., mean time-to-goal, path length, or energy use) relative to an explicit baseline or centralized controller.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful review and the recommendation for major revision. We address the single major comment below and agree that enhancing the abstract will improve the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The abstract reports summary performance numbers (>94% boundary conformance, infrequent tactical interventions) but provides no information on the learning algorithm, training procedure, number of trials, variance across runs, state/action spaces, reward function, or the precise triggering logic for tactical interventions. These details are load-bearing for the central claim that the observed self-organization emerges from decentralized learning; without them the reported percentages cannot be verified or reproduced.

Authors: We agree that the abstract, being a concise summary, omits these methodological specifics. The full details—including the decentralized multi-agent reinforcement learning algorithm, training procedure (episodes, convergence), experimental parameters (state/action spaces, reward function), number of trials (multiple independent runs with variance statistics), and tactical intervention triggering logic (separation minima violations)—are provided in the Methods and Results sections of the manuscript. The reported metrics (>94% conformance, etc.) are derived from those controlled simulations. To address the concern directly, we will revise the abstract to briefly reference the decentralized learning approach and point readers to the methods for verification and reproducibility. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; empirical simulation outcomes independent of inputs

full rationale

The paper's central claim is existential ('it is possible') and supported by simulation runs in three corridor geometries, reporting empirical metrics such as >94% boundary conformance and low tactical intervention rates at low/medium density. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are used to derive the reported performance; the results are generated by executing the decentralized learning process on the described scenarios rather than being defined in terms of themselves. The derivation chain consists of standard multi-agent simulation and learning steps whose outputs are not forced by construction from the inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no information on free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; all arrays are therefore empty.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5760 in / 1136 out tokens · 26423 ms · 2026-06-26T05:41:42.224029+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

[1]

Urban Air Mobility (UAM) Concept of Operations Version 2.0,

Federal Aviation Administration, “Urban Air Mobility (UAM) Concept of Operations Version 2.0,” Tech. rep., Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC, April 2023. URLhttps://www.faa.gov/air-taxis/uam_blueprint. 1, 2

2023
[2]

U-space ConOps and architecture (edition 4),

SESAR Joint Undertaking, “U-space ConOps and architecture (edition 4),” Tech. rep., EUROCONTROL, July 2023. URL https://www.sesarju.eu/node/4544

2023
[3]

UAE Begins Mapping Air Corridors For Air Taxis, Cargo Drones,

Reim, G., “UAE Begins Mapping Air Corridors For Air Taxis, Cargo Drones,”Aviation Week, 2025. URL http://aviationweek.com/aerospace/advanced-air-mobility/uae-begins-mapping-air-corridors- air-taxis-cargo-drones

2025
[4]

Skyways to the Future: Operational Concepts for Advanced Air Mobility in India,

World Economic Forum, “Skyways to the Future: Operational Concepts for Advanced Air Mobility in India,” , 2024. http://reports.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Skyways_to_the_Future_2024.pdf

2024
[5]

Malawi’sUniqueDroneCorridor,

UNICEF,“Malawi’sUniqueDroneCorridor,”,2017.https://www.unicef.org/innovation/drones/malawi-unique- drone-corridor. 1

2017
[6]

Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) Implementation Plan,

Federal Aviation Administration, “Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) Implementation Plan,” Tech. rep., Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC, July 2023. URLhttps://www.faa.gov/air-taxis/implementation-plan. 1

2023
[7]

Design and Analysis of Corridors for UAM Operations,

Verma, S., Dulchinos, V., Wood, R. D., Farrahi, A., Mogford, R., Shyr, M., and Ghatas, R., “Design and Analysis of Corridors for UAM Operations,”2022 IEEE/AIAA 41st Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), 2022, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC55683.2022.9925820. 1

work page doi:10.1109/dasc55683.2022.9925820 2022
[8]

Lane Geometry, Compliance Levels, and Adaptive Geo-fencing in CORRIDRONE ArchitectureforUrbanMobility,

Tony, L. A., Ratnoo, A., and Ghose, D., “Lane Geometry, Compliance Levels, and Adaptive Geo-fencing in CORRIDRONE ArchitectureforUrbanMobility,”2021InternationalConferenceonUnmannedAircraftSystems(ICUAS),2021,pp.1611–1617. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUAS51884.2021.9476745

work page doi:10.1109/icuas51884.2021.9476745 2021
[9]

Air Corridor Planning for Urban Drone Delivery: Complexity Analysis and Comparison via Multi-Commodity Network Flow and Graph Search,

He, X., Li, L., Mo, Y., Sun, Z., and Qin, S. J., “Air Corridor Planning for Urban Drone Delivery: Complexity Analysis and Comparison via Multi-Commodity Network Flow and Graph Search,”Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 193, 2025, p. 103859. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103859, URL https://www.sc...

work page doi:10.1016/j.tre.2024.103859 2025
[10]

Hybrid Control in Air Traffic Management Systems,

Tomlin, C., Pappas, G., Lygeros, J., Godbole, D., Sastry, S., and Meyer, G., “Hybrid Control in Air Traffic Management Systems,”IFAC Proceedings Volumes, Vol. 29, No. 1, 1996, pp. 5512–5517. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S1474667017585596. 2

1996
[11]

Subliminal air traffic control: Human friendly control of a multi-agent system,

Cruck, E., and Lygeros, J., “Subliminal air traffic control: Human friendly control of a multi-agent system,”2007 American Control Conference, 2007, pp. 462–467. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2007.4282641. 2

work page doi:10.1109/acc.2007.4282641 2007
[12]

Towardconflictresolutionwithdeepmulti-agentreinforcementlearning,

Isufaj,R.,AranegaSebastia,D.,andAngelPiera,M.,“Towardconflictresolutionwithdeepmulti-agentreinforcementlearning,” Journal of Air Transportation, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2022, pp. 71–80. URL https://doi.org/10.2514/1.D0296. 2

work page doi:10.2514/1.d0296 2022
[13]

One to any: Distributed conflict resolution with deep multi-agent reinforcement learning and long short-term memory,

Brittain, M. W., and Wei, P., “One to any: Distributed conflict resolution with deep multi-agent reinforcement learning and long short-term memory,”AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum, 2021, p. 1952. URL https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-1952

work page doi:10.2514/6.2021-1952 2021
[14]

A deep ensemble method for multi-agent reinforcement learning: A case study on air traffic control,

Ghosh, S., Laguna, S., Lim, S. H., Wynter, L., and Poonawala, H., “A deep ensemble method for multi-agent reinforcement learning: A case study on air traffic control,”Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, Vol. 31, 2021, pp. 468–476. URL https://doi.org/10.1609/icaps.v31i1.15993. 2 11

work page doi:10.1609/icaps.v31i1.15993 2021
[15]

Towards multi-aircraft transfer learning for trajectory tracking,

Buelta, A., Olivares, A., and Staffetti, E., “Towards multi-aircraft transfer learning for trajectory tracking,”Proceedings of the Fifteenth USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar, 2023. URL https://hdl.handle.net/10115/ 69757. 2

2023
[16]

Multiagent ReinforcementLearningMethodstoResolveDemandCapacityBalanceProblems,

Spatharis, C., Kravaris, T., Vouros, G. A., Blekas, K., Chalkiadakis, G., Garcia, J. M. C., and Fernandez, E. C., “Multiagent ReinforcementLearningMethodstoResolveDemandCapacityBalanceProblems,”Proceedingsofthe10thHellenicConference on Artificial Intelligence, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1145/3200947. 3...

work page doi:10.1145/3200947 2018
[17]

Decentralized air traffic management for advanced air mobility,

de Oliveira, Í. R., Neto, E. C. P., Matsumoto, T. T., and Yu, H., “Decentralized air traffic management for advanced air mobility,”2021 Integrated Communications Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS), IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–8. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNS52807.2021.9441552. 2

work page doi:10.1109/icns52807.2021.9441552 2021
[18]

A Distributed Framework for Traffic Flow Management in the Presence of Unmanned Aircraft,

Balakrishnan, H., and Chandran, B., “A Distributed Framework for Traffic Flow Management in the Presence of Unmanned Aircraft,”USA/Europe ATM R&D Seminar, 2017. URL https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/114703. 2

2017
[19]

Advanced convoy control strategy for autonomously driven railway vehicles,

Henke, C., Frohleke, N., and Bocker, J., “Advanced convoy control strategy for autonomously driven railway vehicles,”IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference, 2006. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2006.1707417. 2

work page doi:10.1109/itsc.2006.1707417 2006
[20]

Platoon formation: Optimized car to platoon assignment strategies and protocols,

Heinovski, J., and Dressler, F., “Platoon formation: Optimized car to platoon assignment strategies and protocols,”IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC), 2018. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/VNC.2018.8628396. 2

work page doi:10.1109/vnc.2018.8628396 2018
[21]

Strategic Hub-Based Platoon Coordination Under Uncertain TravelTimes,

Johansson, A., Nekouei, E., Johansson, K. H., and Mårtensson, J., “Strategic Hub-Based Platoon Coordination Under Uncertain TravelTimes,”IEEETransactionsonIntelligentTransportationSystems,2022.URLhttps://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2021.3077467. 2

work page doi:10.1109/tits.2021.3077467 2022
[22]

A Framework for Sense and Follow Convoys for Collective Autonomous Mobility,

Ishihara, A. K., Idris, H. R., and Xue, M., “A Framework for Sense and Follow Convoys for Collective Autonomous Mobility,” AIAA Aviation Forum, 2021. URL https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-2329. 2

work page doi:10.2514/6.2021-2329 2021
[23]

Distraction or disruption? Autonomous trucks gain ground in US logistics,

Chottani, A., Hastings, G., Murnane, J., and Neuhaus, F., “Distraction or disruption? Autonomous trucks gain ground in US logistics,” www.mckinsey.com/industries/travel-logistics-and-infrastructure/our-insights/distraction-or-disruption-autonomous- trucks-gain-ground-in-us-logistics, 2018. 2

2018
[24]

A review of truck platooning projects for energy savings,

Tsugawa, S., Jeschke, S., and Shladover, S. E., “A review of truck platooning projects for energy savings,”IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 2016. URL https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7497531. 2

arXiv 2016
[25]

Enhanced self-separation decision making for autonomous flight operations in air corridors,

Liu, Z., Wang, M., and Liu, Z., “Enhanced self-separation decision making for autonomous flight operations in air corridors,” Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 124, 2025, p. 102721. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2024. 102721, URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969699724001868. 2

work page doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2024 2025
[26]

Analysis of Traffic Flow in Structured Urban Airspace Networks with MFD-based Feedback Control,

Chour, K., Razzaghi, P., Verma, D., Xue, M., Munishkin, A., and Kalyanam, K., “Analysis of Traffic Flow in Structured Urban Airspace Networks with MFD-based Feedback Control,”AIAA AVIATION FORUM AND ASCEND 2024, 2024, p. 4575. URL https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2024-4575. 2

work page doi:10.2514/6.2024-4575 2024
[27]

A reinforcement learning approach to vehicle coordination for structured advanced air mobility,

Deniz, S., Wu, Y., Shi, Y., and Wang, Z., “A reinforcement learning approach to vehicle coordination for structured advanced air mobility,”Green Energy and Intelligent Transportation, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2024, p. 100157. https://doi.org/https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.geits.2024.100157, URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773153724000094. 2

work page doi:10.1016/j.geits.2024.100157 2024
[28]

Investigation of Merge Assist Policies to Improve Safety of Drone Traffic in a Constrained Urban Airspace,

Doole, M., Ellerbroek, J., and Hoekstra, J. M., “Investigation of Merge Assist Policies to Improve Safety of Drone Traffic in a Constrained Urban Airspace,”Aerospace, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace9030120, URL https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/9/3/120. 2

work page doi:10.3390/aerospace9030120 2022
[29]

Hybrid transformer based multi - agent reinforcement learning for multiple unpiloted aerial vehicle coor dination in air corridors,

Yu, L., Li, Z., Ansari, N., and Sun, X., “ Hybrid Transformer Based Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Multiple Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Coordination in Air Corridors ,”IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, , No. 01, 2025, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2025.3532204, URL https://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/TMC.2025.3532204. 2

work page doi:10.1109/tmc.2025.3532204 2025
[30]

Scalable Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningthroughIntelligentInformationAggregation,

Nayak, S., Choi, K., Ding, W., Dolan, S., Gopalakrishnan, K., and Balakrishnan, H., “Scalable Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningthroughIntelligentInformationAggregation,”Proceedingsofthe40thInternationalConferenceonMachineLearning, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 202, PMLR, 2023, pp. 25817–25833. URL https://proceedings.mlr.press/ v202/naya...

2023
[31]

Cooperation and Fairness in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning,

Aloor, J. J., Nayak, S. N., Dolan, S., and Balakrishnan, H., “Cooperation and Fairness in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning,” ACM J. Auton. Transport. Syst., Vol. 2, No. 2, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1145/3702012, URL https://doi.org/10.1145/3702012. 2 12

work page doi:10.1145/3702012 2024
[32]

https://wisk.aero/aircraft/

Wisk, 2025. https://wisk.aero/aircraft/. 5

2025
[33]

https://www.jobyaviation.com/

Joby Aviation, 2025. https://www.jobyaviation.com/

2025
[34]

UAM Variable Separation,

Mogford, R., Peknik, D., and Zelman, J., “UAM Variable Separation,” Presentation, NASA Ames Research Center, 2020. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20205006214

arXiv 2020
[35]

Resolving Conflicting Constraints in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Layered Safety,

Choi, J. J., Aloor, J. J., Li, J., Mendoza, M. G., Balakrishnan, H., and Tomlin, C., “Resolving Conflicting Constraints in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Layered Safety,”Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems, LosAngeles, CA, USA, 2025. https://doi.org/10.15607/RSS.2025.XXI.094. 5

work page doi:10.15607/rss.2025.xxi.094 2025
[36]

Interactive Supercomputing on 40,000 Cores for Machine Learning and Data Analysis , url =

Reuther, A., Kepner, J., Byun, C., Samsi, S., Arcand, W., Bestor, D., Bergeron, B., Gadepally, V., Houle, M., Hubbell, M., Jones, M., Klein, A., Milechin, L., Mullen, J., Prout, A., Rosa, A., Yee, C., and Michaleas, P., “Interactive supercomputing on 40,000 cores for machine learning and data analysis,”2018 IEEE High Performance extreme Computing Conferen...

work page doi:10.1109/hpec.2018.8547629 2018

[1] [1]

Urban Air Mobility (UAM) Concept of Operations Version 2.0,

Federal Aviation Administration, “Urban Air Mobility (UAM) Concept of Operations Version 2.0,” Tech. rep., Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC, April 2023. URLhttps://www.faa.gov/air-taxis/uam_blueprint. 1, 2

2023

[2] [2]

U-space ConOps and architecture (edition 4),

SESAR Joint Undertaking, “U-space ConOps and architecture (edition 4),” Tech. rep., EUROCONTROL, July 2023. URL https://www.sesarju.eu/node/4544

2023

[3] [3]

UAE Begins Mapping Air Corridors For Air Taxis, Cargo Drones,

Reim, G., “UAE Begins Mapping Air Corridors For Air Taxis, Cargo Drones,”Aviation Week, 2025. URL http://aviationweek.com/aerospace/advanced-air-mobility/uae-begins-mapping-air-corridors- air-taxis-cargo-drones

2025

[4] [4]

Skyways to the Future: Operational Concepts for Advanced Air Mobility in India,

World Economic Forum, “Skyways to the Future: Operational Concepts for Advanced Air Mobility in India,” , 2024. http://reports.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Skyways_to_the_Future_2024.pdf

2024

[5] [5]

Malawi’sUniqueDroneCorridor,

UNICEF,“Malawi’sUniqueDroneCorridor,”,2017.https://www.unicef.org/innovation/drones/malawi-unique- drone-corridor. 1

2017

[6] [6]

Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) Implementation Plan,

Federal Aviation Administration, “Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) Implementation Plan,” Tech. rep., Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC, July 2023. URLhttps://www.faa.gov/air-taxis/implementation-plan. 1

2023

[7] [7]

Design and Analysis of Corridors for UAM Operations,

Verma, S., Dulchinos, V., Wood, R. D., Farrahi, A., Mogford, R., Shyr, M., and Ghatas, R., “Design and Analysis of Corridors for UAM Operations,”2022 IEEE/AIAA 41st Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), 2022, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC55683.2022.9925820. 1

work page doi:10.1109/dasc55683.2022.9925820 2022

[8] [8]

Lane Geometry, Compliance Levels, and Adaptive Geo-fencing in CORRIDRONE ArchitectureforUrbanMobility,

Tony, L. A., Ratnoo, A., and Ghose, D., “Lane Geometry, Compliance Levels, and Adaptive Geo-fencing in CORRIDRONE ArchitectureforUrbanMobility,”2021InternationalConferenceonUnmannedAircraftSystems(ICUAS),2021,pp.1611–1617. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUAS51884.2021.9476745

work page doi:10.1109/icuas51884.2021.9476745 2021

[9] [9]

Air Corridor Planning for Urban Drone Delivery: Complexity Analysis and Comparison via Multi-Commodity Network Flow and Graph Search,

He, X., Li, L., Mo, Y., Sun, Z., and Qin, S. J., “Air Corridor Planning for Urban Drone Delivery: Complexity Analysis and Comparison via Multi-Commodity Network Flow and Graph Search,”Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 193, 2025, p. 103859. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103859, URL https://www.sc...

work page doi:10.1016/j.tre.2024.103859 2025

[10] [10]

Hybrid Control in Air Traffic Management Systems,

Tomlin, C., Pappas, G., Lygeros, J., Godbole, D., Sastry, S., and Meyer, G., “Hybrid Control in Air Traffic Management Systems,”IFAC Proceedings Volumes, Vol. 29, No. 1, 1996, pp. 5512–5517. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S1474667017585596. 2

1996

[11] [11]

Subliminal air traffic control: Human friendly control of a multi-agent system,

Cruck, E., and Lygeros, J., “Subliminal air traffic control: Human friendly control of a multi-agent system,”2007 American Control Conference, 2007, pp. 462–467. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2007.4282641. 2

work page doi:10.1109/acc.2007.4282641 2007

[12] [12]

Towardconflictresolutionwithdeepmulti-agentreinforcementlearning,

Isufaj,R.,AranegaSebastia,D.,andAngelPiera,M.,“Towardconflictresolutionwithdeepmulti-agentreinforcementlearning,” Journal of Air Transportation, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2022, pp. 71–80. URL https://doi.org/10.2514/1.D0296. 2

work page doi:10.2514/1.d0296 2022

[13] [13]

One to any: Distributed conflict resolution with deep multi-agent reinforcement learning and long short-term memory,

Brittain, M. W., and Wei, P., “One to any: Distributed conflict resolution with deep multi-agent reinforcement learning and long short-term memory,”AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum, 2021, p. 1952. URL https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-1952

work page doi:10.2514/6.2021-1952 2021

[14] [14]

A deep ensemble method for multi-agent reinforcement learning: A case study on air traffic control,

Ghosh, S., Laguna, S., Lim, S. H., Wynter, L., and Poonawala, H., “A deep ensemble method for multi-agent reinforcement learning: A case study on air traffic control,”Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, Vol. 31, 2021, pp. 468–476. URL https://doi.org/10.1609/icaps.v31i1.15993. 2 11

work page doi:10.1609/icaps.v31i1.15993 2021

[15] [15]

Towards multi-aircraft transfer learning for trajectory tracking,

Buelta, A., Olivares, A., and Staffetti, E., “Towards multi-aircraft transfer learning for trajectory tracking,”Proceedings of the Fifteenth USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar, 2023. URL https://hdl.handle.net/10115/ 69757. 2

2023

[16] [16]

Multiagent ReinforcementLearningMethodstoResolveDemandCapacityBalanceProblems,

Spatharis, C., Kravaris, T., Vouros, G. A., Blekas, K., Chalkiadakis, G., Garcia, J. M. C., and Fernandez, E. C., “Multiagent ReinforcementLearningMethodstoResolveDemandCapacityBalanceProblems,”Proceedingsofthe10thHellenicConference on Artificial Intelligence, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1145/3200947. 3...

work page doi:10.1145/3200947 2018

[17] [17]

Decentralized air traffic management for advanced air mobility,

de Oliveira, Í. R., Neto, E. C. P., Matsumoto, T. T., and Yu, H., “Decentralized air traffic management for advanced air mobility,”2021 Integrated Communications Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS), IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–8. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNS52807.2021.9441552. 2

work page doi:10.1109/icns52807.2021.9441552 2021

[18] [18]

A Distributed Framework for Traffic Flow Management in the Presence of Unmanned Aircraft,

Balakrishnan, H., and Chandran, B., “A Distributed Framework for Traffic Flow Management in the Presence of Unmanned Aircraft,”USA/Europe ATM R&D Seminar, 2017. URL https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/114703. 2

2017

[19] [19]

Advanced convoy control strategy for autonomously driven railway vehicles,

Henke, C., Frohleke, N., and Bocker, J., “Advanced convoy control strategy for autonomously driven railway vehicles,”IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference, 2006. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2006.1707417. 2

work page doi:10.1109/itsc.2006.1707417 2006

[20] [20]

Platoon formation: Optimized car to platoon assignment strategies and protocols,

Heinovski, J., and Dressler, F., “Platoon formation: Optimized car to platoon assignment strategies and protocols,”IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC), 2018. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/VNC.2018.8628396. 2

work page doi:10.1109/vnc.2018.8628396 2018

[21] [21]

Strategic Hub-Based Platoon Coordination Under Uncertain TravelTimes,

Johansson, A., Nekouei, E., Johansson, K. H., and Mårtensson, J., “Strategic Hub-Based Platoon Coordination Under Uncertain TravelTimes,”IEEETransactionsonIntelligentTransportationSystems,2022.URLhttps://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2021.3077467. 2

work page doi:10.1109/tits.2021.3077467 2022

[22] [22]

A Framework for Sense and Follow Convoys for Collective Autonomous Mobility,

Ishihara, A. K., Idris, H. R., and Xue, M., “A Framework for Sense and Follow Convoys for Collective Autonomous Mobility,” AIAA Aviation Forum, 2021. URL https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-2329. 2

work page doi:10.2514/6.2021-2329 2021

[23] [23]

Distraction or disruption? Autonomous trucks gain ground in US logistics,

Chottani, A., Hastings, G., Murnane, J., and Neuhaus, F., “Distraction or disruption? Autonomous trucks gain ground in US logistics,” www.mckinsey.com/industries/travel-logistics-and-infrastructure/our-insights/distraction-or-disruption-autonomous- trucks-gain-ground-in-us-logistics, 2018. 2

2018

[24] [24]

A review of truck platooning projects for energy savings,

Tsugawa, S., Jeschke, S., and Shladover, S. E., “A review of truck platooning projects for energy savings,”IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 2016. URL https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7497531. 2

arXiv 2016

[25] [25]

Enhanced self-separation decision making for autonomous flight operations in air corridors,

Liu, Z., Wang, M., and Liu, Z., “Enhanced self-separation decision making for autonomous flight operations in air corridors,” Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 124, 2025, p. 102721. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2024. 102721, URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969699724001868. 2

work page doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2024 2025

[26] [26]

Analysis of Traffic Flow in Structured Urban Airspace Networks with MFD-based Feedback Control,

Chour, K., Razzaghi, P., Verma, D., Xue, M., Munishkin, A., and Kalyanam, K., “Analysis of Traffic Flow in Structured Urban Airspace Networks with MFD-based Feedback Control,”AIAA AVIATION FORUM AND ASCEND 2024, 2024, p. 4575. URL https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2024-4575. 2

work page doi:10.2514/6.2024-4575 2024

[27] [27]

A reinforcement learning approach to vehicle coordination for structured advanced air mobility,

Deniz, S., Wu, Y., Shi, Y., and Wang, Z., “A reinforcement learning approach to vehicle coordination for structured advanced air mobility,”Green Energy and Intelligent Transportation, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2024, p. 100157. https://doi.org/https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.geits.2024.100157, URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773153724000094. 2

work page doi:10.1016/j.geits.2024.100157 2024

[28] [28]

Investigation of Merge Assist Policies to Improve Safety of Drone Traffic in a Constrained Urban Airspace,

Doole, M., Ellerbroek, J., and Hoekstra, J. M., “Investigation of Merge Assist Policies to Improve Safety of Drone Traffic in a Constrained Urban Airspace,”Aerospace, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace9030120, URL https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/9/3/120. 2

work page doi:10.3390/aerospace9030120 2022

[29] [29]

Hybrid transformer based multi - agent reinforcement learning for multiple unpiloted aerial vehicle coor dination in air corridors,

Yu, L., Li, Z., Ansari, N., and Sun, X., “ Hybrid Transformer Based Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Multiple Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Coordination in Air Corridors ,”IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, , No. 01, 2025, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2025.3532204, URL https://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/TMC.2025.3532204. 2

work page doi:10.1109/tmc.2025.3532204 2025

[30] [30]

Scalable Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningthroughIntelligentInformationAggregation,

Nayak, S., Choi, K., Ding, W., Dolan, S., Gopalakrishnan, K., and Balakrishnan, H., “Scalable Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningthroughIntelligentInformationAggregation,”Proceedingsofthe40thInternationalConferenceonMachineLearning, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 202, PMLR, 2023, pp. 25817–25833. URL https://proceedings.mlr.press/ v202/naya...

2023

[31] [31]

Cooperation and Fairness in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning,

Aloor, J. J., Nayak, S. N., Dolan, S., and Balakrishnan, H., “Cooperation and Fairness in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning,” ACM J. Auton. Transport. Syst., Vol. 2, No. 2, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1145/3702012, URL https://doi.org/10.1145/3702012. 2 12

work page doi:10.1145/3702012 2024

[32] [32]

https://wisk.aero/aircraft/

Wisk, 2025. https://wisk.aero/aircraft/. 5

2025

[33] [33]

https://www.jobyaviation.com/

Joby Aviation, 2025. https://www.jobyaviation.com/

2025

[34] [34]

UAM Variable Separation,

Mogford, R., Peknik, D., and Zelman, J., “UAM Variable Separation,” Presentation, NASA Ames Research Center, 2020. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20205006214

arXiv 2020

[35] [35]

Resolving Conflicting Constraints in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Layered Safety,

Choi, J. J., Aloor, J. J., Li, J., Mendoza, M. G., Balakrishnan, H., and Tomlin, C., “Resolving Conflicting Constraints in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Layered Safety,”Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems, LosAngeles, CA, USA, 2025. https://doi.org/10.15607/RSS.2025.XXI.094. 5

work page doi:10.15607/rss.2025.xxi.094 2025

[36] [36]

Interactive Supercomputing on 40,000 Cores for Machine Learning and Data Analysis , url =

Reuther, A., Kepner, J., Byun, C., Samsi, S., Arcand, W., Bestor, D., Bergeron, B., Gadepally, V., Houle, M., Hubbell, M., Jones, M., Klein, A., Milechin, L., Mullen, J., Prout, A., Rosa, A., Yee, C., and Michaleas, P., “Interactive supercomputing on 40,000 cores for machine learning and data analysis,”2018 IEEE High Performance extreme Computing Conferen...

work page doi:10.1109/hpec.2018.8547629 2018