Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 56 references

Alcohol induced surface charging of colloidal quantum dots for controllable electrophoretic deposition processing

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Adding alcohols to a non-polar dispersion of oleate-capped PbSe quantum dots creates a controllable positive surface charge, enabling electrophoretic film formation and size-selective separation.

desk verdict Useful, reproducible EPD thickness control and size separation from alcohol charging of QDs, but the proposed hydrogen-bond mechanism is not established—ligand stripping is a live alternative. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.07310 v1 pith:RWVTUOZ6 submitted 2025-05-12 physics.app-ph cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Jiaming Su , Kai Gu , Qingchen Wang , Kaiying Min , Zhiyuan Gao , Haizheng Zhong This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.app-phcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords surfacechargealcoholhydroxylgroupelectrophoreticdepositionquantumdotssizedependenteffectzetapotentialhydrogenbondingPbSe
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports that adding an alcohol to a non-polar dispersion of carboxylic-acid-capped colloidal quantum dots charges the dots positively, with the zeta potential of oleate-capped PbSe rising from +1.6 mV to +13.4 mV as the alcohol fraction increases. The authors attribute this charging to intermolecular hydrogen bonds between the alcohol's hydroxyl group and the carboxylate headgroups of the surface ligands, which shift electron density away from the alcohol's active hydrogen and leave it more positive. They use this alcohol-induced charging to control electrophoretic deposition, producing smooth quantum dot films with thicknesses continuously tunable from about 400 nm to 5 µm, and to separate a mixed sample of dots into monodisperse size fractions. A sympathetic reader would value this because surface charge in non-polar solvents has been a largely uncontrolled variable in quantum dot processing, and the paper turns it into a straightforward quantitative handle.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the intermolecular hydrogen bond between the alcohol's hydroxyl group and the carboxylate headgroup of the oleate ligand. According to the paper, this bond shifts electron density away from the alcohol's active hydrogen, leaving the hydrogen more positive, which is how the quantum dot gains its positive surface charge. This charge then enters the electrophoretic deposition model through the Henry equation under the Hückel approximation, $J_0 = \frac{2}{3\eta} C \varepsilon \zeta E_\infty$, which connects the measured zeta potential to deposition flux and explains why film thickness grows with alcohol ratio. The hydrogen-bond interpretation is carried by 1H NMR chemical-shift changes and DFT charge-density difference maps, and it is contrasted with the ligand-stripping picture reported for short-chain alcohols.

What would settle it

After adding methanol to a dispersion of oleate-capped PbSe QDs, centrifuge the mixture and analyze the supernatant by 1H NMR or mass spectrometry: if free oleic acid appears in the supernatant while the zeta potential is rising, then the charging is caused by ligand stripping instead of the proposed hydrogen-bond electron-cloud shift; if no free oleate appears, the hydrogen-bond mechanism remains supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the surface charge of carboxylic-acid-capped colloidal quantum dots in non-polar solvents can be deliberately and continuously tuned by adding alcohols, and that this charging is caused specifically by intermolecular hydrogen bonds between the alcohol hydroxyl and the carboxylate headgroup of the oleate ligand. The paper argues that these hydrogen bonds shift the electron cloud of the alcohol's active hydrogen, making the hydrogen more positive and thereby giving the dot a net positive charge that grows with the alcohol volume fraction. Evidence includes the zeta potential rising from +1.6 mV to +13.4 mV with increasing ethanol/hexane ratio, a roughly linear increase in single-dot charge inferred from integrated current and deposited mass, 1H NMR peak shifts consistent with hydrogen-bonded alcohol, and DFT charge-density differences showing electron depletion at the active hydrogen and accumulation at the carboxylate oxygen. On this basis the paper develops a five-stage microscopic mechanism for alcohol-induced electrophoretic deposition and demonstrates both controlled film growth and size-selective separation of PbSe quantum dots.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the added alcohol raises the zeta potential by forming intermolecular hydrogen bonds with the carboxylate headgroups of the oleate ligands, shifting electron density away from the alcohol's active hydrogen, rather than by stripping oleate ligands from the surface or by direct proton transfer.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Film thickness becomes a controllable output: by varying the alcohol-to-solvent ratio alone, the authors tune PbSe film thickness from ~1.9 µm to ~5.2 µm in methanol/toluene and from ~126 nm to ~1.5 µm in ethanol/hexane.
  • The charging route is not limited to one material: the same alcohol addition raises the zeta potential of PbS, Cu2Se, CuInSe2, and CsPbBr3 dots, and of dots capped with other carboxylic acids, so the processing knob is broadly applicable.
  • Because the ligand count per dot grows with size, larger dots develop a higher positive charge, which lets a mixed batch of dots be separated into monodisperse fractions by sequential electrophoretic deposition.
  • The sign of the charge is controllable: the dots deposit on the negative electrode, opposite to several previously reported QD systems that deposit on the positive electrode, offering a complementary processing route.
  • The slope of thickness versus alcohol ratio decreases as the hydroxyl hydrogen becomes less active (methanol > ethanol > isopropanol > n-butanol), so the hydrogen-bond strength of the alcohol can be used to preset the sensitivity of the deposition.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the hydrogen-bond mechanism is the true cause, the zeta-potential increase should correlate quantitatively with the alcohol's hydrogen-bond donor strength, so one could predict the charging slope for any new alcohol from a known acidity scale before measuring it.
  • The same mechanism might be ported to non-carboxylate ligands, such as phosphonic acids or amines, that can act as hydrogen-bond acceptors, potentially extending alcohol-induced charging to a wider family of nanocrystals.
  • The in situ inference of single-dot charge from current integration and deposited mass could be used as a real-time process monitor for industrial EPD, provided the linear zeta-potential-to-charge relation holds at higher fields and concentrations.
  • Because the paper shows charge neutralization at the electrode triggers aggregation, the rate of neutralization could be tuned to control film porosity or to pattern films, though the paper does not explore this.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports that adding short-chain alcohols to non-polar dispersions of oleate-capped PbSe colloidal quantum dots (QDs) increases their zeta potential from +1.6 mV to +13.4 mV, enabling controlled electrophoretic deposition (EPD) on the negative electrode. The authors characterize this alcohol-induced surface charging using zeta potential, 1H NMR, FTIR, and DFT calculations, and attribute the positive charging to an electron-cloud shift of the alcohol's active hydrogen mediated by intermolecular hydrogen bonding with the carboxylate headgroup. They develop an EPD model based on the Hamaker equation, demonstrate thickness control from 400 nm to 5 μm by varying solvent ratio, electric field, concentration, and deposition time, and propose a five-stage microscopic mechanism for alcohol-induced EPD. They further demonstrate size-selective separation of mixed PbSe QDs into three monodisperse fractions and show that the charging behavior extends to other carboxylic-acid-capped QD systems (PbS, Cu2Se, CuInSe2, CsPbBr3) and to QDs with mixed ligands.

Significance. The practical contribution is significant: the work offers a simple, quantitative handle for inducing positive surface charge on colloidal QDs in non-polar solvents, with reproducible EPD thickness control and a demonstrated size-selective separation protocol. The EPD model (Eq. 3) uses the measured zeta potential as input and is verified against independent thickness measurements, with no fitted parameters, which is a notable strength. The universality tests across several QD compositions and ligands strengthen the empirical claims. However, the mechanistic explanation—hydrogen-bond-mediated electron-cloud shift producing net positive particle charging—is not yet supported by the evidence as presented. The empirical findings are valuable and reproducible, but the load-bearing mechanistic inference requires additional control experiments before the proposed mechanism can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Mechanism of alcohol-induced positive charging (Fig. 2c–2h)] The central mechanistic claim—that the zeta-potential rise from +1.6 to +13.4 mV is caused by intermolecular H-bonding between the alcohol hydroxyl and the carboxylate headgroup—is underdetermined because no control is performed for oleate desorption. Reference 30 (Hassinen et al., JACS 2012), cited in the Introduction, shows that short-chain alcohols (methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, n-butanol) strip X-type ligands from PbSe and CdSe QDs and quench their luminescence; the alcohols used here are exactly that class. The observations in this section—increased positive zeta potential, 1H NMR shifts of the active hydrogen, and the yellow anodic deposit with C–O and O–H stretches—are all compatible with partial ligand stripping and/or proton exchange with released oleic acid. The authors should add control experiments, e.g., 1H NMR of the olefinic protons of surface oleate, quantitative FTIR of the ligand shell before and after alcohol addition, and/or luminescence quenching measurements, to distinguish H-bond-mediated charging from ligand stripping. Without this, the proposed electron-cloud-shift mechanism is not established.
  2. [Mechanism of alcohol-induced positive charging, DFT (Fig. 2f and 2h)] The DFT calculation shows only a local charge-density redistribution on a neutral model cluster (the carboxylate–alcohol hydrogen bond); it does not demonstrate net particle charging. A positive zeta potential requires a net positive charge on the QD, but the figure and text describe the proton hydrogen losing density and the carbonyl oxygen gaining density, which is a polarization of the hydrogen bond, not a transfer of charge to the QD. The manuscript needs either a calculation of the net charge on the QD+ligand+alcohol aggregate or a clear statement that the DFT evidence supports only the local interaction and that the net charging step is inferred from the zeta-potential and EPD measurements. As written, the DFT is not load-bearing evidence for the net-charging mechanism.
  3. [Mechanism of alcohol-induced positive charging, NMR paragraph (Fig. 2e and S13)] The 1H NMR interpretation is internally confusing. The text states that the methanol active-hydrogen peak downshifts from 1.85 to 3.36 ppm with increasing methanol concentration, attributed to reduced shielding from enhanced H-bonding; then, in the presence of QDs, the peak 'isolates and downshifts to 3.85 ppm.' Two sentences later it says the shielding effect of the active hydrogen is enhanced and the splitting peak moves to high field. Downfield (higher ppm) corresponds to deshielding, not enhanced shielding, so the description is contradictory. The authors should clarify whether the QD-induced shift is upfield or downfield and which species the splitting at 3.67 ppm belongs to; this is important because the NMR shifts are the main experimental evidence for the proposed H-bonding interaction.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The phrase 'fixed amounts of alcohols' should be 'a fixed amount of alcohol'; 'quantum dots solution' should be 'quantum dot solution'; and 'nuclear magnetic spectroscopy' should be 'nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy'.
  2. [Figure 1g] The sentence 'With the extension of the deposition time' should be 'With extension of the deposition time'.
  3. [Mechanism of alcohol-induced positive charging] The sentence 'Base on the above results' should be 'Based on the above results'.
  4. [DFT simulation details (Supplementary Methods)] The DFT section should report the model cluster size, the number of atoms, and whether the 400 Ry plane-wave cutoff was tested for convergence; the caption of Fig. 2f refers to a 'QD surface' but the calculation appears to be a small cluster, which should be clarified.
  5. [Size-dependent surface charging (Fig. 4b)] The 4.64 nm PbSe sample deviates from the linear zeta-potential-versus-size trend; the text notes this deviation but gives no explanation, which would help the reader assess the claimed size-ligand-charge relationship.
  6. [Data availability / reproducibility] The paper cites reference 36 for the deep-learning detection and segmentation model used to analyze TEM images; if the model or software is publicly available, a link or availability statement should be provided in the Supporting Information.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the EPD thickness model is checked against independent thickness data, and the underdetermined hydrogen-bonding mechanism is a correctness risk, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper does not exhibit a load-bearing circular reduction. The central quantitative claims are: (i) zeta potential increases with alcohol content from +1.6 to +13.4 mV, an electrophoretic light scattering measurement; (ii) EPD film thickness increases with alcohol ratio and is described by the Hamaker/Henry model in Eq. 3, which takes the measured zeta potential, concentration, and dielectric constant as inputs and is checked against independently measured SEM thickness values; and (iii) per-QD surface charge is obtained by integrating the EPD current and dividing by the number of deposited QDs estimated from film thickness, then compared with zeta potential as a consistency check. None of these steps fits a parameter to the claimed output. The hydrogen-bonding mechanism is inferred from NMR shifts, FTIR bands, and DFT charge-density differences; the inference is underdetermined because ref. 30, cited in the introduction only for acetonitrile-induced ligand removal, shows that short-chain alcohols strip X-type ligands, an alternative origin of positive charging that the paper does not experimentally exclude. Underdetermination of a causal explanation is a correctness risk, not a circularity, because the mechanism is not defined in terms of the measured zeta potential or the separated sizes. The only self-citations, refs. 31 and 36, are methodological: synthesis, TGA ligand quantification, and TEM particle-counting software, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from them. Therefore no circular step can be exhibited, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central EPD model uses measured zeta potential as input and standard electrokinetic relations; no hidden fitted parameters are apparent. The main assumptions are the validity of zeta potential in low-polarity solvents, the applicability of the Hückel-Henry mobility model, the attribution of integrated EPD current to QD charge transport, and the adequacy of PBE DFT for the hydrogen-bonding picture. The paper does not introduce new entities.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Henry equation under Hückel approximation applies to charged QDs in low-dielectric non-polar solvents
    Used to derive Equations 2 and 3 for electrophoretic mobility in non-polar systems; validity in such low-conductivity media is assumed.
  • standard math Hamaker's EPD flux model (Equation 1) governs deposition
    Basis for the thickness prediction; standard in the EPD literature.
  • domain assumption The integrated current-time curve charge can be attributed to QD charge transport and dissociated alcohol molecules, with a separable QD fraction
    Used to derive per-QD surface charge in Figure 2b; side reactions and carbonized deposits complicate the attribution.
  • standard math DFT with the PBE functional captures the hydrogen-bonding interaction between methanol and carboxylate ligands
    Informs the proposed electron-cloud-shift mechanism; no validation against higher-level theory or experiment is shown.
  • domain assumption Zeta potential measured by electrophoretic light scattering in non-polar solvents reflects particle surface charge
    Used as the core quantitative measure of surface charging; low ionic strength can make such measurements unreliable.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Alcohol induced surface charging of colloidal quantum dots for controllable electrophoretic deposition processing." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RWVTUOZ6

@misc{pith2026250507310,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Alcohol induced surface charging of colloidal quantum dots for controllable electrophoretic deposition processing},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RWVTUOZ6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.07310}
}
read the original abstract

In this work, we report an alcohol-induced surface charging route of colloidal QDs to achieve controllable electrophoretic deposition processing. By adding a fixed amounts of alcohols into a preformed quantum dots solution in non-polar solvents, the colloidal quantum dots can be positively charged, and then deposited on negative electrode under applied electric field. The surface charging of PbSe quantum dots was investigated by zeta potential, nuclear magnetic resonance, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and discrete Fourier transform calculations. It was found that the zeta potential of oleate acid capped PbSe QDs increases from +1.6 mV to +13.4 mV with the amount of alcohol solvent increasing. The alcohol-induced zeta potential increasing can be explained to the electron cloud shift of active hydrogen mediated by intermolecular hydrogen bonds between carboxy acid and alcohol. Considering the influence of surface charging of quantum dots on their dispersibility, we describe the microscopic mechanism of alcohol-induced electrophoretic deposition processing. Furthermore, we developed a size-selective separation protocol by controlling alcohol-induced electrophoretic deposition processing.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    P.; Talapin, D

    Garcí a De Arquer, F. P.; Talapin, D. V.; Klimov, V. I.; Arakawa, Y.; Bayer, M.; Sargent, E. H. Semiconductor Quantum Dots: Technological Progress and Future Challenges. Science. 2021, 373, eaaz8541

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    L.; Brus, L

    Efros, A. L.; Brus, L. E. Nanocrystal Quantum Dots: From Discovery to Modern Development. ACS Nano. 2021, 15, 6192–6210

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    R.; Lifshitz, E.; Sargent, E

    Kagan, C. R.; Lifshitz, E.; Sargent, E. H.; Talapin, D. V. Building Devices from Colloidal Quantum Dots. Science. 2016, 353, aac5523

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Scholes, G. D. Controlling the Optical Properties of Inorganic Nanoparticles. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2008, 18, 1157–1172

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    J.; Brewer, A

    Calvin, J. J.; Brewer, A. S.; Alivisatos, A. P. The Role of Organic Ligand Shell Structures in Colloidal Nanocrystal Synthesis. Nat. Synth. 2022, 1, 127–137

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    A.; Ling, D.; Hyeon, T.; Talapin, D

    Boles, M. A.; Ling, D.; Hyeon, T.; Talapin, D. V. The Surface Science of Nanocrystals. Nat. Mater. 2016, 15, 141–153

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    H., Boccaccini, A

    Dickerson, J. H., Boccaccini, A. R., Electrophoretic Deposition of Nanomaterials; Springer New York: New York, NY, 2012

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    O.; Vandeperre, L

    Van Der Biest, O. O.; Vandeperre, L. J. ELECTROPHORETIC DEPOSITION OF MATERIALS. Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 1999, 29, 327–352

    work page 1999

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    A Review on Fundamentals and Applications of Electrophoretic Deposition (EPD)

    Besra, L.; Liu, M. A Review on Fundamentals and Applications of Electrophoretic Deposition (EPD). Prog. Mater Sci. 2007, 52, 1–61

    2007

  2. [10]

    A.; Xia, Y.; Steigerwald, M

    Islam, M. A.; Xia, Y.; Steigerwald, M. L.; Yin, M.; Liu, Z.; O’Brien, S.; Levicky, R.; Herman, I. P. Addition, Suppression, and Inhibition in the Electrophoretic Deposition of Nanocrystal Mixture Films for CdSe Nanocrystals with γ-Fe2 O3 and Au Nanocrystals. Nano Lett. 2003, 3...

    2003

  3. [11]

    A.; Xia, Y.; Telesca, D

    Islam, M. A.; Xia, Y.; Telesca, D. A.; Steigerwald, M. L.; Herman, I. P. Controlled Electrophoretic Deposition of Smooth and Robust Films of CdSe Nanocrystals. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 49–54

    2004

  4. [12]

    Whan Lee, S.; Zhang, D.; Herman, I. P. Rapid and Multi -Step, Patterned Electrophoretic Deposition of Nanocrystals Using Electrodes Covered with Dielectric Barriers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 104, 053113

    2014

  5. [13]

    O.; Ha, D

    Otelaja, O. O.; Ha, D. -H.; Ly, T.; Zhang, H.; Robinson, R. D. Highly Conductive Cu 2– x S Nanoparticle Films through Room -Temperature Processing and an Order of Magnitude Enhancement of Conductivity via Electrophoretic Deposition. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces . 2014, 6, 18911–18920

    2014

  6. [14]

    Yu, Y.; Yu, D.; Orme, C. A. Reversible, Tunable, Electric -Field Driven Assembly of Silver Nanocrystal Superlattices. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 3862–3869

    2017

  7. [15]

    K.; Scheidt, R

    Ravi, V. K.; Scheidt, R. A.; DuBose, J.; Kamat, P. V. Hierarchical Arrays of Cesium Lead Halide Perovskite Nanocrystals through Electrophoretic Deposition. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 8887–8894

    2018

  8. [16]

    T.; Achtstein, A

    Aniskevich, Y.; Radchanka, A.; Antanovich, A.; Prudnikau, A.; Quick, M. T.; Achtstein, A. W.; Jo, J. H.; Ragoisha, G.; Artemyev, M.; Streltsov, E. Electrophoretically -Deposited CdSe Quantum Dot Films for Electrochromic Displays and Smart Windows. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2021, 4...

    2021

  9. [17]

    W.; Soulimane, T.; Silien, C.; Ryan, K

    Zhang, Y.; Pham, X.-M.; Keating, T.; Jia, N.; Mullen, A.; Laishram, D.; Gao, M.-Y.; Corbett, B.; Liu, P.; Sun, X. W.; Soulimane, T.; Silien, C.; Ryan, K. M.; Ma, Z.; Liu, N. Highly Efficient Inverted Light -Emitting Diodes Based on Vertically Aligned Cd Se/CdS Nanorod Layers F...

    2024

  10. [18]

    Liu, G.; Wu, X.; Xiong, F.; Yang, J.; Liu, Y.; Liu, J.; Li, Z.; Qin, Z.; Deng, S.; Yang, B. -R. Fluorescent, Multifunctional Anti -Counterfeiting, Fast Response Electrophoretic Display Based on TiO2/CsPbBr3 Composite Particles. Light Sci. Appl. 2024, 13, 198

    2024

  11. [19]

    Multiparticle Synergistic Electrophoretic Deposition Strategy for High -Efficiency and High - Resolution Displays

    Li, X.; Zhao, J.; Xiao, H.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, M.; Zhang, X.; Yan, X.; Tang, A.; Chen, L. Multiparticle Synergistic Electrophoretic Deposition Strategy for High -Efficiency and High - Resolution Displays. ACS Nano. 2024, 18, 17715–17724

    2024

  12. [20]

    Jia, S.; Banerjee, S.; Herman, I. P. Mechanism of the Electrophoretic Deposition of CdSe Nanocrystal Films: Influence of the Nanocrystal Surface and Charge. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2008, 112, 162–171

    2008

  13. [21]

    Zhao, J.; Chen, L.; Li, D.; Shi, Z.; Liu, P.; Yao, Z.; Yang, H.; Zou, T.; Zhao, B.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, H.; Yang, Y.; Cao, W.; Yan, X.; Zhang, S.; Sun, X. W. Large -Area Patterning of Full- Color Quantum Dot Arrays beyond 1000 Pixels per Inch by Selective E lectrophoretic Deposit...

    2021

  14. [22]

    Park, Y.; Kang, H.; Jeong, W.; Son, H.; Ha, D. -H. Electrophoretic Deposition of Aged and Charge Controlled Colloidal Copper Sulfide Nanoparticles. Nanomaterials. 2021, 11, 133

    2021

  15. [23]

    S.; Kim, H

    Song, M.; Kim, Y.; Baek, D. S.; Kim, H. Y.; Gu, D. H.; Li, H.; Cunning, B. V.; Yang, S. E.; Heo, S. H.; Lee, S.; Kim, M.; Lim, J. S.; Jeong, H. Y.; Yoo, J. -W.; Joo, S. H.; Ruoff, R. S.; Kim, J. Y.; Son, J. S. 3D Microprinting of Inorganic Porous Materi als by Chemical Linking...

    2023

  16. [24]

    Nanoscale Electric Vehicle

    Xiao, H.; Zhao, J.; Li, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, M.; Cao, W.; Yan, X.; Zhang, X.; Sun, X. W.; Chen, L. “Nanoscale Electric Vehicle” for the Patterning of Nanomaterials: Selective Electrophoretic Deposition of Programmable Silica Composite Nanoparticles. Nano Energy. 2024, 128, 109906

    2024

  17. [25]

    W.; Costi, R.; Bulović, V

    Song, K. W.; Costi, R.; Bulović, V. Electrophoretic Deposition of CdSe/ZnS Quantum Dots for Light‐Emitting Devices. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 1420–1423

    2013

  18. [27]

    -K.; Yoon, S.; Lee, M

    Kang, H.; Park, Y.; Hong, Y. -K.; Yoon, S.; Lee, M. -H.; Ha, D. -H. Solvent-Induced Charge Formation and Electrophoretic Deposition of Colloidal Iron Oxide Nanoparticles. Surf. Interfaces. 2021, 22, 100815

    2021

  19. [29]

    Ultrahigh-Resolution, High -Fidelity Quantum Dot Pixels Patterned by Dielectric Electrophoretic Deposition

    Luo, C.; Ding, Y.; Ren, Z.; Wu, C.; Huo, Y.; Zhou, X.; Zheng, Z.; Wang, X.; Chen, Y. Ultrahigh-Resolution, High -Fidelity Quantum Dot Pixels Patterned by Dielectric Electrophoretic Deposition. Light Sci. Appl. 2024, 13, 273

    2024

  20. [30]

    F.; M artins, J

    Hassinen, A.; Moreels, I.; De Nolf, K.; Smet, P. F.; M artins, J. C.; Hens, Z. Short -Chain Alcohols Strip X -Type Ligands and Quench the Luminescence of PbSe and CdSe Quantum Dots, Acetonitrile Does Not. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 20705–20712

    2012

  21. [31]

    Size Dependent Specific Heat Capacity of PbSe Nanocrystals

    Gu, K.; Wu, H.; Su, J.; Sun, P.; Tan, P.-H.; Zhong, H. Size Dependent Specific Heat Capacity of PbSe Nanocrystals. Nano Lett. 2024, 24, 4038–4043

    2024

  22. [32]

    Kornhuber, K.; Kavalakkatt, J.; Lin, X.; Ennaoui, A.; Lux-Steiner, M. Ch. In Situ Monitoring of Electrophoretic Deposition of Cu2ZnSnS4 Nanocrystals. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 5845–5850

    2013

  23. [33]

    D.; Mengel, S.; Fafarman, A

    Dillon, A. D.; Mengel, S.; Fafarman, A. T. Influence of Compact, Inorganic Surface Ligands on the Electrophoretic Deposition of Semiconductor Nanocrystals at Low Voltage. Langmuir. 2018, 34, 9598–9605

    2018

  24. [34]

    R.; Orme, C

    Panta, K. R.; Orme, C. A.; Flanders, B. N. Quantitatively Controlled Electrophoretic Deposition of Nanocrystal Films from Non-Aqueous Suspensions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023, 636, 363– 377

    2023

  25. [35]

    Hamaker, H. C. Formation of a Deposit by Electrophoresis. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1940, 35, 279–287

    1940

  26. [36]

    Deep Learning Models for Colloidal Nanocrystal Synthesis

    Gu, K.; Liang, Y.; Su, J.; Sun, P.; Peng, J.; Miao, N.; Sun, Z.; Fu, Y.; Zhong, H.; Zhang, J. Deep Learning Models for Colloidal Nanocrystal Synthesis. arXiv e -prints. 2024, arXiv:2412.10838. Acknowledgement This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation o...

    2024 arXiv

  27. [37]

    Synthesis conditions and size of PbSe and other different kinds of quantum dots

    Herman 2003 Au-SH Hexane None Unclear Eu2O3-TOPO Hexane Both + & - [8] Dickerson 2006 CdS-ODPA+TOPO 8*100nm rod Toluene Positive electrode - [9] Ryan 2009 CdSe-TOPO+TBP Toluene Both + & - [10] Zaban 2010 PbSeS-OA PbS-OA Toluene Both + & - [11] Benehkohal 2012 CdSe/ZnS-OA Chlor...

    2003

  28. [38]

    Effects of Surface Ligands on Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance and Stabilization of Cu2−xSe Nanocrystals

    Zhu, D.; Wang, L.; Liu, Z.; Tang, A. Effects of Surface Ligands on Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance and Stabilization of Cu2−xSe Nanocrystals. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 509, 145327

    2020

  29. [39]

    Near‐Infrared Nanophosphors Based on CuInSe 2 Quantum Dots with Near‐Unity Photoluminescence Quantum Yield for Micro‐LEDs Applications

    Lian, W.; Tu, D.; Weng, X.; Yang, K.; Li, F.; Huang, D.; Zhu, H.; Xie, Z.; Chen, X. Near‐Infrared Nanophosphors Based on CuInSe 2 Quantum Dots with Near‐Unity Photoluminescence Quantum Yield for Micro‐LEDs Applications. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, 2311011

    2024

  30. [40]

    Reducing the Chromaticity Shifts of Light‐Emitting Diodes Using Gradient‐Alloyed CdxZn1−xSeyS1−y@ZnS Core Shell Quantum Dots with Enhanced High‐Temperature Photoluminescence

    Tang, J.; Li, F.; Yang, G.; Ge, Y .; Li, Z.; Xia, Z.; Shen, H.; Zhong, H. Reducing the Chromaticity Shifts of Light‐Emitting Diodes Using Gradient‐Alloyed CdxZn1−xSeyS1−y@ZnS Core Shell Quantum Dots with Enhanced High‐Temperature Photoluminescence. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2019, 7, 1801687

    2019

  31. [41]

    Blue Light-Emitting Diodes Based on Colloidal Quantum Dots with Reduced Surface-Bulk Coupling

    Chen, X.; Lin, X.; Zhou, L.; Sun, X.; Li, R.; Chen, M.; Yang, Y .; Hou, W.; Wu, L.; Cao, W.; Zhang, X.; Yan, X.; Chen, S. Blue Light-Emitting Diodes Based on Colloidal Quantum Dots with Reduced Surface-Bulk Coupling. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 284

    2023

  32. [42]

    Siloxane -Modified ZnMgO Nanoparticles with Enhanced Colloidal Stability and Improved Quantum Dot Light-Emitting Diode Stability

    Yang, M.; Bao, H.; Jing, Y .; Ao, Z.; Wang, J.; Wu, L.; Feng, Y .; Song, T.; Wu, X.; Yan, Y .; Zhong, H. Siloxane -Modified ZnMgO Nanoparticles with Enhanced Colloidal Stability and Improved Quantum Dot Light-Emitting Diode Stability. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2025, 16, 2764–2770

    2025

  33. [43]

    A.; Herman, I

    Islam, M. A.; Herman, I. P. Electrodeposition of Patterned CdSe Nanocrystal Films Using Thermally Charged Nanocrystals. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 80, 3823–3825

    2002

  34. [44]

    A.; Xia, Y .; Steigerwald, M

    Islam, M. A.; Xia, Y .; Steigerwald, M. L.; Yin, M.; Liu, Z.; O’Brien, S.; Levicky, R.; Herman, I. P. Addition, Suppression, and Inhibition in the Electrophoretic Deposition of Nanocrystal Mixture Films for CdSe Nanocrystals with γ-Fe2 O3 and Au Nanocrystals. Nano Lett. 2003, ...

    2003

  35. [45]

    V .; Kavich, D

    Mahajan, S. V .; Kavich, D. W.; Redigolo, M. L.; Dickerson, J. H. Structural Properties of Electrophoretically Deposited Europium Oxide Nanocrystalline Thin Films. J. Mater. Sci. 2006, 41, 8160–8165

    2006

  36. [46]

    Ahmed, S.; Ryan, K. M. Centimetre Scale Assembly of Vertically Aligned and Close Packed Semiconductor Nanorods from Solution. Chem. Commun. 2009, No. 42, 6421

    2009

  37. [47]

    Quantum Dot Sensitized Solar Cells with Improved Efficiency Prepared Using Electrophoretic Deposition

    Salant, A.; Shalom, M.; Hod, I.; Faust, A.; Zaban, A.; Banin, U. Quantum Dot Sensitized Solar Cells with Improved Efficiency Prepared Using Electrophoretic Deposition. ACS Nano. 2010, 4, 5962– 5968

    2010

  38. [48]

    P.; Chavhan, S.; Tena-Zaera, R.; Demopoulos, G

    Parsi Benehkohal, N.; González -Pedro, V .; Boix, P. P.; Chavhan, S.; Tena-Zaera, R.; Demopoulos, G. P.; Mora -Seró, I. Colloidal PbS and PbSeS Quantum Dot Sensitized Solar Cells Prepared by Electrophoretic Deposition. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2012, 116, 16391–16397

    2012

  39. [49]

    W.; Costi, R.; Bulović, V

    Song, K. W.; Costi, R.; Bulović, V . Electrophoretic Deposition of CdSe/ZnS Quantum Dots for Light‐Emitting Devices. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 1420–1423

    2013

  40. [50]

    Selective Electrophoretic Deposition of CdSe Nanoplatelets

    Lhuillier, E.; Hease, P.; Ithurria, S.; Dubertret, B. Selective Electrophoretic Deposition of CdSe Nanoplatelets. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 4514–4520

    2014

  41. [51]

    O.; Ha, D

    Otelaja, O. O.; Ha, D. -H.; Ly, T.; Zhang, H.; Robinson, R. D. Highly Conductive Cu 2– x S Nanoparticle Films through Room -Temperature Processing and an Order of Magnitude Enhancement of Conductivity via Electrophoretic Deposition. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2014, 6, 18911–18920

    2014

  42. [52]

    D.; Le Quoc, L.; Goktas, M.; Opasanont, B.; Dastidar, S.; Mengel, S.; Baxter, J

    Dillon, A. D.; Le Quoc, L.; Goktas, M.; Opasanont, B.; Dastidar, S.; Mengel, S.; Baxter, J. B.; Fafarman, A. T. Thin Films of Copper Indium Selenide Fabricated with High Atom Economy by Electrophoretic Deposition of Nanocrystals under Flow. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2016, 154, 128–135

    2016

  43. [53]

    Yu, Y .; Yu, D.; Orme, C. A. Reversible, Tunable, Electric -Field Driven Assembly of Silver Nanocrystal Superlattices. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 3862–3869

    2017

  44. [54]

    K.; Scheidt, R

    Ravi, V . K.; Scheidt, R. A.; DuBose, J.; Kamat, P. V . Hierarchical Arrays of Cesium Lead Halide Perovskite Nanocrystals through Electrophoretic Deposition. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 8887– 8894

    2018

  45. [55]

    V .; Thanh Duong, N.; Anh Nguyen, D.; Jo, Y .; Cho, S.; Young Kim, D.; Shrestha, N

    Fulari, A. V .; Thanh Duong, N.; Anh Nguyen, D.; Jo, Y .; Cho, S.; Young Kim, D.; Shrestha, N. K.; Kim, H.; Im, H. Achieving Direct Electrophoretically Deposited Highly Stable Polymer Induced CsPbBr3 Colloidal Nanocrystal Films for High -Performance Optoelectronics. Chem. Eng....

    2022

  46. [56]

    E.; Keuleyan, S.; Sawvel, A.; Cho, E

    Xu, X.; Kweon, K. E.; Keuleyan, S.; Sawvel, A.; Cho, E. J.; Orme, C. Rapid In Situ Ligand‐ Exchange Process Used to Prepare 3D PbSe Nanocrystal Superlattice Infrared Photodetectors. Small. 2021, 17, 2101166

    2021

  47. [57]

    D.; Mengel, S.; Fafarman, A

    Dillon, A. D.; Mengel, S.; Fafarman, A. T. Influence of Compact, Inorganic Surface Ligands on the Electrophoretic Deposition of Semiconductor Nanocrystals at Low V oltage. Langmuir. 2018, 34, 9598–9605

    2018

  48. [58]

    Zhao, J.; Chen, L.; Li, D.; Shi, Z.; Liu, P.; Yao, Z.; Yang, H.; Zou, T.; Zhao, B.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, H.; Yang, Y .; Cao, W.; Yan, X.; Zhang, S.; Sun, X. W. Large-Area Patterning of Full-Color Quantum Dot Arrays beyond 1000 Pixels per Inch by Selective E lectrophoretic Depositi...

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.