Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 42 references

Single Antenna Tracking and Localization of RIS-enabled Vehicular Users

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Coded smart-surface reflections let one antenna localize and track several vehicles, cutting localization error by up to three times versus delay-only methods.

desk verdict Real idea, but the tracking results rely on oracle acceleration and the default NT=2 makes Doppler unobservable. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.15570 v2 pith:RY4ZT3D6 submitted 2024-11-23 cs.IT eess.SPmath.IT

Somayeh Aghashahi , Zolfa Zeinalpour-Yazdi , Aliakbar Tadaion , Mahdi Boloursaz Mashhadi , Ahmed Elzanaty This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.ITeess.SPmath.IT
keywords reconfigurableintelligentsurfaceRISlocalizationmulti-usertrackingextendedKalmanfiltertime-of-arrivalestimationDopplerCramér-Raolowerboundvehicularnetworks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to show that the location and velocity of several vehicles, each carrying a reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS), can be estimated and tracked using only one transmit antenna and a few single-antenna receivers, even with fixed scatterers present. The key idea is to design the RIS phase shifts so that reflections from different vehicles become separable codes and scatterer reflections cancel, then to read out, per vehicle and receiver, the total path delay and the sum of the cosines of the angles at the RIS. These two quantities are enough to localize each RIS through a least-squares problem and to track it with an extended Kalman filter. If the method works as reported, it offers a low-complexity radio localization option for vehicular RIS systems and reduces localization error by up to a factor of three compared with a time-of-arrival-only approach.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the phase-profile matrix $\Omega_k(t,n_T)=\omega_{k,t}\Omega_k^{(n_T)}$ programmed into each RIS. The paper sets $\omega_{k,2t}=-\omega_{k,2t-1}$ so that subtracting even-slot from odd-slot received matrices $\mathbf{Y}'_{n_r,n_T}=\frac{1}{2}(\mathbf{Y}_{n_r,n_T,o}-\mathbf{Y}_{n_r,n_T,e})$ cancels the fixed scatterer contributions; it chooses the per-RIS code vectors $\gamma_k$ as orthogonal columns of an FFT matrix to separate the $K$ users; and it toggles only the second RIS element between odd and even blocks so that the nonlinear system for $\alpha_{k,n_r}$ collapses to a single-exponent least-squares solution $\hat{\alpha}_{k,n_r}=\frac{\lambda}{2\pi d}\arg\!\left(\frac{1}{N_T}\sum_{n_T=1}^{N_T/2}\frac{\hat{s}_{k,n_r,2n_T-1}-\hat{s}_{k,n_r,2n_T}}{\Omega_{k,2,2}^{(2n_T-1)}-\Omega_{k,2,2}^{(2n_T)}}\right)$. The measurement vector used by both the initialization and the extended Kalman filter is the concatenation of the estimated path sums $\hat{\xi}_{k,n_r}=c\hat{\tau}_{k,n_r}$ and the estimated $\hat{\alpha}_{k,n_r}$, related to the RIS position by equations (13) and (14) of the paper.

What would settle it

Run Algorithm 3 with the same geometry and parameters as Section VI but withhold the true acceleration from the tracker and insert an abrupt turn mid-path; if tracking error rises above the error of repeating the static localization at each step, then the reported tracking accuracy depends on knowing the vehicle's maneuvers in advance.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a moving RIS is not just a reflector to be calibrated away but a target whose position and velocity can be read directly from the reflected signal. With a single-antenna transmitter and $N_r$ single-antenna receivers, the paper estimates, for each RIS $k$ and receiver $n_r$, the delay $\tau_{k,n_r}$ of the Tx\textendash RIS\textendash Rx path and the geometric parameter $\alpha_{k,n_r}=\cos\phi_k+\cos\theta_{k,n_r}$, the sum of the cosines of the angle of arrival at the RIS and the angle of departure from it. Because $\tau_{k,n_r}$ fixes the ellipse of points whose Tx\textendash RIS\textendash Rx path length equals $c\tau_{k,n_r}$, and $\alpha_{k,n_r}$ fixes a second curve that depends on the RIS orientation, their intersection localizes the RIS; the paper solves this as a least-squares problem and feeds the same measurements into an extended Kalman filter that tracks position and velocity over time. The reported result is that this geometry-augmented estimator outperforms a ToA-only baseline by up to a factor of three in localization error, and that the tracking filter further reduces the error along a trajectory.

Load-bearing premise

The tracking filter assumes the receiver is given each vehicle's acceleration vector at every prediction step, and the paper supplies no way to estimate or adapt it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A roadside node with one transmit antenna and a handful of single-antenna receivers can simultaneously separate and track several RIS-equipped vehicles in an environment with fixed scatterers.
  • For a target localization accuracy of 0.1 m, the method needs roughly 20% less transmit power than the ToA-only benchmark, or it can reach the same accuracy with half the number of subcarriers.
  • The same OFDM waveform used for communication carries the delay and $\alpha$ measurements, so localization can be layered onto an existing data link without extra ranging pulses.
  • The derived PEB heat map gives a design rule: receivers should be placed so that vehicle paths stay near the receivers, where the bound is lowest, rather than near the transmitter region where the bound rises.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension not studied here is estimating the acceleration online, for example with an interacting-multiple-model filter; that would show how much of the reported tracking accuracy survives when the known-acceleration input is removed.
  • The same sign-alternation and orthogonal-code construction should transfer to any backscatter tag with a controllable reflection phase, not only vehicular RISs, so the separation principle may extend to low-power IoT localization.
  • Because the gap between the simulated localization error and the PEB is attributed to FFT resolution, super-resolution delay and Doppler estimators are a direct, testable route to closing that gap.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper considers a scenario with a single-antenna transmitter, multiple single-antenna receivers, and multiple mobile users each equipped with a reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS). It proposes a phase-shift design that alternates sign over time to cancel static scatterers and uses orthogonal codewords to separate signals from different RISs. From the received OFDM signals, the authors estimate time of arrival, Doppler frequency, and a geometric parameter alpha equal to the sum of the cosines of the angle of arrival and angle of departure at the RIS. These parameters are used in a least-squares localization problem and in an extended Kalman filter for tracking. The paper also derives Cramér-Rao lower bounds for the position, ToA, and alpha, and compares the localization error with the ToA-based benchmark of [31], reporting up to a factor of three improvement. Simulation results are provided for localization accuracy versus bandwidth, number of subcarriers, power, and number of receivers, and for tracking accuracy over several paths.

Significance. The paper addresses a timely problem—localization and tracking of RIS-equipped vehicles—and is, to my knowledge, the first to treat tracking of mobile RISs with a single-antenna transmitter and multiple single-antenna receivers. The proposed phase-shift design and the joint estimation of ToA and alpha are self-consistent, and the CRLB derivation provides a useful benchmark. The localization comparison against [31] is meaningful because the same phase-shift design and number of transmissions are used for both methods. If the two issues identified below are resolved, the work would be a useful contribution to RIS-aided localization with low-complexity infrastructure. At present, however, the tracking results are conditional on oracle knowledge of acceleration and initial velocity, and the default simulation parameters make the Doppler frequency unobservable in the proposed estimator.

major comments (3)
  1. [Table II, Section III-B, Algorithm 1] Table II sets NT = 2, and this value is used in the default localization and tracking simulations (Figs. 3, 5–11). In Section III-B, Algorithm 1 estimates tau_{k,nr} and f_{d,k,nr} by taking a 2D FFT of the matrix R_{k,nr} in C^{N x NT/2} formed from (6). With NT = 2, R_{k,nr} has a single column, so the Doppler dimension of the 2D FFT has length one and f_d is unobservable; the IFFT variant in Algorithm 1 provides no additional information. The later Doppler-removal step in (7) and the estimate of alpha in (12) both rely on the estimated f_d. Consequently, the localization and tracking results shown for the default NT = 2 settings are not supported by Algorithm 1 as written. Please either run the default simulations with NT > 2 or give a Doppler estimation procedure that works when NT/2 = 1.
  2. [Section IV, eq. (17), Algorithm 3] The EKF prediction step x_k[n|n-1] = A x_k[n-1|n-1] + B a_k treats the acceleration a_k as a known input, and the initialization step of Algorithm 3 says only 'estimate x_k[0|0] employing Algorithm 2,' while Algorithm 2 estimates position only and does not provide the initial velocity component of the 4D state. No estimator or adaptation rule for a_k or v_k[0] is given; the statement in Section IV that the filter 'can adapt itself ... by updating the value of acceleration' is not supported by any update equation. The tracking simulations (Figs. 9–11) use the true initial speeds (10/20 m/s) and true acceleration (2 m/s^2), so the reported tracking gains are conditional on an oracle motion model. This is a load-bearing gap for the tracking half of the central claim; the paper should either provide an acceleration/velocity estimator or clearly re-scope the contribution as tracking with externally provided motion inputs.
  3. [Section III-D, eq. (14)] The expression for alpha_{k,nr} in (14) uses absolute values of coordinate differences, e.g., |p_{k,1} - p_{t,1}| and |p_{k,1} - p_{r,nr,1}|. For the simulated geometry (Tx at (0,0), Rxs on the x-axis, RIS at (7,7)), these absolute values change the sign of the departure terms with respect to the standard steering-vector definition: for Rx1, the correct cos(theta) term is (p_{r,1} - p_{k,1})/||p_r - p_k|| = 5/sqrt(74), whereas (14) evaluates to -5/sqrt(74). Because (14) is used in the LS problem (15), the EKF measurement model (18), and the CRLB derivatives in (21), this potential sign inconsistency affects the correctness of the proposed estimators. Please verify the derivation of (14), state the angle convention explicitly, and ensure the simulation code is consistent with the text.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Algorithm 1, line 5] In the second arg max, the matrix subscript uses n_{1,fd} instead of n_{2,fd}; the peak should be sought over both the ToA and Doppler dimensions after the IFFT.
  2. [Section IV, complexity statement] The expression '22.4N^{1.4}' appears to be a typesetting error; it should likely be '2^{2.4} N^{1.4}' or a similar complexity expression.
  3. [Section I, contributions] The contribution bullet claiming that the localization approach 'works even with a single Rx' is not demonstrated by any simulation or identifiability analysis; all localization figures use Nr = 3 or more.
  4. [Figure 10 caption] The standard deviation sigma0 of the initial localization error is introduced in the caption, but the mechanism for generating this initial error is not described; please clarify how the initial estimate with a given sigma0 is produced.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the derivation is self-contained and benchmarked externally.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained and does not reduce to its inputs. The received-signal model in (2) defines the observation, the phase-shift design in Section III-A is constructed to separate RIS reflections and cancel scatterer contributions, and the estimators (Algorithm 1 for time-of-arrival and Doppler, equation (12) for the geometric parameter alpha, and the least-squares problem (15) for position) are derived directly from that model. The Cramer-Rao lower bound in Section V is computed from the same observation model through the Fisher information matrix, so it is a genuine bound for the stated problem rather than a repackaged input. The localization results are compared against the external benchmark [31], not against any quantity fitted to the claimed improvement. The only self-citations ([10], [11]) are prior RIS communication papers and are not load-bearing for the localization or tracking claims. The tracking EKF (Algorithm 3) does assume the acceleration vector a_k is a known input in the state model (17), which is a practical limitation, but this is an assumption about external motion knowledge, not a circular step in which a prediction is equivalent by construction to a fitted input. No parameter is fitted to the target result, no uniqueness theorem from the authors is invoked, and no known result is merely renamed. Therefore no significant circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard communication signal model assumptions (known Tx/Rx positions, known RIS orientation, single specular reflection) plus two paper-specific premises: exact scatterer cancellation by odd/even differencing, and knowledge of the vehicle acceleration in the tracking filter. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • acceleration input a_k in EKF = not estimated; true value (2 m/s^2) used in simulations
    The EKF prediction (16) uses a_k as a known input; the paper provides no estimation/adaptation rule for it, so the tracking results depend on this unstated knowledge.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Scatterers are static over the T slots and identical in odd and even columns, so subtraction (4) removes them exactly
    Section III-A uses odd/even subtraction to cancel scatterer terms; if scatterers move or vary, residual terms remain.
  • domain assumption Doppler frequency is constant over the transmission block and satisfies |fd Td T| < 1/4, allowing unambiguous sign resolution
    Section III-B and Algorithm 1 rely on this bound; at higher speeds or larger TdT the condition fails.
  • domain assumption RIS orientation psi_k,nr is known at the receivers and used in the LS problem (15)
    The localization cost (15) and EKF measurement model (18) require the orientation of each RIS relative to each Rx; no estimation of psi is provided.
  • domain assumption The reflected path via each RIS is a single specular path with the geometric relation alpha = cos phi + cos theta
    The signal model (2) and the forward models (13)-(14) assume one dominant reflection path per user, with no diffuse or multi-bounce component.
  • ad hoc to paper Acceleration a_k is a known input to the EKF prediction
    Section IV and Algorithm 3 step 4 use B a_k without an estimation procedure; this is needed for the tracking claim.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Single Antenna Tracking and Localization of RIS-enabled Vehicular Users." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RY4ZT3D6

@misc{pith2026241115570,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Single Antenna Tracking and Localization of RIS-enabled Vehicular Users},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RY4ZT3D6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15570}
}
read the original abstract

Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces (RISs) are envisioned to be employed in next generation wireless networks to enhance the communication and radio localization services. In this paper, we propose novel localization and tracking algorithms exploiting reflections through RISs at multiple receivers. We utilize a single antenna transmitter (Tx) and multiple single antenna receivers (Rxs) to estimate the position and the velocity of users (e.g. vehicles) equipped with RISs. Then, we design the RIS phase shifts to separate the signals from different users. The proposed algorithms exploit the geometry information of the signal at the RISs to localize and track the users. We also conduct a comprehensive analysis of the Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRLB) of the localization system. Compared to the time of arrival (ToA)-based localization approach, the proposed method reduces the localization error by a factor up to three. Also, the simulation results show the accuracy of the proposed tracking approach.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.15570 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A capture of the considered scenario, as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Representation of locations and AoA and AoD in a scenario including [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The localization error of the proposed approach for different number [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The localization error of the proposed approach in terms of (a): [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The localization error in terms of (a): Subcarrier bandwidth. (b): [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The localization error as the total bandwidth is fixed in terms of (a): [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: PEB (dB) of RIS localization using the Tx and Rxs. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Localization error in terms of coordinates of the RIS (a): [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Average of the CDFs of error over path 1 for different variances of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Investigation of tracking accuracy over path 1 (a): For different values [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Investigation of tracking accuracy, (a): Tracked paths. (b): Average [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [31]

    Semi-passive 3D positioning of multiple RIS-enabled users,

    K. Keykhosravi, M. F. Keskin, S. Dwivedi, G. Seco-Granados, and H. Wymeersch, “Semi-passive 3D positioning of multiple RIS-enabled users,” IEEE trans. on V ehicular Technology, vol. 70, no. 10, pp. 11 073– 11 077, 2021

    work page 2021

  2. [30]

    Location tracking for reconfigurable intelligent surfaces aided vehicle platoons: Diverse sparsities inspired approaches,

    Y . Chen, Y . Wang, X. Guo, Z. Han, and P. Zhang, “Location tracking for reconfigurable intelligent surfaces aided vehicle platoons: Diverse sparsities inspired approaches,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in commun., pp. 1–1, 2023

    work page 2023

  3. [1]

    Integrated sensing and communications: Toward dual-functional wire- less networks for 6G and beyond,

    F. Liu, Y . Cui, C. Masouros, J. Xu, T. X. Han, Y . C. Eldar, and S. Buzzi, “Integrated sensing and communications: Toward dual-functional wire- less networks for 6G and beyond,” IEEE journal on selected areas in commun., vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1728–1767, 2022

    work page 2022

  4. [2]

    Integrated sensing and communication signals towards 5G-A and 6G: A survey,

    Z. Wei, H. Qu, Y . Wang, X. Yuan, H. Wu, Y . Du, K. Han, N. Zhang, and Z. Feng, “Integrated sensing and communication signals towards 5G-A and 6G: A survey,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , 2023

    work page 2023

  5. [3]

    Convergent communication, sensing and localization in 6G systems: An overview of technologies, opportunities and challenges,

    C. De Lima, D. Belot, R. Berkvens, A. Bourdoux, D. Dardari, M. Guil- laud, M. Isomursu, E.-S. Lohan, Y . Miao, A. N. Barreto, M. R. K. Aziz, J. Saloranta, T. Sanguanpuak, H. Sarieddeen, G. Seco-Granados, J. Su- utala, T. Svensson, M. Valkama, B. Van Liempd, and H. Wymeersch, “Convergent communication, sensing and localization in 6G systems: An overview of...

    2021

  6. [4]

    Integrated sensing, localization, and communication in holographic MIMO-enabled wireless network: A deep learning approach,

    A. Adhikary, M. S. Munir, A. D. Raha, Y . Qiao, Z. Han, and C. S. Hong, “Integrated sensing, localization, and communication in holographic MIMO-enabled wireless network: A deep learning approach,” IEEE trans. on Network and Service Management , pp. 1–1, 2023

    work page 2023

  7. [5]

    Joint angle estimation error analysis and 3-D positioning algorithm design for mmwave positioning system,

    T. Wu, C. Pan, Y . Pan, S. Hong, H. Ren, M. Elkashlan, F. Shu, and J. Wang, “Joint angle estimation error analysis and 3-D positioning algorithm design for mmwave positioning system,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 2181–2197, 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [6]

    Survey of cellular mobile radio localization methods: From 1G to 5G,

    J. A. del Peral-Rosado, R. Raulefs, J. A. L ´opez-Salcedo, and G. Seco- Granados, “Survey of cellular mobile radio localization methods: From 1G to 5G,” IEEE commun. Surveys & Tutorials , vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1124–1148, 2017. 13

    work page 2017

Show all 42 references
  1. [7]

    Towards 6G holographic localization: Enabling technologies and per- spectives,

    A. Elzanaty, A. Guerra, F. Guidi, D. Dardari, and M.-S. Alouini, “Towards 6G holographic localization: Enabling technologies and per- spectives,” IEEE Internet of Things Magazine , 2023

    2023

  2. [8]

    Towards smart and reconfigurable environment: Intelligent reflecting surface aided wireless network,

    Q. Wu and R. Zhang, “Towards smart and reconfigurable environment: Intelligent reflecting surface aided wireless network,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 106–112, Nov. 2019

    2019

  3. [9]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: Principles and opportunities,

    Y . Liu, X. Liu, X. Mu, T. Hou, J. Xu, M. Di Renzo, and N. Al-Dhahir, “Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: Principles and opportunities,” IEEE commun. surveys & tutorials , vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1546–1577, 2021

    2021

  4. [10]

    EMF-aware energy efficient MU-SIMO systems with multiple RISs,

    S. Aghashahi, A. Tadaion, Z. Zeinalpour-Yazdi, M. B. Mashhadi, and A. Elzanaty, “EMF-aware energy efficient MU-SIMO systems with multiple RISs,” IEEE trans. on V ehicular Technology , pp. 1–6, 2023

    2023

  5. [11]

    MU-massive MIMO with multiple RISs: SINR maximiza- tion and asymptotic analysis,

    S. Aghashahi, Z. Zeinalpour-Yazdi, A. Tadaion, M. B. Mashhadi, and A. Elzanaty, “MU-massive MIMO with multiple RISs: SINR maximiza- tion and asymptotic analysis,” IEEE Wireless commun. Letters , vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 997–1001, 2023

    2023

  6. [12]

    Ra- dio localization and mapping with reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: Challenges, opportunities, and research directions,

    H. Wymeersch, J. He, B. Denis, A. Clemente, and M. Juntti, “Ra- dio localization and mapping with reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: Challenges, opportunities, and research directions,” IEEE V ehicular Technology Magazine, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 52–61, Dec. 2020

    2020

  7. [13]

    Leveraging RIS-enabled smart signal propagation for solving infeasible localization problems: Scenarios, key research directions, and open challenges,

    K. Keykhosravi, B. Denis, G. C. Alexandropoulos, Z. S. He, A. Al- banese, V . Sciancalepore, and H. Wymeersch, “Leveraging RIS-enabled smart signal propagation for solving infeasible localization problems: Scenarios, key research directions, and open challenges,”IEEE V ehicula...

    2023

  8. [14]

    Indoor localization with reconfigurable intelligent surface,

    T. Ma, Y . Xiao, X. Lei, W. Xiong, and Y . Ding, “Indoor localization with reconfigurable intelligent surface,” IEEE commun. Letters , vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 161–165, 2021

    2021

  9. [15]

    Fingerprint-based mmwave positioning system aided by reconfigurable intelligent surface,

    T. Wu, C. Pan, Y . Pan, H. Ren, M. Elkashlan, and C.-X. Wang, “Fingerprint-based mmwave positioning system aided by reconfigurable intelligent surface,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Letters , vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1379–1383, 2023

    2023

  10. [16]

    Exploit high-dimensional ris information to localization: What is the impact of faulty element?

    T. Wu, C. Pan, K. Zhi, H. Ren, M. Elkashlan, C.-X. Wang, R. Schober, and X. You, “Exploit high-dimensional ris information to localization: What is the impact of faulty element?” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications , pp. 1–1, 2024

    2024

  11. [17]

    Employing high-dimensional RIS information for RIS-aided localiza- tion systems,

    T. Wu, C. Pan, K. Zhi, H. Ren, M. Elkashlan, J. Wang, and C. Yuen, “Employing high-dimensional RIS information for RIS-aided localiza- tion systems,” IEEE Commun. Letters , 2024

    2024

  12. [18]

    Reconfigurable in- telligent surfaces for localization: Position and orientation error bounds,

    A. Elzanaty, A. Guerra, F. Guidi, and M.-S. Alouini, “Reconfigurable in- telligent surfaces for localization: Position and orientation error bounds,” IEEE trans. on Signal Processing , vol. 69, pp. 5386–5402, 2021

    2021

  13. [19]

    Compressive near-field localization for multipath RIS-aided environments,

    O. Rinchi, A. Elzanaty, and M.-S. Alouini, “Compressive near-field localization for multipath RIS-aided environments,” IEEE commun. Letters, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1268–1272, 2022

    2022

  14. [20]

    Joint beam training and positioning for intelligent reflecting surfaces assisted millimeter wave communications,

    W. Wang and W. Zhang, “Joint beam training and positioning for intelligent reflecting surfaces assisted millimeter wave communications,” IEEE trans. on Wireless commun. , vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 6282–6297, 2021

    2021

  15. [21]

    SISO RIS-enabled joint 3D downlink localization and synchronization,

    K. Keykhosravi, M. F. Keskin, G. Seco-Granados, and H. Wymeersch, “SISO RIS-enabled joint 3D downlink localization and synchronization,” in ICC 2021 - IEEE International Conference on commun. , 2021, pp. 1–6

    2021

  16. [22]

    LOS/NLOS near-field localization with a large reconfigurable intelligent surface,

    D. Dardari, N. Decarli, A. Guerra, and F. Guidi, “LOS/NLOS near-field localization with a large reconfigurable intelligent surface,” IEEE trans. on Wireless commun. , 2021

    2021

  17. [23]

    Phase design and near- field target localization for RIS-assisted regional localization system,

    M. Luan, B. Wang, Y . Zhao, Z. Feng, and F. Hu, “Phase design and near- field target localization for RIS-assisted regional localization system,” IEEE trans. on V ehicular Technology , vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 1766–1777, 2022

    2022

  18. [24]

    Towards ubiquitous positioning by leveraging reconfigurable intelligent surface,

    H. Zhang, H. Zhang, B. Di, K. Bian, Z. Han, and L. Song, “Towards ubiquitous positioning by leveraging reconfigurable intelligent surface,” IEEE commun. Letters , vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 284–288, 2020

    2020

  19. [25]

    RIS-enabled self-localization: Leveraging controllable reflections with zero access points,

    K. Keykhosravi, G. Seco-Granados, G. C. Alexandropoulos, and H. Wymeersch, “RIS-enabled self-localization: Leveraging controllable reflections with zero access points,” in ICC 2022-IEEE International Conference on Communications . IEEE, 2022, pp. 2852–2857

    2022

  20. [26]

    RIS-enabled and access- point-free simultaneous radio localization and mapping,

    H. Kim, H. Chen, M. F. Keskin, Y . Ge, K. Keykhosravi, G. C. Alexandropoulos, S. Kim, and H. Wymeersch, “RIS-enabled and access- point-free simultaneous radio localization and mapping,” IEEE trans. on Wireless commun., pp. 1–1, 2023

    2023

  21. [27]

    Multi-RIS-enabled 3D sidelink positioning,

    H. Chen, P. Zheng, M. F. Keskin, T. Al-Naffouri, and H. Wymeersch, “Multi-RIS-enabled 3D sidelink positioning,” IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun., 2024

    2024

  22. [28]

    Zero access points 3D cooperative positioning via RIS and sidelink communica- tions,

    M. Ammous, H. Chen, H. Wymeersch, and S. Valaee, “Zero access points 3D cooperative positioning via RIS and sidelink communica- tions,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.08287 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  23. [29]

    Positioning and tracking using reconfig- urable intelligent surfaces and extended Kalman filter,

    M. Ammous and S. Valaee, “Positioning and tracking using reconfig- urable intelligent surfaces and extended Kalman filter,” in 2022 IEEE 95th V ehicular Technology Conference: (VTC2022-Spring) , 2022, pp. 1–6

    2022

  24. [32]

    Bi-static sensing for near-field RIS localization,

    R. Ghazalian, K. Keykhosravi, H. Chen, H. Wymeersch, and R. J ¨antti, “Bi-static sensing for near-field RIS localization,” in GLOBECOM 2022- 2022 IEEE Global commun. Conference . IEEE, 2022, pp. 6457–6462

    2022

  25. [33]

    Joint RIS calibration and multi-user positioning,

    Y . Lu, H. Chen, J. Talvitie, H. Wymeersch, and M. Valkama, “Joint RIS calibration and multi-user positioning,” in 2022 IEEE 96th V ehicular Technology Conference (VTC2022-Fall). IEEE, 2022, pp. 1–6

    2022

  26. [34]

    JrCUP: Joint RIS calibration and user positioning for 6G wireless systems,

    P. Zheng, H. Chen, T. Ballal, M. Valkama, H. Wymeersch, and T. Y . Al-Naffouri, “JrCUP: Joint RIS calibration and user positioning for 6G wireless systems,” IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun. , 2023

    2023

  27. [35]

    Joint user localization and location calibration of a hybrid reconfigurable intelligent surface,

    R. Ghazalian, H. Chen, G. C. Alexandropoulos, G. Seco-Granados, H. Wymeersch, and R. J ¨antti, “Joint user localization and location calibration of a hybrid reconfigurable intelligent surface,” IEEE Trans. on V ehicular Technology, 2023

    2023

  28. [36]

    Fingerprint based mmwave positioning system aided by reconfigurable intelligent surface,

    T. Wu, C. Pan, Y . Pan, H. Ren, M. Elkashlan, and C.-X. Wang, “Fingerprint based mmwave positioning system aided by reconfigurable intelligent surface,” IEEE Wireless commun. Letters , pp. 1–1, 2023

    2023

  29. [37]

    6g localization and sensing in the near field: Features, opportunities, and challenges,

    H. Chen, M. F. Keskin, A. Sakhnini, N. Decarli, S. Pollin, D. Dardari, and H. Wymeersch, “6g localization and sensing in the near field: Features, opportunities, and challenges,” IEEE Wireless Commun., 2024

    2024

  30. [38]

    RIS-aided joint localization and synchronization with a single-antenna receiver: Beamforming design and low-complexity esti- mation,

    A. Fascista, M. F. Keskin, A. Coluccia, H. Wymeersch, and G. Seco- Granados, “RIS-aided joint localization and synchronization with a single-antenna receiver: Beamforming design and low-complexity esti- mation,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing , vol. 16, n...

    2022

  31. [39]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: Bridging the gap between scattering and reflection,

    J. C. B. Garcia, A. Sibille, and M. Kamoun, “Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: Bridging the gap between scattering and reflection,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Commun. , vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 2538–2547, 2020

    2020

  32. [40]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces aided multi-cell NOMA networks: A stochastic geometry model,

    C. Zhang, W. Yi, Y . Liu, K. Yang, and Z. Ding, “Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces aided multi-cell NOMA networks: A stochastic geometry model,” IEEE Trans. on Commun., vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 951–966, 2021

    2021

  33. [41]

    AI/ML in 5G

    S. M. Kay, Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1993. Somayeh Aghashahi (S’16) received the B.Sc. degree in pure mathematics from Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran, in 2013, and received the M.Sc. degree in comm...

    1993

  34. [2022]

    Ahmed Elzanaty (S’13-M’18-SM’22) received his PhD degree (cum laude) in electronics, telecom- munications, and information technology from the University of Bologna, Italy, in 2018

    He is an associate editor for the Springer Nature Wireless Personal Communications Journal. Ahmed Elzanaty (S’13-M’18-SM’22) received his PhD degree (cum laude) in electronics, telecom- munications, and information technology from the University of Bologna, Italy, in 2018. Cur...

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.