Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Invariant debiasing learning for recommendation via biased imputation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.20036 v2 pith:RYIAGGO2 submitted 2024-12-28 cs.IR

Invariant debiasing learning for recommendation via biased imputation

classification cs.IR
keywords invariantpreferenceunbiasedvariantinformationlearningmodeldebiasing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Previous debiasing studies utilize unbiased data to make supervision of model training. They suffer from the high trial risks and experimental costs to obtain unbiased data. Recent research attempts to use invariant learning to detach the invariant preference of users for unbiased recommendations in an unsupervised way. However, it faces the drawbacks of low model accuracy and unstable prediction performance due to the losing cooperation with variant preference. In this paper, we experimentally demonstrate that invariant learning causes information loss by directly discarding the variant information, which reduces the generalization ability and results in the degradation of model performance in unbiased recommendations. Based on this consideration, we propose a novel lightweight knowledge distillation framework (KDDebias) to automatically learn the unbiased preference of users from both invariant and variant information. Specifically, the variant information is imputed to the invariant user preference in the distance-aware knowledge distillation process. Extensive experiments on three public datasets, i.e., Yahoo!R3, Coat, and MIND, show that with the biased imputation from the variant preference of users, our proposed method achieves significant improvements with less than 50% learning parameters compared to the SOTA unsupervised debiasing model in recommender systems. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/BAI-LAB/KD-Debias.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ConAlign: Conditional Alignment Framework for Balancing Biased and Unbiased Recommendation

    cs.IR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A per-instance gated alignment between biased and unbiased ranking towers improved unbiased recommendation accuracy and, in live deployment at Kuaishou, slightly raised retention and interest diversity with negligible...