pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.02071 · v1 · pith:RYOYN3YZnew · submitted 2019-07-03 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Chemical composition of the outer halo globular cluster Palomar 15

Andreas Koch , Siyi Xu , R. Michael Rich This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 09:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords globular clusterouter halochemical abundancesPalomar 15Milky Waymultiple populationsiron abundancered giants
0
0 comments X

The pith

The outer halo globular cluster Palomar 15 shows typical chemical abundances with no significant spreads.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper measures abundances in three red giants of the distant Palomar 15 cluster at 38 kpc from the Galactic center. It reports an iron content of -1.94 dex and ratios for elements from carbon to europium that mostly align with other outer and inner halo clusters and field stars at similar metallicity. The absence of abundance spreads and the similarity to NGC 7492 lead to the conclusion that Palomar 15 is representative of outer halo clusters. A single star with higher sodium and aluminum hints at multiple stellar populations. This adds to evidence that outer halo clusters formed through processes distinct from some more complex inner halo objects.

Core claim

Palomar 15 exhibits an iron abundance of -1.94 ± 0.06 dex with no evidence for significant spreads in any of the 16 measured elements. Its abundance pattern, including magnesium enhancement but lower calcium and titanium, closely resembles that of the outer halo cluster NGC 7492, establishing it as typical of the outer Milky Way halo.

What carries the argument

Medium-resolution spectra from Keck/ESI used to derive abundances for 16 elements in three red giant stars, compared against literature values for other clusters and halo stars.

If this is right

  • Pal 15 joins the group of outer halo clusters without heavy-element spreads beyond light elements.
  • The chemical match to NGC 7492 supports a shared formation pathway for outer halo globular clusters.
  • The lack of spreads suggests Pal 15 did not undergo the complex enrichment seen in some other clusters.
  • One star's elevated Na and Al indicates multiple populations may exist despite overall uniformity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If confirmed with larger samples, this would imply outer halo clusters generally lack the multiple-population signatures seen in inner halo clusters.
  • The selective alpha-element pattern could test models of early chemical enrichment in accreted satellites.
  • Similarities across outer halo objects point to a common origin from disrupted dwarf galaxies.

Load-bearing premise

The three red giant stars observed are representative of the cluster and the medium-resolution data can accurately detect or exclude abundance spreads without large systematic errors.

What would settle it

Finding a larger sample of stars with clear abundance variations or significantly different average ratios would indicate Palomar 15 is not typical.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.02071 by Andreas Koch, R. Michael Rich, Siyi Xu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left panel: CMD of the target stars using the HST pho￾tometry of Dotter et al. (2011). Right panel: Kiel diagram with the spectroscopic parameters and old (12.4 Gyr), metal-poor (−2.2, −2.0, −1.8), Dartmouth isochrones (Dotter et al. 2008) with α-enhancement (red lines) and without (black lines). Our targets are indicated as red stars. Our observations were carried out during the night of May 17, 2013, usi… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Sample regions around α-element lines that were used by SP Ace. The best model computed by SP Ace is shown in red superimposed on the observed spectrum of star 11726.t For all further analyses, we used the 2014 version of the stel￾lar abundance code MOOG (Sneden 1973) to determine abun￾dances of a number of species via spectral synthesis. The line list for this purpose is based on Koch et al. (2016) with f… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Spectra of the three red giants near the CH G band. The red lines show the best-fit spectrum and the synthesis of the error margins as dashed lines. 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 log (L/L o ) -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 [C/Fe] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Carbon abundances of red giants in Pal 15 (red stars) and metal-poor halo GCs (black dots; Kirby et al. 2015).The latter are not corrected for evolutionary effects in this representation. 4.3. Light elements (Na, Al) Sodium abundances were measured from the strong Na D reso￾nance lines that we carefully deblended from interstellar contam￾ination. These lines are very strong in our stars, with equivalent wi… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison of Pal 15 (red boxes, scaled to the respective abundance scatter) with seven GCs at similar metallicities. The left panels are for abundance ratios, whereas the right ones show the difference [X/Fe]GC−[X/Fe]Pal15. To help readability, the figures are split into two panels each; the top panels show the three objects at −1.8 dex, and the bottom panels show the remaining more metal-poor reference G… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Globular clusters (GCs) in the outer Milky Way halo are important tracers of the assembly history of our Galaxy. Only a few of these objects show spreads in heavier elements beyond the canonical light-element variations that have essentially been found throughout the entire Galactic GC system, suggesting a more complex origin and evolution of these objects. Here, we present the first abundance analysis of three red giants in the remote ($R_{\rm GC}=38$ kpc) outer halo GC Palomar 15, based on medium-resolution spectra obtained with the Keck/ESI instrument. Our results ascertain a low iron abundance of $-$1.94$\pm$0.06 dex with no evidence of any significant abundance spreads, although this is based on low number statistics. Overall, abundance ratios of 16 species were measured, including carbon, Na, Al, $\alpha$-peak (Mg,Si,Ca,Ti) and Fe-peak (Sc,V,Cr,Fe,Co,Ni) elements, and the three neutron-capture elements Sr, Ba, and Eu. The majority of abundances are compatible with those of halo field stars and those found in other GCs in the outer and inner halos at similar metallicity. Pal 15 is enhanced to [Mg/Fe]=0.45 dex, while other $\alpha$-elements, Ca and Ti, are lower by 0.3 dex. Taking Mg as a representative for [$\alpha$/Fe], and coupled with the lack of any significant spread in any of the studied elements we conclude that Pal 15 is typical of the outer halo, as is bolstered by its chemical similarity to the benchmark outer halo cluster NGC 7492. One star shows evidence of elevated Na and Al abundances, hinting at the presence of multiple stellar populations in this cluster.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the first chemical abundance analysis of three red giant stars in the outer halo globular cluster Palomar 15 (R_GC=38 kpc) using medium-resolution Keck/ESI spectra. It derives [Fe/H] = −1.94 ± 0.06 dex with no evidence for significant abundance spreads (explicitly noting the low-number statistics), measures abundance ratios for 16 species including C, Na, Al, α-elements, Fe-peak elements, and neutron-capture elements Sr, Ba, Eu, and concludes that Pal 15 is chemically typical of the outer halo on the basis of similarity to NGC 7492 and halo field stars at comparable metallicity, while flagging one star with elevated Na and Al as a possible hint of multiple populations.

Significance. If the abundance measurements hold, the work adds a new data point for a remote outer-halo cluster, reinforcing the picture that most outer-halo GCs follow standard halo chemical evolution without the complex heavy-element spreads seen in a few objects. The direct comparison to the benchmark cluster NGC 7492 is a concrete strength. The small sample, however, inherently limits the weight that can be placed on the absence of spreads or the cluster-wide typicality claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that Pal 15 shows 'no evidence of any significant abundance spreads' and is therefore 'typical of the outer halo' rests on abundances from only three stars. With N=3 it is impossible to distinguish a true single-population cluster from one whose second-generation stars were simply not sampled; the paper itself flags the low-number statistics, yet this limitation directly undercuts the strength of the 'no spreads' and 'typical' conclusions.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract and methods: medium-resolution ESI spectra are used for species including Na, Al, Sr, Ba, and Eu, where line blending and uncertainties in stellar parameters (T_eff, log g, v_t) can introduce systematics of 0.1–0.3 dex. The manuscript does not provide the full error budget, line list, or detailed atmospheric-parameter determination, so it is not possible to verify that the quoted uncertainties are sufficient to rule out or detect spreads at the claimed level.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement of no significant spreads is in tension with the report that one star shows elevated Na and Al abundances 'hinting at the presence of multiple stellar populations.' This internal inconsistency weakens the load-bearing claim that the cluster lacks abundance variations.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would benefit from a clearer separation between the 'no spreads' statement and the Na/Al hint, so that readers immediately see the caveat attached to the former.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed comments on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments below and will revise the paper accordingly to improve clarity and address the limitations highlighted.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that Pal 15 shows 'no evidence of any significant abundance spreads' and is therefore 'typical of the outer halo' rests on abundances from only three stars. With N=3 it is impossible to distinguish a true single-population cluster from one whose second-generation stars were simply not sampled; the paper itself flags the low-number statistics, yet this limitation directly undercuts the strength of the 'no spreads' and 'typical' conclusions.

    Authors: We agree with the referee that the small sample size limits the strength of our conclusions regarding the absence of abundance spreads and the cluster's typicality. Although the abstract already mentions the low number statistics, we will revise the abstract to more explicitly emphasize these caveats and moderate the claims about Pal 15 being 'typical of the outer halo'. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and methods: medium-resolution ESI spectra are used for species including Na, Al, Sr, Ba, and Eu, where line blending and uncertainties in stellar parameters (T_eff, log g, v_t) can introduce systematics of 0.1–0.3 dex. The manuscript does not provide the full error budget, line list, or detailed atmospheric-parameter determination, so it is not possible to verify that the quoted uncertainties are sufficient to rule out or detect spreads at the claimed level.

    Authors: The methods section of the manuscript does describe the atmospheric parameter determination and error analysis. However, to allow better verification, we will expand this section in the revised version to include a full error budget detailing random and systematic uncertainties, and we will make the line list available as online material. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the statement of no significant spreads is in tension with the report that one star shows elevated Na and Al abundances 'hinting at the presence of multiple stellar populations.' This internal inconsistency weakens the load-bearing claim that the cluster lacks abundance variations.

    Authors: We appreciate this observation. The phrasing in the abstract may indeed be ambiguous. The lack of significant spreads is based on the overall sample showing no large variations, while the one star provides a tentative hint. We will revise the abstract to clarify this distinction and avoid any apparent inconsistency. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely observational abundance analysis and literature comparisons

full rationale

The paper reports direct spectroscopic measurements of [Fe/H] and abundance ratios for 16 species from three red giants using medium-resolution Keck/ESI spectra. All central claims (metallicity value, absence of spreads, similarity to NGC 7492 and outer-halo field stars) rest on these measurements plus external literature values. No equations, fits, or predictions are defined in terms of the target quantities; no self-citation chains or ansatzes are invoked to justify the results. The analysis is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions of 1D LTE stellar atmosphere modeling and atomic data for red giants at this metallicity; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard 1D LTE assumptions and atomic data suffice for abundance derivation from medium-resolution spectra of red giants.
    Invoked implicitly for all reported [X/Fe] ratios.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5865 in / 1105 out tokens · 40407 ms · 2026-05-25T09:47:47.612928+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 85 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M., Spite, M., Korotin, S

    Andrievsky, S. M., Spite, M., Korotin, S. A., et al. 2009, A&A, 494, 1083

    work page 2009

  2. [2]

    J., & Scott, P

    Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481

    work page 2009

  3. [3]

    & Lardo, C

    Bastian, N. & Lardo, C. 2018, ARA&A, 56, 83

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    & Bensby, T

    Battistini, C. & Bensby, T. 2015, A&A, 577, A9

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    & Bensby, T

    Battistini, C. & Bensby, T. 2016, A&A, 586, A49

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Bensby, T., Feltzing, S., & Oey, M. S. 2014, A&A, 562, A71

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    & Cescutti, G

    Bergemann, M. & Cescutti, G. 2010, A&A, 522, A9

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    C., & Gehren, T

    Bergemann, M., Pickering, J. C., & Gehren, T. 2010, MNRAS, 401, 1334

    work page 2010

  9. [9]

    & Grebel, E

    Boeche, C. & Grebel, E. K. 2016, A&A, 587, A2

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    2017, A&A, 607, A44

    Bragaglia, A., Carretta, E., D’Orazi, V ., et al. 2017, A&A, 607, A44

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    A., Wallerstein, G., & Zucker, D

    Brown, J. A., Wallerstein, G., & Zucker, D. 1997, AJ, 114, 180 C ¸ alıs ¸kan, S ¸., Christlieb, N., & Grebel, E. K. 2012, A&A, 537, A83

    work page 1997

  12. [12]

    C., Lee, Y

    Carollo, D., Beers, T. C., Lee, Y . S., et al. 2007, Nature, 450, 1020

    work page 2007

  13. [13]

    2009, A&A, 505, 139

    Carretta, E., Bragaglia, A., Gratton, R., & Lucatello, S. 2009, A&A, 505, 139

    work page 2009

  14. [14]

    2017, A&A, 600, A118

    Carretta, E., Bragaglia, A., Lucatello, S., et al. 2017, A&A, 600, A118

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    2018, A&A, 615, A17

    Carretta, E., Bragaglia, A., Lucatello, S., et al. 2018, A&A, 615, A17

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    & Kurucz, R

    Castelli, F. & Kurucz, R. L. 2004, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints

    work page 2004

  17. [17]

    R., & Rood, R

    Catelan, M., Ferraro, F. R., & Rood, R. T. 2001, ApJ, 560, 970

    work page 2001

  18. [18]

    Cohen, J. G. 2004, AJ, 127, 1545

    work page 2004

  19. [19]

    Cohen, J. G. & Kirby, E. N. 2012, ApJ, 760, 86

    work page 2012

  20. [20]

    Cohen, J. G. & Melendez, J. 2005, AJ, 129, 1607

    work page 2005

  21. [21]

    P., D’Souza, R., Kauffmann, G., et al

    Cooper, A. P., D’Souza, R., Kauffmann, G., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 434, 3348

    work page 2013

  22. [22]

    J., Hansen, C

    Cordero, M. J., Hansen, C. J., Johnson, C. I., & Pilachowski, C. A. 2015, ApJ, 808, L10

    work page 2015

  23. [23]

    2011, MNRAS, 417, 2411

    Correnti, M., Bellazzini, M., Dalessandro, E., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 417, 2411

    work page 2011

  24. [24]

    M., Skrutskie, M

    Cutri, R. M., Skrutskie, M. F., van Dyk, S., et al. 2003, 2MASS All Sky Catalog of point sources. Da Costa, G. S. & Armandroff, T. E. 1995, AJ, 109, 2533

    work page 2003

  25. [25]

    2008, ApJS, 178, 89

    Dotter, A., Chaboyer, B., Jevremovi´c, D., et al. 2008, ApJS, 178, 89

    work page 2008

  26. [26]

    2011, ApJ, 738, 74 Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A

    Dotter, A., Sarajedini, A., & Anderson, J. 2011, ApJ, 738, 74 Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, A1

    work page 2011

  27. [27]

    Gerashchenko, A. N. & Ananjevskaja, Y . K. 2018, Astrophysics, 61, 182

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    G., Carretta, E., & Bragaglia, A

    Gratton, R. G., Carretta, E., & Bragaglia, A. 2012, A&A Rev., 20, 50 8 A. Koch et al.: Chemical abundances in Pal 15

    work page 2012

  29. [29]

    J., & McWilliam, A

    Hanke, M., Koch, A., Hansen, C. J., & McWilliam, A. 2017, A&A, 599, A97

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    J., Bergemann, M., Cescutti, G., et al

    Hansen, C. J., Bergemann, M., Cescutti, G., et al. 2013, A&A, 551, A57

    work page 2013

  31. [31]

    J., Primas, F., Hartman, H., et al

    Hansen, C. J., Primas, F., Hartman, H., et al. 2012, A&A, 545, A31

    work page 2012

  32. [32]

    H., & Grebel, E

    Harbeck, D., Smith, G. H., & Grebel, E. K. 2003, A&A, 409, 553

    work page 2003

  33. [33]

    Harris, W. E. 1996, AJ, 112, 1487

    work page 1996

  34. [34]

    Hartwick, F. D. A. 1987, in NATO Advanced Science Institutes (ASI) Series C, V ol. 207, NATO Advanced Science Institutes (ASI) Series C, ed. G. Gilmore & B. Carswell, 281–290

    work page 1987

  35. [35]

    I., et al

    Hendricks, B., Boeche, C., Johnson, C. I., et al. 2016, A&A, 585, A86

    work page 2016

  36. [36]

    2006, A&A, 448, 171

    Hilker, M. 2006, A&A, 448, 171

    work page 2006

  37. [37]

    I., Caldwell, N., Rich, R

    Johnson, C. I., Caldwell, N., Rich, R. M., & Walker, M. G. 2017, AJ, 154, 155

    work page 2017

  38. [38]

    I., Rich, R

    Johnson, C. I., Rich, R. M., Pilachowski, C. A., et al. 2015, AJ, 150, 63

    work page 2015

  39. [39]

    2013, A&A, 554, A81

    Kacharov, N., Koch, A., & McWilliam, A. 2013, A&A, 554, A81

    work page 2013

  40. [40]

    K., & Willemsen, P

    Kayser, A., Hilker, M., Grebel, E. K., & Willemsen, P. G. 2008, A&A, 486, 437

    work page 2008

  41. [41]

    N., Guo, M., Zhang, A

    Kirby, E. N., Guo, M., Zhang, A. J., et al. 2015, ApJ, 801, 125

    work page 2015

  42. [42]

    2006, ApJ, 653, 1145

    Kobayashi, C., Umeda, H., Nomoto, K., Tominaga, N., & Ohkubo, T. 2006, ApJ, 653, 1145

    work page 2006

  43. [43]

    2009, Astronomische Nachrichten, 330, 675

    Koch, A. 2009, Astronomische Nachrichten, 330, 675

    work page 2009

  44. [44]

    & Cˆot´e, P

    Koch, A. & Cˆot´e, P. 2010, A&A, 517, A59

    work page 2010

  45. [45]

    & Cˆot´e, P

    Koch, A. & Cˆot´e, P. 2017, A&A, 601, A41

    work page 2017

  46. [46]

    2009, A&A, 506, 729

    Koch, A., Cˆot´e, P., & McWilliam, A. 2009, A&A, 506, 729

    work page 2009

  47. [47]

    J., & Kunder, A

    Koch, A., Hansen, C. J., & Kunder, A. 2017, A&A, 604, A41

    work page 2017

  48. [48]

    & McWilliam, A

    Koch, A. & McWilliam, A. 2011, AJ, 142, 63

    work page 2011

  49. [49]

    W., & Thompson, I

    Koch, A., McWilliam, A., Preston, G. W., & Thompson, I. B. 2016, A&A, 587, A124

    work page 2016

  50. [50]

    M., Reitzel, D

    Koch, A., Rich, R. M., Reitzel, D. B., et al. 2008, ApJ, 689, 958

    work page 2008

  51. [51]

    B., Da Costa, G

    Kuzma, P. B., Da Costa, G. S., & Mackey, A. D. 2018, MNRAS, 473, 2881

    work page 2018

  52. [52]

    K., Rockosi, C

    Lai, D. K., Rockosi, C. M., Bolte, M., et al. 2009, ApJ, 697, L63

    work page 2009

  53. [53]

    Law, D. R. & Majewski, S. R. 2010, ApJ, 718, 1128

    work page 2010

  54. [54]

    Lee, J.-W., L´opez-Morales, M., & Carney, B. W. 2006, ApJ, 646, L119

    work page 2006

  55. [55]

    2011b, A&A, 527, A148 Mar´ın-Franch, A., Aparicio, A., Piotto, G., et al

    Lind, K., Charbonnel, C., Decressin, T., et al. 2011b, A&A, 527, A148 Mar´ın-Franch, A., Aparicio, A., Piotto, G., et al. 2009, ApJ, 694, 1498

    work page 2009

  56. [56]

    F., Milone, A

    Marino, A. F., Milone, A. P., Karakas, A. I., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 815

    work page 2015

  57. [57]

    & Brocato, E

    Matteucci, F. & Brocato, E. 1990, ApJ, 365, 539

    work page 1990

  58. [58]

    P., Piotto, G., Renzini, A., et al

    Milone, A. P., Piotto, G., Renzini, A., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 3636

    work page 2017

  59. [59]

    2008, AJ, 136, 614

    Mottini, M., Wallerstein, G., & McWilliam, A. 2008, AJ, 136, 614

    work page 2008

  60. [60]

    2013, MNRAS, 435, 3667

    Mucciarelli, A., Bellazzini, M., Catelan, M., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 435, 3667

    work page 2013

  61. [61]

    2012, MNRAS, 426, 2889

    Mucciarelli, A., Bellazzini, M., Ibata, R., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 2889

    work page 2012

  62. [62]

    R., & Lanzoni, B

    Mucciarelli, A., Lapenna, E., Ferraro, F. R., & Lanzoni, B. 2018, ApJ, 859, 75

    work page 2018

  63. [63]

    Peterson, R. C. & Latham, D. W. 1989, ApJ, 336, 178

    work page 1989

  64. [64]

    Piatti, A. E. & Koch, A. 2018, ApJ, 867, 8

    work page 2018

  65. [65]

    2015, ApJ, 799, 184

    Pillepich, A., Madau, P., & Mayer, L. 2015, ApJ, 799, 184

    work page 2015

  66. [66]

    M., Frebel, A., Beers, T

    Placco, V . M., Frebel, A., Beers, T. C., & Stancliffe, R. J. 2014, ApJ, 797, 21

    work page 2014

  67. [67]

    J., Venn, K

    Pritzl, B. J., Venn, K. A., & Irwin, M. 2005, AJ, 130, 2140

    work page 2005

  68. [68]

    & Meylan, G

    Pryor, C. & Meylan, G. 1993, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference

    work page 1993

  69. [69]

    50, Structure and Dynamics of Globular Clusters, ed

    Series, V ol. 50, Structure and Dynamics of Globular Clusters, ed. S. G. Djorgovski & G. Meylan, 357 Ram´ırez, I. & Mel´endez, J. 2005, ApJ, 626, 465

    work page 2005

  70. [70]

    U., Mateo, M., Bailey, J

    Roederer, I. U., Mateo, M., Bailey, J. I., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 455, 2417

    work page 2016

  71. [71]

    U., Preston, G

    Roederer, I. U., Preston, G. W., Thompson, I. B., et al. 2014, AJ, 147, 136

    work page 2014

  72. [72]

    2015, A&A, 579, A104

    Sbordone, L., Monaco, L., Moni Bidin, C., et al. 2015, A&A, 579, A104

    work page 2015

  73. [73]

    & Zinn, R

    Searle, L. & Zinn, R. 1978, ApJ, 225, 357

    work page 1978

  74. [74]

    I., Bolte, M., Epps, H

    Sheinis, A. I., Bolte, M., Epps, H. W., et al. 2002, PASP, 114, 851

    work page 2002

  75. [75]

    D., Cˆot´e, P., & Sargent, W

    Shetrone, M. D., Cˆot´e, P., & Sargent, W. L. W. 2001, ApJ, 548, 592

    work page 2001

  76. [76]

    J., & Gallino, R

    Sneden, C., Cowan, J. J., & Gallino, R. 2008, ARA&A, 46, 241

    work page 2008

  77. [77]

    Sneden, C. A. 1973, PhD thesis, The University of Texas at Austin

    work page 1973

  78. [78]

    2005, A&A, 430, 655

    Spite, M., Cayrel, R., Plez, B., et al. 2005, A&A, 430, 655

    work page 2005

  79. [79]

    M., Da Costa, G

    Stanford, L. M., Da Costa, G. S., & Norris, J. E. 2010, ApJ, 714, 1001

    work page 2010

  80. [80]

    B., Bolte, M., Harris, W

    Stetson, P. B., Bolte, M., Harris, W. E., et al. 1999, AJ, 117, 247 Suntzeff, N., Olszewski, E., & Stetson, P. B. 1985, AJ, 90, 1481

    work page 1999

Showing first 80 references.