Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Benchmarking End-To-End Performance of AI-Based Chip Placement Algorithms

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.15026 v2 pith:S2EDTHNQ submitted 2024-07-03 cs.AR cs.AI

classification cs.ARcs.AI
keywords chipplacementalgorithmsdesignfinalai-basedresultsworkflow
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The increasing complexity of modern very-large-scale integration (VLSI) design highlights the significance of Electronic Design Automation (EDA) technologies. Chip placement is a critical step in the EDA workflow, which positions chip modules on the canvas with the goal of optimizing performance, power, and area (PPA) metrics of final chip designs. Recent advances have demonstrated the great potential of AI-based algorithms in enhancing chip placement. However, due to the lengthy workflow of chip design, the evaluations of these algorithms often focus on intermediate surrogate metrics, which are easy to compute but frequently reveal a substantial misalignment with the end-to-end performance (i.e., the final design PPA). To address this challenge, we introduce ChiPBench, which can effectively facilitate research in chip placement within the AI community. ChiPBench is a comprehensive benchmark specifically designed to evaluate the effectiveness of existing AI-based chip placement algorithms in improving final design PPA metrics. Specifically, we have gathered 20 circuits from various domains (e.g., CPU, GPU, and microcontrollers). These designs are compiled by executing the workflow from the verilog source code, which preserves necessary physical implementation kits, enabling evaluations for the placement algorithms on their impacts on the final design PPA. We executed six state-of-the-art AI-based chip placement algorithms on these designs and plugged the results of each single-point algorithm into the physical implementation workflow to obtain the final PPA results. Experimental results show that even if intermediate metric of a single-point algorithm is dominant, while the final PPA results are unsatisfactory. We believe that our benchmark will serve as an effective evaluation framework to bridge the gap between academia and industry.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. PDAGENT-BENCH: Characterizing, Grounding, and Architecting LLM Agents for VLSI Physical Design

    cs.AR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    PDAGENT-BENCH is a new benchmark suite with 353 curated problems and an agentic workflow framework for evaluating LLM/VLM agents across five capability dimensions in VLSI physical design.

  2. CapBench: A Multi-PDK Dataset for Machine-Learning-Based Post-Layout Capacitance Extraction

    cs.AR 2026-04 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    CapBench is a new multi-PDK dataset of post-layout 3D windows with high-fidelity capacitance labels and multiple ML-ready representations, plus baseline results showing CNN accuracy versus GNN speed trade-offs.

Pith tools