The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2501.01453 · v2 · pith:S2K6EAYX · submitted 2024-12-31 · cs.LG · physics.flu-dyn

Geometry Matters: Benchmarking Scientific ML Approaches for Flow Prediction around Complex Geometries

Reviewed by Pithpith:S2K6EAYXopen to challenge →

classification cs.LG physics.flu-dyn
keywords geometriesmodelscomplexfluidscientificscimlaccuracyacross
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Rapid and accurate simulations of fluid dynamics around complicated geometric bodies are critical in a variety of engineering and scientific applications, including aerodynamics and biomedical flows. However, while scientific machine learning (SciML) has shown considerable promise, most studies in this field are limited to simple geometries, and complex, real-world scenarios are underexplored. This paper addresses this gap by benchmarking diverse SciML models, including neural operators and vision transformer-based foundation models, for fluid flow prediction over intricate geometries. Using a high-fidelity dataset of steady-state flows across various geometries, we evaluate the impact of geometric representations -- Signed Distance Fields (SDF) and binary masks -- on model accuracy, scalability, and generalization. Central to this effort is the introduction of a novel, unified scoring framework that integrates metrics for global accuracy, boundary layer fidelity, and physical consistency to enable a robust, comparative evaluation of model performance. Our findings demonstrate that newer foundation models significantly outperform neural operators, particularly in data-limited scenarios, and that SDF representations yield superior results with sufficient training data. Despite these promises, all models struggle with out-of-distribution generalization, highlighting a critical challenge for future SciML applications. By advancing both evaluation models and modeling capabilities, our work paves the way for robust and scalable ML solutions for fluid dynamics across complex geometries.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.