Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 55 references

Coherent frequency combs from electrons colliding with a laser pulse

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper derives the conditions under which an electron beam colliding with a laser pulse emits a coherent frequency comb, and demonstrates a soft x-ray comb in simulation.

desk verdict Genuinely new analytical coherence conditions for electron-laser frequency combs, with solid simulations; the space-charge caveat is real but likely minor at the quoted parameters. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.08554 v3 pith:S45VWAAB submitted 2024-12-11 physics.optics physics.class-ph

Michael J. Quin , Antonino Di Piazza , Matteo Tamburini This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.class-ph
keywords frequencycombcoherentradiationelectronbeamlaserpulseThomsonscatteringsoftx-rayplanewavecoherenceconditions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper derives two concrete conditions that make the radiation from an electron beam colliding with a laser pulse coherent. If the electrons are regularly spaced along the beam with position jitter below one tenth of the Doppler-shifted wavelength, and if the fractional energy spread times the laser pulse-width parameter is much less than unity, the emission builds into a frequency comb. The authors demonstrate with particle simulations that a 100-electron beam meeting these conditions radiates a soft x-ray comb centered near 2480 eV with a harmonic spacing of about 25 eV. The result matters because it gives a simple design rule for coherent short-wavelength sources that are not based on mode-locked lasers or high-harmonic generation.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the classical radiation spectrum of $N$ electrons in a plane wave, equation (7) of the paper, together with the weak-field ($a_0 \ll 1$) approximation in which each electron's contribution is the Fourier transform of the laser envelope $a(\varphi) = a_0 \exp(-\varphi^2/\Delta^2)$ evaluated at the Doppler-shifted frequency. By writing each initial velocity as $u_{0,+}$ plus a small deviation and expanding the phase in $\rho_{0j} = \delta u_{0,+}/u_{0,+}$, the authors convert the coherence question into two simple inequalities on the beam's energy spread and position jitter. The named quantity is the inverse Doppler shift $D_{0j} = (u_{0,+}^j)^{-2}$, which is negligible in the ultra-relativistic limit, so the interference depends only on the initial phase factors $\exp(-i\omega z_{0j})$. This is what lets a regularly spaced beam act as a frequency-comb grating.

What would settle it

Include the interparticle electrostatic forces in the same numerical setup with the quoted beam parameters ($\sigma_z = 0.02$–$0.1\lambda_1$, $\sigma_{\gamma_0}/\gamma_0 \approx 0.001$, spacing $d = 100\lambda_1$) and check whether the harmonic contrast survives; if the comb disappears at densities needed for useful flux, the coherence conditions are necessary but not sufficient for a real source.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a regularly spaced, monoenergetic electron beam colliding head-on with a weak plane-wave laser pulse radiates a coherent frequency comb along the beam axis, with harmonics spaced by $\Delta\omega = 2\pi/d$ where $d$ is the beam spacing. The paper derives the coherence conditions by expanding the per-electron spectral integral, $I_j(\omega)$, around a mean initial velocity. At the Doppler-shifted peak $\omega_1 = u_{0,+}^2 \omega_0$, the leading-order velocity deviation cancels and the second-order term yields the energy condition $(\rho_{0j}\Delta)^2 \ll 1$, i.e. $\sigma_{\gamma_0} \Delta \ll \gamma_0$. For the positions, an existing $\omega\,\delta z < \pi/5$ bound translates to $\sigma_z < 0.1\lambda_1$. Simulations with a Gaussian 800-nm pulse, $a_0 = 0.1$, 15-fs duration, and $\gamma_0 = 20$ confirm the comb spectrum and show the expected degradation when $\sigma_z$ or $\sigma_{\gamma_0}/\gamma_0$ is increased.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation and simulations neglect the Coulomb forces between electrons; for the dense, nanoscopically spaced beams the comb scheme requires, those forces could blur the regular spacing or broaden the energy spread during the collision.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A few-cycle laser pulse (smaller $\Delta$) directly relaxes the monoenergeticity requirement, since the bound on $\sigma_{\gamma_0}/\gamma_0$ is $1/\Delta$.
  • Changing the beam spacing $d$ tunes the comb mode spacing, so nanoscale-patterned beams produce soft x-ray combs.
  • The coherence conditions are independent of polarization in the weak-field limit; circularly and linearly polarized pulses yield the same comb shape up to a constant height factor.
  • The same conditions apply at other angles of observation, so the comb is not limited to emission along the beam axis.
  • For lower-frequency regimes such as terahertz, the required beam spacing and energy spread become easier to reach, extending the method beyond x-rays.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the interparticle fields are included, the maximum usable beam density is likely set by when Coulomb repulsion blurs the spacing over the interaction time; a simulation with these forces could map the density ceiling.
  • The same two inequalities could act as a diagnostic tool for laser-plasma accelerators: a measured comb contrast would directly read out the beam's effective spacing jitter and energy spread.
  • The paper treats head-on collision with a plane wave; adding a tightly focused laser pulse would introduce a transverse phase profile that could break the comb, but might also allow spatial selection of harmonics.
  • Because the comb is generated in a single pass, the scheme could in principle be combined with beam-recirculation or energy-recovery concepts to build a steady-state x-ray comb source.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper derives analytical conditions for the emission of coherent radiation from an electron beam colliding with a plane-wave laser pulse. Using the exact solution of the Lorentz equation in a plane wave and Jackson's radiation formula, the authors consider the a0 << 1 regime with a Gaussian envelope. They expand the radiation integral to second order in the relative energy spread ρ and obtain the coherence condition (ρΔ)^2 << 1 for observation at the Doppler-shifted peak frequency ω1, and the position condition δz/λ < 0.1. They then perform particle simulations of N = 100 electrons with γ0 = 20, spacing d = 100λ1, a0 = 0.1, λ0 = 800 nm, and show a soft x-ray comb near 2.5 keV. The simulations confirm that position jitter with σz < 0.1λ1 and energy spread σγ/γ << 1/Δ preserve coherence, and that the comb is insensitive to transverse position/velocity spreads. The authors also argue that few-cycle pulses relax the monoenergeticity requirement.

Significance. The analytical derivation is parameter-free: the comb spacing and central frequency follow from the chosen γ0, ω0, and d, and the coherence conditions are tested against simulations rather than fitted. The paper extends previous studies of coherent emission [25,26] to include velocity variations, and the resulting conditions are simple and falsifiable. If the scheme is realizable, it offers a path to soft x-ray combs with high coherence per pulse, complementing existing HHG-based combs. The numerical results reproduce the predicted N^2 scaling of the comb intensity. The main uncertainty is the physical realizability of the required nanoscale-spaced monoenergetic beams, and in particular the neglect of interparticle fields in the simulations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section III, first paragraph] The statement 'we neglect interparticle fields and solve for the trajectories using the external field alone' is load-bearing for the numerical demonstration, but no quantitative justification is given for the parameters used. With N = 100 electrons spaced at d = 100λ1 ≈ 50 nm, γ0 = 20, and λ1 ≈ 0.5 nm, the linear density is about 2×10^7 m^-1, and the quoted tolerances are σz < 0.1λ1 ≈ 0.05 nm and σγ/γ << 1/Δ ≈ 0.03. A rough estimate of the Coulomb field from a line charge of this density, including the 1/γ^2 reduction for co-moving relativistic electrons, gives effective transverse fields of order 10^3 V/m for a 50 nm transverse extent, which over the interaction time can produce displacements of order 10^-3 λ1 or larger depending on the transverse beam profile; the paper gives no such estimate. The references [31,32] are cited for the neglect, but the results of those papers are not applied here to show that interparticle fields are negligible at these parameters. Please provide an explicit bound on the position and energy changes induced by interparticle fields during the interaction (and during any propagation or formation stage) and verify that these changes satisfy the derived conditions, or include a simulation with interparticle fields. Without this, the simulated comb cannot be regarded as evidence that the scheme works for a realistic dense beam.
  2. [Section IIIB, paragraph beginning 'Once again we begin from the ideal electron beam'] The statement that 'the electron beam enters the laser field in a relatively short time after the initialization' is not quantified. For the simulated beam (γ0 = 20, σγ/γ ≈ 10^-3), the longitudinal velocity spread is σβ ≈ (1/γ^3) σγ ≈ 2.5×10^-6. The regular spacing d = 50 nm will be smeared by 0.1λ1 ≈ 0.05 nm after a time t ≈ 0.05 nm / (c σβ) ≈ 7×10^-14 s. This is an extremely short time compared with typical accelerator-to-interaction transport times. The paper should state this time scale and discuss whether the cited sources (e.g., CXFEL, laser-plasma injection) can place the beam at the interaction point within this window. If not, the practical relevance of the derived conditions is significantly weaker.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section IIB, IIC, IIIB headings] The headings contain a typo: 'V ariation' should read 'Variation'.
  2. [Conclusion] The word 'simultanouesly' should be 'simultaneously'.
  3. [Section III, numerical parameters] The expression 'dt = π/3ω1' should be written as 'dt = π/(3ω1)' for clarity.
  4. [Equation (11) and surrounding text] The variable ϖ is used in Eq. (11) but is defined only after the equation; consider defining it just before or immediately after.
  5. [Section IIB, after Eq. (10)] The phrase 'there will be a peak' should be 'there will be peaks' since two frequency-domain contributions are discussed.
  6. [Figure captions] The repeated sentence 'The y-axis shows a dimensionless quantity, as ℏ = 1' could be stated once in the text to reduce repetition.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: analytic coherence conditions are derived from first principles and independently tested in simulations; self-citations are supporting but not load-bearing reductions.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. Starting from the exact Lorentz-equation solution in a plane wave (Eqs. 2-4) and the standard radiation integral (Eq. 6), it derives the spectrum for forward emission (Eq. 7), the single-particle spectral factor Ij(omega) (Eq. 8), and, for a Gaussian pulse in the a0 << 1 regime, the analytic Fourier transform (Eq. 10). The energy-coherence condition (rho0j Delta)^2 << 1, i.e. sigma_gamma0 Delta << gamma0, follows from explicitly expanding the exponent of Eq. 11 and requiring it to be small at the spectral peak; it is not defined in terms of the comb it is used to explain. The position-coherence condition sigma_z < 0.1 lambda1 follows from the standard Fourier-comb phase sum |sum exp(i omega delta z_j)|^2 plus the quantitative tolerance omega delta z < pi/5 quoted from Ref. [27]; this is an imported external result, not an ansatz smuggled in to force the conclusion. The comb parameters (central frequency omega1 = u0,+^2 omega0 and spacing Delta omega = 2 pi/d) are determined by the chosen gamma0, omega0, and d, and are then compared against independent numerical simulations; no parameter is fitted to reproduce the comb. The agreement with simulations in Figs. 1-3 is a genuine check of the analytically derived thresholds. Self-citations appear (Refs. [25,31,32] and the co-authored Ref. [27]), but they support peripheral points: consistency with prior identical-velocity treatments and the quoted position tolerance. Ref. [27] is a peer-reviewed independent published result, not a uniqueness theorem invoked to forbid alternatives. The neglect of interparticle fields in the simulations is an explicit physical assumption and a legitimate feasibility caveat, but it is not a circular step: it does not make the predicted comb equivalent to an input by construction. Overall, no load-bearing step reduces to its own input, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation rests on the plane-wave and a0<<1 approximations, the classical no-radiation-reaction regime, and the stated assumption that the exponential dependence of the spectral amplitude on the initial energy dominates. The position tolerance is borrowed from ref [27]. No free parameters are fitted to data in the derivation; simulation parameters are demonstrative examples, and no new entities are postulated.

assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption Plane-wave approximation for the laser pulse
    The pulse is modeled as a plane wave (Eq. 1) and assumed not to be tightly focused; all analytical conditions depend on this geometry.
  • domain assumption Weak-field regime a0 << 1
    Section IIB assumes a Gaussian pulse with small amplitude so the spectrum is the Fourier transform of the envelope; the derived conditions apply in this regime.
  • domain assumption Classical electrodynamics without radiation reaction
    Section II: 'provided strong-field effects such as radiation reaction are negligible'; the exact Lorentz solution is used in this regime.
  • domain assumption Zero initial transverse velocity and on-shell condition
    Section II sets u0,⊥=0 and u0,+ u0,-=1 for all electrons before the collision.
  • ad hoc to paper Exponential dependence on u0,+ dominates in the spectrum integral
    In expanding I_j(ω) around the mean energy, the paper assumes 'the exponential dependence via ã(k) is dominant' and drops the prefactor variation; this is a stated approximation behind the energy-spread condition.
  • domain assumption Position coherence tolerance sigma_z < 0.1 lambda
    The positional criterion is taken from the external result [27] with the numerical factor pi/5 translated to 0.1 wavelengths; it is used to set the beam spacing jitter requirement.
  • domain assumption Neglect of interparticle fields in the simulations
    Section III: 'we neglect interparticle fields and solve for the trajectories using the external field alone'; this is load-bearing for the comb demonstration.
  • standard math Jackson's radiation formula and exact plane-wave Lorentz solution
    Equations (2)-(6) are standard textbook results (Jackson eq. 14.67, Landau-Lifshitz solution) that underpin the derivation of I_j(omega) and the interference sum.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Coherent frequency combs from electrons colliding with a laser pulse." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/S45VWAAB

@misc{pith2026241208554,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Coherent frequency combs from electrons colliding with a laser pulse},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/S45VWAAB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.08554}
}
read the original abstract

Highly coherent and powerful light sources capable of generating soft x-ray frequency combs are essential for high precision measurements and rigorous tests of fundamental physics. In this work, we derive the analytical conditions required for the emission of coherent radiation from an electron beam colliding with a laser pulse, modeled as a plane wave. These conditions are applied in a series of numerical simulations, where we show that a soft x-ray frequency comb can be produced if the electrons are regularly spaced and sufficiently monoenergetic. High quality beams of this kind may be produced in the near future from laser-plasma interactions or linear accelerators. Furthermore, we highlight the advantageous role of employing few-cycle laser pulses in relaxing the stringent monoenergeticity requirements for coherent emission. The conditions derived here can also be used to optimize coherent emission in other frequency ranges, such as the terahertz domain.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.08554 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Frequency comb produced by an ideal electron beam [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Dependence of the frequency comb on the initial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Dependence of the frequency comb on the initial po [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [27]

    Zhang, C.-H

    Z.-W. Zhang, C.-H. Du, J.-F. Zhu, F.-H. Li, B. Shen, X. Wang, and P.-K. Liu, Free-electron-driven frequency comb, Laser Photonics Rev.17, 2200886 (2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [1]

    defined at the initial phase φj 0 = ω0xj 0,+. In the regime of classical electrodynamics, pro- vided strong-field effects such as radiation reaction are negligible [22, 23], we can solve the Lorentz equation ex- actly for the velocity in terms of the light-cone coordi- nates [40] uj ⊥(φj) = − e m A(φj), (2) uj −(φj) = 1 uj 0,+ 1 + [uj ⊥(φj)]2 , (3) uj +(φ...

    work page

  3. [2]

    This condition can be satisfied exactly in the case of a finite-duration pulse

    = 0, where the initial phase φj 0 is necessarily finite. This condition can be satisfied exactly in the case of a finite-duration pulse. However, in the case of a Gaussian pulse, it is necessary to ensure that the chosen value of φj 0 does not significantly affect the trajectories or radiation spectrum (see appendix A). We have also assumed that all elect...

    work page

  4. [3]

    (9) This Fourier-like integral characterizes the shape of the spectrum

    In this case, the coherence at a given frequencyω depends on the ini- tial positions via the sum of amplitudes under the square modulus, while the dependence on the initial velocity is given by I j(ω) = 1 uj 0,+ Z +∞ −∞ e m A(φ)eiϕj (ω,φ)dφ, (8) ϕj(ω, φ) = ω (uj 0,+)2ω0 φ + Z φ −∞ [a(φ′)]2dφ′ . (9) This Fourier-like integral characterizes the shape of the...

    work page

  5. [4]

    ωd = 2 πl, for integer l

    Let us assume thatd is chosen such that the emission is exactly coherent at a given frequency, i.e. ωd = 2 πl, for integer l. The interference pattern in equation (7) then becomes| PN j=1 exp(iωδz j 0)|2. If the perturbation is small δz j 0 ≪ d, then the residual phase will also be small ωδz j 0 ≪ 2π. A quantitative condi- tion ωδz j 0 < π/5 is given in [...

    work page

  6. [5]

    After repeating our simula- tions with these parameters, one can see in figure 2 how the coherence of each harmonic declines asσz increases

    Here, δz j 0 is obtained from a Gaussian distribution of standard deviation σz = [0 .05, 0.10, 0.15] λ1 centered on z0 − jd for each particle. After repeating our simula- tions with these parameters, one can see in figure 2 how the coherence of each harmonic declines asσz increases. Recall that our definition for coherence on the initial po- sitionswas σz...

    work page

  7. [6]

    = 0 at the initial phase φj 0 = ω0(n0xj 0). The position of each particle is then given by the integral in equation (5), and according to equa- tion (6) the radiation spectrum is dE dωdΩ = e2ω2 4π2ω2 0 NX j=1 eiω(˜nj xj 0)I j(ω, n) 2 . (A2) As in equation (7), the interference pattern depends on the initial positions via the sum of oscillatory terms un- d...

    work page

  8. [7]

    In the case of a Gaussian pulse, as considered in this paper, this condition can only be sat- isfied approximately Aµ(φj

    = 0 can be satisfied exactly pro- vided φj 0 ≤ −π∆/2. In the case of a Gaussian pulse, as considered in this paper, this condition can only be sat- isfied approximately Aµ(φj

    work page

Show all 55 references
  1. [8]

    National Inertial Confinement Fusion Program

    ≈ 0. In practice, we found via numerical simulations that if the initial phase sat- isfied φj 0 ≤ −2.5FWHMt ω0 then the spectra presented in this paper were not visibly affected. Finally, we note that if the plane wave propagates in the opposite direc- tion to the observern = ...

  2. [9]

    T. Udem, R. Holzwarth, and T. W. Hänsch, Optical fre- quency metrology, Nature416, 233 (2002)

    2002

  3. [10]

    S. T. Cundiff and J. Ye, Colloquium: Femtosecond opti- cal frequency combs, Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 325 (2003)

    2003

  4. [11]

    Picqué and T

    N. Picqué and T. W. Hänsch, Frequency comb spec- troscopy, Nat. Photonics13, 146 (2019)

    2019

  5. [12]

    Fortier and E

    T. Fortier and E. Baumann, 20 years of developments in optical frequency comb technology and applications, Commun. Phys. 2, 153 (2019)

    2019

  6. [13]

    Shvyd’ko, R

    Y. Shvyd’ko, R. Röhlsberger, O. Kocharovskaya, J. Ev- ers, G. A. Geloni, P. Liu, D. Shu, A. Miceli, B. Stone, W. Hippler, B. Marx-Glowna, I. Uschmann, R. Loet- zsch, O. Leupold, H.-C. Wille, I. Sergeev, M. Gerharz, X. Zhang, C. Grech, M. Guetg, V. Kocharyan, N. Kujala, S. Liu,...

    2023

  7. [14]

    Zhang, T

    C. Zhang, T. Ooi, J. S. Higgins, J. F. Doyle, L. von der Wense, K. Beeks, A. Leitner, G. A. Kazakov, P. Li, P. G. Thirolf, T. Schumm, and J. Ye, Frequency ratio of the 229mth nuclear isomeric transition and the 87sr atomic clock, Nature 633, 63 (2024)

    2024

  8. [15]

    Pupeza, C

    I. Pupeza, C. Zhang, M. Högner, and J. Ye, Extreme- ultraviolet frequency combs for precision metrology and attosecond science, Nat. Photonics15, 175 (2021)

    2021

  9. [16]

    Herrmann, M

    M. Herrmann, M. Haas, U. D. Jentschura, F. Kottmann, D. Leibfried, G. Saathoff, C. Gohle, A. Ozawa, V. Bat- teiger, S. Knünz, N. Kolachevsky, H. A. Schüssler, T. W. Hänsch, and T. Udem, Feasibility of coherent xuv spec- troscopy on the1s−2stransition in singly ionized helium, ...

    2009

  10. [17]

    T. W. Hänsch, Nobel lecture: Passion for precision, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 1297 (2006)

    2006

  11. [18]

    J. L. Hall, Nobel lecture: Defining and measuring optical frequencies, Rev. Mod. Phys.78, 1279 (2006)

    2006

  12. [19]

    Gohle, T

    C. Gohle, T. Udem, M. Herrmann, J. Rauschenberger, R. Holzwarth, H. A. Schuessler, F. Krausz, and T. W. Hänsch, A frequency comb in the extreme ultraviolet, Nature 436, 234 (2005)

    2005

  13. [20]

    R. J. Jones, K. D. Moll, M. J. Thorpe, and J. Ye, Phase- coherent frequency combs in the vacuum ultraviolet via high-harmonic generation inside a femtosecond enhance- ment cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 193201 (2005)

    2005

  14. [21]

    Cingöz, D

    A. Cingöz, D. C. Yost, T. K. Allison, A. Ruehl, M. E. Fermann, I. Hartl, and J. Ye, Direct frequency comb spectroscopy in the extreme ultraviolet, Nature482, 68 (2012)

    2012

  15. [22]

    Pupeza, S

    I. Pupeza, S. Holzberger, T. Eidam, H. Carstens, D. Esser, J. Weitenberg, P. Rußbüldt, J. Rauschenberger, J. Limpert, T. Udem, A. Tünnermann, T. W. Hänsch, A. Apolonski, F. Krausz, and E. Fill, Compact high- repetition-rate source of coherent 100 ev radiation, Nat. Photonics 7...

    2013

  16. [23]

    S. M. Cavaletto, Z. Harman, C. Ott, C. Buth, T. Pfeifer, and C. H. Keitel, Broadband high-resolution x-ray fre- quency combs, Nat. Photonics8, 520 (2014)

    2014

  17. [24]

    Huang and K.-J

    Z. Huang and K.-J. Kim, Review of x-ray free-electron laser theory, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 10, 034801 (2007)

    2007

  18. [25]

    Schmüser, M

    P. Schmüser, M. Dohlus, J. Rossbach, and C. Behrens, Ultraviolet and Soft X-Ray Free-Electron Lasers, 2nd ed. (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009)

    2009

  19. [26]

    Tammaro, O

    S. Tammaro, O. Pirali, P. Roy, J.-F. Lampin, G. Ducour- 8 nau, A. Cuisset, F. Hindle, and G. Mouret, High den- sity terahertz frequency comb produced by coherent syn- chrotron radiation, Nat. Commun.6, 7733 (2015)

    2015

  20. [28]

    K.-J. Kim, Y. Shvyd’ko, and S. Reiche, A proposal for an x-ray free-electron laser oscillator with an energy- recovery linac, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 244802 (2008)

    2008

  21. [29]

    Q. Z. Lv, E. Raicher, C. H. Keitel, and K. Z. Hatsagort- syan, High-brilliance ultranarrow-band x rays via elec- tron radiation in colliding laser pulses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 024801 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    Di Piazza, C

    A. Di Piazza, C. Müller, K. Z. Hatsagortsyan, and C. H. Keitel, Extremely high-intensity laser interactions with fundamental quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1177 (2012)

    2012

  23. [31]

    Gonoskov, T

    A. Gonoskov, T. G. Blackburn, M. Marklund, and S. S. Bulanov, Charged particle motion and radiation in strong electromagnetic fields, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 045001 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    Fedotov, A

    A. Fedotov, A. Ilderton, F. Karbstein, B. King, D. Seipt, H. Taya, and G. Torgrimsson, Advances in qed with in- tense background fields, Phys. Rep.1010, 1 (2023), ad- vances in QED with intense background fields

    2023

  25. [33]

    M. J. Quin,Coherence Effects and Spin Polarisation of Electrons in Electromagnetic Fields, Master’s thesis, Uni- versity of Heidelberg (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    E. G. Gelfer, A. M. Fedotov, O. Klimo, and S. Weber, Coherent radiation of an electron bunch colliding with an intense laser pulse, Phys. Rev. Res.6, L032013 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    Angioi and A

    A. Angioi and A. Di Piazza, Quantum limitation to the coherentemissionofacceleratedcharges,Phys.Rev.Lett. 121, 010402 (2018)

    2018

  28. [36]

    C. Emma, N. Majernik, K. K. Swanson, R. Ariniello, S. Gessner, R. Hessami, M. J. Hogan, A. Knetsch, K. A. Larsen, A. Marinelli, B. O’Shea, S. Perez, I. Rajkovic, R. Robles, D. Storey, and G. Yocky, Experimental gener- ation of extreme electron beams for advanced accelerator ap...

    2025

  29. [37]

    Graveset al., ASU Compact XFEL, inProc

    W. Graveset al., ASU Compact XFEL, inProc. 38th Int. Free Electron Laser Conf.(2018) pp. 225–228

    2018

  30. [38]

    The compact X-ray free electron laser at arizona state university, accessed: March 2025

    2025

  31. [39]

    M. J. Quin, A. D. Piazza, C. H. Keitel, and M. Tam- burini, Effect of interparticle fields and radiation re- action on beam dynamics (2025), arXiv:2306.17832 [physics.plasm-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  32. [40]

    M. J. Quin, A. D. Piazza, C. H. Keitel, and M. Tamburini, Broadband coherent xuv light from e−/e+ microbunching in an intense laser pulse (2024), arXiv:2411.17631 [physics.plasm-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Sarri, K

    G. Sarri, K. Poder, J. M. Cole, W. Schumaker, A. di Pi- azza, B. Reville, T. Dzelzainis, D. Doria, L. A. Gizzi, G. Grittani, S. Kar, C. H. Keitel, K. Krushelnick, S. Kuschel, S. P. D. Mangles, Z. Najmudin, N. Shukla, L. O. Silva, D. Symes, A. G. R. Thomas, M. Vargas, J. Vieira...

    2015

  34. [42]

    M. J. V. Streeter, C. Colgan, J. Carderelli, Y. Ma, N. Ca- vanagh, E. E. Los, H. Ahmed, A. F. Antoine, T. Au- det, M. D. Balcazar, L. Calvin, B. Kettle, S. P. D. Man- gles, Z. Najmudin, P. P. Rajeev, D. R. Symes, A. G. R. Thomas, and G. Sarri, Narrow bandwidth, low-emittance p...

    2024

  35. [43]

    Zhao, Y.-T

    J. Zhao, Y.-T. Hu, Y. Lu, H. Zhang, L.-X. Hu, X.-L. Zhu, Z.-M. Sheng, I. C. E. Turcu, A. Pukhov, F.-Q. Shao, and T.-P. Yu, All-optical quasi-monoenergetic gev positron bunch generation by twisted laser fields, Commun. Phys. 5, 15 (2022)

    2022

  36. [44]

    Naumova, I

    N. Naumova, I. Sokolov, J. Nees, A. Maksimchuk, V. Yanovsky, and G. Mourou, Attosecond electron bunches, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 195003 (2004)

    2004

  37. [45]

    V. V. Kulagin, V. A. Cherepenin, M. S. Hur, and H. Suk, Theoretical investigation of controlled generation of a dense attosecond relativistic electron bunch from the in- teraction of an ultrashort laser pulse with a nanofilm, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 124801 (2007)

    2007

  38. [46]

    Wu and J

    H.-C. Wu and J. Meyer-ter Vehn, Giant half-cycle at- tosecond pulses, Nat. Photonics6, 304 (2012)

    2012

  39. [47]

    Kiefer, M

    D. Kiefer, M. Yeung, T. Dzelzainis, P. S. Foster, S. G. Rykovanov, C. L. S. Lewis, R. S. Marjoribanks, H. Ruhl, D. Habs, J. Schreiber, M. Zepf, and B. Dromey, Rela- tivistic electron mirrors from nanoscale foils for coherent frequency upshift to the extreme ultraviolet, Nat. C...

    2013

  40. [48]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,The Classical Theory of Fields, 2nd ed. (Elsevier, Oxford, 1975)

    1975

  41. [49]

    J. D. Jackson,Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd ed. (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1998)

    1998

  42. [50]

    N. B. Narozhnyi and M. S. Fofanov, Photon emission by an electron in a collision with a short focused laser pulse, J. Exp. Theor. Phys.83, 14 (1996)

    1996

  43. [51]

    V. Y. Kharin, D. Seipt, and S. G. Rykovanov, Temporal laser-pulse-shape effects in nonlinear thomson scattering, Phys. Rev. A93, 063801 (2016)

    2016

  44. [52]

    Seipt and B

    D. Seipt and B. Kämpfer, Nonlinear compton scatter- ing of ultrahigh-intensity laser pulses, Laser Physics23, 075301 (2013)

    2013

  45. [53]

    M. A. Valialshchikov, V. Y. Kharin, and S. G. Ryko- vanov, Narrow bandwidth gamma comb from nonlinear compton scattering using the polarization gating tech- nique, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 194801 (2021)

    2021

  46. [54]

    M. J. Quin,Classical Radiation Reaction and Collective Behaviour, Ph.D. thesis, University of Heidelberg (2023)

    2023

  47. [55]

    Tamburini,Radiation reaction effects in superintense laser-plasma interaction, PhD thesis, University of Pisa (2011)

    M. Tamburini,Radiation reaction effects in superintense laser-plasma interaction, PhD thesis, University of Pisa (2011)

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.