Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Offline Policy Optimization with Eligible Actions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2207.00632 v1 pith:S4N4MLH6 submitted 2022-07-01 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords policyalgorithmofflineoverfittingavoidfunctionimportancelearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Offline policy optimization could have a large impact on many real-world decision-making problems, as online learning may be infeasible in many applications. Importance sampling and its variants are a commonly used type of estimator in offline policy evaluation, and such estimators typically do not require assumptions on the properties and representational capabilities of value function or decision process model function classes. In this paper, we identify an important overfitting phenomenon in optimizing the importance weighted return, in which it may be possible for the learned policy to essentially avoid making aligned decisions for part of the initial state space. We propose an algorithm to avoid this overfitting through a new per-state-neighborhood normalization constraint, and provide a theoretical justification of the proposed algorithm. We also show the limitations of previous attempts to this approach. We test our algorithm in a healthcare-inspired simulator, a logged dataset collected from real hospitals and continuous control tasks. These experiments show the proposed method yields less overfitting and better test performance compared to state-of-the-art batch reinforcement learning algorithms.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. When Can You Trust Offline Evaluation of Equal-Cost Top-k Allocation? A Controlled, Reproducible Benchmark and Practitioner's Guide

    cs.LG 2026-08 accept novelty 5.5 of 10

    Offline evaluation of deterministic top-k allocation is trustworthy only under logger-target action alignment and credible propensities; nuisance-only cross-fitting worsens the optimizer's curse, and propensity-estima...

  2. Concept-driven Off Policy Evaluation

    stat.ML 2024-11 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Concept-based importance sampling for off-policy evaluation is introduced, claiming unbiasedness and variance reduction for known concepts and learning concepts with a CBM algorithm when unknown.

Pith tools