Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Enhancing Approximate Modular Bayesian Inference by Emulating the Conditional Posterior

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.19028 v1 pith:S5L6AXML submitted 2024-10-24 stat.ME stat.CO

Enhancing Approximate Modular Bayesian Inference by Emulating the Conditional Posterior

classification stat.ME stat.CO
keywords algorithmbayesianmodulescomputationalconditionalcut-distributionemulatingfeedback
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In modular Bayesian analyses, complex models are composed of distinct modules, each representing different aspects of the data or prior information. In this context, fully Bayesian approaches can sometimes lead to undesirable feedback between modules, compromising the integrity of the inference. This paper focuses on the "cut-distribution" which prevents unwanted influence between modules by "cutting" feedback. The multiple imputation (DS) algorithm is standard practice for approximating the cut-distribution, but it can be computationally intensive, especially when the number of imputations required is large. An enhanced method is proposed, the Emulating the Conditional Posterior (ECP) algorithm, which leverages emulation to increase the number of imputations. Through numerical experiment it is demonstrated that the ECP algorithm outperforms the traditional DS approach in terms of accuracy and computational efficiency, particularly when resources are constrained. It is also shown how the DS algorithm can be improved using ideas from design of experiments. This work also provides practical recommendations on algorithm choice based on the computational demands of sampling from the prior and cut-distributions.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.