Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 47 references

Nature of nonanalytic chemical short-range order in metallic alloys

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Short-range order in fcc metallic alloys is genuinely nonanalytic at the $\Gamma$ point, and the directional cusp is a host-lattice elasticity property.

desk verdict Clean parameter-free derivation of the Γ cusp in strain-induced SRO, but the dilute-to-concentrated leap is unproven and the 'mostly nonanalytic' claim is oversold. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.05684 v1 pith:S5UIFKKN submitted 2025-06-06 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Hao Deng , Jue-Yi Qi , Qin-Han Xia , Jinshan Li , Xie Zhang This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords nonanalyticshort-rangeorderstrain-inducedinteractionmicroscopicelasticitytheoryelasticanisotropyface-centeredcubicalloysdiffusescatteringphonondispersionshigh-entropy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Short-range order (SRO) in metallic alloys has been observed in diffuse scattering experiments as a directional discontinuity at the $\Gamma$ point, but whether that discontinuity is physical or an artifact has been debated since theoretical and neutron-scattering results contradicted it. This paper argues that the nonanalyticity is real and generic: it is set by the elastic anisotropy and long-range atomic interactions of the host lattice, not by the particular solute. Using ab initio microscopic elasticity theory, the authors compute the strain-induced interaction $V_{\rm si}(q)$ for twelve face-centered-cubic dilute alloys and derive an analytic formula for the ratios $V^{110}_{\rm si}(\Gamma)/V^{100}_{\rm si}(\Gamma)$ and $V^{111}_{\rm si}(\Gamma)/V^{100}_{\rm si}(\Gamma)$ that depend only on the host's elastic anisotropy $\eta$ and $c_{12}/c_{11}$; the ab initio ratios agree within $\pm0.05$ for most alloys. If correct, the controversy over the observed nonanalyticity is resolved in favor of a genuine physical effect, and the nonanalyticity becomes a sharp diagnostic for verifying SRO in compositionally complex alloys.

What carries the argument

The central object is the strain-induced atomic interaction $V_{\rm si}(q)$ computed with microscopic elasticity theory (MET), $V_{\rm si}(q) = -F(q)G(q)F^*(q) + Q$, where $F$ collects the real-space forces exerted by a solute atom on the host atoms and $G$ is the lattice Green's function. The paper computes $F$ and $G$ from first principles for dilute alloys rather than from empirical parametrization, and then evaluates the directional limit $q\to0$ using a first-nearest-neighbor model of the fcc force constants and dynamical matrix. The key mathematical output is Eq. (6), which expresses the two nonanalyticity ratios $V^{110}_{\rm si}(\Gamma)/V^{100}_{\rm si}(\Gamma)$ and $V^{111}_{\rm si}(\Gamma)/V^{100}_{\rm si}(\Gamma)$ purely in terms of the host's elastic anisotropy $\eta = 2c_{44}/(c_{11}-c_{12})$ and $c_{12}/c_{11}$, so the cusp amplitude is a host property. Deviations from this formula identify hosts where longer-range force constants matter, as diagnosed by comparing ab initio and analytic phonon dispersions.

What would settle it

Measure the diffuse scattering intensity of a concentrated fcc alloy such as Cu83Mn17 along [100], [110], and [111] with a high-energy synchrotron, approaching $\Gamma$ as closely as possible; if the extrapolated directional ratios disagree with Eq. (6) by more than $\pm0.05$ for an elastically anisotropic host, the central claim fails. A complementary check is a supercell calculation of $V_{\rm si}(q\to0)$ at experimental solute concentrations.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own account, the nonanalyticity of chemical SRO at $\Gamma$ is a real property of the strain-induced interaction $V_{\rm si}(q)$ in fcc solid solutions. In the long-wavelength limit, the value of $V_{\rm si}$ approached along [100], [110], and [111] is generally different, so the diffuse scattering intensity has a directional cusp at $|q|\to 0$; only when the host is elastically isotropic ($\eta=1$) or has $c_{12}/c_{11}=1$ does the limit become direction independent. The paper derives Eq. (5) for $\lim_{q\to0}V_{\rm si}$ under a first-nearest-neighbor force model of fcc lattice dynamics, yielding Eq. (6) for the two directional ratios as functions of $\eta$ and $c_{12}/c_{11}$ alone. Direct ab initio evaluations for twelve alloys confirm the host-only formula to within about $\pm0.05$ for most cases. The exceptions, in Pd, Pt, and Pb hosts, are explained by long-range atomic interactions, which in Pt and Pb nearly degenerate the lowest acoustic branches and effectively restore isotropy, while in Pd they enhance the anisotropy. The conclusion is that the nonanalytic SRO seen in the scattering experiments is physical and originates from the elastic response of the host lattice, and that the same signature should appear whenever an elastically anisotropic host develops SRO.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the cusp computed for one isolated foreign atom in a perfect host crystal survives in the real, concentrated alloys where nonanalytic SRO was measured, with no other effect changing it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the paper is right, the nonanalyticity observed in diffuse x-ray scattering from Cu83Mn17 and later alloys is a physical property of the host lattice, not an extrapolation artifact or a peculiarity of one parametrized elasticity model.
  • The directional ratios at $\Gamma$ become predictable from tabulated elastic constants alone, so new SRO experiments on any fcc alloy can be checked against Eq. (6) without additional fitting.
  • Hosts with $\eta=1$ or $c_{12}/c_{11}=1$ should show no directional cusp, giving a crisp null case that distinguishes anisotropy-driven SRO from other diffuse-scattering sources.
  • In Pd-, Pt-, and Pb-based hosts, long-range atomic interactions can either amplify or cancel the elastic-anisotropy effect; phonon measurements near $\Gamma$ tell which regime applies.
  • Because the nonanalyticity is a host property, it offers an experimental fingerprint that may discriminate genuine SRO from planar-defect or higher-order Laue zone contributions in compositionally complex alloys.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct extension the authors do not spell out is that the magnitude of the cusp should scale with solute concentration through the $x(1-x)$ factor in the SRO intensity, so a concentration series of diffuse-scattering measurements could separate the strain-induced cusp from concentration-fluctuation backgrounds.
  • The same force-constant and Green's-function machinery should predict which directions carry the cusp in bcc and hcp hosts; the present fcc ratios are specific to the octahedral symmetry of the first-neighbor shell.
  • One could test the host-only prediction by measuring diffuse scattering in a dilute alloy where the solute is chosen to have very different chemical interaction strength but the same host: Eq. (6) predicts identical nonanalyticity ratios regardless of solute, which can be directly checked.
  • For compositionally complex alloys, the paper's compilation of elastic constants suggests that most fcc high-entropy alloys are sufficiently anisotropic to show the cusp; whether concentration disorder smears it remains an open experimental question.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the nonanalytic behavior of chemical short-range order (SRO) in fcc metallic alloys, specifically the directional dependence of the strain-induced interaction V_si(q) near the Γ point. The authors compute V_si from ab initio forces and Green's functions for dilute alloys, observe that V_si(Γ) differs when approached along [100], [110], and [111], and derive an analytic formula, Eq. (5), and the ratios Eq. (6), which depend only on the host elastic anisotropy η and c12/c11. They compare these predictions with ab initio results for 12 alloys and report agreement within ±0.05 for most cases, with larger deviations for Pd-W, Pt-Cu, and Pb-Sn. They attribute the nonanalyticity primarily to elastic anisotropy of the host lattice, with long-range force constants additionally affecting Pd, Pt, and Pb hosts. They also propose that the nonanalyticity can serve as a signature of SRO in compositionally complex alloys.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper resolves a long-standing debate about whether the nonanalytic diffuse scattering observed in alloys is a physical effect or an artifact. The analytic ratios in Eq. (6) are parameter-free predictions, since the Kanzaki force magnitude f cancels, and the comparison with ab initio data for a range of fcc hosts is a genuine test. The paper also provides a useful categorization of hosts by their expected nonanalyticity strength. However, the significance is tempered by the fact that the ab initio calculations are performed in the dilute limit while the experimental observations are for concentrated alloys, and by the explicit exception of Pt-Cu, for which the ab initio result is analytic while Eq. (6) predicts nonanalytic behavior.

major comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 2 caption and Eq. (6)] The ab initio V_si calculations are explicitly for 'x being very small' (Fig. 2 caption), but the experimental nonanalyticity the paper claims to explain was observed in concentrated alloys such as Cu83Mn17 (Refs. [3,4]). The paper does not show that the directional cusp at Γ survives at finite solute concentration, nor that Eq. (6) should be evaluated with pure-host elastic constants rather than composition-dependent alloy constants. Concentration fluctuations, solute-solute correlations, and modified Kanzaki forces can add analytic contributions and change the cusp amplitude; without a finite-concentration calculation or formal argument, the connection between the dilute theory and the concentrated experiments is not established.
  2. [Fig. 2(i) and discussion of phonon dispersions] Pt-Cu is an explicit exception to the central claim: Fig. 2(i) shows no nonanalyticity in a large vicinity of Γ, while Eq. (6) predicts a noticeable nonanalyticity using the host elastic constants. The authors attribute this to long-range force constants making the lowest acoustic branches degenerate and producing an 'effective' η of 1, but this is inferred from the phonon dispersions in Figs. 3(f)-3(i) and is not incorporated into the derivation. A quantitative demonstration that adding long-range force constants to Eq. (4) removes the cusp for Pt and Pb would be needed to support the statement that the nonanalyticity is primarily governed by host elastic anisotropy.
  3. [Eqs. (2)-(5)] The analytic derivation is based on the assumption that Kanzaki forces are restricted to first neighbors with pattern (f,f,0) and that the dynamical matrix is given by the elastic-constant expression Eq. (4). While the comparison with ab initio data validates this for many hosts, it is an approximation, and the large deviations for Pd-W, Pt-Cu, and Pb-Sn in Fig. 3(e) show that the approximation is not universally adequate. The paper would be strengthened by a quantitative criterion for when the first-neighbor/elastic-constant model is valid, rather than a case-by-case phonon argument.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 2 caption] For reproducibility, the exact supercell sizes and solute concentrations used in the ab initio V_si calculations should be stated explicitly rather than through the phrase 'x being very small'.
  2. [Eq. (5)] The definition of α and β as q_y = α q_x and q_z = β q_x should be repeated immediately before Eq. (5); currently the reader must infer it from the preceding paragraph.
  3. [concluding paragraph] The word 'nonanalyicity' in the final paragraph is a typo and should read 'nonanalyticity'.
  4. [Methods and Supplemental Material] The main text does not specify the DFT code, exchange-correlation functional, and q-point sampling used for the ab initio V_si calculations; the Supplemental Material is cited but the reader would benefit from a brief statement of these parameters in the main text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the analytic ratios in Eq. (6) are parameter-free predictions, not fits to the ab initio Vsi data; the remaining caveats are shared-DFT-input and dilute-to-concentrated transferability, not circular reductions.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation (Eqs. 3-6) is a closed-form microscopic-elasticity calculation with first-neighbor Kanzaki forces and a first-neighbor dynamical matrix. The resulting ratios Vsi_110(Gamma)/Vsi_100(Gamma) and Vsi_111(Gamma)/Vsi_100(Gamma) depend only on the host elastic constants eta and c12/c11, with the solute force amplitude f cancelling. These ratios are not fitted to the ab initio Vsi data: Fig. 3 shows explicit quantitative deviations, including the failure for Pt-Cu, so the comparison has genuine falsifiable content. The elastic constants entering Eq. (6) and the ab initio Vsi values are both obtained from DFT, which is a shared-input caveat rather than a circular reduction: the model's first-neighbor assumption could fail, and it does for Pt. There is no load-bearing self-citation: the cited references are external prior work, not the authors' own uniqueness theorems or fitted parameterizations. The paper's use of dilute-limit Vsi calculations to interpret concentrated-alloy experiments such as Cu83Mn17 is a transferability assumption and an external-validity limitation, but it is not a circularity under the quote-and-reduction standard. Overall, the central claim is derived from a stated model and tested against independent ab initio data, so no circular step is established.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard MET relations plus two domain assumptions (analytic V_ch, dilute-to-concentrated mapping) and one modeling assumption (first-neighbor force pattern and elastic-constant dynamical matrix). No new physical entities are postulated. The parameter f cancels in the key ratios, so no fitted constants enter Eq. (6).

free parameters (1)
  • First-nearest-neighbor Kanzaki force magnitude f
    Introduced in Eq. (3) as an assumed force pattern (f,f,0) on first-nearest-neighbor atoms. It cancels in the derived ratios Eq. (6), so it does not affect the central nonanalyticity predictions, but its assumed spatial pattern is a modeling input.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The chemical interaction V_ch is short-range and analytic, so any nonanalyticity in α_q comes only from V_si.
    Stated in the introduction: 'The chemical interaction is short-range and cannot introduce any nonanalyticity.' Load-bearing because if V_ch had long-range nonanalytic contributions, the conclusion that elastic anisotropy is the origin would not follow.
  • standard math The diffuse SRO scattering intensity is proportional to α_q = 1/(1 + x(1-x) kBT V_q^tot) (Eq. 1), a linear-response mean-field relation.
    This is the standard Krivoglaz-Khachaturyan formula used throughout MET; the paper relies on it to connect V_si(q) to observable diffuse scattering.
  • domain assumption The dilute-limit V_si computed for a single solute in a perfect host describes the interaction in the experimentally relevant concentrated alloys.
    All ab initio calculations are for dilute alloys (Fig. 2 caption: 'with x being very small'), while the experimental observations to be explained (Refs [3-8]) are on concentrated alloys such as Cu83Mn17. No derivation shows concentration independence of the nonanalyticity.
  • ad hoc to paper The Kanzaki forces are restricted to first nearest neighbors with pattern (f,f,0), and the dynamical matrix is given by the elastic-constant interpolation Eq. (4).
    Used to derive Eqs. (5) and (6). The paper itself shows this assumption fails for Pd, Pt, and Pb hosts where long-range force constants matter, indicating it is not universally valid.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nature of nonanalytic chemical short-range order in metallic alloys." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/S5UIFKKN

@misc{pith2026250605684,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nature of nonanalytic chemical short-range order in metallic alloys},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/S5UIFKKN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.05684}
}
read the original abstract

Nonanalytic chemical short-range order (SRO) has long been observed in diffuse scattering experiments for metallic alloys. However, considerable debate surrounds the validity of these observations due to the unresolved nature of the nonanalyticity. Using prototypical face-centered cubic alloys as an example, here we demonstrate that SRO in metallic alloys is mostly nonanalytic at {\Gamma}. The nonanalyticity stems from the elastic anisotropy and long-range atomic interactions of the \emph{host} lattice. The physical insights substantially improve our understanding of chemical order in alloys and resolves the long-standing debate in the field. Nonanalytic SRO is expected to be general in alloys and the nonanalyticity may serve as a unique feature to verify the intensely debated existence of SRO in compositionally complex alloys.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.05684 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. shows the strain-induced interaction between substitutional Mn atoms in the prototypical Cu-Mn alloy within the (b1, b2) plane, where b1 and b2 are two re￾ciprocal lattice vectors. It can be seen that V si is highly anisotropic in the vicinity of Γ. When approaching Γ from different directions, V si(Γ) thus has different val￾ues. To better illustrate the nonanalyticity we depict in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Line profiles of the strain-induced interaction between solute atoms in a series of fcc alloys along three high-symmetry [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Computed elastic anisotropy indices for various fcc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    effective

    (equivalently for the other 11 first nearest-neighbor atoms), then the Fourier components of the Kanzaki forces can be derived as Fx(q) = 4ifsin qxa 2 (cos qya 2 + cos qza 2 ), Fy(q) = 4ifsin qya 2 (cos qza 2 + cos qxa 2 ), Fz(q) = 4ifsin qza 2 (cos qxa 2 + cos qya 2 ), (3) whereais the lattice constant, andiis the imaginary unit. The dynamical matrixD(q)...

    work page

  2. [2]

    This indicates that even though these two metals are not elastically isotropic, long-range atomic interactions within the host lattice counteract the elastic anisotropy, which thus leads to a pronounced decrease of the nonan- alyticity at Γ. As for Pd, the long-range interactions also play an important role, but in contrast to Pt, further enhance the elas...

    work page

  3. [3]

    M. A. Krivoglaz,X-ray and Neutron Diffraction in Non- ideal Crystals(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1995)

    work page 1995

  4. [4]

    A. G. Khachaturyan,Theory of structural transforma- tions in solids(Wiley, New York, 1983)

    work page 1983

  5. [5]

    Reichert, V

    H. Reichert, V. N. Bugaev, O. Shchyglo, A. Sch¨ ops, Y. Sikula, and H. Dosch, Strain-Induced Nonanalytic Short-Range Order in the Spin Glass Cu 83Mn17, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 236105 (2001)

    work page 2001

  6. [6]

    Reichert, V

    H. Reichert, V. Bugaev, O. Shchyglo, A. Sch¨ ops, I. Ram- steiner, Y. Sikula, H. Dosch, and V. Honkim¨ aki, Reichert et al. Reply:, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 209604 (2002)

    work page 2002

  7. [7]

    Reichert, O

    H. Reichert, O. Klein, V. Bugaev, O. Shchyglo, A. Udyanskyy, H. Dosch, and K. F. Peters, Absence of 2kF Splitting in the Diffuse Scattering from Cu 3Au at the (001) Surface, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 185504 (2003)

    work page 2003

  8. [8]

    Reichert, A

    H. Reichert, A. Sch¨ ops, I. B. Ramsteiner, V. N. Bugaev, O. Shchyglo, A. Udyansky, H. Dosch, M. Asta, R. Drautz, and V. Honkim¨ aki, Competition between Order and Phase Separation in Au-Ni, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 235703 (2005)

    work page 2005

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    I. B. Ramsteiner, O. Shchyglo, M. Mezger, A. Udyan- sky, V. Bugaev, S. Sch¨ oder, H. Reichert, and H. Dosch, Omega-like diffuse X-ray scattering in Ti–V caused by static lattice distortions, Acta Mater.56, 1298 (2008)

    2008

  2. [10]

    R. P. Kurta, V. N. Bugaev, and A. D. Ortiz, Long- Wavelength Elastic Interactions in Complex Crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 085502 (2010)

    2010

  3. [11]

    Strain-Induced Nonanalytic Short-Range Order in the Spin Glass Cu 83Mn17

    R. V. Chepulskii and V. A. Tatarenko, Comment on “Strain-Induced Nonanalytic Short-Range Order in the Spin Glass Cu 83Mn17”, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 209603 (2002)

    2002

  4. [12]

    Sch¨ onfeld, M

    B. Sch¨ onfeld, M. J. Portmann, G. Kostorz, and J. Kohlbrecher, Analytical behavior of short-range order scattering of Cu-rich Cu-Mn near the Γ point, Phys. Rev. B66, 100102 (2002)

    2002

  5. [13]

    See Supplemental Materials at [URL] for details for theab initiocalculations and the analytical derivations, which includes Refs. [38–45]

  6. [14]

    Zener,Elasticity and Anelasticity of Metals(Univer- sity of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1948)

    C. Zener,Elasticity and Anelasticity of Metals(Univer- sity of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1948)

    1948

  7. [15]

    Chang and H

    C. Chang and H. Zhang, First-principles calculations to investigate elastic and thermodynamic properties of FeAlNixCrMn quinternary alloys, J. Mater. Res. Tech- nol.18, 1322 (2022)

    2022

  8. [16]

    Zheng and S.-Q

    S.-M. Zheng and S.-Q. Wang, Elastic properties of face- centered cubic, body-centered cubic and hexagonal high entropy alloys by MaxEnt approach, Mater. Res. Express 5, 076503 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    Liang, J

    F. Liang, J. Du, G. Su, C. Xu, C. Zhang, and X. Kong, Phase Stability and Mechanical Properties Analysis of AlCoxCrFeNi HEAs Based on First Principles, Metals 12, 1860 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    Q. Zhao, J. Li, Q. Fang, and H. Feng, Effect of Al solute concentration on mechanical properties of Al xFeCuCrNi 6 high-entropy alloys: A first-principles study, Phys. B Condens. Matter566, 30 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    Yin and W

    B. Yin and W. A. Curtin, First-principles-based predic- tion of yield strength in the RhIrPdPtNiCu high-entropy alloy, Npj Comput. Mater.5, 14 (2019)

    2019

  12. [20]

    Huang, X

    Z. Huang, X. Lu, M. Yan, and Y. Fu, Evaluating stability, elastic and thermodynamic properties of AlTiNiCuCo x (x= 0.5,0.75,1,1.25,1.5) high entropy alloys, Mater. Res. Express6, 126581 (2019)

    2019

  13. [21]

    Vaghari and K

    M. Vaghari and K. Dehghani, Computational and experi- mental investigation of a new non equiatomic FCC single- phase Cr15Cu5Fe20Mn25Ni35 high-entropy alloy, Phys. B Condens. Matter671, 415413 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    Zhang and G

    S. Zhang and G. Wang, Predicting mechanical properties of high entropy alloys with face centered cubic structure from first principles calculations, Mater. Today Commun. 32, 104059 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    Laplanche, M

    G. Laplanche, M. Schneider, F. Scholz, J. Frenzel, G. Eggeler, and J. Schreuer, Processing of a single- crystalline CrCoNi medium-entropy alloy and evolution of its thermal expansion and elastic stiffness coefficients with temperature, Scr. Mater.177, 44 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    J. J. Pais Pereda, K. V. Larionov, L. Jiang, D. V. Shtan- sky, and P. B. Sorokin, Analysis of Stability and Me- chanical Properties of Al-Cr-Fe-Co-Ni-Cu HEA Based on Machine Learning, J. Phys. Chem. C128, 18489 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Li, Third-order elastic constants and anharmonic properties of three fcc high-entropy alloys from first- principles, J

    X. Li, Third-order elastic constants and anharmonic properties of three fcc high-entropy alloys from first- principles, J. Alloys Compd.764, 906 (2018)

    2018

  18. [26]

    Esfandiarpour and M

    A. Esfandiarpour and M. Nasrabadi, Investigation of the effect of composing elements of CuNiCoFeV high entropy alloy on thermal-elastic properties: An ab initio study, Intermetallics104, 59 (2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    Y. Liu, K. Wang, H. Xiao, G. Chen, Z. Wang, T. Hu, T. Fan, and L. Ma, Theoretical study of the mechanical properties of CrFeCoNiMox (0.1≤x≤0.3) alloys, RSC Adv.10, 14080 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    Huang, ´A

    S. Huang, ´A. Vida, A. Heczel, E. Holmstr¨ om, and L. Vi- tos, Thermal Expansion, Elastic and Magnetic Properties of FeCoNiCu-Based High-Entropy Alloys Using First- Principle Theory, JOM69, 2107 (2017)

    2017

  21. [29]

    W. Li, Q. Gao, J. Ren, Q. Wang, J. Li, H. Xue, X. Lu, and F. Tang, Designing the composition and optimizing the mechanical properties of non-equiatomic FeCoNiTi high-entropy alloys, J. Mater. Res. Technol.29, 376 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    F. Tian, L. K. Varga, N. Chen, L. Delczeg, and L. Vi- tos,Ab Initioinvestigation of high-entropy alloys of 3d elements, Phys. Rev. B87, 075144 (2013)

    2013

  23. [31]

    Sharma, N

    P. Sharma, N. K. Sharma, H. Sharma, V. Jindal, I. Mu- dahar, and V. Bubanja, First-principles study of five Fe-based high entropy alloys, Comput. Mater. Sci.244, 113221 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Zhang, S

    R. Zhang, S. Zhao, J. Ding, Y. Chong, T. Jia, C. Ophus, M. Asta, R. O. Ritchie, and A. M. Minor, Short-range or- der and its impact on the CrCoNi medium-entropy alloy, Nature581, 283 (2020)

    2020

  25. [33]

    X. Chen, Q. Wang, Z. Cheng, M. Zhu, H. Zhou, P. Jiang, L. Zhou, Q. Xue, F. Yuan, J. Zhu, X. Wu, and E. Ma, Direct observation of chemical short-range order in a medium-entropy alloy, Nature592, 712 (2021)

    2021

  26. [34]

    Ferrari, F

    A. Ferrari, F. K¨ ormann, M. Asta, and J. Neugebauer, Simulating short-range order in compositionally complex materials, Nat. Comput. Sci.3, 221 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    Moniri, Y

    S. Moniri, Y. Yang, J. Ding, Y. Yuan, J. Zhou, L. Yang, F. Zhu, Y. Liao, Y. Yao, L. Hu, P. Ercius, and J. Miao, Three-dimensional atomic structure and local chemical order of medium- and high-entropy nanoalloys, Nature 624, 564 (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    B. Yin, S. Yoshida, N. Tsuji, and W. A. Curtin, Yield strength and misfit volumes of NiCoCr and implications for short-range-order, Nat. Commun.11, 2507 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    Z. Pei, X. Zhang, M. Eisenbach, and P. K. Liaw, Rigorous computation of short-range order unifies its controversial effects in complex concentrated alloys, Acta Mater.286, 120713 (2025)

    2025

  30. [38]

    Walsh, M

    F. Walsh, M. Zhang, R. O. Ritchie, A. M. Minor, and M. Asta, Extra electron reflections in concentrated alloys do not necessitate short-range order, Nat. Mater.22, 926 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    F. G. Coury, C. Miller, R. Field, and M. Kaufman, On the origin of diffuse intensities in fcc electron diffraction patterns, Nature622, 742 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  33. [41]

    P. E. Bl¨ ochl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B50, 17953 (1994)

    1994

  34. [42]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  35. [43]

    H. J. Monkhorst and J. D. Pack, Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations, Phys. Rev. B13, 5188 (1976)

    1976

  36. [44]

    Methfessel and A

    M. Methfessel and A. T. Paxton, High-precision sampling for Brillouin-zone integration in metals, Phys. Rev. B40, 3616 (1989)

    1989

  37. [45]

    Grabowski, T

    B. Grabowski, T. Hickel, and J. Neugebauer, Ab initio study of the thermodynamic properties of nonmagnetic elementary fcc metals: Exchange-correlation-related er- ror bars and chemical trends, Phys. Rev. B76, 024309 (2007)

    2007

  38. [46]

    Boeck, C

    S. Boeck, C. Freysoldt, A. Dick, L. Ismer, and J. Neugebauer, The object-oriented DFT program library S/PHI/nX, Comput. Phys. Commun.182, 543 (2011)

    2011

  39. [47]

    F. D. Murnaghan, The Compressibility of Media under Extreme Pressures, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.30, 244 (1944)

    1944

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.