REVIEW 1 cited by
Annotating Ambiguous Images: General Annotation Strategy for High-Quality Data with Real-World Biomedical Validation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In the field of image classification, existing methods often struggle with biased or ambiguous data, a prevalent issue in real-world scenarios. Current strategies, including semi-supervised learning and class blending, offer partial solutions but lack a definitive resolution. Addressing this gap, our paper introduces a novel strategy for generating high-quality labels in challenging datasets. Central to our approach is a clearly designed flowchart, based on a broad literature review, which enables the creation of reliable labels. We validate our methodology through a rigorous real-world test case in the biomedical field, specifically in deducing height reduction from vertebral imaging. Our empirical study, leveraging over 250,000 annotations, demonstrates the effectiveness of our strategies decisions compared to their alternatives.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A Probabilistic Segment Anything Model for Ambiguity-Aware Medical Image Segmentation
A SAM variant that samples a latent code into the prompt embedding produces diverse lung nodule masks and reports better GED, DSC, and IoU than Probabilistic U-Net on LIDC-IDRI.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.