Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

On the Uncertainty Estimates of Equivariant-Neural-Network-Ensembles Interatomic Potentials

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.00195 v1 pith:S66TYZ44 submitted 2023-09-01 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords uncertaintiesdataenne-ipactualcomparedensembleerrorsinteratomic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine-learning (ML) interatomic potentials (IPs) trained on first-principles datasets are becoming increasingly popular since they promise to treat larger system sizes and longer time scales, compared to the {\em ab initio} techniques producing the training data. Estimating the accuracy of MLIPs and reliably detecting when predictions become inaccurate is key for enabling their unfailing usage. In this paper, we explore this aspect for a specific class of MLIPs, the equivariant-neural-network (ENN) IPs using the ensemble technique for quantifying their prediction uncertainties. We critically examine the robustness of uncertainties when the ENN ensemble IP (ENNE-IP) is applied to the realistic and physically relevant scenario of predicting local-minima structures in the configurational space. The ENNE-IP is trained on data for liquid silicon, created by density-functional theory (DFT) with the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) for the exchange-correlation functional. Then, the ensemble-derived uncertainties are compared with the actual errors (comparing the results of the ENNE-IP with those of the underlying DFT-GGA theory) for various test sets, including liquid silicon at different temperatures and out-of-training-domain data such as solid phases with and without point defects as well as surfaces. Our study reveals that the predicted uncertainties are generally overconfident and hold little quantitative predictive power for the actual errors.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Knowing when to trust machine-learned interatomic potentials

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    PROBE recasts MLIP uncertainty quantification as selective classification by training a compact discriminative classifier on frozen per-atom backbone embeddings, yielding a reliability probability that tracks actual e...

  2. Bayesian Neural Networks versus deep ensembles for uncertainty quantification in machine learning interatomic potentials

    physics.chem-ph 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Deep ensembles outperform variational Bayesian neural networks in accuracy and uncertainty calibration on machine-learned TiO2 potentials, with some low-data exceptions when Bayesian methods are better calibrated.

Pith tools