Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

FactCheck Editor: Multilingual Text Editor with End-to-End fact-checking

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.19482 v1 pith:S6WSQMTG submitted 2024-04-30 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords editortextclaimscorrectfact-checkingfactchecklanguagesmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce 'FactCheck Editor', an advanced text editor designed to automate fact-checking and correct factual inaccuracies. Given the widespread issue of misinformation, often a result of unintentional mistakes by content creators, our tool aims to address this challenge. It supports over 90 languages and utilizes transformer models to assist humans in the labor-intensive process of fact verification. This demonstration showcases a complete workflow that detects text claims in need of verification, generates relevant search engine queries, and retrieves appropriate documents from the web. It employs Natural Language Inference (NLI) to predict the veracity of claims and uses LLMs to summarize the evidence and suggest textual revisions to correct any errors in the text. Additionally, the effectiveness of models used in claim detection and veracity assessment is evaluated across multiple languages.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DTELS: Towards Dynamic Granularity of Timeline Summarization

    cs.CL 2024-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A new dynamic-granularity timeline summarization benchmark with event-atom metrics shows LLM-based methods beat earlier TLS baselines yet still struggle with informativeness and granularity consistency.

Pith tools