Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A gravitational microlensing determination of continuum source size in Q2237+0305

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/9904361 v3 pith:S6XMLG5P submitted 1999-04-26 astro-ph

A gravitational microlensing determination of continuum source size in Q2237+0305

classification astro-ph
keywords sourcecontinuumsizeeventlimitsmassobservedvelocity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Following the detection of a gravitational microlensing high magnification event (HME) in Q2237+0305A attempts have been made to place limits on the dimensions of the quasar continuum source. The analyses have studied either the observed event magnitude or the event duration. The latter approach has been hampered by lack of knowledge about the transverse velocity of the lensing galaxy. We obtain both upper and lower statistical limits on the size of the continuum source from the observed HME using determinations of transverse velocity obtained from the published monitoring data. Our calculations take account of the caustic orientation as well as the component of the caustic velocity that results from stellar proper motions. Our determination of source size relies on an estimated duration of 52 days for the HME, and so will be refined when more HMEs are observed. We find that the upper and lower limits on the magnified region of the R-band continuum source are 6 times 10^15 and 2 times 10^13 cm respectively (99% confidence). Through consideration of the joint probability for source size and mean microlens mass we find that the mean mass lies between ~0.01 solar masses and ~1 solar mass (95% confidence).

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.